The Bodies of August: Photographic Realism and Controversy at the National Air and Space Museum Bryan C. Taylor The sight that greeted our eyes was quite beyond what we had expected, because we saw this cloud of boiling dust and debris below us, with this tremendous mushroom on top. And beneath that was hidden the ruins of the city of Hiroshima. — Col. Paul Tibbets, August 6,1945 1 The nation requires anthems, flags. The poet offers discord. Rags. — Salman Rushdie 2 One consistent site of critical scholarship has been "realist" discourse circulating in public affairs. This term includes a variety of modernist, institutional discourses claiming unmediated access to the fundamental truths of social and physical reality. Implicitly, these discourses presume that communication is transparent, and that objective information about phenomena can be unproblematically expressed. Critics typically reject this claim to expose the Real as the product, not the referent, of strategic rhetoric. The self-effacing quality of realism, critics claim, masks its activation of culturally preferred codes for representation (such as the shaky, hand-held camerawork which connotes immediacy and authenticity for the viewers of cinema-verite). These codes reproduce ideological premises concerning what is normal, good, and inevitable (and their opposites) in social life. In their repetition and mutual reinforcement, realist discourses create verisimilitude, not validity .3 Critics have investigated the genres of journalism, literature, ethnography, science, history, and international relations to show how the use of realism authorizes interested accounts, legitimates hegemonic identities, and obscures the contingency of narrative production.4 Frequently, these practices also mobilize competing interests and stimulate resistance among marginalized groups.5 In this essay, I am concerned with the relationship between realism and nuclear weapons. Three themes in this relationship are evoked in the epigraph from Paul Bryan C. Taylor is Associate Professor of Communication at the University of Colorado in Boulder, Colorado. © Rhetoric & Public Affairs Vol. 1, No. 3,1998, pp. 331-361 ISSN 1094-8392 332 Rhetoric & Public Affairs Tibbets, pilot of the world's first atomic bombing mission. One theme is the importance of vision for realism. Like all nuclear witnesses, Tibbets was faced with translating the awesome evidence of his senses for his audience (here, journalists requesting an account of his "reactions over the target"). Although the Enola Gay's crew experienced Hiroshima through a variety of senses—one excited crewman believed he could taste the bomb's radiation6—here it is vision that predominates, and vision that establishes Tibbets's complex credibility as an author, witness and survivor of the scene. Another theme in this account involves the excessive quality of the nuclear object. Although Tibbets had been briefed prior to his mission about the destructive force of the weapon, its effects were still "quite beyond" his expectations . His remark indicates the threat posed by nuclear excess to the adequacy of realism for projecting and depicting nuclear events. A final theme involves the tension between presence and absence in nuclear realism. Tibbets's language emphasizes the signs of nuclear explosion: "boiling dust and debris," and the iconic mushroom cloud. Yet in its concluding sentence, the account also acknowledges its limitations. Beyond the presence of these signs lie unseen and unspeakable phenomena. The mushroom cloud is both a sign of the bomb's detonation and a screen that prevents Tibbets from engaging the "hidden" fate of those below. "The ruins" of Hiroshima are a lacuna where his realism falters . Historically, his comments initiate a tradition in which nuclear excess has often remained "beneath" official rhetoric, a surplus of unrealized meaning signaled by its incompleteness. In this essay, I explore the operation of these themes in the related realisms of history , museology, and photography. Specifically, I am concerned with Hiroshima and Nagasaki as events which alternately defy and incite these discourses. Since 1945, nuclear realism has circulated in a variety of genres, such as personal narrative (which claims to transmit the truth of nuclear events through the direct witness of individual speakers), and orthodox historiography (which recovers the "facts" of those events from their encoding in the raw data of documents and testimony).7 These verbal and iconographie discourses do not operate exclusively; they frequently combine and interact in texts such...