Use Of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Research Articles

B‐type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care

The rapid and accurate diagnosis of heart failure in primary care is a major unmet clinical need. We evaluated the additional use of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. A randomized controlled trial. Twenty-nine primary care physicians in Switzerland and Germany coordinated by the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. A total of 323 consecutive patients presenting with dyspnoea. Assignment in a 1 : 1 ratio to a diagnostic strategy including point-of-care measurement of BNP (n = 163) or standard assessment without BNP (n = 160). The total medical cost at 3 months was the primary end-point. Secondary end-points were diagnostic certainty, time to appropriate therapy, functional capacity, hospitalization and mortality. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by a physician blinded to the BNP levels. Heart failure was the final diagnosis in 34% of patients. The number of hospitalizations, functional status and total medical cost at 3 months [median $1655, interquartile range (IQR), 850-3331 vs. $1541, IQR 859-2827; P = 0.68] were similar in both groups. BNP increased diagnostic certainty as defined by the need for further diagnostic work-up (33% vs. 45%; P = 0.02) and accelerated the initiation of the appropriate treatment (13 days vs. 25 days; P = 0.01). The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for BNP to identify heart failure was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.93). The use of BNP levels in primary care did not reduce total medical cost, but improved some of the secondary end-points including diagnostic certainty and time to initiation of appropriate treatment.

Use of B‐type natriuretic peptide in the management of hypoxaemic respiratory failure

Evaluation and management of patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) are difficult. The use of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a quantitative marker of cardiac stress and heart failure (HF), may be helpful. The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of causative disorders of hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the ICU and to determine the impact of a BNP-guided diagnostic strategy. This prospective, multi-centre, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial included 314 ICU patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure: 159 patients were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy involving the measurement of BNP and 155 were assessed in a standard manner. The time to discharge and the total cost of treatment were the primary endpoints. Hypoxaemic respiratory failure was multi-causal in 27% of the patients. Heart failure was the most common diagnosis in both groups. The use of BNP levels, in conjunction with other clinical information, significantly increased the detection of HF in combination with an additional diagnosis (32 vs. 16%, P = 0.001) and also increased the application of HF-specific medical therapy (nitrates: 32 vs. 23%, P < 0.05 and diuretics: 65 vs. 50%, P < 0.01). Time to discharge (median, 13 vs.14 days, P = 0.50) and total cost of treatment (median, US-$6190 vs. 7155, P = 0.24) were comparable in both groups. Hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the ICU is often a multi-causal disorder. The use of BNP increased the detection of HF, but did not significantly improve patient management as quantified by time to discharge or treatment cost. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00130559.

Cost‐Effectiveness of B‐Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing

As with any other diagnostic method, the cost-effectiveness of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing depends on the indication of its use and the specific clinical setting. The use of BNP levels, in conjunction with other clinical information, provides information that seems to be particularly helpful in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure (HF) as well as screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In the screening for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, BNP testing seems to be cost-effective (<$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-years gained) when used in a population with a prevalence of at least 1%. BNP testing, in fact, results in cost savings in the diagnosis of HF. Although the data are less robust, BNP seems cost-effective in the risk stratification of hospitalized HF patients when compared with echocardiography. Because BNP guidance seems to reduce the number of rehospitalizations in recently hospitalized patients with chronic HF, the use of BNP is also most likely cost-effective in this indication. For the remaining and, in part, evolving indications, further studies are needed to assess cost-effectiveness.

Cost‐Effectiveness of B‐Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing

As with any other diagnostic method, the cost‐effectiveness of B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing depends on the indication of its use and the specific clinical setting. The use of BNP levels, in conjunction with other clinical information, provides information that seems to be particularly helpful in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure (HF) as well as screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In the screening for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, BNP testing seems to be cost‐effective (&lt;$50,000 per quality‐adjusted life‐years gained) when used in a population with a prevalence of at least 1%. BNP testing, in fact, results in cost savings in the diagnosis of HF. Although the data are less robust, BNP seems cost‐effective in the risk stratification of hospitalized HF patients when compared with echocardiography. Because BNP guidance seems to reduce the number of rehospitalizations in recently hospitalized patients with chronic HF, the use of BNP is also most likely cost‐effective in this indication. For the remaining and, in part, evolving indications, further studies are needed to assess cost‐effectiveness.

Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the detection of myocardial ischemia

Exercise electrocardiography (ECG) has high specificity but limited sensitivity for the detection of myocardial ischemia. The aim of this study was to determine whether measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG. A total of 256 consecutive patients with suspected myocardial ischemia referred for rest/ergometry myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography were enrolled. Levels of BNP were determined before and 1 minute after maximal exercise. Inducible myocardial ischemia on perfusion images was detected in 127 patients (49.6%). Median BNP levels at rest and after peak exercise were higher in patients with than without inducible ischemia (71 pg/mL vs 38 pg/mL, P < .001; and 88 vs 52 pg/mL, P < .001, respectively). Compared with patients in the lowest peak exercise BNP quartile, those in the highest quartile of peak exercise BNP had more than 3 times the risk of inducible ischemia (adjusted relative risk 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.6, P = .015). Using 110 pg/mL as a cutoff, the combination of exercise ECG and peak exercise BNP level distinguished between ischemic and nonischemic patients more accurately than the exercise ECG alone (67% vs 60%, P = .024). Although the increase in accuracy was similar for the combination of exercise ECG with baseline BNP or DeltaBNP, overall, peak exercise BNP seemed to be the preferred measurement. B-type natriuretic peptide levels are associated with inducible myocardial ischemia. The use of BNP levels improves the diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG.

The use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the management of patients with diabetes and acute dyspnoea

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels on the management of patients with diabetes presenting with acute dyspnoea. This study evaluated the subgroup of 103 patients with diabetes included in the B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Acute Shortness of Breath Evaluation (BASEL) study (n=452). Patients were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy with (n=47, BNP group) or without (n=56, control group) the use of BNP levels assessed by a rapid bedside assay. Time to discharge and total cost of treatment were recorded as the primary endpoints. Although similar with regard to age and sex, patients with diabetes more often had pre-existing cardiovascular and renal disease and heart failure as the cause of acute dyspnoea compared with patients without diabetes. In addition, medical and economic outcomes were worse in patients with diabetes. The use of BNP levels significantly reduced time to discharge (median 9 days [interquartile range (IQR) 2-16] in the BNP group vs 13 days [IQR 8-22] in the control group; p=0.016). At 30 days, the diabetic patients in the BNP group had spent significantly fewer days in hospital compared with the diabetic patients in the control group (9 days [IQR 2-19] vs 16 days [IQR 8-24], respectively; p=0.008). Total treatment costs at 30 days were US$5,705 (IQR 2,285-9,137) in the BNP group and US$7,420 (IQR 4,194-11,966) in the control group (p=0.036). The results of this study indicate that measurement of BNP levels improves the management of patients with diabetes presenting with acute dyspnoea.

Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the management of acute dyspnea in patients with pulmonary disease

In patients with pulmonary disease, it is often challenging to distinguish exacerbated pulmonary disease from congestive heart failure (CHF). The impact of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements on the management of patients with pulmonary disease and acute dyspnea remains to be defined. This study evaluated the subgroup of 226 patients with a history of pulmonary disease included in the BASEL Study. Patients were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy with (n = 119, BNP group) or without (n = 107, clinical group) the use of BNP levels provided by a rapid bedside assay. Time to discharge and total cost of treatment were recorded as the primary end points. Baseline characteristics were similar in patients assigned to the BNP and control groups. Comorbidity was extensive, including coronary artery disease and hypertension in half of patients. The primary discharge diagnosis was CHF and exacerbated obstructive pulmonary disease in 39% and 33%, respectively. The use of BNP levels significantly reduced the need for hospital admission (81% vs 91%, P = .034). Median time to discharge was 9.0 days in the BNP group as compared with 12.0 days (P = .001) in the clinical group. Median total cost of treatment was $4841 in the BNP group as compared with $5671 in the clinical group (P = .008). Inhospital mortality was 8% in both groups. CHF is a major cause of acute dyspnea in patients with a history of pulmonary disease. Used in conjunction with other clinical information, rapid measurement of BNP reduced time to discharge and total treatment cost of these patients.

The use of B‐type natriuretic peptide in the management of elderly patients with acute dyspnoea

The aim of this study was to define the impact of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels on the management of elderly patients presenting with acute dyspnoea. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study in 269 elderly patients at least 70 years of age included in the B-type natriuretic peptide for Acute Shortness of breath Evaluation (BASEL) study. Patients were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy with (n = 136, BNP group) or without (n = 133, control group) the use of BNP levels provided by a rapid bedside assay. The time to discharge and the total cost of treatment were the primary end-points. Amongst elderly patients, baseline characteristics were well matched between both groups. The use of BNP levels significantly reduced the time to discharge (median 9.0 in the BNP group versus 11.0 days in the control group; P = 0.029). Total treatment cost was $5381 (95% CI, 4482-6280) in the BNP group when compared with $7411 (95% CI, 6180-8642; P = 0.009) in the control group. In addition, a significant reduction in 30-day mortality was observed (9% in the BNP group versus 17% in the control group; P = 0.039). Used in conjunction with other clinical information, rapid measurement of BNP in the emergency department improved the management of elderly patients presenting with acute dyspnoea and thereby reduced the time to discharge and the total treatment cost. In addition, BNP testing seemed to reduce 30-day mortality.

B-type natriuretic peptide for acute dyspnea in patients with kidney disease: Insights from a randomized comparison

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are reliably elevated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and therefore helpful in its diagnosis. However, kidney disease results in elevated BNP levels independently of CHF. Accordingly, the impact of kidney disease on the benefit of BNP testing needs to be scrutinized. This study evaluated patients with and without kidney disease [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) presenting with acute dyspnea. A total of 452 consecutive patients (240 with kidney disease and 212 without kidney disease) were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy with (BNP group) or without (control group) the use of BNP levels provided by a rapid bedside assay. Patients with kidney disease were older, more often had CHF as the cause of acute dyspnea, and more often died in-hospital or within 30 days as compared to patients without kidney disease. In patients without kidney disease, BNP testing significantly reduced median time to discharge (from 9.5 days to 2.5 days) (P= 0.003) and total cost of treatment (from 7184 dollars to 4151 dollars) (P= 0.004). In contrast, in patients with kidney disease, time to discharge and total cost of treatment were similar in both groups. When applying BNP cut-off values without adjustment for the presence of kidney disease, the use of BNP levels does significantly improve the management of patients without kidney disease, but not of those with kidney disease.

Use of B-type natriuretic peptide for the management of women with dyspnea

In studies with predominately male patients, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels have been shown to be helpful in the evaluation and management of patients who present with acute dyspnea. The effect of BNP levels on the management of women has not been defined. This study evaluated a predefined subgroup of 190 women included in a prospective randomized controlled study of BNP testing for emergency diagnosis of acute dyspnea. Patients were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy with (n = 93, BNP group) or without (n = 97, control group) the use of BNP levels provided by a rapid bedside assay. Women differed significantly from men in baseline characteristics, symptoms, signs, and final discharge diagnoses. The use of BNP levels decreased the need for hospital admission (73% vs 86%, p = 0.034) and intensive care (12% vs 23%, p = 0.048). Median time to discharge was 6 days in the BNP group versus 10 days in the control group (p = 0.023). Total cost of treatment was $4,781 in the BNP group (95% confidence interval 3,854 to 5,708) versus $6,843 in the control group (95% confidence interval 5,611 to 8,074, p = 0.009). In-hospital mortality rates were 4% in the BNP group and 10% in the control group (p = 0.165). Thus, used in conjunction with other clinical information, rapid measurement of BNP decreased time to discharge and total cost of treatment in women who presented with acute dyspnea.

Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide levels after anthracycline administration

Background Cardiotoxicity leading to congestive heart failure is a complication of the anthracyclines. Biochemical methods to diagnose and monitor cardiac function after anthracycline administration would be most useful. We examined the diagnostic role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a potent biochemical marker of left ventricular dysfunction, in patients administered anthracyclines.Methods Twenty-seven consecutive patients receiving anthracyclines were investigated by serial measurements of BNP levels and other cardiac neurohormones (A-type natriuretic peptide, renin, aldosterone, angiotensin II, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) and myocardial markers (creatine kinase-MB and myosin light chain). Echocardiography was done to assess systolic (ejection fraction) and diastolic (mitral inflow A/E ratio) functions.Results Of the examined cardiac biochemical markers, BNP levels alone showed marked elevations to abnormal levels after anthracycline administration. Most patients showed transient increases (peak at 3 to 7 days). Patients with persistent elevations showed a poor prognosis. A/E ratio also correlated with increases in BNP levels in selected patients, which may suggest that raised BNP levels are reflective of induced diastolic dysfunction.Conclusions Our studies suggest the possible use of BNP levels to assess the cardiac state after anthracycline administration. BNP levels most likely reflect cardiac tolerance to the cardiotoxic agent. Serial BNP profiles also suggest persistent elevations to be associated with potentially decompensatory states in contrast to tolerable transient increases. Diagnosis of degree of cardiac tolerance by response to drug administration may be analogous to use of stress testing (exercise) to help define underlying left ventricular dysfunction. (Am Heart J 1998;136:362-3.)