Today Information Technology (IT) has become very much a part of the fabric of life. Specific legislation has been necessary to address issues arising from the application of technology in various areas of human endeavor. The law of evidence has had to take cognizance of this as evidence has frequently to be collected in an electronic form from remote computers for use in legal proceedings. Amendments to the Malaysian Evidence Act 1950 in 1993 provided for the admissibility of computer generated documents. This raises several ancillary questions. Does the specification of computer generated documents pose a problem in adducing electronic evidence in general? Secondly, are there sufficiently competent people in the investigative team, the prosecution and the judiciary who appreciate the nature of electronic evidence and thirdly are the courts equipped to handle the special evidentiary requirements of high tech crimes? When dealing with computer generated documents a distinction between original and copies cannot be established. A further problem with computer evidence is that it can be easily altered without leaving any obvious trace of its alteration. Thus rules for admissibility and the probative or prejudicial value to be attached to such evidence needs to be addressed. This paper examines the legal framework for the admissibility of electronic evidence and identifies the problems relating to computer or electronic evidence.