Oral Corticosteroid Use Research Articles

A Case in which Eosinophilic Meningoencephalitis Occurred during Oral Corticosteroid Tapering and after Switching from Anti-IL-5 to Anti-IgE Treatment.

A 49-year-old man with severe eosinophilic asthma, sinusitis, and esophagitis was admitted with a sudden severe headache. The patient was diagnosed with eosinophilic meningoencephalitis based on frontotemporal abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging and high eosinophil counts in the cerebrospinal fluid. His allergic-disease control levels were poor, requiring regular oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. He was switched from anti-interleukin (IL)-5 to anti-IgE therapy because of worsening urticaria and asthma symptoms during OCS tapering. We suspect this was a case of complex eosinophilic meningoencephalitis caused by the combination of OCS tapering and anti-IL-5 therapy cessation that acquired anti-IgE antibody sensitization based on positive drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test results.

Personalized Medicine in Severe Asthma: From Biomarkers to Biologics.

Severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous clinical condition presented as chronic inflammation of the airways. Conventional treatments are mainly focused on symptom control; however, there has been a shift towards personalized medicine. Identification of different phenotypes driven by complex pathobiological mechanisms (endotypes), especially those driven by type-2 (T2) inflammation, has led to improved treatment outcomes. Combining biomarkers with T2-targeting monoclonal antibodies is crucial for developing personalized treatment strategies. Several biological agents, including anti-immunoglobulin E, anti-interleukin-5, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin/interleukin-4, have been approved for the treatment of severe asthma. These biological therapies have demonstrated efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations, lowering eosinophil count, improving lung function, diminishing oral corticosteroid use, and improving the quality of life in selected patients. Severe asthma management is undergoing a profound transformation with the introduction of ongoing and future biological therapies. The availability of novel treatment options has facilitated the adoption of phenotype/endotype-specific approaches and disappearance of generic interventions. The transition towards precision medicine plays a crucial role in meticulously addressing the individual traits of asthma pathobiology. An era of tailored strategies has emerged, allowing for the successful targeting of immune-inflammatory responses that underlie uncontrolled T2-high asthma. These personalized approaches hold great promise for improving the overall efficacy and outcomes in the management of severe asthma. This article comprehensively reviews currently available biological agents and biomarkers for treating severe asthma. With the expanding repertoire of therapeutic options, it is becoming increasingly crucial to comprehend the influencing factors, understand the pathogenesis, and track treatment progress in severe asthma.

Proteomic signatures of eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma from serum and sputum

Eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma defined by high levels of blood and sputum eosinophils and neutrophils exemplifies the inflammatory heterogeneity of asthma, particularly severe asthma. We analysed the serum and sputum proteome to identify biomarkers jointly associated with these different phenotypes. Proteomic profiles (N=1129 proteins) were assayed in sputum (n=182) and serum (n=574) from two cohorts (U-BIOPRED and ADEPT) of mild-moderate and severe asthma by SOMAscan. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalised logistic regression in a stability selection framework, we sought sparse sets of proteins associated with either eosinophilic or neutrophilic asthma with and without adjustment for established clinical factors including oral corticosteroid use and forced expiratory volume. We identified 13 serum proteins associated with eosinophilic asthma, including 7 (PAPP-A, TARC/CCL17, ALT/GPT, IgE, CCL28, CO8A1, and IL5-Rα) that were stably selected while adjusting for clinical factors yielding an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.83-0.84) compared to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.61-0.63) for clinical factors only. Sputum protein analysis selected only PAPP-A (AUC=0.81 [95% CI: 0.80-0.81]). 12 serum proteins were associated with neutrophilic asthma, of which 5 (MMP-9, EDAR, GIIE/PLA2G2E, IL-1-R4/IL1RL1, and Elafin) complemented clinical factors increasing the AUC from 0.63 (95% CI: 0.58-0.67) for the model with clinical factors only to 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89-0.90). Our model did not select any sputum proteins associated with neutrophilic status. Targeted serum proteomic profiles are a non-invasive and scalable approach for subtyping of neutrophilic and eosinophilic asthma and for future functional understanding of these phenotypes. U-BIOPRED has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 115010, resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) companies' in-kind contributions (www.imi.europa.eu). ADEPT was funded by Johnson & Johnson/Janssen pharmaceutical Company.

Biologic use and treatment patterns in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a US real-world study

BackgroundSeveral biologics are now approved in the US as add-on treatments for chronic rhinosinusitus with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This cross-sectional, retrospective, real-world study aimed to characterize treatment patterns and identify predictors of biologic use among patients with CRSwNP.MethodsAdults in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases with medical claims for CRSwNP were identified June 2018–June 2019 (identification period [IP]). Patient characteristics were collated in the IP and treatment pattern data during the IP plus the following year (July 2019–June 2020; observation period [OP]). Data were stratified by sinus surgery and biologic use.ResultsOf the 5997 eligible patients identified (58% male, mean age 48.1 years), 10.7% (n = 642) used biologics during the OP. More biologic users had common respiratory conditions than non-users, particularly asthma (89.1% vs 35.0%; P < 0.001). Biologic users had fewer diagnostic services but more drug-related services than non-users. Only 11.6% of patients who had sinus surgery used biologics, with most (56.1%) having their first biologic dose before sinus surgery and 12.5% ≤ 30 days after. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was higher in biologic users than non-users (all patients: 68.8% vs 42.5%; P < 0.001) and in those with/without sinus surgery. Comorbidities, prior OCS/doxycycline use, and age (< 65 years) increased the odds of biologic use, with asthma increasing the odds 5.46 times (P < 0.001).ConclusionsBiologic use was more common before first/next sinus surgery and in patients with high unmet need, elucidating predictors of biologic use that could be used in clinical practice.

Factors influencing poor response to type 2 targeted therapies in severe asthma: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundA significant breakthrough has been made in treating severe asthma, with the recognition of various asthma phenotypes and an updated management guideline. Type 2 targeted therapies, such as benralizumab and omalizumab; have been identified as an effective treatment for severe asthma, improving patient response, lung function tests and asthma symptom control. This study aimed to evaluate factors contributing to poor response to therapy.MethodsA retrospective single-center cohort study of 162 patients with severe asthma who started biologic therapy; their data were retrieved from medical records for further analysis. Poor responders were patients remained clinically and functionally uncontrolled despite even after augmenting all treatment options.ResultsChildhood-onset asthma, bronchiectasis, poor symptom control (ACT below 19), severe airway obstruction (< 60% predicted), and maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use were significantly associated with poor response to omalizumab and benralizumab; p = 0.0.4 and 0.01; 0.003 and 0.01; 0.01 and 0.001, 0.05 and 0.04; 0.006 and 0.02, respectively. However, chronic rhinosinusitis and IgE < 220kIU/L were associated with higher poor response rates to omalizumab (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). At the same time, female patients and those with blood eosinophils level < 500 cells/mm3 had a higher poor response rate to benralizumab (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Ischemic heart disease (IHD), bronchiectasis, and continued use of OCS increased the likelihood of poor response to omalizumab by 21, 7, and 24 times (p = 0.004, 0.008, and 0.004, respectively). In contrast, the female gender, childhood-onset asthma and higher BMI increased the likelihood of poor response to benralizumab by 7, 7 and 2 times more, p = 0.03, 0.02 and 0.05, respectively.ConclusionPoor response to omalizumab treatment was independently associated with ischemic heart disease (IHD), bronchiectasis, and a history of maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use. Conversely, poor response to benralizumab therapy was independently linked to female gender, childhood-onset asthma and higher body mass index (BMI).

Steroid-sparing effect of belimumab: results from a retrospective observational study of real-world data

ObjectiveComparison of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in patients with SLE in a US rheumatology network pre- and post-belimumab initiation.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 214140) used data from the Patient-Important...

PCR144 Impact of Oral Corticosteroid Use on Health-Related Quality of Life: Analysis of EQ-5D Data from Navigator

PCR144 Impact of Oral Corticosteroid Use on Health-Related Quality of Life: Analysis of EQ-5D Data from Navigator

Real-World Study of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol on Asthma Control in the US.

Real-world asthma control data among patients initiating fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) are limited. This study assessed rescue medication use and asthma-related exacerbations in patients with asthma before and after initiating single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI using administrative claims data. This retrospective, pre-post cohort study analyzed data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (September 18, 2016‒March 31, 2020). Patients aged ≥18 years that had ≥1 dispensing of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg (first dispensing = index date), ≥12 months of continuous health insurance enrollment prior to (pre-treatment) and following (post-treatment) FF/UMEC/VI initiation and ≥1 diagnosis of asthma during the pre-treatment period or on the index date were included. The primary endpoint was the number of oral corticosteroid (OCS) dispensings per patient per year during pre- and post-treatment periods. Secondary endpoints included asthma-related exacerbation rates and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use. Comparisons between pre- and post-treatment periods were made using risk and rate ratios. Overall, 890 patients with asthma initiating treatment with FF/UMEC/VI were included. The most recently dispensed controller medications prior to FF/UMEC/VI initiation were inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (33.5%) and leukotriene modifiers (33.0%). Patients had a 29% reduction in the number of OCS dispensings (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.71 [0.65, 0.77], P < 0.001) during post-treatment versus pre-treatment, with a 23% reduction in the proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS dispensing post-treatment (risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.77 [0.73, 0.82], P < 0.001). Significant reductions in rates (rate ratio [95% CI]) of asthma-related exacerbations (0.59 [0.52, 0.67], P < 0.001) and SABA use (0.80 [0.74, 0.86], P < 0.001) were also observed. In this real-world study, patients with asthma had significantly lower OCS use, asthma-related exacerbations, and SABA use following treatment initiation with FF/UMEC/VI compared with their pre-treatment period. These results suggest better asthma control following initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in a routine clinical practice setting.

Prevalence, Diagnostic Utility and Associated Characteristics of Bronchodilator Responsiveness.

Rationale: The prevalence and diagnostic utility of bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in a real-life setting is unclear. Objective: To explore this uncertainty in patients aged ⩾12 years with physician-assigned diagnoses of asthma, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or COPD in NOVELTY, a prospective cohort study in primary and secondary care in 18 countries. Methods: The proportion of patients with a positive BDR test in each diagnostic category was calculated using 2005 (ΔFEV1 or ΔFVC ⩾12% and ⩾200 ml) and 2021 (ΔFEV1 or ΔFVC >10% predicted) European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society criteria. Measurements and Main Results: We studied 3,519 patients with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma, 833 with a diagnosis of asthma + COPD, and 2,436 with a diagnosis of COPD. The prevalence of BDR was 19.7% (asthma), 29.6% (asthma + COPD), and 24.7% (COPD) using 2005 criteria and 18.1%, 23.3%, and 18.0%, respectively, using 2021 criteria. Using 2021 criteria in patients diagnosed with asthma, BDR was associated with higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide; lower lung function; higher symptom burden; more frequent hospital admissions; and greater use of triple therapy, oral corticosteroids, or biologics. In patients diagnosed with COPD, BDR (2021) was associated with lower lung function and higher symptom burden. Conclusions: BDR prevalence in patients with chronic airway diseases receiving treatment ranges from 18% to 30%, being modestly lower with the 2021 than with the 2005 European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society criteria, and it is associated with lower lung function and greater symptom burden. These observations question the validity of BDR as a key diagnostic tool for asthma managed in clinical practice or as a standard inclusion criterion for clinical trials of asthma and instead suggest that BDR be considered a treatable trait for chronic airway disease.

Comparison of the General Characteristics of Patients with Severe Asthma Who Switched from Omalizumab to Mepolizumab versus Patients Who Responded to Omalizumab Treatment: A Real-Life Study

Introduction: Severe asthma is characterized by frequent recurrent airway symptoms and exacerbations, and these affect the quality of life. Biological agents can be used in the treatment of patients with severe asthma if the disease cannot be controlled with standard controller treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory data of patients with severe asthma who were switched from omalizumab to mepolizumab and patients with severe asthma who responded to omalizumab. Methods: The clinical characteristics and laboratory data of patients with severe asthma who responded to omalizumab and switched from omalizumab to mepolizumab were compared retrospectively. Results: Evaluation was made of a total of 79 patients, including 64 omalizumab responders and 15 who switched to mepolizumab from omalizumab. After omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment, the annual number of asthma attacks, the use of oral corticosteroid (OCS), the annual number of hospitalizations, and the eosinophil count significantly decreased (omalizumab: p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively; mepolizumab: p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). After omalizumab treatment, the increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (%) and asthma control test (ACT) score were determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). After mepolizumab treatment, the increase in ACT score was significant (p = 0.003). Drug allergy, chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), regular use of OCS, and high baseline eosinophil count (cells/µL) were associated with poor response to omalizumab treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 7.86, p = 0.003; OR = 52.92, p < 0.001; OR = 10.16, p = 0.004; OR = 0.99, p = 0.004, respectively). House dust mite sensitivity and high baseline FEV1 (%) were associated with good response to omalizumab treatment (OR = 0.29, p = 0.041; OR = 1.06, p = 0.03, respectively). The blood eosinophil count had diagnostic value in predicting the nonresponsiveness to omalizumab treatment (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.967, p < 0.001, cut-off: 510). Conclusion: A high pretreatment eosinophil count, concomitant CRSwNP, a history of drug allergy, and regular OCS use may be associated with poor response to omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma. Depending on the treatment response, treatment switching can be applied between biological agents. The results of the current study should be supported by multicenter studies.

The efficacy of citalopram or escitalopram in patients with asthma and major depressive disorder

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder is common in people with asthma. Yet, few studies have evaluated depression treatment in those with asthma. ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between antidepressant use, depressive symptoms, and asthma control, pooled data from 3 randomized trials of either citalopram or escitalopram were assessed. MethodsLinear fixed effects and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted with between-subject covariates including treatment group, (original) study, and demographics. The within-subject effect of visit, and a treatment group–visit (between-within) interaction effect, were also evaluated. Analyses were repeated in a high asthma exacerbation subgroup having at least 3 oral corticosteroid bursts in the previous 12 months. Outcomes included the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D17), the 7-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and oral corticosteroid use (yes or no). ResultsIn the pooled sample (n = 255), the antidepressant treatment group exhibited lower HAM-D17 overall (P ≤ .001) and a lower likelihood for oral corticosteroid use (P ≤ .001) relative to the placebo group. In the high-exacerbation subgroup (n = 96), treatment group participants had lower overall asthma control questionnaire (P = .004) and HAM-D17 scores (P ≤ .001), and a lower likelihood of oral corticosteroid use (P = .003), relative to placebo participants. All treatment group interaction effects were not significant. ConclusionCitalopram or escitalopram exhibited efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and the need for rescue oral corticosteroids in patients with asthma and major depressive disorder. Future work should determine whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective at improving asthma outcomes in those with asthma who are not depressed. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00621946 and NCT01324700 (one study was conducted before ClinicalTrials.gov requirements).

Mepolizumab has clinical benefits including oral corticosteroid sparing irrespective of baseline EGPA characteristics.

The Mepolizumab in Relapsing or Refractory EGPA (MIRRA) trial (GSK ID: 115921/NCT02020889) demonstrated that mepolizumab increased remission time and reduced oral corticosteroid (OCS) use compared with placebo in patients with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). The present analysis investigated the impact of baseline characteristics on clinical outcomes and characterised the OCS-sparing effect of mepolizumab. In a phase 3, randomised controlled trial for patients with EGPA (MIRRA), patients received standard of care plus mepolizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The accrued duration of remission, the proportion of patients in remission at weeks 36 and 48, and the proportion of patients with clinical benefit (remission, OCS or relapse-related) were assessed according to baseline EGPA characteristic subgroups (post hoc). Mepolizumab-related OCS-sparing benefits were also quantified. Accrued duration of remission and the proportion of patients in remission at weeks 36 and 48 were greater with mepolizumab than placebo across the baseline subgroups of refractory disease, immunosuppressant use, EGPA duration, relapse number and OCS use ≤20 mg·day-1. The proportion of patients with clinical benefit was greater with mepolizumab versus placebo (range 76-81% versus 25-39%), irrespective of immunosuppressant use or EGPA duration. Patients treated with mepolizumab versus placebo accrued significantly more weeks on OCS ≤4 mg·day-1 (OR 5.06, 95% CI 2.47-10.38) and had a mean of 1423.1 mg less per-patient OCS exposure over 52 weeks. Mepolizumab treatment provided benefits to patients with EGPA across varying baseline clinical characteristics and can be considered an OCS-sparing treatment in EGPA.

Mogamulizumab for Refractory CD3-CD4+ Lymphocytic-Variant Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

OCS Introduction. Lymphocytic hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is an indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by chronic blood hypereosinophilia and eosinophil-related organ damage secondary to the production of eosinophilopoietic cytokines (including interleukin-5) by clonal T cells, among which CD3-CD4+ T cells are the most frequent subset. Both high exposure to oral corticosteroids (OCS), failure and/or toxicity of OCS-sparing therapies and the risk of progression to AITL (up to 5 - 10% of patients) underscore the unmet need for novel treatments targeting the clonal T-cells (and not only eosinophils). We previously reported that peripheral CD3-CD4+ T cells express C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4). We hypothesized that mogamulizumab, an afucosylated monoclonal antibody targeting CCR4-positive cells through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, could be beneficial for refractory L-HES patients. Methods. We assessed both the expression of CCR4 by clonal CD3-CD4+ T cells in the skin and lymph nodes as well as theability of mogamulizumab to induce ADCC in vitro on sorted CD3-CD4+ T cells from two L-HES patients, using homologous sorted NK cells as effector cells. We then set up a compassionate use program of intravenous mogamulizumab (1.0 mg/kg weekly for the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 from subsequent cycles) for refractory L-HES patients despite treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologics targeting the IL-5 pathway. Complete blood response was defined as complete if the subset of CD3-CD4+ T cells was &amp;lt;0.5% of all lymphocytes, or as partial if the number of CD3-CD4+ T cells decreased by &amp;gt;50% without reaching complete response at the time of the last perfusion. Results. Significant CCR4 expression on tissue CD4+ T cells was evidenced, and NK cells indeed led to the lysis of CD3-CD4+ T-cells coated with mogamulizumab (10 μg/ml). Four patients with refractory L-HES (despite treatment with high-dose OCS, n=4; pegylated interferon alpha 2a; n=3; or mepolizumab, a single patient) and active disease entered the compassionate use program (Table 1). Despite substantial tapering in OCS doses, all cases showed clinical response. Blood responses (either partial or complete, two patients each) and sharp decrease in absolute eosinophil counts (AEC) were reported in all patients ( Figure 1). Both patients with lymph node enlargement rapidly improved. Although prolonged blood and clinical responses have been observed after discontinuation of mogamulizumab, relapses still occurred preceded by an increase in T-cell clone size and absolute eosinophil count (AEC). Rechallenging a relapse with a short course of mogamulizumab resulted in a complete remission for a further 12 months in case #1. In terms of safety, mogamulizumab was discontinued in two patients due to adverse events: one for recurrent infusion-related reactions and one for infectious events. Lymphopenia was reported in 3/4 cases but was preexisting in the 3 cases. Case #4 reported a serious adverse event related to a tumor lysis syndrome leading to the massive release of IL-5 and subsequent rebound of AEC. Hence lower doses of mogamulizumab, transient use of OCS and/or mepolizumab should be considered in patients with very high number of CD3-CD4+ T cells who are about to start mogamulizumab. Discussion. Mogamulizumab represents a new therapeutic option for L-HES patients with severe refractory HES, T-cell clone related symptoms and/or large or rapidly increasing clonal T-cell counts. In patients who achieve complete remission under mogamulizumab, whether fixed repeated (e.g., every 6 months) infusions could be beneficial to prevent relapses and transformation into high-grade lymphoma remains to be investigated. Figure legend. Hematological responses to mogamulizumab in four refractory lymphocytic HES patients. oral corticosteroids; pINF-α: pegylated interferon alpha; MEPO: mepolizumab; MOGA: mogamulizumab.

Trends inprevalence, treatment use, anddisease burden inpatients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis inJapan: Real-world database analysis.

We report the prevalence of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and describe oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and disease burden before and after the mepolizumab approval in 2018 for EGPA in Japan. Two retrospective studies (GSK IDs: 218083 and 218084) used two databases: (1) the JMDC insurer database (Japanese health insurer claims) was used to report annual EGPA prevalence and OCS use in mepolizumab-treated patients and (2) Medical Data Vision database was used to report annual treatment use, OCS dose, relapses, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with EGPA. EGPA prevalence (95% confidence interval) increased from 4.2 (0.1, 23.4) in 2005 to 58.6 (53.2, 64.5) per 1,000,000 in 2020. Median OCS dose (mg/day) decreased from a range of 4.8-7.7 during 2010-2017 to 4.5-4.8 during 2018-2020 (lowest dose in 2020). The proportion of patients with prednisolone-equivalent daily OCS dose >10 mg decreased from 2017 (11.9%) to 2020 (10.3%), while the median dose halved. The proportion of patients with EGPA relapses (64.3% to 41.6%) and hospitalization (27.8% to 23.6%) decreased from 2010 to 2020. EGPA prevalence increased between 2005 and 2020. With the introduction of mepolizumab for EGPA in 2018, real-world OCS use, relapses, and healthcare resource utilization decreased.

Can serum IgE or blood eosinophil count predict postoperative oral corticosteroid response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps?

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterised by inflammatory mucosa and polyp formation in the paranasal sinuses. The study's primary objective was to evaluate the outcomes of postoperative oral corticosteroid (OCS) in treating patients with bilateral CRSwNP. The secondary objective was to determine whether preoperative serum IgE levels (sIgE)and/or blood eosinophil count (BEC) correlate with postoperative outcomes following OCS use. Patients with bilateral CRSwNP (n=236) who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg OCS twice daily or a placebo for 2 weeks. We investigated the treatment effects based on the subjective visual analogue scale (VAS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22), and objective Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES) over 6 months; subgroups were stratified preoperatively as follows: sIgE <150 IU/mL, sIgE&gt;=150 IU/mL, BEC <0.39x10(9) cells/L, and BEC&gt;=0.39x10(9) cells/L. A total of 193 participants completed the study up to the 6-month follow-up; no apparent linear relationship was noted between sIgE and BEC. No significant differences in scores were noted upon assessment of the VAS, SNOT-22, and LKES among the follow-up timepoints in the primary analysis. However, in the primary or subgroup analyses with sIgE or BEC, significant differences in the longitudinal scores of sleep dysfunction were observed at the 1-month follow-up. Postoperative OCS did not significantly affect bilateral CRSwNP outcomes. sIgE levels and BEC may not be surrogate predictive biomarkers to assess the role of postoperative OCS use. OCS may increase the risk of transient sleep disturbance.

Factors Affecting the Ability to Discontinue Oral Corticosteroid Use in Patients with EGPA Treated with Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy

Introduction: Patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and some with severe eosinophilic asthma require continuous long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for disease control. The anti-interleukin-5 agent, mepolizumab, has recently become available for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma and EGPA, with promising results and safety profiles. The proportion of patients with EGPA who discontinued oral steroids was 18% in the MIRRA trial. To compare patients with EGPA who were able to discontinue steroids with mepolizumab with those who could not. Methods: Twenty patients with EGPA treated with mepolizumab were evaluated at Osaka Habikino Medical Center. The OCS dose, asthma control test score, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, peripheral eosinophil count, and spirometric parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: There was a significant reduction in the mean OCS dose from a prednisolone equivalent of 8.88 ± 4.99 mg/day to 3.18 ± 3.47 mg/day (p < 0.001). In this study, 40% of patients discontinued oral steroids. The most common reason for the failure to discontinue steroids in patients was poor asthma control. The percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s significantly improved in patients with EGPA who could discontinue steroids after receiving mepolizumab. Conclusion: In this real-world study, treatment with mepolizumab for EGPA was associated with a significant reduction in OCS use; however, poor asthma control was identified as an inhibiting factor for steroid reduction.

Influence of Long-term Oral Steroid Intake on Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT) in patients taking oral corticosteroids for extended periods, and to aid in managing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with these risk factors.Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed involving 690 patients who visited a tertiary referral hospital and had been using oral corticosteroids for more than six months. Patients' demographics, tonometry results, drug type, dosage, duration, ophthalmic history, and the use of glaucoma eye drops were analyzed to determine the risk factors associated with glaucoma or OHT.Results: In a generalized linear model analysis comparing patients' eyes diagnosed with glaucoma or ocular hypertension to those without such diagnoses, no statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of drug type, age, and duration of oral corticosteroid use. However, the dosage was found to be statistically significant (odds ratio 1.09, p = 0.0294).Conclusions: No difference in the incidence of glaucoma or OHT was found based on the type of oral steroid, age, or duration of use. However, a higher incidence of glaucoma and OHT was observed among patients taking higher doses of oral steroids. Therefore, it is suggested that using lower doses of oral steroids may be more beneficial for managing IOP.

Clinical features, treatments, their impact, and quality of life for Myasthenia Gravis patients in Australia

This survey provides an update on the experience of Myasthenia Gravis (MG) patients in Australia. Items were drawn from the 2011 Australian Survey and a 2019 US survey allowing for comparative discussion of survey findings. Patients were recruited through the Myasthenia Alliance Australia. Following consent, patients completed an online survey using REDCap software. Questions included demographics, clinical features, treatment side-effects and quality of life (QOL) scales. Samples for completion of survey sections ranged from N = 242–280 representing a power level of over 80%. Female and seronegative patients reported a significantly greater symptom load, earlier disease onset, longer time to diagnosis, more MG exacerbations, treatment side-effects, and poorer QOL. For exacerbation management there was a higher rate of oral corticosteroid use (66%), a lower use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg, 47%) and particularly, Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE, 4.5%) within this sample. Although steroid induced side-effects were rarer (9–34%), a comparatively high use of corticosteroids was reported for current and overall treatments including those for MG crises (52–83%). Common treatment side-effects reported by 57–85% of patients, included fatigue, weight gain, a decrease in the ability to fight infections, gastrointestinal symptoms, and muscle weakness. The impact of MG on daily activities and QOL was considerable, but those who had a thymectomy reported better QOL. The survey identified areas for potential practice improvement in MG treatments (corticosteroids, IVIg, TPE), particularly for exacerbation management, and review is recommended. Further research on gender and antibody status differentials regarding clinical features is required.

Tobacco Exposure and Efficacy of Biologic Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma: A Nationwide Study From the Danish Severe Asthma Register

Randomized trials of biologics in severe, uncontrolled asthma have excluded patients with a cumulative tobacco exposure of more than 10 pack-years. Therefore, our knowledge of the impact of smoking exposure on the clinical effects of biologics in severe asthma remains incomplete. However, because many patients with asthma are current or former smokers, investigating the potential impacts of tobacco exposure on the effects of biologic treatment is clinically important. To investigate the impact of smoking history and tobacco exposure on the effectiveness of biologic therapy in real-life patients with severe asthma. We used data from a complete nationwide cohort of patients with severe asthma who were receiving biologics, the Danish Severe Asthma Register. We divided patients according to smoking history and cumulative tobacco exposure and analyzed data at baseline and after 12 months of biologic treatment. A total of 724 bio-naive patients were identified in the Danish Severe Asthma Register, 398 of whom had never been smokers (55%), 316 were previous smokers (44%), and 10 were current smokers (1%). Within the group of current and former smokers, 37% had 1 to 9 pack-years of tobacco exposure, 26% had 10 to 19 pack-years, and 37% had 20 or more pack-years of tobacco exposure. Patients with tobacco exposure had similar reductions in the number of exacerbations, reductions in maintenance oral corticosteroid use, and improvements in asthma symptoms compared with patients with 0 pack-years. Former smoking history and lifetime tobacco exposure do not have an impact on the efficacy of biologics in patients with severe asthma.

Prevalence and prescribing patterns of oral corticosteroids in the United States, Taiwan, and Denmark, 2009-2018.

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly prescribed for acute, self-limited conditions, despite studies demonstrating toxicity. Studies evaluating longitudinal OCS prescribing in the general population are scarce and do not compare use across countries. This study investigated and compared OCS prescription patterns from 2009 to 2018 in the general populations of the United States, Taiwan, and Denmark. This international population-based longitudinal cohort study used nationwide claims databases (United States: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart; de-identified; Taiwan: National Health Insurance Research Database; and Denmark: National Prescription and Patient Registries/Danish National Patient Registry) to evaluate OCS prescribing. We classified annual OCS duration as short-term (1-29 days), medium-term (30-89 days), or long-term (≥90 days). Longitudinal change in annual prevalence of OCS use and physician prescribing patterns were reported. Among 54,630,437 participants, average annual percentage of overall OCS use was 6.8% in the United States, 17.5% in Taiwan, and 2.2% in Denmark during 2009-2018. Prevalence of OCS prescribing increased at an average annual rate of 0.1%-0.17%, mainly driven by short-term prescribing to healthy adults. One-quarter to one-fifth of OCS prescribing was associated with a diagnosis of respiratory infection. Family practice and internal medicine physicians were among the highest OCS prescribers across countries and durations. Age- and sex-stratified trends mirrored unstratified trends. This study provides real-world evidence of an ongoing steady increase in OCS use in the general populations of the United States, Taiwan, and Denmark. This increase is largely driven by short-term OCS prescribing to healthy adults, a practice previously viewed as safe but recently shown to incur substantial population-level risk.