Abstract Archeological research started in Mariano Miro (Chapaleufu, La Pampa, Argentina) site in 2011. In this site there are remains of a rural village, founded in 1901 by the railway station under the same name of the Ferrocarril Oeste, with its header in Buenos Aires city. This village was inhabited by nearly 500 people and there was a series of shops typical of an agricultural-livestock occupation (stores, a baker's shop, a smith house, etc.). Towards 1911 it had to be abandoned forcibly because its inhabitants could not renew their lease agreement over the lands they settled in. As from that moment, its owners destined that space to agricultural exploitation, and therefore no village structures were left standing. The Mariano Miro archaeological study is included in an investigation that aims at learning population dynamics in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. During those times, lands were incorporated to the national territory after military campaigns against indigenous populations. This study presents results obtained through different prospecting techniques applied to delimit the old village common land. Although nowadays no surface structural remains are seen, the presence of a great number of vitreous, ceramic and metallic fragments was recorded, from which a 240 × 140 m study area was set. Over the whole surface of that area, covering 39,200 m2, transects were laid out; prospecting was conducted with a metal detector and a systematic collection of surface material was made. The diversity of data obtained was processed by Geographic Information System (GIS) which, together with ARCGIS10 software, enabled us to correlate multiple variables. The use of documentary sources (aerial photographs, cartography and village layout blueprints) helped identify site formation processes, old buried structures and areas associated with specific social practices. The prospecting design applied let us guide archaeological interventions in such a large area and, based on the distribution and density of these findings, it helped differentiate sectors that would respond to deliberate social practices during village occupation (e.g. dumps), from those that would be the result of post-depositional anthropic and natural processes.
Read full abstract