Use Of Oral Anticoagulants In Patients Research Articles

Anticoagulant Utilization and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for prevention of stroke and embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). These agents have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety. However, their uptake in practice has been variable, and prescribed dosages may be inconsistent with manufacturer recommendations. To evaluate patterns of oral anticoagulant use in patients with NVAF, including determination of patient characteristics associated with the prescribing of warfarin or DOACs and whether prescribed dosages of DOACs were concordant with manufacturer recommendations. This retrospective chart review was conducted from April to September 2017 at Abbotsford Regional Hospital, Abbotsford, British Columbia. Patients at least 18 years of age with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of 1 or higher were included. Patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants, those with reversible atrial fibrillation, and those undergoing renal dialysis were excluded. The dosage of DOACs was categorized as too low, too high, or correct in relation to manufacturer recommendations for the Canadian product. A total of 120 patients were included. At discharge, 83 (69%) of the patients had a prescription for DOAC, 25 (21%) had a prescription for warfarin, and 12 (10%) had no prescription for an oral anticoagulant. There were no statistically significant differences between the warfarin and DOAC groups with respect to patient characteristics. Among the 56 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was indicated, 7 (13%) received a dose that was too low. Among the 23 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was not indicated, 4 (17%) received a dose that was too high. At the study hospital, most patients with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of at least 1 had a discharge prescription for DOAC. Patient characteristics appeared to be similar between the warfarin and DOAC groups. For a notable proportion of patients who received a DOAC, the dosage was incorrect. Appropriate prescribing of oral anticoagulants could be further improved by education for prescribers and involvement of hospital pharmacists.

The influence of frailty under direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation

BackgroundFrailty is a prognostic factor in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is no report on the associations between frailty and clinical adverse events in patients with AF taking...

Association of Race/Ethnicity With Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Black and Hispanic patients are less likely than white patients to use oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Little is known about racial/ethnic differences in use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation. To assess racial/ethnic differences in the use of oral anticoagulants, particularly DOACs, in patients with atrial fibrillation. This cohort study used data from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II, a prospective, US-based registry of outpatients with nontransient atrial fibrillation 21 years and older who were followed up from February 2013 to July 2016. Data were analyzed from February 2017 to February 2018. Self-reported race/ethnicity as white, black, or Hispanic. The primary outcome was use of any oral anticoagulant, particularly DOACs. Secondary outcomes included the quality of anticoagulation received and oral anticoagulant discontinuation at 1 year. Of 12 417 patients, 11 100 were white individuals (88.6%), 646 were black individuals (5.2%), and 671 were Hispanic individuals (5.4%) with atrial fibrillation. After adjusting for clinical features, black individuals were less likely to receive any oral anticoagulant than white individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56, 0.99]) and less likely to receive DOACs if an anticoagulant was prescribed (aOR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.83]). After further controlling for socioeconomic factors, oral anticoagulant use was no longer significantly different in black individuals (aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.59-1.04]); among patients using oral anticoagulants, DOAC use remained significantly lower in black individuals (aOR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.95]). There was no significant difference between white and Hispanic groups in use of oral anticoagulants. Among patients receiving warfarin, the median time in therapeutic range was lower in black individuals (57.1% [IQR, 39.9%-72.5%]) and Hispanic individuals (51.7% [interquartile range {IQR}, 39.1%-66.7%]) than white individuals (67.1% [IQR, 51.8%-80.6%]; P < .001). Black and Hispanic individuals treated with DOACs were more likely to receive inappropriate dosing than white individuals (black patients, 61 of 394 [15.5%]; Hispanic patients, 74 of 409 [18.1%]; white patients, 1003 of 7988 [12.6%]; P = .01). One-year persistence on oral anticoagulants was the same across groups. After controlling for clinical and socioeconomic factors, black individuals were less likely than white individuals to receive DOACs for atrial fibrillation, with no difference between white and Hispanic groups. When atrial fibrillation was treated, the quality of anticoagulant use was lower in black and Hispanic individuals. Identifying modifiable causes of these disparities could improve the quality of care in atrial fibrillation.

PO383 The Rates of Oral Anticoagulation Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation – Preliminary Data from Pinnacle-Brazil Registry

PO383 The Rates of Oral Anticoagulation Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation – Preliminary Data from Pinnacle-Brazil Registry

Clinical Pharmacology of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Kidney Disease.

Oral anticoagulants are commonly used drugs in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD to treat atrial fibrillation to reduce stroke and systemic embolism. Some of these drugs are used to treat or prevent deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with CKD who undergo knee and hip replacement surgeries. Warfarin is the only anticoagulant that is approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration in individuals with mechanical heart valves. Each oral anticoagulant affects the coagulation profile in the laboratory uniquely. Warfarin and apixaban are the only anticoagulants that are Food and Drug Administration approved for use in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD. However, other oral anticoagulants are commonly used off label in this patient population. Given the acquired risk of bleeding from uremia, these drugs are known to cause increased bleeding events, hospitalization, and overall morbidity. Each anticoagulant has unique pharmacologic properties of which nephrologists need to be aware to optimally manage patients. In addition, nephrologists are increasingly asked to aid in the management of adverse bleeding events related to oral anticoagulant use in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD. This article summarizes the clinical pharmacology of these drugs and identifies knowledge gaps in the literature related to their use.

A meta-summary of case reports of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use in patients with left ventricular thrombus.

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is commonly seen in patients with extensive anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The standard of care for LV thrombus is anticoagulation with warfarin. However, there has been an increasing trend of case reports using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for the treatment of LV thrombus. This study aimed to perform a meta-summary of the literature to characterise and evaluate the safety and feasibility of using NOAC in patients with LV thrombus. We searched for articles published in four electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar using an appropriate keyword/MeSH term search strategy. Twenty-four studies comprising 36 patients were included in the analysis. Rivaroxaban was used in majority of patients (47.2%), whilst Apixaban and Dabigatran were prescribed in 25.0% and 27.8% of patients respectively. The most commonly associated risk factor found was post-acute myocardial infarction in 15 patients (41.7%). LV thrombus resolution was met by most patients (87.9%), and the median duration of treatment to resolution was 30.0days (IQR = 22.5-47.0). One non-fatal bleeding event (3.0%) and no embolic events were reported. The use of NOAC may have a role in the treatment of LV thrombus in selected patients. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate this treatment strategy.

Interventions and Strategies to Improve Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Anticoagulation therapy is the fundamental approach for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Numerous systematic reviews comparing anticoagulation strategies have been published. We aim to summarize the efficacy and safety evidence of these strategies in AF patients from previously published systematic reviews. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from inception to Feb 24th, 2017, to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that assessed interventions or strategies to improve oral anticoagulant use in AF patients. Thirty-four systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion but only 11 were included in the qualitative analyses, corresponding to 40 unique meta-analyses, as the remaining systematic reviews had overlapping primary studies. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics for stroke prevention in AF patients. Conversely, patient's self-management and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), in general were superior to warfarin for preventing stroke and reducing mortality. All interventions showed comparable risk of major bleeding with warfarin. Findings from this overview support the superiority of NOACs and patient's self-management for preventing stroke in AF patients. However, uncertainties remain on the benefits of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics due to poor quality evidence, and future research is warranted.

Use of oral anticoagulants in German nursing home residents: drug use patterns and predictors for treatment choice.

Information on utilization of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in nursing homes is scarce. This study aimed to (i) describe OAC use in German nursing home residents, (ii) examine factors influencing whether treatment is initiated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and (iii) assess which conditions predict switching to NOAC instead of continuing VKA. Using claims data (2010-2014), we studied a cohort of new nursing home residents aged ≥65 years receiving OAC. Further, OAC use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was examined over the years. Overall, 16 804 patients (median age: 85 years, 75% female, 44% with renal disease) were included. The majority received phenprocoumon as first OAC (58.0%), followed by rivaroxaban (28.1%). Over the study period, NOAC use increased substantially. Initiating NOAC instead of VKA was predicted by a previous stroke (adjusted odds ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.49-2.08). In contrast, renal disease predicted VKA initiation (0.66; 0.59-0.75) as did the presence of a prosthetic heart valve. Switching from VKA to NOAC was predicted by a stroke (2.55; 2.00-3.24), bleeding events and a recent hospitalization. During 2010-2014, the proportion of AF patients with a CHADS2 score ≥2 receiving OAC increased from 27% to 46%. NOACs are increasingly used in German nursing homes, both for initial anticoagulation but also in VKA pre-treated patients. Switching from VKA to NOAC was substantially influenced by aspects such as intended higher effectiveness and safety but probably also practicability due to less blood monitoring.

Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves/Prior Surgical Valve Repair: A Multicenter Clinical Practice Experience.

This is an observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with bioprosthetic valves or prior surgical valve repair in clinical practice. A total of 122 patients (mean age: 74.1 ± 13.2; 54 females) with bioprosthetic heart valve or surgical valve repair and AF treated with NOACs were included in the analysis. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack, Vascular disease) and HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INR [international normalized ratio], Elderly, Drugs or alcohol) score values were 3.6 ± 1.2 and 2.6 ± 1.4, respectively. Of the total study population, 28.6% was taking apixaban 5 mg twice daily (BID), 24.5% apixaban 2.5 mg BID, 18% dabigatran 150 mg BID, 13% dabigatran 110 mg BID, 9.8% rivaroxaban 20 mg daily (QD), and 5.7% rivaroxaban 15 mg QD. Also, 92% of the study population previously had warfarin replaced with NOACs due to lack compliance and labile INR control (time in therapeutic range < 60%). NOAC therapy for AF was started on average 934 ± 567 days after bioprosthetic heart valve implantation or surgical repair for an average duration of 835 ± 203 days. The study population included 24 (19.6%) patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve, 52 (43%) patients with bioprosthetic aortic valve, 41 (33.6%) patients with previous surgical mitral repair, 5 (4%) patients with previous surgical aortic repair, and concomitant use of NOACs. All patients were evaluated for thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism) as well as major bleeding events during the follow-up period. In our study population, we recorded a low mean annual incidence of thromboembolism (0.8%) and major bleeding (1.3%). According to our data, anticoagulation therapy with NOACs seems to be an effective and a safe treatment strategy for nonvalvular AF patients with bioprosthetic valves or prior surgical valve repair.

Renal function and risk of stroke and bleeding in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Comparison between uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin administration

The effect of uninterrupted oral anticoagulant use in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is not fully understood. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of periprocedural uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use compared with those of uninterrupted warfarin use in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF stratified by various renal function groups. A total of 2091 patients were retrospectively included in this study. The study population was divided into 4 groups: creatinine clearance level ≥80 mL/min (n = 1086), 50-79 mL/min (n = 774), 15-49 mL/min (n = 209), and <15 mL/min (n = 22). We investigated periprocedural complications and compared them between uninterrupted DOAC and warfarin groups. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic events among the 4 groups (0.6%, 0.6%, 1.0%, and 0%, respectively; P = .792). However, major bleeding events (0.9%, 1.4%, 4.8%, and 4.5%; P < .001) and minor bleeding events (4.1%, 6.1%, 11.5%, and 13.6%; P < .001) primarily occurred in patients with CKD. The rate of periprocedural complications in the DOAC group was similar to that in the warfarin group for each renal function category. Adverse events did not differ after adjustment using propensity score-matched analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that lower body weight, antiplatelet drug use, initial ablation session, and CKD were independent predictors of adverse events. The periprocedural bleeding risk was increased in patients with CKD. Uninterrupted DOAC and warfarin administration during catheter ablation for AF in patients with CKD is feasible and effective.

Decision Algorithms for Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Practical Guide for Neurologists.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are valid alternative options to vitamin K antagonists due to their limited interactions with drugs or food and the fact that they do not require regular coagulation monitoring. To this regard, recent practice guidelines recommend that DOACs should be considered as first-line anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This review (1) outlines current international guidelines for the management of DOACs to prevent stroke in patients with NVAF, (2) outlines indications for elderly patients as well as specific settings including acute coronary syndromes and intracranial hemorrhage, and (3) offers a practical guide for the use of DOACs in neurological settings.

A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment with oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): an international, cluster-randomised trial

Oral anticoagulation is underused in patients with atrial fibrillation. We assessed the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention, versus usual care, on oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study was a two-arm, prospective, international, cluster-randomised, controlled trial. Patients were included who had atrial fibrillation and an indication for oral anticoagulation. Clusters were randomised (1:1) to receive a quality improvement educational intervention (intervention group) or usual care (control group). Randomisation was carried out centrally, using the eClinicalOS electronic data capture system. The intervention involved education of providers and patients, with regular monitoring and feedback. The primary outcome was the change in the proportion of patients treated with oral anticoagulants from baseline assessment to evaluation at 1 year. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02082548. 2281 patients from five countries (Argentina, n=343; Brazil, n=360; China, n=586; India, n=493; and Romania, n=499) were enrolled from 48 clusters between June 11, 2014, and Nov 13, 2016. Follow-up was at a median of 12·0 months (IQR 11·8-12·2). Oral anticoagulant use increased in the intervention group from 68% (804 of 1184 patients) at baseline to 80% (943 of 1184 patients) at 1 year (difference 12%), whereas in the control group it increased from 64% (703 of 1092 patients) at baseline to 67% (732 of 1092 patients) at 1 year (difference 3%). Absolute difference in the change between groups was 9·1% (95% CI 3·8-14·4); odds ratio of change in the use of oral anticoagulation between groups was 3·28 (95% CI 1·67-6·44; adjusted p value=0·0002). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a reduction in the secondary outcome of stroke in the intervention versus control groups (HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·23-0·99; log-rank p value=0·0434). A multifaceted and multilevel educational intervention, aimed to improve use of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and at risk for stroke, resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of patients treated with oral anticoagulants. Such an intervention has the potential to improve stroke prevention around the world for patients with atrial fibrillation. Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer.

Laboratory Monitoring of Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

ImportanceThe non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are administered in fixed doses without anticoagulant monitoring. Randomized trials show that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective as and safer than dose-adjusted warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses indicate that plasma drug levels or anticoagulant activity of the NOACs predict stroke and bleeding. This review examines the historical basis for anticoagulant monitoring, discusses methods to measure and interpret drug levels, and critically assesses the role of routine laboratory monitoring in the management of NOAC therapy.ObservationsThe predictable anticoagulant response of NOACs has provided the pharmacological basis for their administration in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Although it is possible to accurately measure NOAC drug levels, within-patient variability complicates interpretation of these results. Furthermore, patient characteristics, such as age and renal function, confound the association between NOAC drug levels and clinical outcomes. Information is lacking on the optimal drug level in particular patient groups (eg, elderly, the renally impaired, and those with high bleeding risk), the appropriate dose adjustment to achieve expected levels, and whether routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment will improve clinical outcomes. A benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment over current standard-of-care metrics without such monitoring remains unproven.Conclusions and RelevanceRobust evidence from patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to NOACs or warfarin demonstrates that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective and safe as monitored warfarin, with lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage and reduced mortality. Further research is required to determine whether routine laboratory monitoring might provide a net benefit for patients. Until such data are available, clinicians should continue to prescribe NOACs in fixed doses without routine monitoring.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs traditional anticoagulants in cirrhosis

The coagulopathy of cirrhosis is complex, placing patients at risk for both bleeding and thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have equivalent or superior efficacy and safety as compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs); however, their efficacy and safety in liver cirrhosis has not been studied. To better define this, we evaluated outcomes of patients with cirrhosis prescribed DOACs compared to other anticoagulants at our center. Retrospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation over a 3-year period for thrombosis or prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes of interest were bleeding events and recurrent thrombosis or stroke. During the study period, 27 patients with cirrhosis were prescribed a DOAC and 18 were prescribed VKA or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Both groups had similar total bleeding events (8 DOAC vs 10 other, P=.12). There were significantly less major bleeding episodes in the DOAC group (1 [4%] vs 5 [28%], P=.03). Recurrent thrombosis occurred in one patient receiving a DOAC (4%) and one patient (6%) receiving other anticoagulation (P=1.0). Direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with cirrhosis may be as safe as traditional anticoagulants. Patients with cirrhosis at our center prescribed DOACs had less major bleeding events, while maintaining efficacy at preventing stroke or thrombosis.

Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation-Associated Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective, Multicenter Survey in Northwestern China

Anticoagulation therapy has been recommended by major guidelines to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation-associated ischemic stroke (AFAIS). However, in real-world clinical practice, oral anticoagulants with either vitamin K antagonists or nonvitamin K antagonists are often underused for these patients. Here, we sought to investigate the current status of oral anticoagulant use in patients with AFAIS in northwestern China. We reviewed medical records of consecutive patients with AFAIS discharged from 14 hospitals in northwestern China between January 2012 and May 2015. A total of 1014 cases were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 70.3 ± 10.8 years. Fifty-four percent were female. Among all participants, only 20.0% received anticoagulants (19.4% warfarin and .6% nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants), whereas 57.5% took antiplatelet drugs and 22.5% received neither anticoagulant nor antiplatelet treatment. Anticoagulant use decreased with increasing age and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. The proportions of anticoagulant use at discharge in patients younger than 65 years, 65-74 years, and 75 years or older were 28.5%, 20.7%, and 13.9%, respectively. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 had anticoagulant use rates at discharge of 19.2%, 24.8%, 20.3%, 13.7%, 8.1%, and 8.0%, respectively. In northwestern China, oral anticoagulants are substantially underutilized in patients with AFAIS, especially in patients at higher risk of stroke, suggesting a large treatment gap in the secondary prevention management in patients with AFAIS.

A clustered randomized trial to IMProve treatment with AntiCoagulanTs in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): design and rationale

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common, increasing as the population ages, and a major cause of embolic stroke. While oral anticoagulation (OAC) is highly effective at preventing stroke in patients with AF, it continues to be underused in eligible patients worldwide. The objective of this prospective, cluster randomized controlled trial (IMPACT-AF; ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02082548) is to determine whether a comprehensive customized intervention will increase the rate and persistence of use of OAC in patients with AF. IMPACT-AF will be conducted in approximately 50 centers in 5 low- to middle-income countries. Before randomization, sites within countries will be paired to match in size, practice type and baseline rate of OAC use. Site pairs will be randomized to intervention versus control. In total, 40 to 70 patients with AF and at least 2 CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors will be enrolled at each site using a consecutive enrollment strategy, with the goal of capturing actual practice patterns. We aim for patients with a new diagnosis of AF to comprise at least 30% of the study cohort. Assuming an average baseline OAC use of 60% and a post-intervention use of 70% with a post-control rate of 60%, there will be roughly 94-98% power with 25 clusters per group (intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.02). While this trial focuses on improving treatment use and reducing preventable strokes, we also aim to better understand the reasons for OAC underuse. This will improve the intervention with the goal of creating educational recommendations to improve care for patients with AF.

Suboptimal Use of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: Has the Introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Improved Prescribing Practices?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and the associated risk of stroke are emerging epidemics throughout the world. Suboptimal use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention has been widely reported from observational studies. In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for thromboprophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate current practices of anticoagulation in AF, pharmacologic features and adoption patterns of DOACs, their impacts on proportion of eligible patients with AF who receive oral anticoagulants, persisting challenges and future prospects for optimal anticoagulation. In conducting this review, we considered the results of relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies from real-world practice settings. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus (RIS), Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science were used to source relevant literature. There were no date limitations, while language was limited to English. Selection was limited to articles from peer reviewed journals and related to our topic. Most studies identified in this review indicated suboptimal use of anticoagulants is a persisting challenge despite the availability of DOACs. Underuse of oral anticoagulants is apparent particularly in patients with a high risk of stroke. DOAC adoption trends are quite variable, with slow integration into clinical practice reported in most countries; there has been limited impact to date on prescribing practice. Available data from clinical practice suggest that suboptimal oral anticoagulant use in patients with AF and poor compliance with guidelines still remain commonplace despite transition to a new era of anticoagulation featuring DOACs.

The use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: cohort study data

Aim. To study the rate of prescription of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) depending AF type and the reasons for their not-prescribing according to cohort study data. Material and methods. Patients (n=58) with AF were included into the study. The rate of OAC, including new OAC (NOAC), prescription depending type AF and the reasons for their not-prescribing were studied. Results. The rate of OAC use was 46.5% (warfarin – 22.4%, NOAC – 20.7%), antiplatelet agents use – 60.3%. The reasons for the lack of OAC use were: contraindications (high risk of hemorrhage or bleeding history) – 5.2%; patient’s inability to comply with the recommendations and the valvular AF, which does not allow to recommend NOAC – 25.8%; preference for a doctor based on the patient's refusal or preference – 22.4%. OAC use in patients with persistent AF was recorded significantly more frequently than in paroxysmal AF (85.71% vs 24.32%; χ2=17.9; p<0.0001). Conclusions. A large part of patients with AF remains without OAC prescribing. More active use of NOAC will allow to correct current situation

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Focused Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and predisposes patients to an increased risk of embolic stroke. After nearly 60 years, warfarin is no longer the only effective therapeutic option for patients with AF. Large randomized trials have consistently shown that non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban significantly reduce from the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared with warfarin. We provide a focused review regarding the NOACs and ICH in AF patients by summarizing findings of these large clinical trials, mechanisms of lower ICH, reversal strategies with specific agents, and monitoring strategies.

Abstract 15425: Is Accurate Stroke Risk ssessment with CHADS 2 Necessary in Managing Patients with Atrial Fibrillation? Insights from the Stroke Prevention and Rhythm Interventions in Atrial Fibrillation (SPRINT-AF) Registry

Introduction: Guidelines have advocated use of scoring schemes such as CHADS 2 to assess stroke risk for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recent studies had demonstrated poor agreement between physician-reported and scoring-derived stroke risk. From a national registry, we assessed if rates of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use differ between patients whose stroke risks are concordantly or discordantly categorized. Methods: From December 2012 to July 2013, a cross-sectional analysis of 936 consecutive AF patients was performed, enrolled from 109 primary care and specialty practices in 10 Canadian provinces. Based on clinical judgment, physicians categorized each patient as low, moderate, or high risk for stroke. We categorized patients’ stroke risk based on their CHADS 2 score (low: 0; moderate: 1, high: ≥2). Agreement between physician-reported and CHADS 2 risk was reported by the weighted kappa. We compared rates of OAC use between patients whose stroke risk was concordantly or discordantly categorized by clinicians, relative to those derived from CHADS 2 . Results: Complete data were available in 929 (98.8%) patients for analysis. The weighted kappa between physician-reported and CHADS 2 -derived stroke risk was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.48). Physician-determined stroke risk was concordantly categorized to CHADS 2 scores in 544 (58.6%) patients. Among patients with CHADS 2 ≥2, rates of OAC use were similar between the concordant and discordant groups (91.7% vs. 90.4%, p=0.66). For patients with CHADS 2 =1, rates of OAC use were higher in the concordant group (84.2% vs. 66.4%, p&lt;0.01). For patients with CHADS 2 =0, rates of OAC use were lower in the concordant group (43.5% vs. 80.0%, p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: In this contemporary AF registry, the agreement between physician-reported and CHADS 2 -derived stroke risk was only modest. Despite this, the rate of OAC use in patients at high risk (CHADS 2 ≥2) was similarly high between the concordant and discordant groups. However, rates of OAC use between the 2 groups differed among patients at lower stroke risk. Our results suggest that discrepancy in stroke risk categorization is associated with guideline-discordant OAC use, particularly for patients with lower CHADS 2 scores.