Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Research Articles

Potentially inappropriate medications in older individuals with diabetes: A population-based study in Quebec, Canada

AimTo study the population-based prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) among older individuals with diabetes, and to identify factors associated with their use. MethodsWe used the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (QICDSS) database to conduct a population-based cohort study of individuals with diabetes ≥66 years between April 1st, 2014 and March 31st, 2015. PIMs were defined according to the 2015 Beers Criteria. Factors associated with PIM use were identified using robust Poisson regression models. Risk ratios (RR) and 99% confidence intervals (99%CI) were calculated. ResultsMore than half (56%) of the 286,962 older individuals with diabetes used at least one PIM over a year. Benzodiazepines (41%), proton pump inhibitors (27%) and endocrine medication (mainly glibenclamide) (25%) were the most common PIMs used. Factors associated with PIM use included female sex (RR: 1.17; 99%CI: 1.16–1.18), and comorbidities such as schizophrenia (1.48; 1.45–1.51), anxiety disorders (1.34; 1.33–1.35) and Alzheimer's disease (1.14; 1.13–1.25). Risks of using PIMs increased both with increasing comorbidities and number of medications. ConclusionPIM use is highly prevalent among older individuals with diabetes. Interventions to promote optimal medication use should particularly target individuals with comorbidities and polypharmacy who are most vulnerable to adverse drug events.

A multifactorial intervention to lower potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults in Argentina.

Adverse drug reactions are a common cause of potentially avoidable harm, particularly in older adults. To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a pilot multifactorial intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older adults. We conducted a phase 2, feasibility, open-label study in the ambulatory setting of an integrated healthcare network in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We recruited primary care physicians (PCPs) and measured PIM use in a sample of their patients (65years or older). Educational workshops for PCPs were organized with the involvement of clinician champions. Practical deprescribing algorithms were designed based on Beers criteria. Automatic email alerts based on specific PIMs recorded in each patient's electronic health record were used as a reminder tool. PCPs were responsible for deprescribing decisions. We randomly sampled 879 patients taking PIMs from eight of the most commonly used drug classes at our institution and compared basal (6months prior to the intervention) and final (12months after) prevalence of PIM use using a test of proportions. There was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in all drug classes evaluated. Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (basal prevalence 5.92%; final 1.59%); benzodiazepines (10.13%; 6.94%); histamine antagonists (7.74%; 3.07%); opioids (2.16%; 1.25%); tricyclic antidepressants (8.08%; 4.10%); muscle relaxants (7.74%; 3.41%), anti-hypertensives (3.53%; 1.82%) and oxybutynin (2.96%; 1.82%). The absolute reduction in the overall prevalence was 8.5 percentage points (relative reduction of 51.4%). This multifactorial intervention is feasible and effective in reducing the use of potentially inappropriate medication in all drug classes evaluated.

PDG2 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATIONS AND HOSPITAL ENCOUNTERS AMONG OLDER ADULTS: A META-ANALYSIS

To evaluate the impact of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and hospital encounters among older adults. We searched Medline and Scopus from January 1991 to April 2019 using keywords and MeSH terms related to PIMs. Studies were included if they compared the odds of hospital encounters between PIM and non-PIM groups. Hospital encounters could be either hospital admissions or emergency department (ED) visits. Using random-effects meta-analytic methods, we calculated the pooled odds of any hospital encounter in PIM versus non-PIM users with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 21 studies evaluating 3,137,188 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients on PIMs was >20% in most (n=18) studies, median follow up was 12 months and the mean age of patients ranged from 72 to 86 years. PIM use was associated with increased odds of both hospital admissions (OR=1.52; 95%CI=1.40 to 1.65) and ER visits (OR=1.72, 95%CI= 1.33 to 2.24). PIM use among older patients was associated with more hospital encounters. Interventions aimed at decreasing PIM use may also decrease healthcare resource utilization.

Potentially Inappropriate Medications in a Psychogeriatric Inpatient Ward: An Audit Based on Beers Criteria.

IntroductionOlder adults are often prescribed a high number of medications. Overcoming inaction in health care is difficult but essential to deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Curbing the use of PIMs is urgent in older adults suffering from psychiatric illness, as cognitive, emotional and psychosocial adversity makes them an especially vulnerable group. We aimed to audit PIM usage and deprescribing in an old-age psychiatry inpatient service of a university-affiliated public hospital.MethodsThe 2015 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria were used in the present study. Computerized medical records were reviewed for all patients discharged from the Dunedin Public Hospital Inpatient Psychogeriatric Ward during the period January 2017 to December 2017.ResultsDuring the 1-year study period, 136 patients were discharged from our psychogeriatrics inpatient ward, including 87 women and 49 men, with a mean age of 75.4 ± 8.6 years (range: 59–95). The mean number of medications prescribed per patient at the time of admission was 7.7. At discharge, a mean of 8.9 medications were recorded. Analysis focused on 120 complete patient records. Of the 49 patients with 63 high-risk medications, 16 patients (prescribed 19 high-risk medications) had their high-risk medication stopped, 23 patients (prescribed 24 high-risk medications) had high-risk medications started and 10 (prescribed 20 high-risk medications) had no change to high-risk medications between admission and discharge. In 56 of 120 patients (47%), benzodiazepines (BZDs) were started, stopped or unchanged.ConclusionOlder adults suffering from severe psychiatric disorders are frequently prescribed PIMs. However, clinical decision-making for this vulnerable population needs to take into account safety as reflected by the Beers Criteria, but also the complexity of managing psychogeriatric problems.

Disparities in the appropriateness of medication use: Analysis of the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) population-based cohort study.

Prior work has identified disparities in the quality and outcomes of healthcare across socioeconomic subgroups. Medication use may be subject to similar disparities. To assess the association between demographic and socioeconomic factors (gender, age, race, income, education, and rural or urban residence) and appropriateness of medication use. US adults aged ≥45 years (n=26,798) from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study were included in the analyses, of which 13,623 participants aged ≥65 years (recruited 2003-2007). Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older adults and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were identified through 2015 Beers Criteria and clinically significant drug interactions list by Ament et al., respectively as measures of medication appropriateness. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of disparity parameters with PIM use and DDIs. Interactions between race and other disparity variables were investigated. Approximately 87% of the participants aged ≥65 years used at least one drug listed in the Beers Criteria, and 3.8% of all participants used two or more drugs with DDIs. Significant gender-race interaction across prescription-only drug users revealed that white females compared with white males (OR=1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.48) and black males compared with white males (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.41-1.82) were more likely to receive PIM. Individuals with lower income and education also were more likely to use PIM in this sub-group. Females were less likely than males (female vs. male: OR=0.55, 95% CI 0.48-0.63) and individuals resided in small rural areas as opposed to urban areas (small rural vs. urban: OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76) were more likely to have DDIs. Demographic and socioeconomic disparities in PIM use and DDIs exist. Future studies should seek to better understand factors contributing to the disparities in order to guide development of interventions.

Use of potentially inappropriate medication and polypharmacy in older adults: a repeated cross-sectional study

BackgroundWith age, the number of chronic conditions increases along with the use of medications. For several years, polypharmacy has been found to be on the increase in western societies. Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug events (ADE). Medications called potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) have also been found to increase the risk of ADEs in an older population. In this study, which we conducted during a national information campaign to reduce PIM, we analysed the prevalence of PIM in an older adult population and in different strata of the variables age, gender, number of chronic conditions and polypharmacy and how that prevalence changed over time.MethodsThis is a registry-based repeated cross-sectional study including two cohorts. Individuals aged 75 or older listed at a primary care centre in Blekinge on the 31st March 2011 (cohort 1, 15,361 individuals) or on the 31st December 2013 (cohort 2, 15,945 individuals) were included in the respective cohorts. Using a chi2 test, the two cohorts were compared on the variables age, gender, number of chronic conditions and polypharmacy. Use of five or more medications at the same time was the definition for polypharmacy.ResultsUse of PIM decreased from 10.60 to 7.04% (p-value < 0.001) between 2011 and 2013, while prevalence of five to seven chronic conditions increased from 20.55 to 23.66% (p-value < 0.001). Use of PIM decreased in all strata of the variables age, gender number of chronic conditions and polypharmacy. Except for age 80–84 and males, where it increased, prevalence of polypharmacy was stable in all strata of the variables.ConclusionsUse of potentially inappropriate medications had decreased in all variables between 2011 and 2013; this shows the possibility to reduce PIM with a focused effort.Polypharmacy does not increase significantly compared to the rest of the population.

Potentially inappropriate medications in older patients based on Beers criteria: a cross-sectional study of a family medicine practice in Saudi Arabia.

BackgroundThe use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is an important issue in older patients who are at risk of adverse drug events.AimTo determine the prevalence of PIM use, according to Beers criteria, among an older population (aged ≥65 years) in a large family medicine setting, and to identify the associated risks.Design & settingA prospective cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥65 years was conducted from June 2017 to June 2018 at the Family and Community Medicine (FCM) clinics of King Saud Medical City (KSMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.MethodThis cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥65 years who were seen at new appointments or followed-up at the FCM clinics of KSMC in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected by extensive face-to-face interviews and from the patients’ medical records.ResultsA total of 270 older patients aged 72.41 ±6.23 years (mean ±standard deviation [SD]) were included in the present study. The prevalence of PIMs was 60.7% (n = 164). Multivariate analyses identified three independent variables associated with PIMs: incremental age per 5 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.15 to 1.88; P = 0.002), female sex (OR 1.95, 95% CI = 1.10 to 3.42; P = 0.021), and polypharmacy (OR 8.21, 95% CI = 4.58 to 14.7; P<0.001). The most common PIMs used were 39.4% related to proton pump inhibitors (PPI), 25.2% to diuretics (other than spironolactone), 10.6% to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and 8.7% to aspirin use.ConclusionThis study showed high prevalence of PIMs. Increasing age, female sex, and polypharmacy were found to be significant risk factors for PIM use. The frequency of morbidities was not significantly different among patients with PIMs compared to those without PIMs, except for hypertension and osteoarthritis, which were more common in the PIMs group. The present study reinforces the importance of comprehensive medication management and reviews.

One-year persistence of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: A population-based study.

To assess the 1-year persistence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and identify associated factors in community-dwelling older adults in Quebec, Canada. A population-based cohort study was conducted using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System. Individuals insured by the public drug plan and aged ≥66 years who initiated a PIM between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015 were followed-up for 1 year. PIMs were identified using the 2015 Beers criteria. One-year persistence of PIM use was defined as continuous treatment with any PIM, without interruption for more than 60 days between prescriptions refills. Poisson regression models were performed to identify factors associated with 1-year persistence of any PIM. In total, 25.1% of PIM initiators were persistent at 1 year. In non-persistent individuals, the median time to PIM discontinuation was 31 days (interquartile range 21-92). Individuals were more persistent at 1 year with antipsychotics (43.9%), long-duration sulphonylureas (40.2%), antiarrhythmics/immediate-release nifedipine (36.5%) and proton pump inhibitors (36.0%). Factors significantly associated with persistence were an increased age, being a man and having a high number of medications and chronic diseases, especially dementia, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. One-quarter of community-dwelling older adults are continuously exposed to PIMs. To optimize medication prescribing in the older population, further interventions are needed to limit the use of PIMs most likely to be continued, especially in individuals most at risk of being persistent and also particularly vulnerable to adverse events.

Increasing Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Allogeneic HCT Recipients Leads to Higher NRM

Background The American Geriatric Society has established criteria (Beers criteria) for Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) in older (65+y) adults (J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):674-694). The use of PIMs in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) and its impact on outcomes is unknown. Methods The use of PIMs, in defined categories [anticholinergics, central nervous system (CNS), benzodiazepines, gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and narcotics] in older (≥ 65y) allo-HCT recipients were compared to younger recipients [(40-64y undergoing reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)] during initial HCT admission (day-14 to +28 post HCT). Use of PIMs was defined as the number of days a patient received 1 or more PIMs between d-14 to +28. Medications were retrieved from medical records and categorized by Beers criteria for 354 allo-HCT recipients ≥ 40y in 2 groups (40-64y RIC, n=240; and 65+y RIC, n=114). Poisson regression determined the log use of PIMs in the 2 groups. In 65+y group, we evaluated the impact of PIMs on the incidence of CTCAE grade 3 and 4 toxicities; and non-relapse mortality (NRM). All analyses were adjusted or length of hospital stay. Results All PIMs: The median (range) days of all PIMs in 65+y RIC recipients [94 (24-279)] was similar to 40-64y RIC recipients [101 (8-441), p=0.48, confirmed in Poisson regression (Figure 1) [65+y RIC vs 40-64y RIC log change 0.0, p=1.0). Patients with a high (vs. low) HCT-CI score received more days of all PIMs (p=0.02). PIM Categories (Figure 1) were compared and 65+y recipients received fewer days of benzodiazepines (log change -0.18, p=0.04) or narcotics (-0.21, p=0.04), but more days of anticholinergics (0.22, p=0.03) and GI PIMs (0.16, p 65+y group: In adjusted regression analysis, increasing days of narcotics was associated with a 1.6 fold (95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.03) higher risk of NRM. Increasing days of narcotics was also associated with a 1.66 fold (95% CI 1.02-2.69) greater odds of grade 3-4 toxicities, p=0.04 (Figure 2). More days of all PIMs was associated with a 5 times greater odds of discharge to rehab or a nursing facility (95% CI 1.43-10.0, p Conclusions Older recipients (65+y) receive PIMs as frequently as younger recipients (40-64y). Females, those with a high HCT-CI and UCB recipients receive PIMs more frequently. Amongst older recipients, use of PIMs, particularly narcotics, was associated with a higher NRM and higher risks of grade 3-4 toxicities. Identifying and reducing use of PIMs in older HCT recipients may help lower the burden of adverse events and associated health care costs.

A closer look at the 2019 Beers criteria

Increased use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is one of the major issues arising in older adults. The use of PIMs has been found to be associated with adverse drug events, drug-related problems and other major significant health consequences. However, PIMs continue to be prescribed as first-line drugs in older adults in many parts of the world. Beers criteria for PIM use were first established by Mark Beers in 1991 and the criteria have been updated multiple times by Mark Beers and the American Geriatric Society. The Beers criteria for PIM use are a specially designed tool to improve medication selection and reduce adverse drug events in older adults. The expert panel made some noteworthy changes in the 2019 Beers criteria update. The purpose of this review is to highlight noteworthy changes and to provide additional details and rationale behind the selected noteworthy changes within the 2019 criteria. This review will aid healthcare professionals to apply the 2019 Beers criteria in their clinical judgment when selecting drug therapy for older adults.

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: potentially inappropriate medications for older adults?

Introduction: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older adults cause more adverse effects than benefits. The 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria (2019BC) considered five clinical situations as PIM use in older adults. Can drug analysis, according to these situations, assist in the act of making prescriptions for older people? Seeking a practical example for this question, we assessed drugs currently questioned as to their safe use among older people. Objective: To check if chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine fit the PIM criteria for older adults and whether this analysis is clinically applicable. Method: We systematized the objective based on the five clinical situations defined as PIM use in older adults by the 2019BC. Results: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine fulfill, respectively, four and five of these clinical situations. This evaluation allowed the likely definition of these drugs as PIMs for older adults in a simple way, based on a brief analysis of the available literature. Conclusion: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine may be considered PIMs for older adults. We expect that this analysis can be replicated with other drugs and reduce iatrogenesis in older people.

Association of Potentially Inappropriate Medications With All-Cause Mortality in the Elderly Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients: Importance of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Prescription.

BackgroundAcute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is the most common cause of readmissions in the hospital. ADHF patients are associated with polypharmacy. It is a common problem among elderly patients due to frequently occurring multiple morbidities and is associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). The aim of this study was to examine the association between PIMs and all-cause mortality in elderly ADHF patients.MethodsThis retrospective study included ADHF patients who were admitted to the Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital between January 2015 and August 2016. We investigated the proportion of patients taking at least one PIM at admission and the characteristics of patients at admission. PIMs were defined based on the Screening Tool of Older People’s potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP). Multiple Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the association between PIM use and all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 193 elderly patients (median age 81 years, interquartile range (IQR) 65 - 99 years) were included in the study. All-cause death occurred in 30 patients. The median number of medications at admission was 7 (IQR 0 - 18). The number of medications (greater than or equal to six) at admission was associated with mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mm Hg at admission, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at admission were independent predictors for all-cause mortality.ConclusionsThe medical staff should attempt to stop unnecessary medications that are prone to be inappropriate prescribing. In particular, prescription of NSAIDs should be carefully assessed and monitored.

Potentially inappropriate medication in older participants of the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) - Sex differences and associations with morbidity and medication use.

IntroductionMultimorbidity in advanced age and the need for drug treatment may lead to polypharmacy, while pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes may increase the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs).ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the proportion of subjects using potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in a cohort of older and predominantly healthy adults in relation to polypharmacy and morbidity.MethodsCross-sectional data were available from 1,382 study participants (median age 69 years, IQR 67–71, 51.3% females) of the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). PIM was classified according to the EU(7)-PIM and German PRISCUS (representing a subset of the former) list. Polypharmacy was defined as the concomitant use of at least five drugs. A morbidity index (MI) largely based on the Charlson Index was applied to evaluate the morbidity burden.ResultsOverall, 24.1% of the participants were affected by polypharmacy. On average, men used 2 (IQR 1–4) and women 3 drugs (IQR 1–5). According to PRISCUS and EU(7)-PIM, 5.9% and 22.6% of participants received at least one PIM, while use was significantly more prevalent in females (25.5%) compared to males (19.6%) considering EU(7)-PIM (p = 0.01). In addition, morbidity in males receiving PIM according to EU(7)-PIM was higher (median MI 1, IQR 1–3) compared to males without PIM use (median MI 1, IQR 0–2, p<0.001).ConclusionPIM use occurred more frequently in women than in men, while it was associated with higher morbidity in males. As expected, EU(7)-PIM identifies more subjects as PIM users than the PRISCUS list but further studies are needed to investigate the differential impact of both lists on ADEs and outcome.Key pointsWe found PIM use to be associated with a higher number of regular medications and with increased morbidity. Additionally, we detected a higher prevalence of PIM use in females compared to males, suggesting that women and people needing intensive drug treatment are patient groups, who are particularly affected by PIM use.

Prevalence and factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication use in older medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

To assess the factors related to potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in elderly patients with cancer, as well as to compare the PIM prevalence in older adults with and without cancer. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked base (2009-2011) were accessed to conduct a retrospective study comparing patients with cancers of the breast, colon/rectum, and prostate against a matched population of subjects without cancer. PIM use was defined based on the 2015 Beers Criteria and was quantified using prescription claims. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between the patients' characteristics, clinical factors, and PIM use in patients with cancer based on Beers criteria. Propensity score matching was applied to compare use of PIM in patients with versus without cancer. PIM usage rates in patients with colorectal and breast cancers were significantly higher than non-cancer-bearing adults; the difference in PIM usage rate was not significantly different in the prostate cancer-matched cohort. The prevalence of inappropriate medication use in the three types of cancers evaluated was directly correlated with number of medications prescribed, treatment with chemotherapy, and co-morbid medical problems. Patients diagnosed with cancer were more likely to use PIM compared with their non-cancer counterparts. The updated Beers criteria has the potential to serve as an important tool in geriatric oncology practice but it may still need to take into consideration different cancer types and their respective treatments.

The analysis of the use of potentially inappropriate medications in elderly in the Slovak Republic.

Background The prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) using explicit criteria has been well documented in European countries, however, there is a lack of evidence in the Slovak Republic. There are no specific guidelines and there is a lack of geriatricians in Slovakia. Higher use of PIM leads to greater healthcare services use as well as increases healthcare costs. Objective The aim of this study was to perform an evaluation of the availability and the actual use of PIM by geriatric patients in the nursing homes in Slovakia. Setting Together 459 residents ≥ 65years living in nursing homes in the Slovak Republic were included for analysis of their drug therapy. Methods Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients' therapy for evaluation of PIM use. Identification of PIM was based on the Renom-Guiteras EU7 PIM list published in 2015. Main outcome measure Potentially inappropriate medications use. The presence of polypharmacy in patients. Results Inappropriate drug use according to EU7 PIM list was identified in 90.60% (416) patients. The mean number of PIM was 2.34 ± 0.07 PIM/patient/day. Polypharmacy (use of ≥ 5 drugs by patient daily) was found in 83% of all patients. The mean number of prescribed drugs was 8.32 ± 0.17 drugs/patient/day. Out of all 282 PIM listed in EU7 PIM list, there are 150 (53.19%) available on the Slovak market and 86 (30.50%) were used in patients. Patients using at least one PIM took two times more drugs compared to patients without PIM (8.77 ± 0.17 vs. 3.98 ± 0.39 drugs/patient/day, p < 0.001). The most common PIM were PPI (36% of patients), piracetam (17.2%) and alprazolam (16.80%). Conclusions The risk of PIM was almost 9.5 times higher if polypharmacy was present in geriatric patients (OR 9.51, 95% CI, 4.86 - 18.61, p < 0.001). There was a strong, positive correlation (ρ = 0.65) between the number of drugs and the number of PIM (p < 0.01). There was neither association between age/gender of patient and polypharmacy; nor age/gender of patient and presence of PIM. The lack of geriatricians and national guidelines for inappropriate prescribing results in alarmingly high use of PIM in the Slovak Republic.

Polypharmacy, Inappropriate Medication Use, and Drug Interactions in Older Korean Patients with Cancer Receiving First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy.

Polypharmacy is an important issue in the care of older patients with cancer, as it increases the risk of unfavorable outcomes. We estimated the prevalence of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients with cancer in Korea and their associations with clinical outcomes. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of geriatric patients with cancer undergoing first-line palliative chemotherapy. Eligible patients were older adults (≥70 years) with histologically diagnosed solid cancer who were candidates for first-line palliative chemotherapy. All patients enrolled in this study received a geriatric assessment (GA) at baseline. We reviewed the daily medications taken by patients at the time of GA before starting chemotherapy. PIMs were assessed according to the 2015 Beers criteria, and DDIs were assessed by a clinical pharmacist using Lexi-comp Drug Interactions. We evaluated the association between polypharmacy and clinical outcomes including treatment-related toxicity, and hospitalization using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. In total, 301 patients (median age 75 years; range, 70-93) were enrolled; the most common cancer types were colorectal cancer (28.9%) and lung cancer (24.6%). Mean number of daily medications was 4.7 (±3.1; range, 0-14). The prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was 45.2% and that of excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications) was 8.6%. PIM use was detected in 137 (45.5%) patients. Clinically significant DDIs were detected in 92 (30.6%) patients. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with hospitalization or emergency room (ER) visits (odds ratio: 1.73 [1.18-2.55], p < .01). Neither polypharmacy nor PIM use showed association with treatment-related toxicity. Polypharmacy, PIM use, and potential major DDIs were prevalent in Korean geriatric patients with cancer. Polypharmacy was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or ER visits during the chemotherapy period. This study, which included 301 older Korean patients with cancer, highlights the increased prevalence of polypharmacy in this population planning to receive palliative chemotherapy. The prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy was 45.2% and 8.6%, respectively. The prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) was detected in 45.5% and clinically significant drug-drug interaction in 30.6% of patients. Given the association of polypharmacy with increased hospitalization or emergency room visits, this study points to the need for increased awareness and intervention to minimize polypharmacy in the geriatric cancer population undergoing chemotherapy. Moreover, specific criteria for establishing PIMs should be adopted for the treatment of older adults with cancer.

Association between potentially inappropriate medications at discharge and unplanned readmissions among hospitalised elderly patients at a single centre in Japan: a prospective observational study

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use at admission and discharge among hospitalised elderly patients and evaluate the association between PIMs at discharge and unplanned readmission in...

Relationship Between Potentially Inappropriate Medications And The Risk Of Hospital Readmission And Death In Hospitalized Older Patients.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among hospitalized elderly patients using Beers and Chinese criteria and identify the correlation between PIMs and the risk of hospital readmission and death.MethodsThis study was conducted on geriatric patients aged ≥65 years at Beijing Fuxing Hospital between June 2015 and December 2017. The Beers criteria of 2015 and the Chinese criteria of 2017 were used to detect PIMs. Follow-ups were conducted for 12–36 months (or until patients’ death, if it came sooner). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to explore the correlations between PIM use and the risk of hospital readmission and death.ResultsOf 508 patients, 352 (69.3%) and 339 (66.7%) had at least one PIM identified using the Beers criteria and the Chinese criteria, respectively. Proton-pump inhibitors in the Beers criteria and clopidogrel in the Chinese criteria were the most leading PIMs. PIMs identified using the Beers criteria were a risk factor for the all-cause hospital readmission. After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidity, and so forth, PIM use was still an indicator of rehospitalization. PIM grouping defined using the Chinese criteria was not associated with hospital readmission. PIM grouping defined using either criteria was not associated with all-cause death.ConclusionThe study showed a high prevalence of PIM use in China. PIMs defined using the Beers criteria increased the risk of hospital readmission. Clinicians should pay more attention to PIMs, carry out routine PIM assessment, and reduce adverse health outcomes in elderly patients.

Potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: a population-based cohort study.

Non-optimal medication use among older adults is a public health concern. A concrete picture of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is imperative to ensure optimal medication use. To assess the prevalence of PIMs in community-dwelling older adults and identify associated factors. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (QICDSS). The QICDSS includes data on drug claims for community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases or at risk of developing chronic diseases aged ≥65 years who are insured by the public drug insurance plan. Individuals aged ≥66 years who were continuously insured with the public drug plan between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2016 were included. PIMs were defined using the 2015 Beers criteria. We conducted multivariate robust Poisson regression analyses to explore factors associated with PIM use. A total of 1 105 295 individuals were included. Of these, 48.3% were prescribed at least one PIM. The most prevalent PIMs were benzodiazepines (25.7%), proton-pump inhibitors (21.3%), antipsychotics (5.6%), antidepressants (5.0%) and long-duration sulfonylureas (3.3%). Factors associated with PIM exposure included being a woman [rate ratio (RR): 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.21], increased number of medications and having a high number of chronic diseases, especially mental disorders (RR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.49-1.51). Almost one out of two community-dwelling older adults use a PIM. It is imperative to reduce the use of PIMs, by limiting their prescription and by promoting their deprescribing, which necessitates not only the active involvement of prescribers but also patients.

Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Polypharmacy: A Study of Older People with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia.

With multimorbidity increasing among older people, polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are assuming a prominent role in the life of the geriatric population. To investigate the association of polypharmacy and PIM use with a wide range of factors in older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to mild dementia. The study population comprised 160 outpatients with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5-1 and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 20-30. Patients were classified as receiving polypharmacy when they took ≥5 different medications at the same time. PIMs were identified using the STOPP-J criteria. Cognitive, neuropsychological, nutritional, and physical function tests were performed and body measurements taken. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using both components of the EQ-5D scale, the index score and the visual analogue scale (QOL VAS). A comorbidity index was calculated for all participants. PIM use was significantly associated with lower scores on the verbal fluency (initial letters) test and QOL index. Participants receiving polypharmacy showed an increased likelihood of worse frailty status and lower QOL VAS score. The number of medications was significantly associated with a worse frailty status. In a geriatric population with MCI to mild dementia, PIM use was associated with lower verbal fluency (initial letters) score and lower QOL, while the presence of polypharmacy was correlated with a worse frailty status and lower QOL. The number of medicines, instead, was correlated with a worse frailty status only.