Use Of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors Research Articles

Renoprotective effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes patients with decompensated heart failure

BackgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) reduces the risk of the composite renal endpoint and weakens the progressive decline in renal function in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, a detailed mechanism of SGLT2i on renal function and outcome remains uninvestigated.MethodsWe prospectively included 40 type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients (median 68 years old, 29 male) who were hospitalized for decompensated HF and received SGLT2i during the index hospitalization. Of them, 24 patients had increases in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12-month follow-up and 16 had decreases in eGFR. We investigated the baseline factors associating with the improvement in renal function.ResultsLower plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level and the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) were independently associated with increases in eGFR during the follow-up period (p < 0.05 for both). Patients with both low plasma BNP levels and uses of RASI achieved significant increases in eGFR irrespective of the baseline HbA1c levels.ConclusionsLower plasma BNP level and the use of RASI at baseline were the key factors contributing to the renoprotective effects of SGLT2i among patients with decompensated HF and T2DM.

Nationwide questionnaire survey on the management of chronic kidney disease for general practitioners in Japan.

In 2019, a nationwide questionnaire survey on the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was circulated to general practitioners (GPs) throughout Japan by The Japan Physicians Association. The aim was to assess the current state of CKD medical care in the country and evaluate the utilization of CKD-specific guidelines in the treatment by GPs. The voluntary survey targeted all members of Japan Physicians Association, a nationwide organization consisting primarily of 15,000 GPs in clinics throughout the country. GPs were divided into groups: 171 GPs using and 414 GPs not using the guidelines. Comparisons between the groups' responses were made using propensity score matching and component cluster analysis. Overall responses revealed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate's utilization rate was high (95.1%). However, evidence-practice gaps in urine protein quantification and anemia remedy were prominent. There were significantly favorable answers in terms of CKD management in the user group compared with those in the non-user group, except for the questions about a urine check at the first visit, stopping the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and the target blood pressure for elderly CKD patients. The differences suggest that utilization of the CKD guidelines has improved CKD management practices by GPs. Further promotion of CKD guidelines utilization (28% in this survey) is considered valid for CKD medical education.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor is associated with the reduced risk of all-cause mortality in COVID-19 among patients with/without hypertension.

Consecutively hospitalized patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China were retrospectively enrolled from January 2020 to March 2020 to investigate the association between the use of renin–angiotensin system inhibitor (RAS-I) and the outcome of this disease. Associations between the use of RAS-I (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)), ACEI, and ARB and in-hospital mortality were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models in overall and subgroup of hypertension status. A total of 2771 patients with COVID-19 were included, with moderate and severe cases accounting for 45.0% and 36.5%, respectively. A total of 195 (7.0%) patients died. RAS-I (hazard ratio (HR)= 0.499, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.325–0.767) and ARB (HR = 0.410, 95% CI 0.240–0.700) use was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality among patients with COVID-19. For patients with hypertension, RAS-I and ARB applications were also associated with a reduced risk of mortality with HR of 0.352 (95% CI 0.162–0.764) and 0.279 (95% CI 0.115–0.677), respectively. RAS-I exhibited protective effects on the survival outcome of COVID-19. ARB use was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality among patients with COVID-19.

Treatment with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for Taiwan heart failure patients: Rationale and baseline characteristics of the TAROT-HF study.

This study used a real-world database to investigate the prescription patterns of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) among Taiwanese patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The Treatment with Angiotensin Receptor neprilysin inhibitor fOr Taiwan Heart Failure patients (TAROT-HF) study is a principal investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational, retrospective study on Taiwanese HFrEF patients. A total of 1772 patients with HFrEF (mean age 62.5 years, 75.3% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 29.3%) who received Sac/Val at 10 hospitals between 2017 and 2018 were enrolled at the date of Sac/Val initiation. Among these patients, 585 (33%) initially received Sac/Val during acute decompensated heart failure (HF) hospitalization (TAROT-AHF arm), whereas 1187 (67%) initially received the same at the outpatient clinic (TAROT-CHF arm). A total of 1343 (75.8%) patients received an initial dose of 50 mg twice daily or fewer, whereas 422 (23.8%) received the standard initiation dose (100 mg twice daily). During outpatient Sac/Val initiation, the mean dosages were significantly higher than that following hospitalization (117 ± 55 mg vs 109 ± 57 mg; p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis identified younger age, higher systolic blood pressure, higher LVEF, prior use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, use of ivabradine, and a history of diabetes mellitus as independent factors for initiating a standard Sac/Val dose. Over a follow-up period of 18 months, incidences of cardiovascular death or first unplanned HF hospitalization were 18.69 and 33.11 per 100-person years for the TAROT-CHF and TAROT-AHF arms, respectively. The TAROT-HF study provided an opportunity to describe the clinical features of patients with HFrEF who received Sac/Val, assess the real-world utilization and efficacy of Sac/Val, and compare these patients with those included in prior registries.

Influence of study discontinuation during the run-in period on the estimated efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in the PARAGON-HF trial.

The 4822 patients randomized in the PARAGON-HF trial were a subset of 5746 initially eligible patients who entered sequential run-in periods. We identified patient factors associated with study discontinuation during the run-in period and estimated the implications of these discontinuations for the overall study result. We utilized multivariable logistic regression models to identify patient factors associated with study discontinuation during the run-in period. The efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in a broader cohort approximating the full run-in population was estimated by weighting randomized patients according to the inverse probability of run-in completion. A total of 924 (16.1%) subjects failed to complete the run-in period. In multivariable models, non-completion was associated with region other than Central Europe, lower systolic blood pressure, lower serum sodium, lower haemoglobin, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, higher New York Heart Association functional class, prior heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and lack of prior use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or beta-blocker. In repeat analysis of the effect of randomized treatment in PARAGON-HF giving greater weight to participants resembling those who failed to complete the run-in period, the incidence of HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death was higher, and sacubitril/valsartan treatment reduced the composite of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death compared with valsartan (rate ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.00). Patients with more advanced HF were at higher risk for non-completion of the run-in period in PARAGON-HF. Re-analysis of study outcomes accounting for the effect of run-in non-completion did not alter the estimated treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan.

Cardiovascular Therapy and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Cohort Study

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection has a significant impact on the cardiovascular system and drugs acting on the latter are suspected to influence clinical outcome. This study aims to assess cardiovascular therapy exposure status (i.e. absence, continuation, discontinuation, and initiation) relative to admission and in-hospital mortality among inpatients with COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all hospitalized adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 at the Geneva University Hospitals from February 26, 2020, and discharged by June 5, 2020 was conducted. A twostep multivariate logistic regression adjusted for potential confounding factors was used to quantify the associations between mortality and exposure status to eight main cardiovascular drug categories. Findings: Of 838 inpatients with COVID-19, 781 (93·2%) received cardiovascular drugs, and 152 (18·1%) died before discharge. Drug exposures associated with decreased in-hospital mortality were renin-angiotensin system inhibitor continuation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0·51 [0·28-0·94], p=0·031) and initiation (aOR 0·06 [0·01-0·42], p=0·005), and lipid-modifying agent continuation (aOR 0·52 [0·27-0·99], p=0·046). Exposures associated with increased in-hospital mortality were discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (aOR 2·34 [1·07-5·12], p=0·033), lipid-modifying agents (aOR 3·25 [1·31-8·07], p=0·011), and anticoagulants (aOR 14·93 [2·24-99·41], p=0·005). Diuretic continuation (aOR 2·09 [1·07-4·08], p=0·031) and initiation (aOR 6·20 [3·38-11·39], p<0·001), and antiarrhythmic initiation (aOR 5·49 [1·40-21·61], p=0·015) were associated with increased mortality. Interpretation: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the use continuation of cardiovascular drugs, except diuretics, appeared safe and should be continued. The use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and lipid-modifying agents was associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Declaration of Interests: None declared. Ethics Approval Statement: The study protocol was evaluated and accepted by the Geneva Research Ethics Committee (protocol 2020-00610) with a waiver of ad hoc informed consent.

Role of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy Doses and Optimization in Patients Hospitalized With Decompensated Systolic Heart Failure

Despite significant advances in evidence-based treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the use of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) at recommended doses remains suboptimal. We examine the usage and modification of inpatient GDMT and its effect on outcomes in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute on chronic HFrEF between 2013 and 2018. Overall use and modification of GDMT, which included heart failure appropriate beta-blockers (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and aldosterone blockers (MRA) during the hospitalization were collected. Target dosages were based on guideline recommendations. Primary endpoints included 30-day hospitalization-free survival and 1-year survival. Among 1,655 patients, discharge use of BB, RASi, and MRA was 73.4%, 55.9% and 13.8%, respectively. Upon discharge, ≥50% target dose of BB, RASi, and MRA was used in 25.3%, 15.6%, and 13.7%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, there was a statistically significant improvement in 1-year survival and 30-day hospitalization-free survival in patients discharged on increasing number of medication classes optimized at ≥50% target dose (per extra medication, HR 0.74, 0.64-0.86, p <0.001, and HR 0.73, 0.62-0.86, p = 0.0002), respectively. Initiation and/or uptitration of BB and RASi was associated with improved 30-day hospitalization-free survival and 1-year survival, (HR 0.73 (0.57-0.92), p = 0.0087; HR 0.62 (0.46-0.82), p <0.001) for BB and (HR 0.77 (0.62-0.95), p <0.001; HR 0.62 (0.48-0.80), p <0.001) for RASi, respectively. In conclusion, inpatient optimization of GDMT in acute HFrEF is feasible and associated with improved 30-day hospitalization-free survival and 1-year survival.

1071-P: Long-Term Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitor Use and Risk of Pneumonia and Pneumonia-Related Death in Type 2 Diabetes

Introduction: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) which can reduce the proinflammatory-vasoconstricting activity of ACE/angiotensin II and enhance the anti-inflammatory-vasodilatory activity of ACE2/angiotensin 1-7. These drugs may be protective across a range of respiratory infections including bacterial and viral pneumonias. We examined long-term use of ACEi/ARBs on the risk of first pneumonia hospitalization and pneumonia-related death in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Prospective analysis of 16,285 Chinese T2D patients with new RASi use observed between 2001 and 2019. Overlap weighting was performed to balance baseline characteristics. We used time-dependent Cox model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of outcomes while adjusting for the time-varying covariates. Results: There were 6,379 (39.2%) ACEi-users only, 4,065 (25.0%) ARBs-users and 5,841 (35.9%) non RASi-users. During a median observation of 7.6 years, 6.1% had first pneumonia hospitalization, 1.3% died during or within one month of pneumonia hospitalization and 17.6% died from other causes. No association was observed between RASi use and first pneumonia hospitalization. However, RASi-users had lower risk for pneumonia-related death (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.76) than non-users [ACEi-users only: HR 0.53 (0.34-0.81); ARBs-users: HR 0.58 (0.32-1.04)]. We also noted reduced risk for all-cause death in RASi-users (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.54-0.67) [ACEi-users only: HR 0.61 (0.54-0.69); ARBs-users: HR 0.67 (0.57-0.79)]. Conclusions: Long-term use of RASi was associated with reduced risk of pneumonia-related death and all-cause death, but not first pneumonia hospitalization, in Chinese patients with T2D. Relevance to other respiratory infections such as coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) merits further investigation. Disclosure M. Shi: None. E. Chow: Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Sanofi-Aventis. A. Yang: None. E. S. H. Lau: None. H. Wu: None. B. Fan: None. A. P. Kong: Advisory Panel; Self; Lilly Diabetes, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Aptorum. A. Luk: None. R. C. Ma: Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi-Aventis, Tricida, Inc. J. C. Chan: Consultant; Self; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, MSD Corporation, Sanofi, Other Relationship; Self; Asia Diabetes Foundation, GemVCare, Research Support; Self; Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Hua Medicine, Lilly Diabetes, Merck KGaA.

Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on pemetrexed plus platinum-induced hematological toxicities: a multicenter retrospective study using three propensity score analyses.

Hematological toxicities induced by pemetrexed plus platinum therapy remain a critical issue in clinical practice. We hypothesized that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) can ameliorate pemetrexed-induced hematological toxicities through drug-drug interactions involving organic anion transporters. Thus, this study aimed to clarify whether RAS inhibitors (RASIs) could prevent pemetrexed plus platinum-induced hematological toxicities. We retrospectively analyzed data from 305 consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma who received their first cycle of a pemetrexed plus platinum regimen and were treated with or without RASIs. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe myelosuppression after the first cycle. Propensity score (PS)-matched, PS-adjusted, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses were used. The number of patients with grade ≥3 hematological toxicities was 27 (8.9%). PS-matched analyses revealed that the concomitant use of RASIs was slightly associated with a lower risk of grade ≥3 hematological toxicities (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-2.32; p = 0.536). Additionally, sensitivity analyses using PS-adjusted and IPTW methods demonstrated similar results (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.19-2.15; p = 0.463 and OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.11-1.29; p = 0.117, respectively). These findings suggest that RASIs might prevent pemetrexed plus platinum-induced hematological toxicities.

MO493PATTERNS OF HYPERKALEMIA AND ASSOCIATED ADVERSE HEALTH OUTCOMES IN PERSONS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with CKD are often described as having chronic hyperkalemia, but earlier studies have relied on a single potassium measurement. Whether the hyperkalemia in CKD is chronic or transient, and whether temporal patterns have different outcome implications, is unknown. Method Observational study from the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project of patients with confirmed CKD G3-5. We extracted all data on potassium measured during routine outpatient care and estimated its longitudinal trajectories. At each month, we created a rolling assessment of the proportion of time in which potassium was abnormal during the previous year, defining patterns of normokalemia (100% of time with potassium 3.5-5.0 mmol/L), transient (&amp;lt;50% of time with potassium &amp;gt;5.0 mmol/L) and chronic hyperkalemia (≥50% of time with potassium &amp;gt;5.0 mmol/L). We described the presence of chronic and transient hyperkalemia throughout the spectrum of CKD G3-5 and identified clinical predictors by logistic regression. Through time-dependent Cox models we examined whether previous hyperkalemia patterns offer prognostic gain beyond that of the current potassium value. Results We included 36,511 participants (56% women) with confirmed CKD G3-5, median age 81 years, and eGFR 46 ml/min/1.73 m2. During 3-year-median follow-up, patterns of transient and chronic hyperkalemia were observed in 15% and 4% of patients with CKD G3a, increasing to 50% and 17% of patients with CKD G5. Factors associated with chronic hyperkalemia were younger age, male sex, more severe CKD category, presence of diabetes or heart failure, use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and use of potassium binders. Major cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 13,104 (36%) patients and 13,570 (37%) died. In time-dependent models, independent of identified confounders and of time-updated potassium values, compared with the normokalemic pattern, patients with transient (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.29-1.46) or chronic (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32) hyperkalemia patterns were at higher risk of MACE. Transient hyperkalemia pattern (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.35-1.52) and time-updated elevated potassium, but not a state of chronic hyperkalemia (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.20), predicted the risk of death. Conclusion Chronic hyperkalemia occurs in 4-17% of patients with CKD G3-5. We did not observe a clear dose-response for the association between hyperkalemia pattern (normal, transient, chronic) with either MACE or death. There was modest incremental information in the previous potassium pattern, beyond potassium measured at a single time point.

Hypertension in kidney transplantation: a consensus statement of the 'hypertension and the kidney' working group of the European Society of Hypertension.

Hypertension is common in kidney transplantation recipients and may be difficult to treat. Factors present before kidney transplantation, related to the transplantation procedure itself and factors developing after transplantation may contribute to blood pressure (BP) elevation in kidney transplant recipients. The present consensus is based on the results of three recent systematic reviews, the latest guidelines and the current literature. The current transplant guidelines, which recommend only office BP assessments for risk stratification in kidney transplant patients should be reconsidered, given the presence of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension in this population and the better prediction of adverse outcomes by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring as indicated in recent systematic reviews. Hypertension is associated with adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and decreased survival in kidney transplant recipients. Current evidence suggests calcium channel blockers could be the preferred first-step antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant patients, as they improve graft function and reduce graft loss, whereas no clear benefit is documented for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use over conventional treatment in the current literature. Randomized control trials demonstrating the clinical benefits of BP lowering on kidney and major cardiovascular events and recording patient-related outcomes are still needed. These trials should define optimal BP targets for kidney transplant recipients. In the absence of kidney transplant-specific evidence, BP targets in kidney transplant recipients should be similar to those in the wider chronic kidney disease population.

Does renin-angiotensin system inhibition have impacts on muscle mass and bone mineral density in heart failure patients?

AimsResults of experimental studies have indicated the possibility of muscle and bone mass being negatively regulated by renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) activation, but that possibility has not been analysed in patients with heart failure (HF).Methods and resultsData for HF patients who received a dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry scan in our hospital were reviewed. Propensity scores for the use of RAS inhibitors (RASIs) were calculated using a multivariate logistic regression model to minimize selection bias. One hundred sixty pairs of patients were extracted. Plasma aldosterone concentration was significantly lower in the RASIs group than in the no‐RASIs group (119 [IQR 71–185] vs. 94 [IQR 60–131] pg/mL, P = 0.003), confirming RAS inhibition in the RASIs group. Skeletal muscle mass index tended to be higher in the RASIs group than in the non‐RASIs group (15.6 [IQR 14.0–17.2] vs. 15.0 [IQR 13.3–16.6] pg/mL, P = 0.065). The proportion of patients with muscle wasting, defined as appendicular skeletal muscle mass indexes of <7.00 and <5.40 kg/m2 for males and females, respectively, was significantly lower in the RASIs group than in the non‐RASIs group (53% vs. 64%, P = 0.041). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the no use of RASIs was associated with presence of muscle wasting independently of age, presence of diabetes, renal function, and severity of HF. Bone mineral densities and proportions of patients with osteoporosis were similar in the two groups.ConclusionsRenin‐angiotensin system inhibition is associated with a lower prevalence of muscle wasting in HF patients independently of established risk factors.

Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Use and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics are widely used to treat patients with hypertension. Although, the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and breast cancer has been highly debated, recent evidence supporting this association remains controversial. Objective: To evaluate the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer and its prognosis. Methods: This study was conducted using data from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases retrieved for the period from January 2000 to April 2021. Articles and their references were checked and summary effects were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results: This meta-analysis included 57 articles, which were all related to breast cancer risk or prognosis. Assessment of breast cancer risk using the pooled data showed that the use of BBs or CCBs or diuretics was associated with increased cancer risk [BB: relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09–1.32; CCBs: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.08; diuretics: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11]. Long-term use of diuretic increased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), whereas long-term RASIs treatment reduced the risk (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68–0.91). In addition, we found that diuretic users may be related to elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04–1.33], whereas using other antihypertensive medications was not associated with this prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Conclusion: Using CCBs, BBs, and diuretics increased the risk of breast cancer. In addition, diuretics may elevate the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. The long-term use of RASIs was associated with a significantly lower breast cancer risk, compared with non-users. Thus, this analysis provides evidence to support the benefits of the routine use of RASIs in patients with hypertension, which has important public health implications.

Renin‐Angiotensin System Blockade is Associated with Exercise Capacity, Sympathetic Activity and Endothelial Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have exercise intolerance that is associated with cardiovascular mortality. CKD patients have exaggerated increases in blood pressure (BP) reactivity and impaired ability to maintain skeletal muscle perfusion during exercise mediated by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) overactivation and decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) increases central SNS activation and reduces NO synthesis, and prior studies have suggested that RAS blockade may modulate physical function declines. The aim of this study was to investigate whether use of RAS inhibitors (RASi) is associated with greater exercise capacity in CKD, and whether greater exercise capacity with RASi is linked to lower SNS activity and increased NO-dependent endothelial function. 35 hypertensive CKD patients (56.7 ± 7.0 yr) and 20 age-matched controls without CKD (CON, 52.5 ± 8.2 yr) were recruited. Exercise capacity was measured via VO2 peak from a maximal treadmill test, muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA) was measured via microneurography, and vascular endothelial function was measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Participants with CKD were further grouped by current usage of RASi including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) for group difference analyses. There were no baseline differences in demographics or hemodynamics between CKD patients with and without RASi. VO2 peak was greater in CKD patients with RASi compared to CKD patients not on RASi and lower compared to CON (23.3 ± 5.8 vs.16.4 ± 2.9, p=0.007; vs.30.0 ± 7.7, p=0.005 ml/min/kg respectively). MSNA in CKD patients with RASi was lower compared to CKD patients not on RASi but similar with CON (43.9 ± 7.1 vs. 53.8 ± 8.2; p=0.009, vs.38.0 ± 20.3; p=0.103 bursts/min respectively). FMD in CKD patients with RASi was greater compared to CKD patients not on RASi and lower compared to CON (3.2 ± 2.6 vs. 1.3 ± 1.6; p=0.007, vs. 5.0 ± 3.0; p=0.045 % respectively). VO2 peak was positively associated with FMD (r=0.417, p=0.038) and was predicted by the combination of FMD and RASi status (r2 =0.344, p=0.01) and MSNA and RASi status (r2 =0.575, p=0.040) in CKD patients. In summary, hypertensive CKD patients on RASi have better exercise capacity compared to those not on RASi. Furthermore, greater exercise capacity in RASi-treated group was associated with lower resting SNS activity and better NO-dependent vascular endothelial function. Long-term randomized trials examining the effects of RASi on physical function and underlying autonomic and vascular mechanisms are needed to determine its causal effect and its responsible mechanisms in CKD.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors effect before and during hospitalization in COVID-19 outcomes: Final analysis of the international HOPE COVID-19 (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID-19) registry

BackgroundThe use of Renin-Angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been questioned because both share a target receptor site.MethodsHOPE-COVID-19 (NCT04334291) is an international investigator-initiated registry. Patients are eligible when discharged after an in-hospital stay with COVID-19, dead or alive. Here, we analyze the impact of previous and continued in-hospital treatment with RASi in all-cause mortality and the development of in-stay complications.ResultsWe included 6503 patients, over 18 years, from Spain and Italy with data on their RASi status. Of those, 36.8% were receiving any RASi before admission. RASi patients were older, more frequently male, with more comorbidities and frailer. Their probability of death and ICU admission was higher. However, after adjustment, these differences disappeared. Regarding RASi in-hospital use, those who continued the treatment were younger, with balanced comorbidities but with less severe COVID19. Raw mortality and secondary events were less frequent in RASi. After adjustment, patients receiving RASi still presented significantly better outcomes, with less mortality, ICU admissions, respiratory insufficiency, need for mechanical ventilation or prone, sepsis, SIRS and renal failure (p<0.05 for all). However, we did not find differences regarding the hospital use of RASi and the development of heart failure.ConclusionRASi historic use, at admission, is not related to an adjusted worse prognosis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, although it points out a high-risk population. In this setting, the in-hospital prescription of RASi is associated with improved survival and fewer short-term complications.

Impact of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors on the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in NSCLC Patients.

The Renin-Angiotensin system (RAS) induces immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, and RAS inhibitors (RASi) improve the tumor immune microenvironment. We evaluated the impact of RASi on the efficacy anti-programmed cell death-1/Ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies. This retrospective study analyzed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies monotherapy as second- or later-line treatment. We classified patients into those with or without use of RASi. A total of 256 NSCLC patients were included and 37 patients used RASi. The median PFS of patients treated with RASi was significantly longer than that of patients treated without (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.40-0.88). The median OS of patients treated with RASi tended to be longer than that of patients treated without (HR=0.71, 95%CI=0.45-1.11). The use of RASi was associated with a significantly longer PFS in NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. RASi use may enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.

The Effect of Chronic and Inhospital Exposure to Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on the Outcome and Inflammatory State of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Adult Inpatients.

Background Controversies exist about the effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcome. The inhospital use of RASi and its effect on inflammatory sate are still poorly studied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives We aimed to compare the impact of previous and inhospital RASi exposure on the outcome and inflammatory response of COVID-19 patients. Methods Single-centre, ambispective analysis of hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients at Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, between March and August 2020 was performed. We excluded asymptomatic patients and those admitted due to another disease. The primary outcome was inhospital all-cause mortality. Illness severity was assessed based on the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury (ARDS/ALI), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We used C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) as surrogate markers of the inflammatory response. Results From a total of 432 patients, 279 were selected, among whom 133 (47.7%) were receiving a RASi. Chronic treatment with RASi was not associated with the risk of death (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.66–2.31, p=0.500), ARDS/ALI development (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67–1.86, p=0.676), ICU admission (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.67–1.84, p = 0.686), and IMV need (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.58–1.84, p=0.917) in a univariable and multivariable analysis. Inhospital RASi withdrawing was associated with the risk of death (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.11–17.21, p=0.035) and ARDS/ALI development (OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.49–12.6, p=0.007), the latter remaining significant after adjustment. Previous exposure to RASi was associated with lower CRP levels at admission (p=0.018). IL-6 levels were significantly higher in those patients whose RASi were stopped (p=0.024). Conclusion Previous and inhospital exposure to RASi was not associated with mortality nor severity of COVID-19. This study supports current guidance on RASi management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A pressor dose of angiotensin II has no influence on the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and other molecules associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice.

In the early phase of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, it was postulated that the renin‐angiotensin‐system inhibitors (RASi) increase the infection risk. This was primarily based on numerous reports, which stated that the RASi could increase the organ Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the receptor of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), in rodents. RASi can theoretically antagonize the potential influence of angiotensin II (Ang II) on ACE2. However, while Ang II decreases the ACE2 levels in cultured cells, there is little evidence that supports this phenomenon in living animals. In this study, we tested whether Ang II or Ang II combined with its antagonist would alter the ACE2 and other molecules associated with the infection of SARS‐CoV‐2. Male C57BL6/J mice were administered vehicle, Ang II (400 ng/kg/min), or Ang II with losartan (10 mg/kg/min) for 2 weeks. ACE2 knockout mice were used as a negative control for the ACE2 assay. We found that both Ang II, which elevated blood pressure by 30 mm Hg, and Ang II with losartan, had no effect on the expression or protein activity of ACE2 in the lung, left ventricle, kidney, and ileum. Likewise, these interventions had no effect on the expression of Transmembrane Protease Serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and Furin, proteases that facilitate the virus‐cell fusion, and the expression or activity of Tumor Necrosis Factor α‐Convertase (TACE) that cleaves cell‐surface ACE2. Collectively, physiological concentrations of Ang II do not modulate the molecules associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. These results support the recent observational studies suggesting that the use of RASi is not a risk factor for COVID‐19.

Can the use of Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors increase the susceptibility to SARSCoV-2 infection (COVID-19)?

Can the use of Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors increase the susceptibility to SARSCoV-2 infection (COVID-19)?

Renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and COVID-19: overwhelming evidence against an association

Renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and COVID-19: overwhelming evidence against an association