Use Of Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

Incident dementia in ischaemic stroke patients with early cardiac complications: A propensity-score matched cohort study.

The risk of dementia in patients with stroke-heart syndrome (SHS) remains unexplored. Retrospective analysis using the TriNetX network, including patients with ischaemic stroke from 2010 to 2020. These patients were categorised into two groups: those with SHS (heart failure, myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy within 30 days post-stroke) and those without SHS. The primary outcome was the 1-year risk of dementia (vascular dementia, dementia in other disease, unspecified dementia, or Alzheimer's disease). The secondary outcome was the 1-year risk of all-cause death. Cox regression analysis after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes. We included 52,971 patients with SHS (66.6 ± 14.6 years, 42.2% females) and 854,232 patients without SHS (64.7 ± 15.4 years, 48.2% females). Following PSM, 52,970 well-balanced patients were considered in each group. Patients with SHS had a higher risk of incident dementia compared to those without SHS (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.20-1.36). The risk was the highest during the first 31 days of follow-up (HR 1.51, 95%CI 1.31-1.74) and was mainly driven by vascular and mixed forms. The increased risk of dementia in patients with SHS, was independent of oral anticoagulant use, sex and age but it was the highest in those aged <75 years compared to ⩾75 years. SHS is associated with increased risk of dementia. Future studies are needed to develop innovative strategies for preventing complications associated with stroke-heart syndrome and improving the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Anticoagulation Use and Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Core Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the SELECT2 Trial.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) safety and efficacy in patients with large core infarcts receiving oral anticoagulants (OAC) are unknown. In the SELECT2 trial (NCT03876457), 29 of 180 (16%; vitamin K antagonists 15, direct OACs 14) EVT, and 18 of 172 (10%; vitamin K antagonists 3, direct OACs 15) medical management (MM) patients reported OAC use at baseline. EVT was not associated with better clinical outcomes in the OAC group (EVT 6 [4-6] vs MM 5 [4-6], adjusted generalized odds ratio 0.89 [0.53-1.50]), but demonstrated significantly better outcomes in patients without OAC (EVT 4 [3-6] vs MM 5 [4-6], adjusted generalized odds ratio 1.87 [1.45-2.40], p = 0.02). The OAC group had higher comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation (70% vs 17%), congestive heart failure (28% vs 10%), and hypertension (87% vs 72%), suggesting increased frailty. However, the results were consistent after adjustment for these comorbidities, and was similar regardless of the type of OACs used. Whereas any hemorrhage rates were higher in the OAC group receiving EVT (86% in OAC vs 70% in no OAC), no parenchymal hemorrhage or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were observed with OAC use in both the EVT and MM arms. Although we did not find evidence that the effect was due to excess hemorrhage or confounded by underlying cardiac disease or older age, OAC use alone should not exclude patients from receiving EVT. Baseline comorbidities and ischemic injury extent should be considered while making individualized treatment decisions. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:887-894.

Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives.

Thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation are common among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and these conditions typically require anticoagulation. Traditionally, vitamin K antagonists were used for management, but the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased in KTRs. In the general population, DOACs are recommended over warfarin, but the applicability of these recommendations to KTRs is unclear because of risk-benefit concerns. There is some hesitancy to use DOACs in KTRs because of their dependence on renal clearance for elimination, potential drug-drug interactions, and limited data. To date, studies of DOACs in KTRs have demonstrated that they are efficient in thromboembolic events, major bleeding is rare, and drug-drug interactions appear rare. However, no guidance yet exists about the use of DOACs, reversal of DOAC action, and the pre- and post-kidney transplant management of DOACs in KTRs, and the evidence base is scarce. Thus, decisions on DOAC use in KTRs are based on expert opinion and the resources and experiences of individual transplant centers. This review summarizes 10 published studies on the use of DOACs in 741 KTRs, evaluating the side effects, efficacy, drug-drug interactions, and perioperative management compared with those of 1320 KTRs using vitamin K antagonists. Although current data are limited, DOACs appear to be relatively safe and effective in KTRs, with some studies suggesting lower bleeding rates and better kidney function than with vitamin K antagonists. However, more research with larger patient groups is needed to draw definitive conclusions.

SAFETY OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 80 YEARS AND OLDER: CLINICAL RISK FACTORS

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use is complicated by bleeding, especially in the geriatric population. Most studies focus on predicting major bleeding, while clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) is no less important for practice. АIM: of the study was to evaluate the ability of clinical factors to predict the risk of CRNMB while taking DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged 80 years and older. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 367 patients were examined with non-valvular AF aged 80 years and older (median age 84 [82; 88] years) taking DOACs. The main population parameters (gender and age composition of groups, body mass index), risk of ischemic stroke according to the CHA2DS2-VASc scale, risk of bleeding according to the HAS-BLED scale, comorbidity, Charlson comorbidity index, risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases, number of medications taken, objective examination data, vascular wall stiffness, and laboratory test results were assessed. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, significant risk factors for developing CRNMB with all DOACs were: higher frequency of walking (p=0.022), lower heart rate (p=0.08), and history of gastric and duodenal ulcer (GDU) (odds ratio (OR) 5.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.31; 12], p0.001). As a result of multivariate analysis, a model for predicting CRNMB was developed, with age, type of DOAC, liver disease, acute cerebrovascular accident, history of GDU selected as predictors. The resulting model was characterized by 62.6% [95% CI: 57.4; 67.6] predictive accuracy, 66.5% [95% CI: 59.4; 73.1] sensitivity and 58.2% [95% CI: 50.4; 65.7] specificity. CONCLUSION: The study identified specific modifiable, potentially modifiable, and non-modifiable risk factors for the development of CRNMB in patients with AF over 80 years of age taking DOACs. The results of the study can be used to create an electronic system to support medical decision-making, manage risk factors, and improve the quality of life of the population.

Cluster-specific risk factors for suboptimal thromboprophylaxis in contemporary European cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation: the EHRA-PATHS Project

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is essential to optimal thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Owing to bleeding risk concerns, OAC use may be challenging in clinically complex high-risk AF patients. Comorbidities might lead to suboptimal OAC use. We assessed cluster-specific risk factors for non-prescribing OAC in pre-defined AF clusters in contemporary European EHRA-PATHS AF cohort. Methods The EHRA-PATHS AF cohort was constructed using data from the three prospective EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) AF registries - General Pilot, General Long-term, and AF III registry. A two-step cluster analysis was performed. A hierarchical cluster analysis with 18 variables was used to identify the optimal number of clusters, followed by a K-means cluster analysis to determine variable cluster association. Cluster-specific risk factors for non-prescribing OAC were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Of 18.799 patients, 2086 (11.1%) were not prescribed with OAC. Among the three clusters (see Table), OAC non-prescribing was significantly more prevalent in Cluster 1 (younger healthier AF patients) compared with Cluster 2 (Elderly with less comorbidity, mostly non-cardiovascular) or Cluster 3 (Elderly with more comorbidity, mostly cardiovascular), both P&amp;lt;0.001, with no significant difference between Clusters 2 and 3 (P=0.161). Cluster-specific multivariable risk factors for non-prescribing OAC are shown in Table. In all three clusters AF clinical type was significantly associated with OAC non-use. In Cluster 1, OAC non-use was less likely in the presence of CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk factors, while bleeding risk factors were predominant multivariable predictors of OAC non-use among elderly (Clusters 2 and 3). Conclusion Our findings in a large contemporary European cohort suggest that different considerations prevail in treatment decision on OAC use in AF patients in clinical practice, depending on patient’s age and AF clinical type, as well as the presence and type of underlying comorbidities. Our findings could help in formulating targeted interventions to optimize stroke prevention in different subgroups of AF patients.

Oral anticoagulants or antiplatelets for cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Cryptogenic strokes comprise 20 to 30% of ischemic strokes and include a substantial proportion classified as embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, the optimal antithrombotic strategy for cryptogenic stroke remains contentious. Purpose We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants (OAC) versus antiplatelets in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Methods Six electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to Feb 15, 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stroke recurrence and major bleeding rates between OAC and antiplatelets in cryptogenic stroke patients. We included trials adhering to a stringent diagnostic work-up for cryptogenic stroke, defined as cerebral infarction not attributed to definite sources of cardioembolism, large artery atherosclerosis, or small artery disease despite undergoing comprehensive investigations. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke, and the secondary outcome was major bleeding based on International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria. Subgroup analysis was conducted for ESUS patients with an increased risk of cardiac emboli, such as patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial cardiopathy, defined as lead V1 terminal P-wave &amp;gt; 5000 μV × ms in electrocardiogram, serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level &amp;gt; 250 pg/mL, and left atrial diameter (LAE) &amp;gt; 4 cm, or LAE index ≥ 3 cm/m2 on echocardiogram. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence (CI) was used as a measure of the effect estimates for aforementioned outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using a restricted maximum likelihood model given between-study variance is inevitable. Results Our meta-analysis included 9 RCTs with a total of 15,139 patients (OAC = 7,343; antiplatelets = 7,796). ARCADIA, RE-SPECT ESUS, and NAVIGATE ESUS Trial investigated apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively, while warfarin was primarily used as OAC in the remaining six trials. Aspirin was predominantly utilized for antiplatelet therapy. There was no significant difference in recurrent ischemic stroke between OAC and antiplatelets (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.04; I2 = 0%). However, OAC use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.56; I2 = 36%). Subgroup analysis in ESUS patients revealed comparable rates of recurrent ischemic stroke in those with atrial cardiopathy (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.29; I2 = 0%) and PFO (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.07; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that OAC use does not decrease the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared with antiplatelet use but is associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding in patients with cryptogenic stroke.Primary (A) and secondary (B) outcomesSubgroup analysis for recurrent stroke

Comparing the real-world and clinical trial bleeding rates associated with oral anticoagulation treatment for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background The prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) involves the use of oral anticoagulation, commonly in the form of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). However, it comes with an increased risk of bleeding and therefore, counselling patients on their individual risk is important. Although majority of patients initiated on DOAC have been represented within the clinical trials, there are some cohorts which are under-represented in whom clinicians are unable to practice evidence-based medicine. Methods Utilising the pooled clinical trial (CT) data sourced from Medidata Enterprise Data Store, 5 recent open-label industry sponsored AF trials were compared with Real-World data (RWD) was sourced from the HealthVerity Marketplace with the occurrence of bleeding events as the primary outcome of interest. Results A total of 64,421 patients were included in the analysis, with 3207 patients from the clinical DOAC trials and 61,214 patients from the RWD cohort. Overall, the patients from RWD cohort had more co-morbidities, were older (72.2 ± 11.9 vs 65.3 ±10.7 years old, p&amp;lt;0.001), had higher mean CHA2DS2VASc (3.98 ± 1.9 vs 2.87 ± 1.73, p&amp;lt;0.001) and HAD-BLED scores (2.13 ± 1.02 vs 1/04 ± 0.93, p&amp;lt;0.001) when compared to the trial data. When comparing the incidence of first major bleed at 12 months post treatment initiation, rates in the RWD cohort was significantly higher (10.69 vs 18.97 per 100 person-years). The impact of comorbidities such as age, CHA2DS2VASc and HAD-BLED scores were similar in both cohorts, however, there was an under-representation of older, females and more co-morbid patients within the clinical trial cohort. Conclusion DOAC treated patients have higher bleeding incidence rate in the RWD cohort as compared to clinical trials. This can be explained by the older patient age group with more complex medical histories and higher HAS-BLED scores. The under-representation of higher risk patients and lower proportion of females within clinical trials should be addressed to better translate clinical trial data into real world clinical practice.

Cognitive patterns according to mini-mental state examination domains in patients with AF and association with all-cause mortality: a cluster analysis from a contemporary prospective study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with cognitive impairment even in the absence of previous stroke. However, data on specific patterns of cognitive impairment and their association with outcomes are limited. Purpose We aimed to identify different phenotypic groups of AF patients stratified according to specific cognitive domains using cluster analysis and evaluate the association between identified clusters and adverse outcomes. Methods We used data from a prospective observational study on AF patients excluding those with previous clinically overt stroke. We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis based on Ward’s Method using data from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) administered during the enrollment. The MMSE includes 6 distinct cognitive domains. We normalized each domain’s score from 0 to 100 to preserve the ranking and the interpretability of the test. Patients’ clusters were identified by examining the distance between cluster coefficients and by visual inspection of the dendrogram. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Results A total of 872 stroke-free AF patients were included. Three clusters based on MMSE domains were identified: Cluster 1 (n=494, 56.7%); Cluster 2 (n=243, 27.9%) and Cluster 3 (n=135, 15.5%). The clusters greatly differed according to the cognitive domains affected and baseline characteristics (Table). The use of oral anticoagulants did not differ among clusters and it was substantially high (88.6%). Cluster 2 had a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment (37.9% vs 35.6% for Cluster 3 and 1.0% for Cluster 1, p&amp;lt;0.001) with a lower mean MMSE score compared to other clusters. The analysis of MMSE domains showed substantial deficits in the orientation, attention/calculation, and recall domains with peculiar differences among the clusters. Cluster 2 showed the most significant impairment in the copying domain (100%) while Cluster 3 had a higher impairment in attention/calculation and recall domains. After a median follow-up of 629 days, all-cause mortality was 15.9% with a significantly higher prevalence in Cluster 2 (26.9% vs 10.0% and 15.5% for Cluster 1 and Cluster 3 respectively, p&amp;lt;0.001). At the adjusted Cox regression analysis, Cluster 2 was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with Cluster 1 (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.18-2.82) while Cluster 3 was not independently associated with the outcome (Figure). Conclusions In a prospective observational cohort of stroke-free AF patients, we identified three clusters showing different patterns of cognitive impairment, affecting specific MMSE domains and resulting in a different risk of mortality. Our findings highlight the clinical implications of cognitive impairment and stress the need for a more holistic approach to AF patients including a comprehensive cognitive assessment, as well as the need for studies on interventions able to positively affect cognitive impairment.Figure

Anticoagulation status and left atrial appendage occlusion indications in hospitalized cardiology patients with atrial fibrillation: a Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot (HECMOS) sub-study

Abstract Background Proper use of oral anticoagulants is crucial in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAC) may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF and contraindications for long-term anticoagulant treatment. Purpose We aimed to assess the anticoagulation status and LAAC indications in patients with NVAF from HECMOS (Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot) survey. Methods HECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. HECMOS used an electronic platform to collect demographic and clinically relevant information from all patients hospitalized on March 3, 2022, in 55 different cardiology departments. In this substudy, we included patients with known AF without mechanical prosthetic valves and moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis. Patients with poor adherence to anticoagulants, high bleeding risk, previous major bleeding, and previous stroke were considered candidates for LAAC. Results Two hundred fifty-six patients (mean age 76.6±11.7, 148 males) were included in our analysis. Most of them (n=159; 62%) suffered from persistent AF. Mean CHA 2 DS 2 - VASc score was 4.28±1.7, while mean HAS-BLED score was 1.47±0.9. Three out of 3 patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 0 or 1 (female) received improperly anticoagulants. Sixteen out of 18 patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 1 or 2 (female) received anticoagulants. Thirty-three out of 235 patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc &amp;gt; 1 or 2 (for female) did not receive improperly anticoagulants. Among 221 under anticoagulant therapy, 191 (86.4%) received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and 30 (13.6%) received vitamin K antagonists. Relative indications for LAAC were present in 77 patients with NVAF (53 had only one risk factor, while 22 had two and 2 patients had three concurrent risk factors). In detail, 15 reported poor or no adherence to the anticoagulant therapy, 17 patients had a history of major bleeding, 36 had a prior stroke and 35 had a HAS-BLED score ≥3. No LAAC treatment was recorded. Conclusion Αnticoagulation status was nearly optimal in a high thromboembolic risk population of cardiology patients, mainly treated with NOACs. Three out of ten AF patients should be screened for LAAC.Anticoagulation by thrombotic riskPotential LAAC candidates

Risk of death, thromboembolic events, and bleeding in elderly patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Complexity who are not taking oral anticoagulation

Abstract Background Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) often exhibit Clinical Complexity (CC), defined as ≥2 features, i.e. patients aged ≥75 years plus a body mass index (BMI) &amp;lt; 23/kg/m2 and/or bleeding history and/or chronic kidney disease. No data are available about the clinical course of patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and CC who are not taking oral anticoagulation (OAC). Purpose To assess the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and CC who are not taking OAC. Methods Retrospective study with a health care research network (TriNetX). Based on the ICD-10-CM codes entered between 2011-2022 from 85 health care organizations mainly located in the United States, AF patients ≥75 years with CC were categorized into two groups based on the use of OAC during the last year before the study period. The primary outcomes were the one-year risk of death, major cardiovascular events ([MACE]: heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction), and major bleeding (central nervous system, gastrointestinal, internal bleeding, and hypovolemic shock). Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome and catheter ablation. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs following propensity score matching 1:1. Results Overall, we identified 271,402 AF CC patients not on OAC (80.1±6.8 years, 46.5% females) and 87,101 AF CC patients on OAC (79.8±6.5 years, 47.6% females). Before PSM, AF CC patients not on OAC showed no significant differences in cardiovascular and bleeding risk factors but were less treated with pharmacological treatment than AF CC patients on OAC. After PSM, no significant differences were found between the two groups, but AF CC not on OAC were at higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.50-1.57), MACE (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.16), and major bleeding (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.31-1.38), when compared to AF CC on OAC. AF CC patients not on OAC were associated with a higher risk of each component of the primary outcome and with a lower use of catheter ablation procedures (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.43-0.54) (Table 1). The risk of the composite outcomes was the highest in those with all the three CC components. A progressive increase in OAC prescription was observed during the follow-up period, with increasing of NOACs and lower use of warfarin being observed. There was a clear temporal relationship between increasing OAC prescription and incidence of bleeding in CC patients (Figure 1) Conclusions AF CC patients not on OAC have a high risk of all-cause death, thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Over time, increasing NOAC use was associated with more bleeding in CC patients. New antithrombotic approaches aimed at reducing thrombotic risk without increasing bleeding risk are needed in these patients.Figure 1 OAC new prescriptions

Incidence, characteristics, and prognostic impact of cancers in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the GLORIA-AF registry

Abstract Background Cancers and atrial fibrillation (AF) are all aging-related diseases. Coexistence of the two conditions makes management complex due to increased risk of both thromboembolism and bleeding. Purpose The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence and prognostic impact of cancers in patients with AF in the GLORIA-AF registry. Methods GLORIA-AF registry is a prospective multi-centered international multi-centered AF cohort studies. We characterized these patients according to the presence or absence of a cancer diagnosis when enrolled. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major bleeding; the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. Results The prevalence of cancers was 9.7%. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores in cancer patients were higher than in non-cancer patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc 3.5 vs. 3.2, P&amp;lt;0.001; mean HAS-BLED score 1.6 vs. 1.3, P&amp;lt;0.001). Patients with cancers had higher oral anticoagulant use than non-cancer patients (84.4% vs. 81.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001) and were more likely to receive NOACs (58.4% vs. 54.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001). During a mean follow up period of 3 years, AF patients with cancers had significantly higher all-cause mortality (15.0% vs. 8.3%, P&amp;lt;0.001), major bleeding rate (5.3% vs. 3.1%, P&amp;lt;0.001), the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding (20.0% vs. 12.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001), and composite of all-cause mortality, thromboembolism, and major bleeding than non-cancer patients (21.0% vs. 12.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001), but nonsignificant differences in cardiovascular mortality (3.6% vs. 3.1%, P=0.2), any stroke, transient ischemic attack, or non-central nervous system embolism (3.2% vs. 2.7%, P=0.1), and OAC discontinuation (29.0% vs. 28%, P=0.2). Among the cancers, hematological cancer was associated the highest risk of all-cause mortality (HR=3.7, 95%CI 2.69-5.0, P&amp;lt;0.001) while respiratory cancer was associated the highest risk of major bleeding (HR=2.62, 95%CI 1.24-5.5, P=0.011). After multivariable adjustment, cancer was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.30, 95%CI 1.05-1.62, P=0.018), composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding (HR=1.32, 95%CI 1.04-1.68, P=0.022), and composite of all-cause mortality, thromboembolism, and major bleeding (HR=1.29, 95%CI 1.04-1.60, P=0.022), but the risk of major bleeding was nonsignificantly different (HR=1.16, 95%CI 0.71-1.87, P=0.6). Conclusions Cancer is a common comorbidity in patients with AF and is independently associated with increased risk of poor outcomes including all-cause mortality and MACEs. However, cancer did not increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality, major bleeding, and discontinuation of OAC. Cancer in patients with AF should receive appropriate treatments for the cancer itself and appropriate OAC, although strategies may vary between different cancers.Distribution of caners in GLORIA-AFKaplan-Meier curves for the outcomes

Low rates of haemorrhagic stroke, not increased by age, renal/hepatic impairment, concomitant anti-platelet use and high CHA2DS2-VASc scores, in the 4-year follow-up of ETNA-AF-Europe

Abstract Background Balancing the risks of stroke and bleeding is necessary to optimise oral anticoagulation use in clinical practice. Concerns remain over the increased bleeding risk in patients receiving NOACs, and long-term safety data in this population are limited. Purpose To report annualised rates of haemorrhagic stroke in various sub-populations of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with edoxaban during the 4-year follow-up of ETNA-AF-Europe. Methods ETNA-AF-Europe, a post-authorisation, observational study conducted across 776 sites from 10 European countries, assessed the risks and benefits of edoxaban use in patients with AF. Here, we present the annualised event rates of haemorrhagic stroke during the 4-year follow-up, that occurred overall (on-/off-edoxaban) and on-edoxaban, including sub-populations stratified by age, renal impairment, hepatic impairment, chronic concomitant antiplatelet use and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Patient characteristics were collected at baseline and annualised event rates were reported for outcomes. Results A total of 13,164 patients were included in the full analysis set. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. The overall and on-edoxaban annualised haemorrhagic stroke rates were low (number of events, % [95% confidence interval]: 36, 0.1 [0.05;0.11] and 31, 0.1 [0.05;0.10] respectively). The overall haemorrhagic stroke rates remained low in subgroups stratified by age (&amp;lt;65 years: 4, 0.1 [0.00;0.11]; ≥65–75 years: 13, 0.1 [0.04;0.13]; ≥75 years: 19, 0.1 [0.05;0.12]), renal impairment (yes: 23, 0.1 [0.05;0.13]; no: 12, 0.1 [0.03;0.11]), hepatic impairment (yes: 0, 0.0 [0.00;0.00]; no: 35, 0.1 [0.06;0.11]), concomitant antiplatelet use (yes: 2, 0.1 [0.00;0.16]; no: 34, 0.1 [0.05;0.11]) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (low [0–1]: 0, 0.0 [0.00;0.00]; moderate [2–4]: 28, 0.1 [0.06;0.12]; high [&amp;gt;4]: 7, 0.1 [0.03;0.18]) (Figure). Likewise, on-edoxaban haemorrhagic stroke rates were low irrespective of age (&amp;lt;65 years: 3, &amp;lt;0.1 [0.00;0.010; ≥65–75 years: 12, 0.1 [0.04;0.13]; ≥75 years: 16, 0.1 [0.04;0.12]); renal impairment (yes: 20, 0.1 [0.05;0.12]; no: 10, 0.1 [0.02;0.10]); hepatic impairment (yes: 0, 0.0 [0.00;0.00]; no: 30, 0.1 [0.05;0.11]); chronic concomitant antiplatelet use (yes: 2, 0.1 [0.00;0.18; no: 29, 0.1[0.05;0.10]) or CHA2DS2-VASc score (low [0–1]: 0, 0.0 [0.00;0.00]; moderate [2–4]: 25, 0.1 [0.05;0.12]; High [&amp;gt;4]: 6, 0.1 [0.02;0.17]) (Figure). Conclusions The overall and on-edoxaban annualised rates of haemorrhagic stroke were low and were not increased by non-modifiable risk factors such as age, renal/hepatic impairment, concomitant antiplatelet use and high CHA2DS2-VASc scores during the 4-year follow-up. The overall annualised rates on-edoxaban in ETNA-AF-Europe registry are quite comparable with incidence rates reported in the literature in age-stratified populations (incidence/100 person-years: 55-64 years: 0.06 [0.04-0.07]; 65-74 years: 0.1 [0.09-0.1]; 75-84 years 0.2 [0.1-0.2]).Baseline Characteristics

Clinical outcomes in &amp;gt;10,000 Asian vs &amp;gt;61,000 Non-Asian race patients with AF randomized to Warfarin vs DOACs: a patient-level meta-analyses from COMBINE AF

Abstract Background Randomized data comparing clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with Asian vs non-Asian races are limited. Methods Using the COMBINE AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation) database (data from RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48), we performed an individual patient-level meta-analysis to investigate and compare clinical outcomes of AF patients with self-defined Asian and non-Asian races adjusted for baseline characteristics. Standard-dose direct oral anticoagulants (SD DOAC) were defined as dabigatran 150mg bid; rivaroxaban 20mg (15mg) QD, apixaban 5 mg (2.5 mg) bid, or edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg) QD. Low-dose DOACs (DOACs [LD]) were defined as dabigatran 110 mg bid or edoxaban 30 mg (15mg) QD. Results There were 10,212 pts of Asian race and 61,471 non-Asian races in the COMBINE AF database. Compared with non-Asians, Asians were on average 3.2 yrs younger, 20 kg lighter, had worse renal function (mean CrCl 64.9 vs. 77.3 mL/min), and higher rates of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (37.2% vs 26.6%), P&amp;lt;0.001 for each. The median value of time in therapeutic range of patients randomized to warfarin was lower in Asians than non-Asians (57.7% vs. 66.2%, P&amp;lt;0.001). In the warfarin arm, Asians had a higher adjusted risk of stroke/systemic embolic events (SEE), major bleeding (MB), ICH, GI bleeding (GIB), and net clinical outcome (NCO: stroke/SEE, MB, or death)(Figure; Upper panel). Compared to warfarin, SD DOACs significantly reduced the risks of stroke/SEE, MB, and NCO to a greater degree in Asians than non-Asians (HR stroke/SEE: Asians 0.65 vs Non-Asians 0.86; HR MB: Asians 0.62 vs Non-Asians 0.91; HR NCO: Asians 0.76 vs non-Asians 0.94; Pint &amp;lt;0.02 for each), while SD DOACs increased GIB only in non-Asians (Asian HR 0.92 [0.69-1.23] vs Non-Asians HR 1.41 [1.25-1.58], Pint 0.009; Figure Lower panel). Conclusions The adjusted risks of stroke/SEE and major bleeding with warfarin were higher in Asians compared to non-Asians. The benefits of DOACs over warfarin in preventing stroke/SEE, MB, and net clinical outcomes were significantly greater in Asians than non-Asians.

The effect of oral anticoagulants on the incidence of dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, with dementia being an increasingly recognised complication of this. Treatment with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy may be protective in developing this complication. Purpose This meta-analysis aims to investigate the validity of this hypothesis, whilst additionally exploring the effect of specific OAC medication subtypes on the incidence of dementia. Methods A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase for relevant studies reporting the efficacy of OAC therapy for the incidence of dementia in patients with AF was conducted from its inception until March 2023. This included observational studies that reported odds ratio, risk ratio and hazard ratio for adult AF patients. Studies including patients with prior OAC use or prior history of dementia were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled hazard ratio and their corresponding 95% confidence interval for all outcomes. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the study design, presence of observational window, and prior history of stroke in patients. Results A total of 13 studies were included in the study. Although the heterogeneity was high in all comparisons, we demonstrated that OAC usage lowered the risk of developing dementia in AF patients when compared to the non-OAC cohort. Looking more specifically at medication subtypes, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K agonists (VKA) were both effective in reducing the likelihood of AF patients developing dementia when compared to non-OAC treatments. Conclusion Our meta-analysis confirms that administration of OAC and its subtypes (VKA and DOAC) are effective pharmacotherapies in managing dementia in patients with AF. These findings have important clinical implications for the management of AF patients and highlight the need for further investigation of the protective effects of OAC therapy on cognitive decline. Future research should explore the long-term effects of OAC therapy on cognitive function in AF patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background/Introduction There are limited randomized controlled trials (RCTs) data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) versus warfarin in patients with left ventricular (LV) thrombus. Current AHA and ESC guidelines recommend oral anti-coagulants (either DOAC or warfarin) for 3 to 6 months without any preference. Purpose We aimed to compare outcomes with DOACs versus warfarin in patients with LV thrombus. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed from inception to 02/01/2024 of the PubMed database. RCTs of adult patients comparing DOAC to warfarin were evaluated for mortality, major bleeding, stroke, and LV thrombus resolution. Meta-analytic Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using DerSimonian-Laird method. Results From 100 studies, four RCTs with 188 subjects (95 DOAC and 93 warfarin) were included with mean age of 53.4 years, 69.5% males, and mean follow up 5.03 months. There was no difference in mortality (OR= 0.67 [95% CI 0.15-3.06]; p=0.60; I2=0%; 3 trials), stroke (OR= 0.46 [95% CI 0.09-2.44]; p=0.37; I2=0%; 4 trials), major bleeding (OR= 0.43 [95% CI 0.12-1.55]; p=0.20; I2=0%; 4 trials), and LV thrombus resolution (OR= 1.33 [95% CI 0.45-3.95]; p=0.61; I2=0%; 2 trials) with use of DOAC compared to warfarin (Figure Panel A to D). Overall, there was no evidence of publication bias using either funnel plot or eggers test (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Conclusions In this meta-analysis of 4 RCTs, there was similar efficacy and safety of DOAC and warfarin in patients with LV thrombus. However, the evidence is limited by small sample size with lesser precision in the estimates. Future large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Optimal anticoagulant strategy for periprocedural management of atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract Background This network meta-analysis was performed to rank the safety and efficacy of periprocedural anticoagulant strategies in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulant regimens in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation up to July 1, 2021. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were thromboembolic and major bleeding events, respectively, and the net clinical benefit was investigated as the primary-outcome composite. Results Seventeen studies were included (n = 6950). The mean age ranged from 59 to 70 years; 74% of patients were men and 55% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Compared with the uninterrupted vitamin-K antagonist strategy, the odds ratios for the composite of primary safety and efficacy outcomes were 0.61 (95%CI: 0.31–1.17) with uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants, 0.63 (95%CI: 0.26–1.54) with interrupted direct oral anticoagulants, and 8.02 (95%CI: 2.35–27.45) with interrupted vitamin-K antagonists. Uninterrupted dabigatran significantly reduced the risk of the composite of primary safety and efficacy outcomes (odds ratio, 0.21; 95%CI, 0.08–0.55). Conclusion Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants are preferred alternatives to uninterrupted vitamin-K antagonists. Interrupted direct oral anticoagulants may be feasible as alternatives. Our results support the use of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants as the optimal periprocedural anticoagulant strategy for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

Peripheral artery disease, antithrombotic treatment and outcomes in European and Asian patients with atrial aibrillation: a report from 2 prospective observational registries

Abstract Background In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy use and the risk of outcomes remains unclear. Objective To analyse the epidemiology of PAD in a large cohort of European and Asian AF patients, and the impact on treatment patterns and risks of adverse outcomes. Methods We analysed AF patients from two large prospective observational registries. We identified patients with PAD as reported by the investigators. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factor associated with the presence of PAD at baseline. OAC prescription and risk of outcomes were analyzed according to the presence of PAD, using adjusted Logistic and Cox regression analyses. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Interaction analyses were also performed according to different subgroups. Results 15,497 patients with AF (mean age 68.9, SD 11.6 years; 38.6% female, 30% from Asia) were included in the analysis. PAD was found in 941 patients (6.1%), with higher prevalence among European individuals compared to Asian (8.1% vs 1.2%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Patients with PAD were older, more likely with permanent AF, more symptomatic and with higher thromboembolic and bleeding risk. On logistic regression analysis, European patients had 6-fold higher odds of presenting with PAD compared with Asians (Figure 1, Panel A). Other comorbidities and increasing age were associated with higher odds of prevalent PAD (Figure 1 Panel A). Conversely, female sex was associated with lower odds of having PAD at baseline. With age modelled as a continuous variable, and odds of PAD at baseline, there was a non-linear relationship, with the odds of PAD increasing almost linearly until 70 years, plateauing afterwards (Figure 1 Panel B). After adjustments, PAD was associated with lower use of OAC (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.85). On Cox regression analysis, PAD was associated with a higher risk of the primary composite outcome (HR 1.28, 95%CI: 1.08-1.52) and all-cause death (HR 1.40, 95%CI: 1.16-1.69). A significant interaction was observed between PAD and age, with greater risks of PAD found in younger patients (&amp;lt;65 years) for the primary outcome (pint=0.014, Figure 2, panel A). Consistent results were observed when we analysed the interaction between PAD and age, modelled as a restricted cubic spline, where the risk of the primary outcome followed a J-curve across age, while patients without PAD showed an approximately linear relationship (pint&amp;lt;0.001, Figure 2, Panel B). Conclusions In patients with AF, PAD is associated with lower use of OAC and higher risk of adverse outcomes, with a greater risk seen in younger patients.Figure 1Figure 2

Dementia in patients with early cardiovascular complications following ischaemic stroke: A neglected complication of the stroke-heart syndrome

Abstract Background Early cardiovascular complications may occur in 20-30% of patients following following ischaemic stroke (stroke-heart-syndrome, SHS). The risk of dementia in patients with SHS remains unexplored. We aimed to quantify the risk of incident dementia in patients with SHS. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis using a global federated health care network (TriNetX). We included patients who were discharged alive post-ischaemic stroke from 2000 to 2022. These individuals were classified into two cohorts based on the incidence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days post-stroke (acute heart failure [HF], acute myocardial infarction [AMI], ventricular fibrillation or flutter [VFF], or Takotsubo disease [TTS]), ie. those with SHS (Group 1) and those with stroke-only (without SHS; Group 2). The primary outcome was the five-year risk of dementia (vascular dementia [F01], dementia in other disease [F02], unspecified dementia [F03], Alzheimer’s disease [G30]). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression analysis after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Results We identified 70,113 patients with SHS (age 67.3±14.0; 42.2% females) and 1,092,540 patients with stroke-only (age 65.2±14.9, 48.1% females). Prior to PSM, patients with SHS were generally older and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular treatments compared to those without SHS. Following PSM, 70,111 well-balanced patients were considered in each group, however, patients with SHS had a higher risk of dementia compared to patients with stroke-only (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.20-1.30). Among the SHS complications, the highest dementia risks were associated with acute HF (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.21-1.36) and AMI (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.17-1.30), with no significant associations were found for TTS, and VFF. The increased risk of dementia in patients with SHS compared to patients with stroke-only was independent of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use, sex, and age (&amp;gt; or &amp;lt; 75 years) [Figure 1]. Conclusion Stroke-heart syndrome is associated with increased risk of dementia. Innovative strategies to identify and to prevent SHS complications would improve long-term prognosis in patients with recent stroke.

Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients?

The outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant use after noncardiac thoracic surgery have not been elucidated. We compared the safety and efficacy of the postoperative use of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin. This retrospective cohort study included patients taking anticoagulants after noncardiac thoracic surgery between 2008 and 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on drug type: Group D (direct oral anticoagulants) and Group W (warfarin). The occurrence of bleeding and thromboembolic events was also assessed. Anticoagulants were administered to 434 postoperative patients. One (0.4%) of the 247 patients in Group D and 3 (1.6%) of the 187 patients in Group W experienced thromboembolic events. Four patients (1.6%) in Group D and 4 (2.1%) patients in Group W experienced bleeding events. All bleeding events in Group D occurred within 1week of oral administration, whereas only 1 case of bleeding occurred after resumption in Group W. The outcomes of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants did not differ from those of patients treated with warfarin. However, major bleeding can occur after the postoperative resumption of direct oral anticoagulant use. Attention should be paid to resuming oral anticoagulants within a few days of non-cardiac thoracic surgery.

Intravenous thrombolysis in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: A survey of NIH StrokeNet sites

BackgroundPatients with suspected ischemic stroke and use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) within 48 h are excluded from thrombolysis. We aimed to determine practice patterns across institutions in the NIH StrokeNet, a network of hospitals to conduct NIH-funded stroke clinical trials, in the United States. MethodsA survey was sent electronically to all NIH StrokeNet regional coordinating centers. The survey questions were geared towards understanding practice patterns with intravenous thrombolysis use in patients on DOACs. We reported proportions and percentages answers to the questions. We compared the likelihood of thrombolysis use in patients with recent DOAC ingestion (never vs. all other responses) across characteristics of survey responder using Chi Square. ResultsA total of 83 site principal investigators completed the survey; 78.3 % would never give thrombolysis to an otherwise eligible patients within 12-24 h from last DOAC ingestion and 54.2 % would never give thrombolysis to an otherwise eligible patient within 24-48 h from last DOAC ingestion. A higher proportion of vascular neurologists would never give thrombolysis in patients with DOAC ingestion within 12-48 h compared to other subspecialties (60.7 % vs. 36.4 %, p = 0.05). Nearly, 80 % would change their practice if a well-designed prospective study demonstrated that the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate is not >5 %. ConclusionsA well-designed prospective study with a set safety threshold is likely to change practice patterns in giving thrombolysis in patients with recent DOAC ingestion, particularly among vascular neurologists who are more likely to never give thrombolysis in this setting.