Use Of Erectile Aids Research Articles

Proerectile pharmacological prophylaxis following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP).

The importance of an early pharmacological prophylaxis for erectile function following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy has been recently stressed by several authors. In spite of that, patient's compliance to erectile rehabilitation protocols seems to be low. The present review is an attempt to define the expected benefits of the currently proposed rehabilitative protocols in terms of cost-efficiency and quality of life. The conclusion is that current scientific evidence in support of an early postoperative use of erectile aids is based mainly on indirect proof of a cavernosal damage that may follow the temporary postoperative 'erectile silence'. Intracavernosal injections or a vacuum device may represent the best first-line treatment option for the first few months from the procedure as their mechanism of action does not require intact neural tissue for erection. Thereafter oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy may be a reasonable choice for those patients who can achieve at least a partial erection. A phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor may not be effective when spontaneous erections are absent. It is possible, since the rehabilitation of sexual function aims to prevent cavernosal tissue damage by providing oxygenation to the erectile tissue, the choice of a potentially ineffective treatment may jeopardize the results of a reasonable nerve-sparing procedure.

American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for reporting morbidity after prostate brachytherapy

Purpose: To standardize the reporting of brachytherapy-related prostate morbidity to guide ongoing clinical practice and future investigations.Methods: Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) with expertise in prostate brachytherapy performed a literature review and, guided by their clinical experience, formulated specific recommendations for reporting on morbidity related to prostate brachytherapy.Results: The ABS recommends using validated, patient-administered health-related quality-of-life instruments for the determination of baseline and follow-up data regarding bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Both actuarial and crude incidences should be reported, along with the temporal resolution of specific complications, and correlated with the doses to the normal tissues. The International Prostate Symptom Score is recommended to assess urinary morbidity, and any dysuria, gross hematuria, urinary retention, incontinence, or medication use should be quantified. Likewise, the “Sexual Health Inventory for Men,” which includes the specific erectile questions of the International Index of Erectile Function, is the preferred instrument for reporting sexual function, and the loss of sexual desire, incidence of hematospermia, painful orgasm (orgasmalgia), altered orgasm intensity, decreased ejaculatory volume, use of erectile aids, and use of hormones for androgen deprivation should be quantified. The ABS recommends adoption of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer acute and late radiation morbidity scoring scheme for reporting rectal morbidity and noting the incidence of rectal steroid, laser, or antidiarrheal use.Conclusion: It is important to focus on health-related quality-of-life issues in the treatment of prostate cancer, because the control rates are very similar between appropriate treatment modalities. The ABS recommends using the International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grading criteria for the determination of urinary, sexual, and bowel function, respectively. Additional parameters for reporting urinary, rectal, and sexual morbidities are presented. These morbidities should be correlated with the doses to the normal tissues. Some of these specific recommendations may be modified if and when new data become available.

Quality of life and sexuality following radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer who use or do not use erectile aids

It is well established that prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may experience disruptive side effects, most notably urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The purpose of this study is to compare relevant outcomes between patients awaiting radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and patients who already underwent the surgery, taking into account type of prostatectomy and use of erectile aids. We compared self-reports of global quality of life, sexuality, urinary continence, and physical capabilities in 86 nerve-sparing patients, 89 standard-prostatectomy patients, 74 prostatectomy patients who used erectile aids, and a comparison group of 45 patients awaiting radical prostatectomy. Regardless of type of surgery, use of erectile aid, or preoperative status, most patients reported good quality of life. The best outcomes in sexuality were reported by patients who used erectile aids, who appeared similar in sexuality to patients awaiting surgery. When differences were detected, standard prostatectomy patients who did not use erectile aids scored worse in most areas of sexuality than nerve-sparing patients who did not use erectile aids. There were no differences in frequency of urinary leakage among the three surgery subgroups. Although most patients reported problems in sexual and urinary function, global quality of life does not appear to be compromised following radical prostatectomy. Findings suggest that postsurgical sexuality differs depending on type of prostatectomy and use of erectile aids, while urinary function is similar across surgery groups. We conclude that erectile aids should be offered routinely to patients who are ineligible for nerve-sparing surgery or experience erectile difficulties following the nerve-sparing procedure.