PurposeUse of mechanical circulatory support before transplant has been traditionally associated with worse post-transplant survival. However, this association has not been confirmed in the era of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to investigate the association between contemporary practices of hemodynamic support strategies and survival after orthotopic heart transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all adult patients (age >18 years) who received heart transplantation between 2008 and 2013 in the UNOS registry. We used cox proportional hazard model to assess the association between hemodynamic support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - (ECMO), left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), and intravenous inotropes) and post-transplant survival.ResultsOf 11148 patients who were transplanted during the study period, 8240 (73.9%) required hemodynamic support before transplant. Of those, 75.8% were male, 67.4% were Caucasian, 34.3% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 63.4% status 1A at transplant, with mean age of 52.6 years. IABP was used in 7.1%, ECMO in 1.1%, inotropes in 53.2%, LVAD in 43.0%, and BiVADs in 4.3%. After adjusting for recipient age, gender, ethnicity, UNOS status at transplant, dialysis, creatinine, HLA mismatch, PRA, length of stay, diabetes, donor age and gender, post-transplant mortality was predicted by ECMO (OR 2.55, p<0.001) and BiVAD (OR 1.59, p=0.002) but not inotropes (OR 1.06, p=0.57), LVAD (OR 1.18, p=0.16) or IABP (OR 1.25, p=0.065).ConclusionContemporary LVADs are no longer associated with post-transplant mortality, whereas ECMO and BiVAD use remain risk factors for death following heart transplantation. PurposeUse of mechanical circulatory support before transplant has been traditionally associated with worse post-transplant survival. However, this association has not been confirmed in the era of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to investigate the association between contemporary practices of hemodynamic support strategies and survival after orthotopic heart transplantation. Use of mechanical circulatory support before transplant has been traditionally associated with worse post-transplant survival. However, this association has not been confirmed in the era of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to investigate the association between contemporary practices of hemodynamic support strategies and survival after orthotopic heart transplantation. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all adult patients (age >18 years) who received heart transplantation between 2008 and 2013 in the UNOS registry. We used cox proportional hazard model to assess the association between hemodynamic support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - (ECMO), left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), and intravenous inotropes) and post-transplant survival. We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients (age >18 years) who received heart transplantation between 2008 and 2013 in the UNOS registry. We used cox proportional hazard model to assess the association between hemodynamic support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - (ECMO), left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), and intravenous inotropes) and post-transplant survival. ResultsOf 11148 patients who were transplanted during the study period, 8240 (73.9%) required hemodynamic support before transplant. Of those, 75.8% were male, 67.4% were Caucasian, 34.3% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 63.4% status 1A at transplant, with mean age of 52.6 years. IABP was used in 7.1%, ECMO in 1.1%, inotropes in 53.2%, LVAD in 43.0%, and BiVADs in 4.3%. After adjusting for recipient age, gender, ethnicity, UNOS status at transplant, dialysis, creatinine, HLA mismatch, PRA, length of stay, diabetes, donor age and gender, post-transplant mortality was predicted by ECMO (OR 2.55, p<0.001) and BiVAD (OR 1.59, p=0.002) but not inotropes (OR 1.06, p=0.57), LVAD (OR 1.18, p=0.16) or IABP (OR 1.25, p=0.065). Of 11148 patients who were transplanted during the study period, 8240 (73.9%) required hemodynamic support before transplant. Of those, 75.8% were male, 67.4% were Caucasian, 34.3% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 63.4% status 1A at transplant, with mean age of 52.6 years. IABP was used in 7.1%, ECMO in 1.1%, inotropes in 53.2%, LVAD in 43.0%, and BiVADs in 4.3%. After adjusting for recipient age, gender, ethnicity, UNOS status at transplant, dialysis, creatinine, HLA mismatch, PRA, length of stay, diabetes, donor age and gender, post-transplant mortality was predicted by ECMO (OR 2.55, p<0.001) and BiVAD (OR 1.59, p=0.002) but not inotropes (OR 1.06, p=0.57), LVAD (OR 1.18, p=0.16) or IABP (OR 1.25, p=0.065). ConclusionContemporary LVADs are no longer associated with post-transplant mortality, whereas ECMO and BiVAD use remain risk factors for death following heart transplantation. Contemporary LVADs are no longer associated with post-transplant mortality, whereas ECMO and BiVAD use remain risk factors for death following heart transplantation.
Read full abstract