Use Of IGRAs Research Articles

Interferon-γ release assays for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) are now established for the immunodiagnosis of latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in many countries. However, the role of IGRAs for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) remains unclear. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) guidelines, we searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies published in January 2001-November 2009 that evaluated the evidence of using QuantiFERON-TB® Gold in-tube (QFT-G-IT) and T-SPOT.TB® directly on blood or extrasanguinous specimens for the diagnosis of active TB. The literature search yielded 844 studies and 27 met the inclusion criteria. In blood and extrasanguinous fluids, the pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of active TB was 80% (95% CI 75-84%) and 48% (95% CI 39-58%) for QFT-G-IT, and 81% (95% CI 78-84%) and 88% (confirmed and unconfirmed cases) (95% CI 82-92%) for T-SPOT.TB®, respectively. In blood and extrasanguinous fluids, the pooled specificity was 79% (95% CI 75-82%) and 82% (95% CI 70-91%) for QFT-G-IT, and 59% (95% CI 56-62%) and 82% (95% CI 78-86%) for T-SPOT.TB®, respectively. Although the diagnostic sensitivities of both IGRAs were higher than that of tuberculin skin tests, it was still not high enough to use as a rule out test for TB. Positive evidence for the use of IGRAs in compartments other than blood will require more independent and carefully designed prospective studies.

Indeterminate Interferon-γ Release Assay Results in Children

Indeterminate Interferon-γ Release Assay Results in Children

New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: Part I. Latent tuberculosis

Nearly a third of the world’s population is estimated to be infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This enormous pool of latently infected individuals poses a major hurdle for global tuberculosis (TB) control. Currently, diagnosis of latent TB infection (LTBI) relies on the tuberculin skin test (TST), a century-old test with known limitations. In this review, the first of a two-part series on new tools for TB diagnosis, recent advances in the diagnosis of LTBI are described. The biggest advance in recent years has been the development of in vitro T-cell-based interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) that use antigens more specific to M. tuberculosis than the purified protein derivative used in the TST. Available research evidence on IGRAs suggests they have higher specificity than TST, better correlation with surrogate markers of exposure to M. tuberculosis in low-incidence settings, and less cross-reactivity due to BCG vaccination than the TST. IGRAs also appear to be at least as sensitive as the purified protein derivative-based TST for active TB. In the absence of a gold standard for LTBI, sensitivity and specificity for LTBI are not well defined. Besides high specificity, other potential advantages of IGRAs include logistical convenience, avoidance of poorly reproducible measurements, such as skin induration, need for fewer patient visits and the ability to perform serial testing without inducing the boosting phenomenon. Overall, due to its high specificity, IGRAs may be useful in low-endemic, high-income settings where cross-reactivity due to BCG might adversely impact the utility of TST. However, despite the growing evidence supporting the use of IGRAs, several unresolved and unexplained issues remain. The review concludes by highlighting areas where evidence is lacking, and provides an agenda for future research. Active TB and drug resistance are discussed in Part II; 423–432 of this issue.