Use Of Nasal Packing Research Articles

Diabetes Insipidus after Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Macroadenoma Resection: Correlation of Patient and Surgery-Related Risk Factors.

Purpose This article aims to identify patient- and surgery-related factors that could predict the development of postoperative central diabetes insipidus (DI). Methods This is a retrospective case-control study conducted at a single-institution tertiary referral center. Patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for pituitary adenoma between November 2018 and April 2023 were recruited. The main outcome measures collected include age, gender, comorbidities, tumor type, postoperative DI, intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, flow of CSF leak, number of layers required for repair, the use of nasal packing, and hospital length of stay. Results A total of 20 patients developed DI postoperatively. Patients' demographic and comorbidity profile did not correlate with DI development. The encounter of an intraoperative CSF leak was correlated with postop DI (chi-square (1) = 18.35, p < 0.001) with a relative risk (RR) of 2.7 (confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-5.28). The use of nasal packs was also correlated with postop DI (chi-square (1) = 10.17, p = 0.001) with a RR of 1.8 (CI = 1.15-2.87). Defects requiring a two or more layers for reconstruction also correlated with postop DI compared to single layer repairs (chi-square (1) = 12.15, p < 0.001) irrelevant of the materials used. Development of DI postop correlated with an increased hospital length of stay ( t (64) = -3.35, p = 0.001). Conclusion The physician should be careful when evaluating patients with pituitary adenomas in the postoperative period, particularly those with intraoperative CSF leak, nasal packing, and those who underwent multilayer reconstruction of the surgical defect.

Optimizing Postoperative Care in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty: A Review of the Role of Nasal Packing and Alternatives in Complication Management.

Rhinoplasty, a common surgical procedure for nose reshaping, demands meticulous preoperative evaluation and precise execution. When coupled with septoplasty to address medical issues stemming from a deviated nasal septum, these procedures can lead to noteworthy postoperative complications. These encompass early issues like epistaxis and hematoma, as well as long-term challenges such as scarring and aesthetic deformities. Strategies like steroids and tranexamic acid are employed to prevent and manage these complications. A contentious aspect in postoperative care is the use of nasal packing. While some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it due to patient discomfort. This review assesses the pros and cons of postoperative nasal packing following rhinoplasty and septoplasty. A thorough literature review spanning 2000-2023 yielded 30 relevant articles from 62. Discussion reveals that nasal packing offers limited benefits in reducing bleeding, edema and ecchymosis. In conclusion, the decision to employ nasal packing in rhinoplasty and septoplasty should be made carefully, considering patient comfort and surgical context. Evidence suggests that nasal packing may not consistently provide significant advantages and could lead to adverse outcomes. Nasal splints offer similar advantages and may be considered viable alternatives. Surgeons should tailor their approach to individual patient needs, with further research needed to refine postoperative management for these procedures.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Septoplasty and Nasal Packs From Otolaryngologists' Perspectives: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Introduction Septoplasty is a commonly performed surgery by otolaryngologists. This study examines the routine use of non-absorbable nasal packs in the postoperative period in Kuwait. Our aim is to assess the views of otolaryngologists in Kuwait regarding the routine use of non-absorbable nasal packing after septoplasty with or without turbinoplasty. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study, an anonymous survey, consisting of 10 questions, using Google Forms was conducted. It was distributed via WhatsApp and in person hard copies to otolaryngologists - head and neck surgeons in Kuwait. Data were securely stored and analyzed using Stata (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas) software. Results Fifty participants have completed the survey. The majority were routinely performing septoplasty for a symptomatic deviated nasal septum (n= 47, 94%). Out of those, 43% (n = 21) usually use silastic splints to prevent postoperative complications, including bleeding, hematoma formation, and adhesions. The use of quilting sutures for the same purpose was done by 21% (n = 10), and 17% (n = 8) used non-absorbable nasal packs. Only two participants believed that no specific intervention was required. More than half used postoperative nasal packs in the case of intra-operative bleeding (n=26, 52%), while 18% (n = 9) believed that it is only necessary in selected cases with predisposing factors to bleeding. Ninety-two percent (n = 46) thought that pain and discomfort were associated with the use of non-absorbable nasal packs, and 50% (n = 25) believed that it could cause hemodynamic instability. Moreover, 66% (n = 33) agreed that quilting or trans-septal sutures can safely substitute nasal packs following septoplasty. Awareness of recent updates on the complications related to nasal packing varied, with more than half of the otolaryngologists being knowledgeable (n = 29, 58%). Discussion Septoplasty, a common surgical intervention for correcting a misaligned nasal septum, addresses various symptoms, such as nasal obstruction, obstructive sleep apnea, epistaxis, and headache. While the practice of nasal packing for 24-48 hours post-septoplasty is widespread, it remains a topic of controversy. Current literature supports the continued use of nasal packing for patients at high risk of bleeding. However, potential drawbacks, including increased pain, headache, and prolonged hospital stay, raise concerns about its overall benefits. An alternative approach, utilizing quilting sutures without nasal packs, has shown promising results in comparative studies, demonstrating less pain and minimal bleeding. Additionally, trans-septal sutures emerge as a safe alternative, minimizing dead space and reducing post-operative complications. Conclusion It appears that otolaryngologists in Kuwait have diverse opinions with regard to nasal packing following septoplasty. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for this common procedure.

Multi-layered repair of high-flow CSF fistulae following endoscopic skull base surgery without nasal packing or lumbar drains: technical refinements to optimise outcome.

Post-operative CSF leak remains a significant problem following endoscopic skull base surgery, particularly when there is a high-flow intra-operative CSF leak. Most skull base repair techniques are accompanied by the insertion of a lumbar drain and/or the use of nasal packing which have significant shortcomings. Our aim was to review the results of a large series of endoscopic skull base cases where a high-flow intra-operative CSF leak rate was encountered and repaired to assess if modifications in technique could reduce the post-operative CSF leak rate. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of skull base cases performed by a single surgeon over a 10-year period was performed. Data regarding patient demographics, underlying pathology, skull base repair techniques and post-operative complications were analysed. One hundred forty-two cases with high-flow intra-operative CSF leak were included in the study. The most common pathologies were craniopharyngiomas (55/142, 39%), pituitary adenomas (34/142, 24%) and meningiomas (24/142, 17%). The CSF leak rate was 7/36 (19%) when a non-standardised skull base repair technique was used. However, with the adoption of a standardised, multi-layer repair technique, the post-operative CSF leak rate decreased significantly (4/106, 4% vs. 7/36, 19%, p = 0.006). This improvement in the rate of post-operative CSF leak was achieved without nasal packing or lumbar drains. With iterative modifications to a multi-layered closure technique for high-flow intra-operative CSF leaks, it is possible to obtain a very low rate of post-operative CSF leak, without lumbar drains or nasal packing.

Use of nasal tampons for on-field management of nasal bleeds (epistaxis) in sports.

In a medical setting, such as the treatment of post-operative nosebleeds, nasal packing, including the use of nasal packs, nasal plugs or nasal tampons (NTs), is widely used to temporarily control anterior epistaxis. Although some literature has documented the use of NTs as a quick, easy and temporary solution to deal with anterior epistaxis in sports-induced nasal injuries, additional research is needed to appreciate on-field versus off-field efficacy, as well as the efficiency of different brands of NTs and packing materials.

Antibiotic use in nasal bone fracture: a single-center retrospective study.

BackgroundProphylactic antibiotics are used to prevent surgical wound infection; however, proper indications must be followed with careful consideration of the risks and benefits, especially in clean or clean-contaminated wounds. Nasal bone fractures are the most common type of facial bone fracture. The most common method for treating nasal bone fracture is closed reduction, which is performed inside the nasal cavity without an incision. The purpose of this study was to determine the need for antibiotic use in the closed reduction of nasal bone fractures.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using data from the National Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital of the Republic of Korea between 2016 and 2018. The records of patients who underwent closed reduction of nasal bone fracture were reviewed and classified according to sex, age, comorbidities, perioperative antibiotic usage, postoperative complications, nasal packing, anesthesia type, surgeon’s specialty, and operation time.ResultsAmong the 373 patients studied, the antibiotic prescription rate was 67.3%. Just 0.8% of patients were prescribed preoperative antibiotics only, 44.0% were prescribed postoperative antibiotics only, and 22.5% were prescribed both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics. There were no cases that satisfied the definition of “surgical site infection.” Furthermore, 2.1% of infection-related complications (e.g., mucosal swelling, synechia, and anosmia) occurred only in the antibiotic usage group. The use of nasal packing, anesthesia type, and surgeon’s specialty did not show any difference in infection-related complication rates.ConclusionAccording to the study findings, the routine use of perioperative antibiotics is not recommended in uncomplicated nasal bone fracture surgery.

Quilting sutures compared with sponge packing in septolplasty and turbinoplasty

IntroductionThere is a lack of consensus regarding the need for nasal packing after a septoplasty. The use of nasal packing has been proposed to reduce bleeding, synechiae and haematomas. Despite these advantages evidence is scant to support postoperative packing. Furthermore, packing is not an innocuous procedure and can cause complications. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of quilting sutures compared with sponge nasal packing on haemostasis, haematomas and wound healing following septoplasty. Material and methodsSeventy-six patients with nasal septum deviation requiring septoplasty and turbinoplasy with radiofrequency were included. Following surgery, fifty patients were selected randomly for septoplasty with one quilting suture. And twenty-six patients had sponge nasal packing. Haemostatic properties, formation of haematomas, formation of synechiae, the patients’ pain and bleeding on removal of the packing were evaluated. ResultsBoth techniques were equally effective in the control of postoperative bleeding, haematoma and synechiae formation following septoplasty. Sponge packing was associated with significant pain and bleeding on removal. ConclusionThe use of quilting sutures like sponge packing is efficient in controlling bleeding, synechiae and haematomas after septoplasty and turbinoplasty.

746 COVID-19: Changing the Future of Emergency Epistaxis Management

IntroductionAcute epistaxis can be a life-threatening airway emergency. Therefore, the majority of patients in whom conservative management (including cautery) has failed are admitted. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our management has shifted towards a more outpatient centred approach.MethodA single centre retrospective study was undertaken of all epistaxis patients managed by the ENT team at our centre over a five-month period from 1st January to 31st May 2020. The first 10 weeks (Pre-COVID-19) were managed using pre-existing guidelines. The following 10 weeks (COVID-19) were managed using the new COVID-19 standard operating procedures which aimed to minimise inpatient admissions.Results142 patients, with similar demographic data, were seen across the 5-month period. There were significantly more patients aged over 65 presenting in the COVID-19 group (p = 0.04). There was a significantly increased use of local haemostatic agents (Nasopore ® and Surgiflo ®) and decreased use of nasal packing in the COVID-19 group. There were significantly fewer admissions (p < 0.0005) in the COVID-19 group, but similar rates of representation, length of stay and morbidity.ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards the use of local haemostatic agents and outpatient management of epistaxis, which is as safe and effective as previously well-established epistaxis management.

Comparación entre una sutura transfixiante y el taponamiento nasal en la septoplastia y turbinoplastia

IntroductionThere is a lack of consensus regarding the need for nasal packing after a septoplasty. The use of nasal packing has been proposed to reduce bleeding, synechiae and haematomas. Despite these advantages evidence is scant to support postoperative packing. Furthermore, packing is not an innocuous procedure and can cause complications. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of quilting sutures compared with sponge nasal packing on haemostasis, haematomas and wound healing following septoplasty. Material and methodsSeventy-six patients with nasal septum deviation requiring septoplasty and turbinoplasy with radiofrequency were included. Following surgery, fifty patients were selected randomly for septoplasty with one quilting suture. And twenty-six patients had sponge nasal packing. Haemostatic properties, formation of haematomas, formation of synechiae, the patients’ pain and bleeding on removal of the packing were evaluated. ResultsBoth techniques were equally effective in the control of postoperative bleeding, haematoma and synechiae formation following septoplasty. Sponge packing was associated with significant pain and bleeding on removal. ConclusionThe use of quilting sutures like sponge packing is efficient in controlling bleeding, synechiae and haematomas after septoplasty and turbinoplasty.

Comparing the Effect of Septoplasty with and without Nasal Packing on Outcomes and Complications of Surgery

Background and Objective: Septoplasty is one of the most common nasal surgeries. After septoplasty, the nasal pack is routinely used to control bleeding, which can lead to complications such as pain and anxiety. This study aims to compare the effect of septoplasty with and without nasal packing on outcomes and complications of the surgery. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing septoplasty surgery at Besat Hospital, Hamadan, Iran, (during 2018 and 2019) were selected among the patients and randomly allocated in two groups of septoplasty with nasal pack (group A, 25 patients) and septoplasty without nasal pack (group B, 25). Anxiety score, pain score, bleeding rate, hematoma, respiratory status and local infection were compared in both groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS software. Results: The incidence of complications of throat irritation, tearing and headache and facial pain during the first 24 hours after septoplasty in group A was 48, 76 and 64, respectively, and in group B, it was 12, 0 and 0, respectively (P <0.05). Mean score of anxiety and pain in the patients during 24 hours and first week after septoplasty and mean score of nasal obstruction during 24 hours, first week and three months after septoplasty in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P <0.05). Conclusion: The use of nasal packs following septoplasty can cause throat irritation, tearing, increased pain, anxiety and respiratory problems in patients and it seems to have no effects on the duration of bleeding during 24 hours after the surgery.

Patterns in Pain and Opiate Use after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

To evaluate postoperative opiate use and patients' opinions regarding pain management after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Case series with planned data collection. Tertiary referral medical center. We prospectively evaluated postoperative opiate utilization in adults undergoing ESS over a 2-year period at an academic medical facility. Exclusion criteria included use of nasal packing, intracranial or orbital procedures, tumor surgery, and any use of endoscopic drills. All patients underwent bilateral maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, sphenoidotomy, and frontal sinusotomy with or without septoplasty. Patients were discharged with 30 oxycodone-acetaminophen (5-325 mg) and a survey assessing pain and narcotic/nonnarcotic use on postoperative days 0 to 7. A total of 64 patients completed surveys. Mean ± SD narcotic use over the 7-day postoperative period was 7.7 ± 7.6 pills. Patients with high narcotic use (>6 pills total) had no differences in demographic or surgical factors from those with low use (≤6 pills) but did report a higher level of postoperative day 1 pain (4.8 ± 1.1 vs 2.0 ± 1.4, P < .001). Narcotic use declined during this period, with <30% of patients requiring narcotics by postoperative day 3. Our results support reduced opiate prescription and encouragement of nonnarcotic use after ESS without compromising effective pain management.

Evaluation of patient nasal saline irrigation practices following endoscopic sinus surgery.

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is an effective treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Postoperative management strategies after FESS often vary from surgeon to surgeon. Recent data suggests that nasal saline irrigation following FESS is almost universally recommended; however, patient adherence has not been formally evaluated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate postoperative nasal irrigation practices and its effects on short-term outcomes in post-FESS patients. Eighty-two patients were followed prospectively following FESS at a tertiary-academic medical institution for 3 postoperative visits. Patients were surveyed on their irrigation practices (start date, frequency, and volume per irrigation per side), and adherence to prescribed antibiotic and steroid regimens. At each visit, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaires and endoscopic examinations were evaluated by the Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES). Factors evaluated include: patient demographics (age, sex, ethnicity), preoperative Lund-Mackay and SNOT-22 scores, comorbidities, extent of procedure, and use of nasal packing and/or spacers. Adherence to irrigation instructions was 82.9%. Factors significantly associated with compliance with irrigation instructions included younger age (p = 0.0022), prior irrigation (p < 0.0001), revision surgery (p = 0.0014), and non-native English language speaking (p = 0.0095). Patients were more likely to irrigate with larger volumes if they were younger (p = 0.0284), had prior irrigation (p < 0.0001), or had revision surgery (p = 0.0056). Multiple factors are associated with patient compliance with nasal saline irrigation after FESS. Ethnic and cultural considerations, such as language barriers, should also be considered to improve outcomes. Identification of patients who may be noncompliant could potentially benefit from increased preoperative counseling to improve adherence rates.

Treatment disparities in the management of epistaxis in United States emergency departments.

There is limited data on epistaxis presentation and management patterns in U.S. emergency departments (EDs). We aim to characterize patients who present to the ED with epistaxis and identify factors associated with nasal-packing use. Retrospective review of Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) from 2009 to 2011. NEDS was queried for patient visits with a primary diagnosis of epistaxis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 784.7). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were obtained. Predictors of nasal packing were determined by multivariable logistic regression. There were 1,234,267 ED visits for epistaxis. The highest proportion of patients were seen in the winter (37.2%) at nontrauma hospitals (76.9%), and were discharged home (95.5%). Fifteen percent of patients were on long-term anticoagulation, 33% had hypertension, and 0.9% had a coagulopathy. Nasal packing was utilized in 243,268 patients (19.7%). Predictors strongly associated with nasal packing included lower socioeconomic quartile (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.53), hospital located in the geographic South (OR 1.62, CI = 1.12-2.34) and Midwest (OR 1.85, P < 0.0001), and nontrauma hospital (OR 1.56, CI = 1.19-2.05). Other factors included long-term anticoagulation (OR 1.21, CI = 1.10-1.33), winter season (OR 1.20, CI = 1.12-1.23), male gender (OR 1.14, CI = 1.10-1.17), and older age (OR 1.01, CI = 1.01-1.02). Mean ED charge was greater for patients who were packed ($1,473 vs. $1,048, P < 0.0001). Several factors, including lower socioeconomic status, geographic location, and nontrauma hospital designation, predict use of nasal packing. These results raise concerns about potential treatment disparities that may result in increased patient morbidity and costs. 2C. Laryngoscope, 128:356-362, 2018.

Effectiveness of Nasal Packing in Trans-septal Suturing Technique in Septoplasty: A Randomized Comparative Study.

Nasal packing is routinely used after septoplasty, but there are patient factors for which its use needs to be reconsidered. Effectiveness of nasal packing in trans-septal suturing technique in septoplasty. Prospective, comparative study, patients submitted to septoplasty were randomized to receive or not nasal packing postoperatively. Comparison in postoperative status for pain, headache, discomfort in swallowing, epiphora, bleeding, infection and pain on pack removal are assessed. In all the patients trans-septal suturing technique was used. Study group has 60 patients. Two groups were made group A in whom nasal packing done post operatively with merocel, group B in whom nasal packing was not done, in both groups quilting sutures were applied on to the septum. There was pain in nose and headache in all the patients in group A. Other symptoms in group A were epiphora, discomfort in swallowing due to ear discomfort. In addition to these there is pain on removal of packs. Routine use of nasal packing can be avoided instead sutures can be placed over the septum, which benefits in improving pain and symptoms due to pack in the postoperative period.

Nasal Septal Chain Suture: A New Suturing Technique.

As a new technique for suturing the nasal septum, the nasal septal chain suture has been described in this study, and compared with nasal packing and the quilting suture technique in terms of patient comfort after septoplasty. A total of 75 patients were evaluated in 3 groups: Merocel nasal packing group, absorbable quilting suture group, and nonabsorbable nasal septal chain suture group. The symptoms of these patients were evaluated using the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale and rhinomanometry measurements. The NOSE scale values were significantly higher on the postoperative 1st and 3rd days in the nasal packing group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The nasal resistance was significantly lower (P = 0.011) and the nasal airflow significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the suture groups on the postoperative 3rd day. The use of nasal packing was found to shorten the surgery duration significantly (P < 0.001), while there was no difference between the 2 suture groups (P = 1.000). There was significantly severe pain during the removal of the nasal packing when compared to the nasal septal chain suture removal (P < 0.001), but there was no difference in the bleeding (P = 0.460). Overall, nasal septal sutures significantly improve patient comfort during the postoperative period, when compared to nasal packing, with an earlier return to nasal respiration. The nasal septal chain suture that has been described in this study for the first time can be an alternative to nasal packing and the nasal septal suture techniques currently in use, since both absorbable and nonabsorbable materials can be used, it is easy to remove, and there is no pain during the suture removal.

Role of topical tranexamic acid in the management of idiopathic anterior epistaxis in adult patients in the emergency department

The role of topical tranexamic acid in the management of anterior epistaxis in adult patients in the emergency department (ED) is examined. The use of alternative agents for the treatment of epistaxis before the use of nasal packing may be reasonable due to patient discomfort, potential complications, and the need for follow-up with a healthcare provider for packing removal. One such agent is tranexamic acid. Two published studies evaluated the off-label use of topical tranexamic acid for the treatment of epistaxis. The first trial compared the efficacy of a topical gel containing 10% tranexamic acid with a placebo gel containing glycerin for the treatment of epistaxis. The percentage of patients whose bleeding ceased within 30 minutes of the intervention did not significantly differ between the tranexamic acid and placebo groups (p = 0.16). The second trial compared the efficacy of cotton pledgets soaked in the i.v. formulation of tranexamic acid inserted into the bleeding naris with standard nasal packing therapy. Bleeding cessation occurred within 10 minutes in 71% of the tranexamic acid group versus 31.2% of the standard treatment group (odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-3.09; p < 0.001). Additional information is necessary to fully evaluate the role of topical tranexamic acid in treatment algorithms; however, the use of topical tranexamic acid may be beneficial in select populations. Topical tranexamic acid may have a role in the treatment of anterior epistaxis in select ED patients, though additional studies are needed to confirm its role in treatment algorithms.

A comparative study on nasal packing after septoplasty: does it matter in terms of patient comfort, bleeding, and crust or synechia formation?

This study aims to compare pain, bleeding, nasal obstruction, crust and synechia formation, and anesthesia-related morbidity in patients with and without use of nasal packs after septoplasty. A total of 66 patients (32 women, 34 men; mean age 24 years; range 18 to 48 years) who underwent Cottle's septoplasty under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three groups in this prospective cohort. Telfa nasal packs were used in sutures + telfa group (n=22) and Merocell nasal packs in merocel alone group (n=22). No packs were administered in sutures alone group (n=22). Three groups were compared in terms of nasal obstruction, bleeding, pain, crust and synechia formation, as well as the amount of secretion, the need for oropharyngeal airway, the presence of laryngospasm, and effort for nasal breathing after anesthesia. The amount of bleeding was higher with lower degree of nasal obstruction in sutures alone group. Pain and secretion were more remarkable in merocel alone group. After the first week, these differences were unable to be differentiated among the groups. There were no differences between three groups with respect to crust and synechia formation two weeks after septal surgery. Nasal packs can be more useful in patients who suffer from bleeding-related morbidity, while septoplasty applied without nasal packs can be more suitable in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The use of nasal packs in septoplasty should be determined on an individualized basis with respect to the characteristics of each patient.

The Incidence of Post-Septoplasty Bleeding in Patients without Nasal Packing

Different packing methods have been used, such as paraffin gauze, Vaseline gauze, bismuth iodoform paraffin paste, glove fingers and merocel2,5-7. The use of nasal packs after septoplasty is based on the assumption that nasal packing decreases postoperative hemorrhage and septal hematoma formation, supports septal flap apposition and prevents synechiae5,7,8. However, there is no evidence to support these benefits5,7,8. Although, it was found that nasal packing is not innocuous. The morbidities associated with the use of nasal packs include compromised nasal breathing, dryness of mouth, nasal valve narrowing, vestibulitis, crusting, synechiae formation, headache, watering from eyes, ear blockage, throat irritation, difficulty in swallowing, hypoxia, hypoxemia, secondary infection, increased hospital stay, increased blood pressure, toxic shock syndrome and death4,9-12. In addition, severe pain is experienced by patients during pack removal. Although this pain lasts for a short duration, it stays clearly in their mind; some patients said, “it was the most painful experience of their life”8,13,14. Therefore, it has been suggested to minimize the use The Incidence of Post-septoplasty Bleeding in Patients without Nasal Packing

Assessing Patient Reported Outcomes after Septorhinoplasty with and without Nasal Packing Using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory

Introduction : Patient-reported outcomes are an invaluable tool to guide clinical decision-making. Nasal packing is a traumatic, painful event for patients, which could negatively impact patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to evaluate if avoiding postoperative nasal packing in septorhinoplasty and rhinoplasty affects patient-reported outcomes. Methods : All septorhinoplasty and rhinoplastyoperations performed over 5 years were identified. The case notes were reviewed to obtain patient demographics, operative details and any post-operative complications. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) was administered via telephone to measure patient-reported outcomes. Results : 167 patients were identified. In 11 the case notes were unavailable. Of the 156 patients remaining, 126 completed the GBI questionnaire (who had undergone 132 operations). No significant difference in GBI scores was found with or without the use of nasal packing. Conclusion : This study suggests that routine nasal packing can be avoided in the majority of patients, but can be used with confidence that patient-reported outcome is not being compromised.

Nasal Packing After Septoplasty

Bilateral anterior nasal packing is used after septoplasty with the goals of decreasing the risk of postoperative bleeding and adhesions. However, multiple studies caution against the use of nasal packing because of the risk of cardiopulmonary complications. To evaluate the cardiopulmonary risks associated with bilateral anterior nasal packing after septoplasty. A literature review was conducted by 2 independent reviewers using EMBASE, Ovid, Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and reference list review from January 1966 to September 2012 to identify studies assessing nasal packing after septoplasty. The studies were reviewed and assigned an Oxford level of evidence grade, Detsky score, and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) score. Data were extracted for arterial blood gases, oxygen desaturations, oxygen saturations, and adverse outcomes. Pooled estimates for randomized studies were performed when possible. Fourteen studies conducted between 1973 and 2011 were included: 2 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 119 patients and 12 prospective observational studies with a total of 356 patients. Nine studies showed a significant change within 1 of the cardiopulmonary parameters investigated. However, there was no consistency in changes across both observational and randomized studies. Furthermore, pooled estimates for cardiopulmonary parameters were all nonsignificant: standard mean differences of the pooled results of the RCTs were 0.05 (95% CI, -0.31 to 0.41) for arterial pH, 0.08 (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.46) for Paco2, and -0.32 (95% CI, -1.28 to 0.63) for Pao2. There were no major cardiopulmonary complications after nasal packing. Bilateral anterior nasal packing does not seem to cause adverse cardiopulmonary changes after septoplasty.