Use Of Nasal Packing Research Articles

Patient comfort following FESS and Nasopore® packing, a double blind, prospective, randomized trial

The use of nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is often associated with pain and a feeling of pressure for patients. The aim of the present work was to investigate a modern wound dressing made of polyurethane (Nasopore®) that makes removal of the nasal packing unnecessary and is focussed on patient comfort. Following bilateral FESS, after randomisation, one side was packed with Nasopore® while the other side was without packing as a control. The following parameters from 47 patients were determined daily in two centres from post-operative day 1 for the duration of the inpatient stay in a double-blinded setting: side-specific post-operative bleeding, nasal breathing and feeling of pressure as well as the general parameters sleep disturbance, headaches and general well-being. Which side patients considered subjectively the better was also recorded. No significant differences were determined between the two sides in terms of the rates of post-operative bleeding and nasal breathing. The feeling of pressure was slightly less on the side packed with Nasopore® on post-operative days 2 and 3. No trend could be observed regarding which side patients described as being subjectively better. There were only slight differences in patient comfort between the Nasopore® side and the control. Because the feeling of pressure in the midface was significantly less and there were no complications, this suggests there is greater patient comfort when using Nasopore® compared to using no nasal packing.

Patient comfort following FESS and Nasopore® packing, a double blind, prospective, randomized trial

Background: The use of nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is often associated with pain and a feeling of pressure for patients. The aim of the present work was to investigate a modern wound dressing made of polyurethane (Nasopore®) that makes removal of the nasal packing unnecessary and is focussed on patient comfort. Methodology: Following bilateral FESS, after randomisation, one side was packed with Nasopore® while the other side was without packing as a control. The following parameters from 47 patients were determined daily in two centres from post-operative day 1 for the duration of the inpatient stay in a double-blinded setting: side-specific post-operative bleeding, nasal breathing and feeling of pressure as well as the general parameters sleep disturbance, headaches and general well-being. Which side patients considered subjectively the better was also recorded. Results: No significant differences were determined between the two sides in terms of the rates of post-operative bleeding and nasal breathing. The feeling of pressure was slightly less on the side packed with Nasopore® on post-operative days 2 and 3. No trend could be observed regarding which side patients described as being subjectively better. Conclusion: There were only slight differences in patient comfort between the Nasopore® side and the control. Because the feeling of pressure in the midface was significantly less and there were no complications, this suggests there is greater patient comfort when using Nasopore® compared to using no nasal packing.

Is nasal packing necessary after septoplasty? A meta‐analysis

Nasal packing is routinely used after septoplasty because it is believed to decrease risk of postoperative bleeding, hematomas, and adhesions. Multiple studies have shown, however, that there are numerous complications associated with nasal packing. The purpose of this work was to perform a meta-analysis on the existing literature to evaluate the role of nasal packing after septoplasty. Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search using EMBASE, OVID, Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, Cochrane Library, and reference list review from 1966 to August 2010 to identify studies assessing nasal packing after septoplasty. All papers were reviewed for study design, results, and were assigned an Oxford level of evidence grade, Detsky score, and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) score. Sixteen papers were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Eleven papers were randomized control trials, 3 were prospective, and 2 were retrospective studies. Nasal packing did not show benefit in reducing postoperative bleeding, hematomas, septal perforations, adhesions, or residual deviated nasal septum. There was, however, an increase in postoperative infections. Two studies using fibrin products as nasal packing showed a decreased bleeding rate. Nasal packing after septoplasty does not show any postoperative benefits. Fibrin products show a possibility of decreasing postoperative bleeding. Routine use of nasal packing after septoplasty is not warranted. This is the first meta-analysis conducted on this topic.

A comparison of the effects of packing or transseptal suture on polysomnographic parameters in septoplasty

Our objective is to examine the effects of using nasal packing or transseptal suture in septoplasty in young patients, specifically on the polysomnographic parameters in the post-operative period. A total of 43 patients who had undergone septoplasty surgery after a diagnosis of septum deviation were included in the study. Packing was inserted in 23 patients, and transseptal suture was performed in the other 20 patients. A polysomnography test was performed on the patients on the first day after surgery and during the post-operative period. A post-operative increase was found in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) within both the packing and suture groups. The AHI increase in the packing group was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the post-operative period, the fall in average oxygen desaturation in the packing group was significantly higher compared to suture group (p < 0.001). In addition, the arousal index was significantly higher in the packing group (p < 0.05). The use of nasal packing in young patients after septoplasty surgery reduced the quality of life after surgery and had negative effects on respiration during sleep. The finding that nasal packing caused obstructive sleep apnea syndrome even in young patients leads us to hypothesise that the effect of the packing on comorbid patients' respiratory function during sleep would be even more severe.

Treatment of epistaxis without the use of nasal packing, a patient study

We questioned how many patients with epistaxis can be treated by cautery without the use of nasal packing, as cautery is more effective and efficient. To investigate this, we performed a retrospective study of a cohort of 418 patients with epistaxis who presented to one ENT consultant at the ENT department of Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (the Netherlands) between 1997 and 2007. Main outcomes were the treatment modality (cautery and/or nasal packing), recurrence of epistaxis and need for hospitalization. In 98% of all patients the bleeding site could be found and treated by cautery. The incidence of recurrent bleeding was 6%. Two percent of all patients had to be admitted to the hospital. This is considerably lower compared with recurrence rates and hospitalization after treatment by nasal packing known from the literature. Therefore we concluded that nearly all patients can be effectively treated by cautery with a low recurrence rate. In addition, this method of treatment is very cost effective. Because cautery requires skill and appropriate facilities, we recommend special attention for this in ENT training programs.

Perioperative Schmerzen und Ängste bei endoskopischen Nasennebenhöhleneingriffen mit konventioneller Nasentamponade*

Aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative level of pain and anxiety for endoscopic sinus surgery, and to compare 3 different types of nasal packing. Prospective, controlled, randomized study comparing different types of nasal packing in regard to perioperative anxiety and pain. Patients suffered from chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps involving all paranasal sinuses. Patients daily evaluated by standardized questionnaires (FPI-R, KASA, STAI) and also visual analog scale for pain on 5 consecutive days before and after endoscopic sinus surgery of all paranasal sinuses. Nasal packings were removed on 2(nd) postoperative day. A total of 73 patients (polyvinyl acetate packing N = 14, glove packing N = 37, glove packing with breathing tubes N = 22) completed the study. Female gender, bad preoperative mood and absence of pain were associated with increased preoperative state anxiety based on regression analysis. Also, preoperative gathering of additional information from relatives and friends was correlated with increased preoperative anxiety. Patients had significantly minor preoperative anxiety if they could expect use of nasal packings with breathing tubes. Female patients, who gathered information about the operation from friends or relatives or patient in worse preoperative mood are at risk for increased state anxiety and should be identified prior to rhinosurgical procedures. Use of nasal packing with at least partially preserved nasal breathing is recommended in clinically anxious patients.

The effects on cardiac functions and arterial blood gases of totally occluding nasal packs and nasal packs with airway

To evaluate the effects on cardiac functions and blood arterial gases of totally occluding nasal packs and nasal packs with airway. Prospective, randomized trial. Thirty-nine adults without any comorbidities underwent septoplasty or septorhinoplasty and had nasal packs placed postoperatively; 19 nasal packs with airways and 20 totally occluding nasal packs. Twenty-four-hour Holter monitorization was done pre- and postoperatively. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed both before the operation and after application of nasal packs. Application of packs with airway did not cause any significant changes in blood gas parameters. Packing with totally occluding nasal packs caused a significant decrease in HCO(3) and pCO(2), and insignificant changes in pO(2), O(2) saturation, and pH. No serious arrhythmias were observed in any patient. In both groups, nasal packing resulted in a significant increase in minimum heart rates, a significant decrease in maximum heart rates, and insignificant changes in the mean heart rates. Heart rate variability obtained from 24-hour Holter electrocardiography was analyzed by power spectral analysis. An increase in the high-frequency (HF) domain, a decrease in the low-frequency (LF) domain, and a decrease in the LF/HF ratio were observed after packing in both groups. Nasal pack-induced cardiac complications may occur due to increased vagal stimuli secondary to nasal mucosa compression rather than obstruction-related hypoxia. The use of nasal packs in the elderly patients with cardiopulmonary disease warrants close observation. Nasals packs with airways should be preferred in patients susceptible to hypoxia.

Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty

Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty

Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a trans-septum suturing technique with conventional nasal packing and intranasal splints in the classic septoplasty operation. The study is a prospective, randomized clinical trial. 114 patients underwent septoplasty for septal deviation and ensuing nasal obstruction. These patients were divided into two groups: packing (using intranasal septal splints and antibiotic meshes at the end of the operation) and non-packing (using four separate trans-septum through and through horizontal mattress sutures without any mesh or intranasal splint insertion). Randomization was performed using the four block randomization system. Patients who failed the regular follow-up were excluded, and the two groups were compared for postoperative bleeding, hematoma, perforation and synechiae. Patients were asked to record pain levels using a visual analogue scale. The authors found no significant statistical differences between the two groups in the parameters studied, but significantly higher pain levels were noted in the patients in the packing group. The final results confirmed that patients who underwent septoplasty, intranasal packing and septal splint insertion did not benefit more than those who had trans-septum through and through suturing.

Nasal Packs With X-ray Indicators

Nasal packing is routinely performed by many surgeons following nasal surgery and is also frequently used for the treatment of epistaxis. The use of nasal packing, however, is sometimes associated with serious complications such as aspiration, bowel perforation, obstructive apnea, and hypoxia. This author has also once had the experience of losing a nasal pack during a procedure performed on a mentally impaired patient. If a nasal pack could be easily tracked by x-ray, treatment would be faster and easier. We now use x-ray indicators quilted into our nasal packs, which enable us to find the packs quickly and easily with plain x-ray film.

Lobular capillary haemangioma of the middle turbinate

Lobular capillary haemangioma (LCH) is a benign, vascular lesion of unknown origin. It usually affects skin and mucous membranes of the oral cavity. It rarely occurs in the nose. Microtrauma and hormonal factors are considered in the aetiology. The most frequently seen symptoms of nasal LCH are epistaxis and nasal obstruction. LCH can be pedinculated or wide based. Its size ranges from several millimetres to centimetres. LCH cases secondary to postoperative use of nasal packs have been reported. Here we present an LCH which was located on the middle turbinate and occurred after the usage of nasal packing. It is known that the nose is a rare location for LCH but middle turbinate location has not been described so far in the literature. LCH should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all endonasal masses with bleeding.

Posterior Epistaxis: Identification of Common Bleeding Sites

The objective of this study was to determine common bleeding sites in the nasal cavity of patients with posterior epistaxis and thus review our management protocol. A prospective study was carried out from 1989 to November 2003 in the otolaryngology-head and neck surgery department of a tertiary referral center. This study included patients who presented with posterior epistaxis uncontrolled with standard nasal packing and with no identifiable bleeding point on examination under local anesthesia. All patients underwent a formal examination under general anesthesia by the senior author of this article. Findings at examination were documented along with subsequent management and its outcome. Forty-three patients were included in this study. Bleeding points were identified in 36 cases. Seven patients had septal bleeding points (20%). The rest were located on the lateral nasal wall (81%). Of these, 4 were on the lateral wall of inferior meatus, 7 on the lateral surface of inferior turbinate, 8 on the lateral wall of middle meatus, and 10 on the lateral surface of middle turbinate. All were located posteriorly. We recommend examination under general anesthesia when conservative measures fail to control bleeding, concentrating on the posterior aspect of the lateral nasal wall. In addition, the lateral aspect of the middle and inferior turbinates may contain a groove within which bleeding points may be concealed. The lateral position of most bleeding sites indicates that use of nasal packing can only attempt to indirectly tamponade blood flow and is rarely justified bilaterally. Electrothermocautery can achieve excellent results with minimal complications. Failure to identify a bleeding point, after thorough examination under general anesthesia, does not require further intervention unless complicated by further bleeding.

Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Practices regarding the use of nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery vary widely among surgeons. Recent trends have included the use of various topical, absorbable agents. The purpose of this review is to clarify the rationale for the selection of these products. Although many of these materials have proven to be effective as hemostats, data are conflicting regarding their effect on mucosal healing. Studies in both humans and animals have raised the concern that these agents may be associated with increased scar tissue formation. The exact roles for the various available materials are yet to be established. The primary advantage is that they do not require removal, which may improve patient comfort. Currently, however, it does not appear that the use of topical absorbable packing is a substitute for routine postoperative debridement.

Lésions liées à l’intubation oro- et nasotrachéale et aux techniques alternatives : lèvres, cavités buccale et nasales, pharynx, larynx, trachée, œsophage

Dysphagia of greater than 48h duration is an indication for indirect laryngoscopy and when odynophagia and otalgia occur simultaneously, the possibility of subluxation of the arytenoids demands an urgent ENT assessment. The potential seriousness of laryngeal lesions following intubation obliges us to use the smallest compatible endotracheal tube. The occurrence of pain cervical surgical emphysema and fever suggests a pharyngeal lesion necessitating the suspension of oral feeding and the initiation of antibiotic therapy with anaerobic activity, while awaiting possible surgical intervention. There is no argument to use a tooth-guard for each intubation, but tooth fragility must be researched. The incidence of nasal fossa trauma is reduced with the use of nasal packs impregnated with local anaesthetic containing a vasoconstrictor. This allows the introduction of a small flexible lubricated tube. Laryngeal mask-induced sore throat is more common than the more serious injuries. The classical technique of introducing a laryngeal mask of appropriate size (4 for women, 5 for men) in which the cuff is inflated to a leak pressure of 20 cm H 2O reduces this frequency. The facial mask may cause injuries especially with prolonged use. The incidence of pulmonary aspiration, linked to the action of drugs, raised intra-abdominal pressure; an emergent situation or difficult intubation is decreased with the performance of the Sellick maneuver at intubation, rapid induction and the neutralization of gastric acidity. A meticulous technique of insertion of the, individualized anaesthesia, particular vigilance at the time of decurarisation and position changes and a calm awakening assure its optimal use, unless the Proseal laryngeal mask modifies this point of view.

Fibrin Glue Prevents Complications of Septal Surgery: Findings in a Series of 100 Patients

Septal surgery is a common type of otolaryngology--head and neck surgery, and it is often performed in combination with other procedures. Complications of septal surgery include bleeding, hematoma, infection, abscess formation, and perforation. The most common methods of preventing these complications are the use of nasal packing, septal splints, and quilting sutures as a means of approximating the septal flaps. In this article, we describe our study of an alternate method: fibrin glue. We used fibrin glue as the sole method of approximating flaps on 100 consecutive septal surgery patients. Our results indicate that the use of fibrin glue is effective, rapid, comfortable, and inexpensive.

The axillary flap approach to the frontal recess.

To evaluate the access to the frontal recess using the axillary flap approach by identifying the frontal ostium during endoscopic sinus surgery. Prospective review of 64 consecutive patients (118 sides) undergoing axillary flap exposure of the frontal recess between November 1998 and July 1999. Demographic data, identification of the frontal ostium, findings at surgery, use of nasal packing, the presence of postoperative symptoms, revision surgery, and the endoscopic appearance of the frontal recess were collected. The operative technique is presented. The frontal sinus ostium was identified in 96% of patients (104 of the 118 sides). Eight sides had Kuhn type 3 cells that required removal for clearance of the frontal ostium. Eighty-two percent of sides (97 sides) had endoscopically healed sinuses without symptoms after an average follow-up of 15.4 months. Six sides had middle meatal adhesions requiring division under local anesthetic. One patient has required revision surgery. The axillary flap approach to the frontal recess provides excellent access to the frontal recess and allows clearance of cells in the recess with identification of the frontal ostium in the vast majority of cases.

Endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with cystic fibrosis: an analysis of complications.

The application of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for the management of paranasal sinus disease in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been well described. Due to underlying medical issues such as acquired coagulopathies and advanced pulmonary disease, perioperative morbidity is assumed to be higher in this group. The incidence and type of complications associated with CF patients undergoing ESS has not been previously described. We reviewed 52 consecutive endoscopic procedures in 41 patients with CF performed by a single surgeon over a 34-month period. This review focused on perioperative and postoperative complications. Additional clinical data gathered included estimated blood loss, length of procedure, coagulation laboratory studies, the presence of nasal polyposis, the use of nasal packing, pulmonary function status, and average hospitalization time. A total of six complications were identified--four immediate and two delayed. The perioperative or immediate complications included two cases of epistaxis, one case of periorbital ecchymosis, and one case of pulmonary hemorrhage. Delayed complications include one case of epistaxis and one case of intranasal scarring. In two of these six patients, length of hospitalization was prolonged for management of the associated complications. No study has specifically addressed complications of ESS in the CF patient. Our review demonstrates a complication rate of 11.5%, which compares favorably with the non-CF ESS complication rates of 0-17% reported in the literature. Critical to successful management of these patients is coordinated care delivered by the pediatrician or internist, the pulmonary specialist, the anesthesia team, and the otolaryngologist. In addition to a review of current literature, we discuss the overall management approach adopted at our institution and highlight elements thought to minimize morbidity.

Surgical Pearl: Use of nasal packing with airway after reconstruction of deep nasal defects

Surgical Pearl: Use of nasal packing with airway after reconstruction of deep nasal defects

Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery—is it justified?

Ninety-five patients undergoing routine nasal surgery were enrolled into a randomized, prospective trial to investigate the efficacy and morbidity of nasal packing. The patients were randomized to receive a bismuth iodoform paraffin paste (BIPP) pack, a Telfa pack or no pack. Patients for septal surgery were randomized between the BIPP and Telfa groups only. They were independently randomized to receive or not receive, a silastic nasal splint for the first post-operative week. Post-operative pain levels were analysed using a visual analogue scale. Mean pain scores were increased 50 per cent by the use of nasal packs and pack removal, particularly BIPP which, was a most painful event (p < 0.001). Reactionary haemorrhage occurred in only two patients (2.1 per cent), both of whom had packs in situ. Vestibulitis was unique to the patients with a silastic splint, who were packed with BIPP, occurring in 21 per cent of them. Similarly septal perforation was unique to this group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adhesions between the groups which received packs and those who did not. Routine nasal packing, especially with BIPP, would seen difficult to justify in view of the increased pain levels and increased complications which occur without any demonstrable benefit in the majority of patients. Therefore packing should be reserved for cases where there is concern about persistent haemorrhage. In these cases Telfa would be preferable to BIPP.

A new approach to the management of acute epistaxis

A new approach to the management of acute epistaxis is described using suction with the operating microscope to define the bleeding point prior to the application of hot wire cautery. This technique was shown to be completely successful in stopping haemorrhage in 82% of acute referrals in a prospective series of 33 patients. It resulted in a significant reduction both in the use of nasal packing and in the length of hospital stay compared with a group of controls treated by traditional means. It is proposed that in most cases of acute epistaxis the bleeding point is accessible to cautery and nasal packing should be reserved for a minority of refractory cases. This avoids unnecessary patient discomfort and the complications of prolonged nasal packing and hospitalization.