Use Of Non-specific Therapies Research Articles

Specific Antidotes for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Life-Threatening Bleeding

Review presents data on medicines from the new group of cardiovascular drugs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) inhibitors, as antidotes for DOAC when stopping life-threatening bleeding. DOAC therapy is accorded by hemorrhages with lower frequency than therapy by indirect anticoagulants, but really exist. New antidotes for DOACs are idarucizumab, andexanet, ciraparantag. The need in antidotes for DOAC may suddenly appear in spontaneous bleeding, during surgical operation, invasive procedure, due to trauma, in patients with stroke, kidney or liver failure. Data is given on the frequency of the main types of bleeding while taking new oral anticoagulants. Information concerning use of antidotes for DOACs in bleedings as well as use of non-specific therapy are reviewed.

How often do general practitioners use placebos and non-specific interventions? Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys.

BackgroundIn a systematic review and meta-analysis we summarize the available evidence on how frequently general practitioners/family physicians (GPs) use pure placebos (e.g., placebo pills) and non-specific therapies (sometimes referred to as impure placebos; e.g., antibiotics for common cold).MethodsWe searched Medline, PubMed and SCOPUS up to July 2018 to identify cross-sectional quantitative surveys among GPs. Outcomes of primary interest were the percentages of GPs having used any placebo, pure placebos or non-specific therapies at least once in their career, at least once in the last year, at least monthly or at least weekly. Outcomes were described as proportions and pooled with random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsOf 674 publications, 16 studies from 13 countries with a total of 2.981 participating GPs (range 27 to 783) met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of GPs having used any form of placebo at least once in their career ranged from 29% to 97%, in the last year at least once from 46% to 95%, at least monthly from 15% to 89%, and at least weekly from 1% to 75%. The use of non-specific therapies by far outnumbered the use of pure placebo. For example, the proportion of GPs using pure placebos at least monthly varied between 2% and 15% compared to 53% and 89% for non-specific therapies; use at least weekly varied between 1% and 3% for pure placebos and between 16% and 75% for non-specific therapies. Besides eliciting placebos effects, many other reasons related to patient expectations, demands and medical problems were reported as reasons for applying placebo interventions.ConclusionHigh prevalence estimates of placebo use among GPs are mainly driven by the frequent use of non-specific therapies; pure placebos are used rarely. The interpretation of our quantitative findings is complicated by the diversity of definitions and survey methods.

The Use of Placebo and Non-Specific Therapies and Their Relation to Basic Professional Attitudes and the Use of Complementary Therapies among German Physicians – A Cross-Sectional Survey

We aimed to investigate the use of placebos (e.g. saline injections) and non-specific treatments (e.g. vitamin supplements in individuals without a relevant deficiency) among physicians working in private practices in Germany, and how such use is associated with the belief in and the use of complementary and alternative treatments, and basic professional attitudes. A four-page questionnaire was sent to nationwide random samples of general practitioners (GP), internists and orthopaedists working in private practices. The response rate was 46% (935 of 2018). 24% of GPs, 44% of internists and 57% of orthopaedists had neither used pure placebos nor non-specific therapies in the previous 12 months. 11% percent of GPs, 12% of internists and 7% of orthopaedists had exclusively used pure placebos; 30%, 33% and 26%, respectively, had exclusively used non-specific therapies; 35%, 12% and 9% had used both. Age, sex and agreement to the statement that physicians should harness placebo effects were not significantly associated with any pattern of use. Exclusive use of pure placebos was associated with being a GP, being an internist, and having unorthodox professional views. In addition to these three factors, a lower use of CAM therapies and a wish for having more time was associated with the exclusive use of non-specific therapies. Among physicians using both pure placebo and non-specific therapies, heterodox views were also somewhat more pronounced. However, associations were particularly strong for being a GP (Odds ratio 11.6 (95%CI 6.41; 21.3)) and having orthodox views (Odds ratio 0.10 (95%CI 0.06; 0.18)) among this group. In conclusion, the use of placebos and non-specific treatments varies strongly between medical specialties and is associated with basic professional attitudes. The findings support the view that the use of placebos and, in particular, of non-specific therapies is primarily a coping behaviour for difficult and uncertain situations.

The role of prothrombin complex concentrates in reversal of target specific anticoagulants

Over the past several years a new era for patients requiring anticoagulation has arrived. The approval of new target specific oral anticoagulants offers practitioners several advantages over traditionally used vitamin K antagonist agents including predictable pharmacokinetics, rapid onset of action, comparable efficacy and safety, all without the need for routine monitoring. Despite these benefits, hemorrhagic complicates are inevitable with any anticoagulation treatment. One of the major disadvantages of the new oral anticoagulants is lack of specific antidotes or reversal agents for patients with serious bleeding or need for urgent surgery. As use of the new target specific oral anticoagulants continues to increase, practitioners will need to understand both the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties of the agents, as well as, the available literature with use of non-specific therapies to reverse anticoagulation. Four factor prothrombin complex concentrates have been available for several years in Europe, and recently became available in the United States with approval of Kcentra. These products have shown efficacy in reversing anticoagulation from vitamin K antagonists, however their usefulness with the new target specific oral anticoagulants is poorly understood. This article will review the properties of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, as well as the limited literature available on the effectiveness of prothrombin complex concentrates in reversal of their anticoagulant effects. Additional studies are needed to more accurately define the role of prothrombin complex concentrates in patients with life threatening bleeding or who require emergent surgery, as current data is both limited and conflicting.

Reversal of target-specific oral anticoagulants

The target-specific oral anticoagulants represent the first new oral anti-thrombotic therapy in over 50years and have the potential to make therapy easier and hence more accessible to many patients. Like any new therapy, the potential benefits must be weighed against the potential challenges and one of the most concerning aspects of the new target-specific oral anticoagulants is the lack of a proven method to reverse their effect. Unlike the vitamin K antagonist, i.e. warfarin, there is no specific antidote for these medications. This paper will review the limited data on the use of non-specific therapies to reverse anticoagulation for the new agents. We hope to prepare clinicians who are faced with a patient who has serious bleeding or needs emergent surgery while taking dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Recurrent miscarriage: pathophysiology and outcome

This article reviews new concepts in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, presents new outcome data and evaluates new modalities of treatment for unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been considered an option for couples who have structural chromosomal abnormalities or unexplained recurrent miscarriage. The association between thrombophilias and adverse pregnancy outcome is further reviewed. In relation to this, there is increasing support for the use of thromboprophylaxis in improving pregnancy outcome in women with inherited thrombophilias. Nonrandomized studies have shown that the reduction in insulin levels with metformin in insulin-resistant individuals may reduce miscarriage risk by restoring normal haemostasis and improving the endometrial milieu. With respect to immunological concepts there is now evidence to suggest that, in addition to a suppression of maternal cell-mediated immunity, some elements of the innate immune system are activated in successful pregnancies. With the exception of aspirin and heparin for the prevention of recurrent miscarriage in women with the antiphospholipid syndrome, no other suggested therapies for this heterogeneous group of patients have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. These include thromboprophylaxis for inherited thrombophilias and use of insulin sensitizers in women with insulin resistance and/or polycystic ovarian syndrome. The role of the innate immune system in pregnancy was recently highlighted, and use of nonspecific therapies to suppress the maternal immune response to pregnancy should be reassessed.

Intracranial complications in otolaryngology.

SINCE the advent of sulfonamides and the antibiotics of the past decade, the decrease in otorhinogenous intracranial complications has been remarkable. Despite this fact, however, reports of such complications are still appearing in the literature with fair regularity. The reasons for the continuation of these occasional complications are varied and speculative. Many authors believe that many otorhinogenous infections still must be treated with adequate surgical drainage in addition to sulfonamides or antibiotics to safeguard against intracranial complications. Maxwell¹stated that common causes for failure in the treatment of the original infection are (1) starting the use of specific drugs too late; (2) inadequate therapy, either by too small amounts of chemotherapeutic agents or by timid and intermittent administration of these agents, and (3) use of nonspecific therapy, i. e., treating an infection with a nonspecific agent, emphasizing the need for routine cultures. <h3>RHINOGENOUS COMPLICATIONS</h3> Maxwell¹stated that in