Use Of Loop Diuretics Research Articles

Canagliflozin reduces oral loop diuretic intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes: a participant level pooled analysis of CREDENCE and CANVAS

Abstract Background Patients with type 2 diabetes often have coexistent heart failure or chronic kidney disease (CKD) that require treatment with loop diuretics; however, the prognostic implications of oral loop diuretic intensification are not well characterized. The sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor canagliflozin reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death and CKD progression among patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk or with concomitant CKD. Purpose To assess the prognostic implications of oral loop diuretic intensification and the treatment effects of canagliflozin versus placebo on loop diuretic use in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods This was a post-hoc participant-level pooled analysis of the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial which enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk or with CKD. Oral loop diuretic intensification was defined as a composite of new loop diuretic initiation (among patients not receiving loop diuretics at baseline) or loop diuretic dose increase (among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline). We assessed the association between the requirement for loop diuretic intensification and the incidence of subsequent all-cause death. The effect of canagliflozin versus placebo on the composite of loop diuretic intensification as well as its components were evaluated. We further examined the effect of canagliflozin on an expanded post hoc composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure or loop diuretic intensification. Results 2,263 (15.6%) of 14,543 patients were treated with loop diuretics at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 1,264 patients (9.4%) required oral loop diuretic intensification, of which 981 (77.6%) patients required initiation of oral loop diuretics and 283 (22.4%) required oral loop diuretic dose increase. Patients requiring oral loop diuretic intensification experienced rates of subsequent mortality that were 3.5-fold higher (5.9[5.4-6.5] per 100 patient-years) than those not requiring oral loop diuretic intensification (1.7[1.6-1.9] per 100 patient-years). Treatment with canagliflozin reduced the need for oral loop diuretic intensification by 41% (HR 0.59; 95%CI: 0.53-0.66) including both new diuretic initiation (HR 0.65; 95%CI: 0.57-0.74) and diuretic dose increase (HR 0.42; 95%CI: 0.33-0.54); Figure 1. Treatment with canagliflozin similarly reduced an expanded composite of worsening heart failure inclusive of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization or diuretic intensification (HR 0.64; 95%CI: 0.58-0.70). Conclusion Among high-risk patients with T2D, new oral loop diuretic intensification was frequent and associated with an increased risk of subsequent mortality. Treatment with canagliflozin significantly reduced the need for loop diuretic intensification.

Association of diuretics with falls and wrist fractures: a Mendelian randomization study

BackgroundThe association between diuretics and falls in older adult has been reported in previous studies, but discrepancy remains between the different types of diuretics. The association of diuretics with the risk of wrist fractures due to diuretics is also unclear. Therefore, in this study, we determined the association of diuretics with falls and wrist fractures by Mendelian randomization.MethodsWe used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to evaluate the effects of the loop diuretics\potassium-sparing diuretics\thiazide diuretics (LDs\PSDs\TDs) on the risk of falls and wrist fracture using the three diuretic-associated genetically-predicted single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as genetic tools. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used as the main evaluation method, with odds ratio (OR) as the evaluation criterion. Additionally, weighted median (WME), MR-Egger, weighted mode (WM) and simple mode (SM) methods were used together for the MR analysis, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the main results.ResultA total of 35 SNPs were included in this study as instrumental variables to replace LDs, PSDs, and TDs, which were 24, 7, and 4. Genetic substitutions for diuretics associated with increased risk of falls were LDs (OR = 1.012043, 95%CI: 1.001607–1.022588, p = 0.022337), PSDs (OR = 1.023794, 95%CI: 1.005605–1.042312, p = 0.010138). Genetically proxied TDs showed no association with falls, but the use of TDs showed a negative correlation with the incidence of wrist fracture (OR = 0.833, 95%CI: 0.767–0.905, p < 0.001). The Cochran Q-test showed no heterogeneity and MR-PRESSO method excluded data pleiotropy.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the use of loop diuretics (LDs) or potassium-sparing diuretics (PSDs) increases the incidence of falls, but there is no causal relationship between thiazide diuretics (TDs) and falls, and TDs may actually reduce the risk of wrist fractures. Clinical use of diuretics necessitates vigilance and appropriate preventive measures to minimize fall-related events.

Association of initial serum sodium change and clinical outcome in patients with diabetes receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy: A multicentre database analysis in Taiwan.

The study aimed to assess the impact of varying degrees of initial serum sodium change among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) starting sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy and their subsequent clinical outcome. We used medical data from a multicentre health care provider in Taiwan and recruited 4400 patients with T2D with baseline normal serum sodium (135-145 mmol/L) and follow-up serum sodium measures available after 3 months of SGLT2i treatment from 1 June 2016 to 31 December 2021. After a median of 2.9 (2.4, 3.4) months of SGLT2i treatment, overall, there was a minimal change in serum sodium levels (from 139.6 ± 2.4 to 139.5 ± 3.7 mmol/L). Most patients (87.8%) maintained normal sodium levels, while 8.6% (n = 378) experienced hyponatraemia (<135 mmol/L) and 3.6% (n = 158) hypernatraemia (>145 mmol/L). Factors independently associated with hyponatraemia included cancer history, chronic lung disease, insulin use, higher glycated haemoglobin, impaired liver function, lower baseline sodium and greater initial decline in kidney function. Conversely, factors linked to hypernatraemia included older age, absence of cancer history, loop diuretic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, higher baseline sodium and a lesser initial decline in kidney function. Over a median of 26.0 months of follow-up, hyponatraemia shortly after starting SGLT2i therapy was associated with significantly increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events [hazard ratio (HR): 2.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.83-3.48], heart failure for hospitalization (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.16-2.37), major adverse renal events (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.73-2.96) and all-cause death (HR: 2.98; 95% CI: 2.17-4.11) after adjusting for clinically relevant factors. Non-linear analysis indicated that a more pronounced initial decline in serum sodium levels correlated steeply with higher risks of these adverse events. While most patients with T2D maintain stable serum sodium homeostasis on SGLT2i therapy, a subset may experience dysnatraemic events with potential worse clinical consequences. Physicians should be vigilant about monitoring sodium levels and considering the associated risks when initiating SGLT2i therapy in patients with risk.

Association between gastroprotective agents and acute kidney injury in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Analysis of a Japanese hospital-based database.

The concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) potentially increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the risk of AKI has not been comprehensively assessed for the concomitant use of NSAIDs with gastroprotective agents such as misoprostol and PPIs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of various gastroprotective agents affects the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs. The data analyzed were obtained from the JMDC hospital-based administrative claims database between April 2014 and August 2022. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were compared with PPIs or misoprostol in patients receiving NSAIDs. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI. The covariates considered were age and sex, admission to intensive care unit, presence of comorbidities based on the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, loop diuretics, other diuretics, and lithium. AKI was identified by changes in serum creatinine. The distribution of AKI was analyzed using the log-rank test, and estimates of the incidence of AKI were compared among the groups using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying variables. Models were adjusted using a doubly robust method that accounts for the inverse probability of treatment weighting at baseline while adjusting for covariates. After screening, 11,688 patients were eligible for inclusion (1729 for H2RAs, 368 for misoprostol, and 9591 for PPIs). AKI occurred in 0.5% of H2RA recipients and 1.1% of PPI recipients; no AKI was observed in the misoprostol group. Compared with H2RAs, the risk of AKI tended to be higher with PPIs (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 0.92-3.63, p = 0.08). Compared with H2RAs, PPIs may increase the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs, although no statistically significant difference was observed. Further research is required to assess the risk trade-off with consideration of both peptic ulcer prevention and the increased risk of AKI in patients concurrently treated with NSAIDs and H2RAs, misoprostol, or PPIs.

Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto's thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.

Recent studies have indicated a potential association of hypertension with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) and other autoimmune diseases, yet the impact of antihypertensive drugs on HT risk is not well understood. We employed a drug-target Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the prolonged impact of 9 classes of antihypertensive medications on HT susceptibility in European and Asian populations. Genetic variants close to or within genes associated with the drug targets and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were utilized to mimic the effects of antihypertensive medications. We focused on drugs linked to a lower risk of coronary artery disease for our main analysis. We gathered genetic data on SBP and HT risk from comprehensive genome-wide association studies available for European and Asian groups. For a supplementary analysis, we used expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) related to drug target genes as proxies. Our analysis revealed that the use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is linked to a reduced risk of HT in both European (OR [95% CI]: 0.96 [0.95 to 0.98] per 1 mmHg decrease in SBP; p = 3.51×10-5) and Asian populations (OR [95% CI]: 0.28 [0.12, 0.66]; p = 3.54×10-3). Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10-5) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10-3) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. These outcomes were confirmed when eQTLs were employed to represent the effects of antihypertensive medications. The study suggests that CCBs and diuretics could potentially reduce the risk of HT in different populations. Additional research is needed to assess the feasibility of repurposing antihypertensive medications for the prevention of HT.

Interleukin-1 blockade with RPH-104 (goflikicept) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): secondary endpoints from an international, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study.

In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), goflikicept, an Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocker, significantly reduced systemic inflammation, measured as the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) at 14 days. We report secondary analyses of biomarkers at 28 days, and cardiac function and clinical endpoints at 1 year. Patients received a single administration of goflikicept 80 mg (n=34), goflikicept 160 mg (n=34), or placebo (n=34). Both doses of goflikicept significantly reduced the AUC for hsCRP at 28 days compared with placebo, without statistically significant differences between the doses. There we no statistically significant differences between groups in the AUC for natriuretic peptides at 28 days. There were no significant differences between placebo, goflikicept 80 mg and 160 mg groups in deaths (2.9%, 2.9% and 0%), hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons (9.1%, 5.9%, and 0%), new-onset or progression of heart failure (9.1%, 5.9%, and 5.9%), and new or increased use of loop diuretics (24.2%, 14.7%, and 17.6%), nor in the number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events, with no treatment-related serious adverse events in any group. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, IL-1 blockade with goflikicept 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated and associated with significant reduction of systemic inflammation. Further adequately powered studies are warranted to determine whether the reduction in systemic inflammation with goflikicept translates into a clinical benefit in patients with STEMI.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, But Not Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Improve Bone Mineral Density: Results From The TUDA study

Abstract Background Both hypertension and osteoporosis are common in older adults and frequently co-exist. The renin angiotensin system has been implicated in osteoclast activation and bone loss. Several studies have previously examined the relationship between various inhibitors of RAS and bone mineral density (BMD). In this study we examined the relationship between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme ACE inhibitors and BMD. Methods Study participants were from a cross-sectional study of adults aged &amp;gt;60 years; Trinity Ulster University Department of Agriculture (TUDA) study. We excluded participants on treatments for osteoporosis. In users and non-users of ARBs and ACE inhibitors, we compared least squares means BMD measured by densitometry at the neck of femur, hip, and lumbar spine adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, timed up and go, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, eGFR, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption, dairy intake, glucocorticoid exposure, thiazide, and loop diuretic use. Results There were 2218 participants (mean age 70.1±6.5 years, 58.3% female, 23.4% (n=519) on ARBs and 30.9% (n=686) on ACE inhibitors). In both univariate and multivariate analysis, ARB users had higher BMD than non-users were associated with higher BMD at the neck of femur (0.860 g/cm² vs. 0.846 g/cm², p=0.016); at the total hip, (0.938 g/cm² vs. 0.919 g/cm², p=0.004); at the lumbar spine, BMD was 1.106 g/cm² vs. 1.074 g/cm² p&amp;lt; 0.001). No significant relationship between ACE inhibitors and BMD at any site was observed after multivariate adjustment. Conclusion ARBs were associated with improved BMD while ACE inhibitors were not. Similar results have been found in other studies but the mechanisms but there is substantial uncertainty regarding the mechanisms underlying these relationships. These findings could be important in the choice of antihypertensive agent in older patients at risk of fracture and further research is warranted.

The Spironolactone Initiation Registry Randomized Interventional Trial in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (SPIRRIT-HFpEF): Rationale and design.

Benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) have not been established. Conventional randomized controlled trials are complex and expensive. The Spironolactone Initiation Registry Randomized Interventional Trial in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (SPIRRIT-HFpEF) is a unique pragmatic registry-based randomized controlled trial. SPIRRIT-HFpEF is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial conducted on platforms in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) and the United States (US) Trial Innovation Network. Patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF are randomized 1:1 to spironolactone (or eplerenone) in addition to usual care, versus usual care alone. The primary outcome is total number of cardiovascular deaths and hospitalizations for heart failure. Outcomes are collected from Swedish administrative complete coverage registries and a US call centre and subsequently adjudicated. Simple eligibility criteria were based on data available in SwedeHF: heart failure as outpatient or at discharge from hospital, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide >300 ng/L (in sinus rhythm) or >750 ng/L (in atrial fibrillation), with pre-specified adjustment for elevated body mass index, and chronic loop diuretic use. Power and sample size assessments were based on an event-driven design allowing enrolment over approximately 6 years, and application of hazard ratios from the TOPCAT trial, Americas subset. The final sample size is expected to be approximately 2400 patients. SPIRRIT-HFpEF will be informative on the effectiveness of generic MRAs in HFpEF and HFmrEF, and on the feasibility of conducting pragmatic and registry-based trials in heart failure and other chronic conditions.

The use of concomitant medications on nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin: A retrospective observational study

BackgroundTeicoplanin (TEIC) is a nephrotoxic agent. However, little is known about the effects of concomitant medications on nephrotoxicity. In this study, we investigated the effects of concomitant drugs on nephrotoxicity. MethodsA retrospective observational case-control study was conducted on patients (≥18 years) who started TEIC at the Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, between January 2013 and April 2023. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity, defined as an increase in serum creatinine levels of ≥50 % or ≥0.5 mg/dL from baseline. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for nephrotoxicity associated with TEIC. In addition, we investigated the relationship between nephrotoxicity and predicted free TEIC concentrations. ResultsOf 305 patients, 43 (14.1 %) developed nephrotoxicity. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that serum albumin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.89, p = 0.02), concomitant use of loop diuretics (OR = 2.22, 95 % CI 1.10–4.59, p = 0.03), antivirals (OR = 3.24, 95 % CI 1.32–7.62, p < 0.01), and vasopressors (OR = 2.57, 95 % CI 1.10–5.78, p = 0.03) were the associated risk factors for nephrotoxicity in patients administered with TEIC. In 216 patients, predicted TEIC concentrations were 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.6–4.9] μg/mL in the nephrotoxicity group versus 3.6 [IQR, 2.5–4.7] μg/mL in the non-nephrotoxicity group, with no significant difference (p = 0.69). ConclusionOur results indicate the importance of modifying the concomitant use of loop diuretics, antivirals, and vasopressors.

Effect of dapagliflozin on readmission and loop diuretics use in patients with acute heart failure: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study

BackgroundThe efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with acute heart failure remains unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of dapagliflozin (DAPA) on loop diuretics use and 90-day readmission in patients with acute heart failure.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with acute heart failure or chronic heart failure with acute exacerbation admitted to Fuyang People’s Hospital from January 2021 to April 2023, this study used DAPA (at a dose of 10 mg once daily) in combination with standard treatment. The patients were divided into DAPA group and DAPA-Free group based on whether they used DAPA in acute heart failure. To minimize the influence of confounding factors and ensure comparability between groups, we used propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsA total of 399 patients were included, with 206 patients (51.63%) in the DAPA group and 193 patients (48.37%) in the DAPA-Free group. PSM produced 160 pairs. After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences between the DAPA and DAPA-Free groups in terms of readmission of all causes (16.88% vs. 18.12%, OR 0.9141, 95% CI 0.5385–1.552, log rank P = 0.739) or readmission for heart failure (11.88% vs. 15.0%, OR 0.9077, 95% CI 0.4441–1.469, log rank P = 0.484) after 90-day follow-up. Patients in the DAPA group had a lower mean daily dose of intravenous loop diuretics compared to the DAPA-Free group (20 mg/d vs. 30.00 mg/d, P<0.001), lower total loop diuretic dose during hospitalization (106.06 ± 31.23 mg vs. 144.50 ± 45.39 mg, P = 0.038) and a decreased number of diuretic types used (11.88% vs. 23.12%, P = 0.008).ConclusionsDAPA reduced the dose of intravenous loop diuretics. However, it did not improve all-cause readmission for 90 days or readmission for heart failure after discharge.

Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.

Congestion and fluid retention are the hallmarks of decompensated heart failure and the major reason for the hospitalization of patients with heart failure. Diuretics have been used in heart failure for decades, and they remain the backbone of the contemporary management of heart failure. Loop diuretics is the preferred diuretic, and it has been given a class I recommendation by clinical guidelines for the relief of congestion symptoms. Although loop diuretics have been used virtually among all patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there is still very limited clinical evidence to guide the optimized diuretics use. This is a sharp contrast to the rapidly growing evidence of the rest of the guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure and calls for further studies. The loop diuretics possess a unique pharmacology and pharmacokinetics that lay the ground for different strategies to increase diuretic efficiency. However, many of these approaches have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In recent years, a stepped and protocolized diuretics dosing has been suggested to have superior benefits over an individual clinician-based strategy. Diuretic resistance has been a major challenge to decongestion therapy for patients with heart failure and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Recently, therapy options have emerged to help overcome diuretic resistance to loop diuretics and have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacology and clinical use of loop diuretics in the context of heart failure, with attention to its side effects, and adjuncts, as well as the challenges and future direction.

UMOD Genotype-Blinded Trial of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Torasemide.

UMOD (uromodulin) has been linked to hypertension through potential activation of Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter (NKCC2), a target of loop diuretics. We posited that hypertensive patients carrying the rs13333226-AA UMOD genotype would demonstrate greater blood pressure responses to loop diuretics, potentially mediated by this UMOD/NKCC2 interaction. This prospective, multicenter, genotype-blinded trial evaluated torasemide (torsemide) efficacy on systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction over 16 weeks in nondiabetic, hypertensive participants uncontrolled on ≥1 nondiuretic antihypertensive for >3 months. The primary end point was the change in 24-hour ambulatory SBP (ABPM SBP) and SBP response trajectories between baseline and 16 weeks by genotype (AA versus AG/GG) due to nonrandomized groups at baseline (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03354897). Of 251 enrolled participants, 222 received torasemide and 174 demonstrated satisfactory treatment adherence and had genotype data. The study participants were middle-aged (59±11 years), predominantly male (62%), obese (body mass index, 32±7 kg/m2), with normal eGFR (92±17 mL/min/1.73 m²) and an average baseline ABPM of 138/81 mm Hg. Significant reductions in mean ABPM SBP were observed in both groups after 16 weeks (AA, -6.57 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.44 to -4.69]; P<0.0001; AG/GG, -3.22 [95% CI, -5.93 to -0.51]; P=0.021). The change in mean ABPM SBP (baseline to 16 weeks) showed a difference of -3.35 mm Hg ([95% CI, -6.64 to -0.05]; P=0.048) AA versus AG/GG genotypes. The AG/GG group displayed a rebound in SBP from 8 weeks, differing from the consistent decrease in the AA group (P=0.004 for difference in trajectories). Our results confirm a plausible interaction between UMOD and NKCC2 and suggest a potential role for genotype-guided use of loop diuretics in hypertension management. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03354897.

Prognostic value of first 24-hour urine output in patients with acute myocardial infarction in intensive care units: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.

To investigate the effect of first 24-hour (24-h) urine output (UO) on in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units due to acute myocardial infarction. This was a retrospective cohort study based on the medical information mart for intensive care IV database involving patients admitted to intensive care units due to acute myocardial infarction. Patients were classified as low UO (LUO), high UO (HUO), and middle UO with a first 24-h UO below 800ml, over 2500ml, or in between, respectively. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was 1-year mortality. A total of 4337 patients were involved. Taking middle UO group as reference, after adjusting for confounders including age, gender, height, weight, comorbidity, occurrence of cardiogenic shock, revascularization, blood pressure, creatinine, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and use of loop diuretics, LUO was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality [odds ratio 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.12-5.26], while HUO was an independent protective factor (odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.77). In the multivariant Cox regression model, LUO was an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 2.65, 95% CI: 2.16-3.26), while HUO did not show significant association. In patients admitted to intensive care units due to acute myocardial infarction, first 24-h UO <800ml was a strong predictor for higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality, while first 24-h UO over 2500ml was associated with lower in-hospital mortality but not long-term mortality.

Use of drugs for hypertension or heart failure and the risk of death in COVID-19: association with loop-diuretics

PurposeTo study the association between the use of drugs for hypertension or heart failure, particularly diuretics, and risk of death in COVID-19.MethodsWe conducted a cohort study, based on record linked individual-based data from national registers, of all Swedish inhabitants 50 years and older (n = 3,909,321) at the start of the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in Sweden. The association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), thiazides, loop diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, beta blocking agents and calcium channel blockers at the index date 6 March 2020, and death in COVID-19 during 7 March to 31 July 2020, was analysed using Cox-proportional hazards regression, adjusted for a wide range of possible confounders.ResultsUse of loop diuretics was associated with higher risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.17–1.35] and thiazides with reduced risk (0.78; 0.69–0.88) of death in COVID-19. In addition, lower risk was observed for ACEI and higher risk for beta-blocking agents, although both associations were weak. For ARB, aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers no significant associations were found.ConclusionIn this nationwide cohort of nearly 4 million persons 50 years and older, the use of loop diuretics was associated with increased risk of death in COVID-19 during the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in Sweden. This contrasted to the decreased risk observed for thiazides. As treatment with loop diuretics is common, particularly in the elderly, the group most affected by severe COVID-19, this finding merit further investigation.

Phenotype and outcomes according to loop diuretic use in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

The use of loop diuretics in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is less frequent compared with heart failure. The clinical and prognostic characteristics of PAH patients according to loop diuretic use remain unexplored. In this study, we retrospectively analysed the characteristics and survival of PAH patients requiring different doses of loop diuretics. Patients diagnosed with PAH between 2001 and 2022 at seven European centres for the management of PAH. According to the median equivalent dose of furosemide in the overall cohort, patients were divided into two subgroups: no/low-dose loop diuretic and high-dose loop diuretic. Primary outcome was 5year all-cause mortality. Among the 397 patients included, 227 (57%) were treated with loop diuretics. Median daily furosemide equivalent dose was 25mg, and accordingly patients were divided in no/low dose (i.e. ≤25mg, n=257, 65%) vs. high dose (i.e. >25mg, n=140, 35%). Patients in the high-dose group were older, more likely to have comorbidities, and had a more severe disease according to the ESC/ERS risk category. Crude 5year survival was significantly shorter in patients in the high-dose group, but after adjustment for age, sex, and risk category, high loop diuretic dose was not significantly associated with the primary outcome. Use of high dose of loop diuretics in PAH is associated with a higher burden of comorbidities, more severe disease, and worse survival. However, in PAH, the need of high loop diuretic dose is a marker of disease severity and not an independent prognostic factor.

Loop diuretic therapy with or without heart failure: impact on prognosis.

Many patients are prescribed loop diuretics without a diagnostic record of heart failure. Little is known about their characteristics and prognosis. Glasgow regional health records (2009-16) were obtained for adults with cardiovascular disease or taking loop diuretics. Outcomes were investigated using Cox models with hazard ratios adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbid disease (adjHR). Of 198 898 patients (median age 65 years; 55% women), 161 935 (81%) neither took loop diuretics nor had a diagnostic record of heart failure (reference group), 23 963 (12%) were taking loop diuretics but had no heart failure recorded, 7844 (4%) had heart failure recorded and took loop diuretics, and 5156 (3%) had heart failure recorded but were not receiving loop diuretics. Compared to the reference group, five-year mortality was only slightly higher for heart failure in the absence of loop diuretics [22%; adjHR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.3)], substantially higher for those taking loop diuretics with no record of heart failure [40%; adjHR 1.8 (95% CI 1.7-1.8)], and highest for heart failure treated with loop diuretics [52%; adjHR 2.2 (95% CI 2.0-2.2)]. For patients with cardiovascular disease, many are prescribed loop diuretics without a recorded diagnosis of heart failure. Mortality is more strongly associated with loop diuretic use than with a record of heart failure. The diagnosis of heart failure may be often missed, or loop diuretic use is associated with other conditions with a prognosis similar to heart failure, or inappropriate loop diuretic use increases mortality; all might be true.

Loop diuretic discontinuation in chronic heart failure patients: A retrospective study

Introduction and ObjectivesThe use of loop diuretics is central in managing congestion in heart failure (HF), but their impact on prognosis remains unclear. In euvolemic patients, dose reduction is recommended, but there is no recommendation on their discontinuation. This study aims to assess the impact of loop diuretic discontinuation on the prognosis of outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study collected data from medical records of patients followed in an outpatient HF clinic at a university hospital center. Patients were included if they had been on loop diuretics and these were discontinued. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected, and number and type of congestive events during the one-year period after discontinuation were recorded. ResultsAmong 265 patients on loop diuretics, almost half (129) discontinued them at some point. Patients had optimized medical therapy, low median age, low New York Heart Association class, low B-type natriuretic peptide values, normal blood pressure, controlled heart rate and kidney function within normal limits. Among 122 patients with one year of follow-up, 18 (14.8%) had a congestive event. Fifteen events (83.3%) were low-dose diuretic reinitiation at a scheduled visit. There were only three worsening heart failure events (2.5%) during the one-year period. A significant improvement in kidney function from discontinuation to the one-year follow-up appointment was also observed. ConclusionsIn our cohort, loop diuretic discontinuation was possible and safe in a large proportion of patients. The results should be interpreted with caution and cannot be extrapolated to a broader population of HF patients.

The role of tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Several conflicting reviews have concluded that the use of loop diuretics is associated with poorer clinical and safety outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an adjunct to conventional diuretic therapy in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library until 24 May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of tolvaptan with conventional therapy and placebo in patients with AHF. The quality assessment of the included trials was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to examine the dosage effect of tolvaptan. A total of 17 studies with 18 reports, involving 10,039 patients, were selected. The tolvaptan add-on therapy significantly alleviated dyspnea [24 h: RR 1.16 (1.04, 1.29), 48 h: RR 1.18 (1.04, 1.33)], reduced body weight within 48 h [Asian group, MD -0.93 (-1.48, -0.38); non-Asian group, MD -2.76 (-2.88, -2.65)], reduced edema [RR 1.08 (1.02, 1.15)], increased serum sodium [non-Asian group, MD 3.40 (3.02, 3.78)], and resulted in a change in serum creatinine [MD -0.10 (-0.18, -0.01)]. No significant differences were observed in mortality and rehospitalization. The NMA suggested that an intermediate dosage (15 mg/day) might offer the best efficacy in reducing dyspnea within 24 h, reducing edema, increasing serum sodium, and lowering the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF). In conclusion, the meta-analysis showed that tolvaptan contributed to the short-term alleviation of congestive symptoms, elevated sodium levels, and a lower incidence of WRF. However, no significant benefits were observed in long-term symptoms, rehospitalization rates, and mortality. An intermediate dosage of tolvaptan might be considered the optimal choice for various clinical outcomes. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42023420288).

#2679 Prediction of acute eGFR decline after first initiation of RASI inhibitors and its impact on clinical outcomes

Abstract Background and Aims The objective of this study is to investigate the correlation between acute eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) decline after initiation of ACEI (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor)/ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker) medications and clinical outcomes in a real-world setting. Additionally, we aim to establish a risk prediction model to identify high-risk individuals who are more likely to experience a rapid decline in eGFR after drug initiation. Method A total of 2026 adult new users of ACEI/ARB were selected from the China Renal Data System (CRDS). Patients in acute clinical states and those using nephrotoxic drugs were excluded, and it was required that patients had at least one creatinine measurement during the baseline period and one week to four weeks after drug initiation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the relative risks of adverse long-term outcomes in patients with different degrees of acute eGFR decline. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to analyze the factors influencing acute eGFR decline. Lasso regression was used to select predictive factors, resulting in a logistic regression model with 18 predictive factors. Results Among the 2026 patients, 1148 (57%), 473 (23%), and 405 (20%) experienced eGFR decline &amp;lt;5% or increase, 5-20% decline, and ≥20% decline, respectively, after initiation of RASI (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor). Following adjustment for multiple variables, an eGFR decline ≥20% was found to be associated with a higher risk of long-term renal disease progression, with a hazard ratio of 1.84 (95% confidence interval 1.19-2.85), but not significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Factors associated with an eGFR decline ≥20% after RASI initiation included higher BMI and Charlson index, more severe proteinuria, lower hemoglobin levels, presence of hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, arrhythmias, and concomitant use of thiazide diuretics or loop diuretics. The predictive model had a C-statistic of 0.75. Conclusion This study demonstrates that a short-term eGFR decline after RASI initiation is associated with a higher risk of long-term renal disease progression but not significantly associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. We have developed a prediction model to estimate the risk of eGFR decline ≥20% after the initial use of RASI, which can aid clinicians in identifying patients with poorer renal outcomes following RASI initiation and facilitate timely intervention.

Semaglutide and diuretic use in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials.

In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from -8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10.3, -6.3] to -6.9% [95% CI -9.1, -4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P = .39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P = .042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P = .24-.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P < .0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P < .001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.