Use Of Antifungal Prophylaxis Research Articles

Antifungal Prophylaxis for Adult Recipients of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Cautionary Stance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Antifungal Prophylaxis for Adult Recipients of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Cautionary Stance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

1150. Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD) in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

BackgroundDespite the use of antifungal prophylaxis, IFD remains a serious complication of AML causing extensive morbidity and mortality. This study seeks to clarify our experience with breakthrough infections in patients with AML.MethodsThis retrospective study included all adult patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for a new diagnosis of AML from June 2014 – Dec 2019 at the University of Michigan Hospital. Chart review determined co-morbidities, chemotherapy regimens, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), antifungal prophylaxis, development of IFD, and outcomes. Patients were followed for 1 year from first induction chemotherapy. EORTC-MSGERC definitions for proven, probable, and possible IFD were used, as were MSGERC-ECMM definitions for breakthrough IFD.ResultsOf 251 patients, mean age was 61.8±14 years, 55% were men, and 73 (29%) underwent allogeneic HCT, 52 of whom developed GVHD. Thirty-one patients developed 33 IFD (12.3%): 4 proven, 12 probable, and 17 possible IFD. Four IFD occurred in patients with GVHD post-HCT; all were treated with high dose steroids and one received an anti-TNF agent. Of the 16 proven and probable IFD, 8 were breakthrough IFD. Mucormycosis occurred in 2 patients on voriconazole; fusariosis occurred in 3 patients taking fluconazole (2), or posaconazole (1). Aspergillosis occurred in 2 patients taking isavuconazole (1) or fluconazole (1), and pneumocystosis occurred in a patient receiving inhaled pentamidine. There were 8 non-breakthrough IFD, including 2 pneumocystosis, 4 aspergillosis, and 2 candidiasis. Risk for IFD increased with subsequent episodes of induction chemotherapy, p=.04.Six of 8 patients with breakthrough IFD and 5 of 8 without breakthrough IFD died within 12 weeks of IFD diagnosis. Excluding the 15 patients who had only possible IFD, 69% (11/16) patients with proven/probable IFD died compared with 35% (77/220) patients without IFD, p=.01.ConclusionPatients with AML remain at risk for fatal IFD despite the use of antifungal prophylaxis. Failure of prophylaxis in our patients who developed breakthrough IFD was associated with a shift towards less common fungi.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Pharmacist review of high-risk haematology outpatients to improve appropriateness of antifungal prophylaxis.

Background Patients with haematological malignancies are at high risk of invasive fungal infections. However, there is a lack of information about the utilisation of the recommended Australian antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in haematology outpatients. Objective To assess the impact of a weekly pharmacist review of high-risk adult haematology outpatients on the utilisation of appropriate antifungal prophylaxis. Setting Outpatient cancer centre, tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Method A 3-month pre-and post-interventional study was conducted. A retrospective audit was conducted to obtain baseline utilisation of antifungal guidelines in adult haematology outpatients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome receiving chemotherapy. This was followed by a weekly pharmacist review over a 3-month period of all eligible outpatients assessing the appropriateness of antifungal agent, dose, use of therapeutic drug monitoring and presence of drug-interactions/contraindications. Recommendations to physicians were conveyed weekly and outcomes recorded. Main outcome measure Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient haematology patients before and after implementation of a 3-month weekly pharmacist review service. Results Forty patients were included in the retrospective group, equating to 348 reviews, while 42 patients equating to 269 reviews were included in the prospective group. Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines increased from 31 to 54% post implementation of a pharmacist review (Odds Ratio = 2.44, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.07-5.58, p = 0.0344). The most common reason for nonadherence to guidelines in both groups was lack of therapeutic drug monitoring and failure to prescribe antifungal prophylaxis where indicated. The percentage of appropriate use of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia increased from 13 to 46% (p value < 0.01) after pharmacist intervention. The pharmacist made 153 recommendations from 269 reviews, with a percentage uptake of 40%. Moderate to severe drug interactions were identified in 19 reviews from 10 patients. One major azole antifungal-chemotherapy interaction was avoided. Conclusions Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines can be improved through a regular pharmacist review. Future studies should identify whether improving adherence to antifungal guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes.

Invasive fungal diseases in patients with new diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Patients with acute leukaemia have a high incidence of fungal infections. This has primarily been shown in acute myeloid leukaemia and is different for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Until now no benefit of mould active prophylaxis has been demonstrated in the latter population. In this retrospective single-centre study, we analysed the incidence, clinical relevance, and outcome of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) as well as the impact of antifungal prophylaxis for the first 100days following the primary diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. In 58 patients a high rate of proven, probable, and possible fungal infections could be demonstrated with a 3.4%, 8.6%, and 17.2% likelihood, respectively. The incidence might be even higher, as nearly 40% of all patients had no prolonged neutropenia for more than 10days, excluding those from the European Organization of Research and Treatment of cancer and the Mycoses Study Group criteria for probable invasive fungal disease. The diagnosed fungal diseases had an impact on the duration of hospitalisation, which was 13days longer for patients with proven/probable IFD compared to patients with no signs of fungal infection. Use of antifungal prophylaxis did not significantly affect the risk of fungal infection. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia are at high risk of acquiring an invasive fungal disease. Appropriate criteria to define fungal infections, especially in this population, and strategies to reduce the risk of infection, including antifungal prophylaxis, need to be further evaluated.

ELFIN, the United Kingdom preterm lactoferrin trial: interpretation and future questions 1.

Results from previous studies have suggested that supplemental bovine lactoferrin (BLF) given to preterm infants (<32weeks gestation) reduces late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). The Enteral Lactoferrin in Neonates (ELFIN) study, performed in the UK, aimed to further address this issue with a well powered double-blind placebo controlled trial of >2200 preterm infants. The results from ELFIN did not demonstrate a reduction in LOS or NEC, or several other clinically important measures. Of the 1093 infants, 316 (29%) in the intervention group developed late-onset sepsis versus 334 (31%) of 1089 in the control group, with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.95 (95%CI = 0.86-1.04; p= 0.233). Reasons for the differences in ELFIN trial results and other studies may include population differences, the routine use of antifungal prophylaxis in the UK, timing of administration of the lactoferrin in relation to disease onset, or specific properties of the lactoferrin used in the different trials. The UK National Institutes for Health Research funded "Mechanisms Affecting the Guts of Preterm Infants in Enteral feeding trials" (MAGPIE) study is further exploring the use of lactoferrin, and the results should be available soon.

Candidaemia in haematological malignancy patients from a SEIFEM study: Epidemiological patterns according to antifungal prophylaxis.

Candidaemia is an important infectious complication for haematological malignancy patients. Antifungal prophylaxis reduces the incidence of candidaemia but may be associated with breakthrough candidaemia. To analyse the Candida species' distribution and relative antifungal susceptibility profiles of candidaemia episodes in relation to the use of antifungal prophylaxis among Italian SEIFEM haematology centres. This multicentre retrospective observational SEIFEM study included 133 single-species candidaemia episodes of haematological malignancy patients for whom antifungal susceptibility testing results of blood Candida isolates were available between 2011 and 2015. Each participating centre provided both clinical and microbiological data. Non-Candida albicans Candida (NCAC) species were the mostly isolated species (89, 66.9%), which accounted for Cparapsilosis (35, 26.3%), Cglabrata (16, 12.0%), Ckrusei (14, 10.5%), Ctropicalis (13, 9.8%) and uncommon species (11, 8.3%). Calbicans caused the remaining 44 (33.1%) episodes. Excluding 2 Calbicans isolates, 23 of 25 fluconazole-resistant isolates were NCAC species (14 Ckrusei, 6 Cglabrata, 2 Cparapsilosis and 1 Ctropicalis). Fifty-six (42.1%) of 133 patients developed breakthrough candidaemia. Systemic antifungal prophylaxis consisted of azoles, especially fluconazole and posaconazole, in 50 (89.3%) of 56 patients in whom a breakthrough candidaemia occurred. Interestingly, all these patients tended to develop a Ckrusei infection (10/56, P=.02) or a fluconazole-resistant isolate's infection (14/50, P=.04) compared to patients (4/77 and 10/77, respectively) who did not have a breakthrough candidaemia. Optimisation of prophylactic strategies is necessary to limit the occurrence of breakthrough candidaemia and, importantly, the emergence of fluconazole-resistant NCAC isolates' infections in haematological malignancy patients.

Invasive fungal infections in acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents

AbstractThe combination of venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (VEN-HMAs) showed promising activity in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment with VEN-HMAs results in prolonged cytopenia, thereby exposing patients to invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Here, we retrospectively studied a cohort of 119 AML patients treated with VEN-HMAs and analyzed the occurrence of IFIs, as well as our practice of antifungal prophylaxis, with the aim to identify the nature and risk factors for IFIs and their association with the type of antifungal prophylaxis used. The intended antifungal prophylaxis was micafungin in 38% of patients, azoles in 41% of patients, and none in 21% of patients. Older age was associated with no antifungal prophylaxis or micafungin use and lesser use of azoles (P = .043). We recorded 15 (12.6%) patients who developed probable or proven IFIs, with a median onset of 72 days (range, 35-281) after starting therapy. IFIs were more common among nonresponders compared with responders to VEN-HMA therapy (22% vs 6%, P = .0132) and in r/r compared with newly diagnosed AML (19% vs 5%, P = .0498); however, the antifungal prophylaxis used, patient age, hypomethylating agent schedule, history of prior allogeneic transplant, and initial neutropenia duration did not influence the development of IFIs during therapy. We conclude that the overall risk of IFIs during VEN-HMA therapy is low. The risk of IFIs is higher in nonresponders and in those who were treated in the r/r setting; these patients need reevaluation of their antifungal prophylaxis to minimize the risk of IFIs during therapy.

Evaluation of posaconazole antifungal prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of invasive aspergillosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Purpose of the studyInvasive aspergillosis (IA) is the most prevalent invasive fungal disease (IFD) in neutropenic patients. Environment is the main source of Aspergillus spores aerosolization especially during building construction. International guidelines recommend mechanical protection during hospital building works; otherwise the use of antifungal prophylaxis is not clearly indicated.Our objective was to determine the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis by posaconazole on IA incidence in acute myeloid leukemia population and to analyse the benefit of this prophylaxis and HEPA-filters during hospital buildings works. Patients and methodsWe included patients treated for acute myeloid leukemia at Brest teaching hospital from January 2009 to December 2015. We compared incidence of IA in the group treated by posaconazole from 2012 to 2015 to the incidence of IA in the first group who did not receive antifungal prophylaxis (from 2009 to 2011). The one-year overall survival was also analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results245 patients were enrolled including 151 treated with posaconazole. 23 IA were diagnosed between 2009 and 2011 (without antifungal prophylaxis), then 31 between 2012 and 2015 (with posaconazole) without statistical difference between the incidence densities (0.34 per 100 hospitalization-days vs. 0.30 per 100 hospitalization-days, p = 0.71). Incidence density of IA increased during building works (2.40 per 100 hospitalization-days vs. 0.28 per 100 hospitalization-days, p < 0.0001). The incidence density of IA significantly decreased during construction periods when posaconazole prophylaxis was used (1.59 per 100 hospitalization-days vs. 4.87 per 100 hospitalization-days p < 0.0001). ConclusionOur study suggests, for the first time, the interest of antifungal prophylaxis in addition to HEPA filtration in prevention of IA during hospital building works.

Risk Adapted Antifungal Strategy in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Should We Change the Current Guidelines?

Background: Current guidelines recommend the use of antifungal prophylaxis during, at least, the first three months post allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). However, these drugs are not exempt of adverse effects due to their own toxicity or drug-drug interactions. In addition, breakthrough mold infections seem to be emerging as a new problem in this setting. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the benefit of a strategy in which allo-SCT patients were not routinely prescribed antifungal drugs except for the case of the development of neutropenic fever and/or exposure to high dose of corticosteroids. Main objectives were 1) requirement and time of exposure to antifungal treatment and 2) cumulative incidence (CI) of proven or probable IFI at 1, 3 and 6 months after transplant. Other objectives were IFI description and overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: 319 patients who underwent a first allo-SCT at our center between 2010 and 2017 and were not under antifungal prophylaxis at the moment of transplant were included. 181 patients (57%) were males and median age was 51 years, range (4-74). Acute myeloid leukemia (35%) was the most frequent diagnosis and myeloablative conditioning regimen was mostly used (69%). 99 patients (31%) received the stem cells from a mismatched donor and BM was the preferred stem cell source (72%). Fourteen patients (4%) did not engraft. The median length of neutropenia &lt;0.5x109/L and &lt;0.1x109/L were 12 days and 6 days, respectively. Forty-two patients (14%) developed acute GVHD grade III-IV. Post-mortem study was performed in 28 of the deceased patients (43%). Results:Thirty-one 31 patients (9.7%) did not receive antifungal drugs along the course of the transplantation, 58 patients (18%) required it for less than 1 week and only 24% were on therapy more than 3 weeks. The median total days on antifungal drugs was 13 days (0-175) for the entire population and 11 days (0-109) in patients who did not develop fungal infection and/or acute GVHD II-IV. Fluconazole (61%) was the main antifungal drug used during the neutropenic phase, followed by caspofungin (27%). Time on fluconazole was significantly shorter than caspofungin, 8 vs. 11 days, p=0.001. A change on antifungal therapy was needed in 130 (45%) patients and was more frequent in those who were receiving fluconazole (57%) compared to those who were receiving caspofungin (20%), p&lt;0.0001. The CI of proven or probable IFI at day 30, 90 and 180 after transplant was 2.5%, 5.1% and 5.5%, respectively. Very importantly, none of the 106 patients who did not receive antifungal drugs or received less than one-week developed IFI. Twelve mold infection, 4 in the postmortem study, and 5 yeast infection were diagnosed. Microbiological identification was obtained in 9 patients; C. parapsilosis (3), Rhizopus (2), C. orthopsilosis (1), Criptococo laurentii (1), A. fumigatus (1), Alternaria spp. (1). The restricted administration of antifungal drugs did not affect the overall survival, Figure 1. Conclusion: In our experience, a restrictive strategy for the use of antifungal drugs in the setting of allo-SCT is feasible and effective. It results in similar cumulative incidences of fungal infection than the recommended policy. Moreover, it allows almost 10% of patients to remain free of antifungal treatment throughout the procedure and one fourth of them being exposed for less than a week. This data supports the change in the antifungal prophylactic paradigm for allo-SCT patients. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

1735. Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Infections During Induction Chemotherapy in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Without Antifungal Prophylaxis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundWhile invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing induction chemotherapy, little current data exist on the epidemiology of IFIs in this patient population given widespread use of antifungal prophylaxis. Because our institution does not administer antifungal prophylaxis, we are in a unique position to study the natural history of IFIs in these patients.MethodsWe evaluated the incidence of IFIs using established definitions in adults with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy at Stanford Health Care from 2012 to 2017. We also analyzed incidence of antifungal treatment, impact of IFI diagnosis on survival, and risk factors for IFI development. Patients were followed for up to 12 weeks after beginning induction chemotherapy.ResultsOf 488 patients analyzed, 243 were eligible for inclusion. The median age was 57 (interquartile range 45–65). Men composed 134 (55%) of the patients and 157 (65%) where white. Fifty-four (22%) had antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome; most received a “7 + 3” regimen involving cytarabine and an anthracycline. Thirty-one (13%) developed a proven or probable IFI; 104 (43%) developed a proven, probable, or possible IFI. Most IFIs were due to lower respiratory tract disease. Eighteen identified organisms were Candida, including six C. albicans. Eight organisms were mold, including four Aspergillus isolates (all but one A. fumigatus) and one isolate each of Fusarium solani, Rhizomucor, Rhizopus, and Scedosporium apiospermum/Pseudallescheria boydii. One hundred ninety patients (78%) received antifungals during their initial admission and 99 (46%) of patients surviving their initial admission were discharged on antifungals. Only 66.7% of patients with a proven or probable IFI survived through 12 weeks, compared with 92.2% of those without (P = 0.007). Baseline absolute neutrophil count ≤500 cells/μL and longer duration of neutropenia were significantly associated with development of proven or probable IFIs.ConclusionAmong patients receiving induction chemotherapy for AML, IFIs due to Candida and mold remain frequent absent antifungal prophylaxis and are associated with worse survival. Our findings support the use of antifungal prophylaxis in this patient population.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

282. Epidemiology of Candidemia in Patients with Solid Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract

BackgroundThe Gastrointestinal (GI) tract is considered as an important source of candidemia. Numerous studies indicate that the majority of patients with candidemia and cancer have an underlying solid tumor mostly of the GI tract. Widespread use of antifungal prophylaxis among patients with selected hematological malignancies resulted in a proportional redistribution of the frequency of candidemia among patients with various malignancies, but the incidence of candidemia among patients with GI solid malignancies is unknown.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with GI malignancies from 2010 to 2018 at Rochester Regional Health, Lipson Cancer Institute was conducted, and the incidence of candidemia was determined.ResultsA total of 2783 patients with GI malignancies were analyzed. Fifty-six percent were males, and a mean age was 67 years. Sites of malignancy included large intestine (n = 1269), pancreas (n = 394), any part of the mouth and associated organs (n = 282), liver and biliary system (n = 273), stomach (n = 235), esophagus (n = 135), small intestine (n = 110), and others (n = 85). Over the period of review, total mortality was 49%. Only 0.7% (n = 19) patients developed candidemia, with a total of 22 events. Nine episodes of candidemia happened prior to diagnosis of cancer, and 13 episodes developed after or at the time of diagnosis. There was no commonality in GI solid malignancy site among patients with candidemia. C. albicans was the most common isolate (9 episodes), followed by C. parapsilosis (8), C. glabrata (3), and C. dubliniensis (2). At the same time, there were 273 episodes of bacteremia in 230 patients (8%).ConclusionIn our study candidemia among patients with GI solid-organ malignancies was very rare.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

A Prospective Observational Multi-institutional Study on Invasive Fungal Infections Following Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MISFIC Study): A Real World Scenario from India.

We performed a prospective multi-centre observational study to understand the incidence of IFI in patients with AML in India with use of anti-fungal prophylaxis. All patients with AML receiving either induction chemotherapy or salvage chemotherapy between November 2014 and February 2016 were included in this prospective observational study from 10 Indian centres. IFI was defined as per the revised EORTC-MSG criteria. Data on type of chemotherapy used, type of anti-fungal prophylaxis used, time to neutrophil recovery, incidence of IFI and survival were collected. Two hundred patients (118 male and 82 females) with a median age of 35years (range: 2-66) were recruited. One hundred and eighty-six (93%) had newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) while 14 (7%) had relapsed disease. IFI occurred in 53 patients (26.5%) with proven or probable IFI occurring in 17 (8.5%). Use of posaconazole prophylaxis (p = 0.027) was the only factor found to be associated with a reduced incidence of IFI. The overall survival (OS) at 6weeks and 3months respectively was similar among patients who had IFI (83.0 ± 5.2%; 81.0 ± 5.4%) as compared to those without IFI (84.4 + 3.0%; 81.4 ± 3.2%). This prospective study reveals a high incidence of IFI in patients undergoing chemotherapy for AML in India. The use of posaconazole prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower incidence of IFI. Optimal strategies to prevent IFI need to be studied.

Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy.

Patients with hematological malignancies are severely immunocompromised and are at high risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI), particularly those undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IFIs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in such patients. We planned to study the incidence of IFI in patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy and receiving antifungal prophylaxis. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 46 patients with non-M3 AML, who received induction chemotherapy and systemic antifungal prophylaxis. None of the patients had IFI at the time of initiation of the chemotherapy. Patients were monitored for the occurrence of IFI using high-resolution computerized tomography of the chest or para-nasal sinus and test for galactomannan antigen on serum or broncho-alveolar lavage and were followed up for 90days. Of the 46 patients on intensive chemotherapies, 41, 4 and 1 patients were started on posaconazole, amphotericin B and voriconazole prophylaxis, respectively. The occurrence of possible and probable IFI was observed in 16 and 4 patients respectively, in which 19 patients were on posaconazole and 1 patient was on amphotericin-B prophylaxis. Overall mortality in the study population was 11 (23.9%). Four out of 20 patients died with IFI but none of the death was attributable to IFI. IFI still remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with AML despite universal use of antifungal prophylaxis. With effective pharmacotherapy, the mortality due to IFI is preventable. Appropriate antifungal prophylaxis strategy still needs to be developed through larger and prospective studies.

Real-World Efficacy of Anti-Fungal Prophylaxis in Patients Treated for Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-host Disease (GI-GVHD)

AimAllogeneic progenitor cell transplant (HPCT) recipients who develop acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) are at increased risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFI). Randomised control trial data supports the use of mould-active fungal prophylaxis in HPCT patients with grade II-IV GVHD (Ullman et al. 2007). We aimed to assess our unit's use of anti-fungal prophylaxis and describe the incidence and species of breakthrough IFI in patients with GI-GVHD.MethodWe conducted a retrospective audit of patients who underwent HPCT at our institution between 2011-2016 and identified those who were treated for acute GI-GVHD using a minimum of prednisone 1mg/kg or equivalent. For those patients the following details were collected: presence of any prior IFIs, anti-fungal prophylaxis before and after initiation of steroids, and the incidence of new IFIs within 6 months of commencing steroids.ResultOf the 551 HPCT performed during this period, 74 evaluable patients were treated for GI-GVHD. All patients received anti-fungal prophylaxis prior to steroid commencement (66.2% received fluconazole, 10.8% posaconazole, 20.2% voriconazole and 2.7% other). Post steroids 35.1% remained on fluconazole, 21.6% received posaconazole, 35.1% received voriconazole, and 8.1% received other anti-fungals. Of the 26 patients remaining on fluconazole, 9 were transitioned to mould-active prophylaxis at a later time.Twelve patients (16.2%) experienced a breakthrough IFI (6 definite and 6 probable). In the 42 patients receiving posaconazole or voriconazole, 7 (16.7%) experienced breakthrough IFI, compared with 3 (11.5%) in the fluconazole cohort. Two other cases occurred in patients who received caspofungin. Notably, patients receiving mould-active fungal prophylaxis developed mucormycosis, Fusarium and Scedosporium infections whereas fluconazole lead to invasive aspergillosis.ConclusionDespite anti-fungal prophylaxis, real-world GI-GVHD patients remain at particularly increased risk of developing IFI. Anti-mould prophylaxis is associated with lower incidence of invasive aspergillosis but higher incidence of non-Aspergillus mould. Further studies investigating optimal anti-mould strategies are warranted. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

1129. Targeted Voriconazole Prophylaxis in Heart Transplantation Recipients

BackgroundThe use of antifungal prophylaxis, targeted or universal, remains controversial and unstudied. The goal of this study is to determine the role of targeted voriconazole prophylaxis (VORI) in prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFI) after heart transplantation (HT).MethodsWe conducted a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study of 276 HT recipients from June 2005 to April 2017 to characterize the incidence and outcome of IFI following targeted VORI. Starting in June 2013, HT recipients with thymoglobulin (ATG) treatment received VORI for 3 months. Probable/proven IFI were defined by EORTC/MSG criteria. Descriptive frequencies and univariate analyses were performed.ResultsMean duration of follow-up post-HT was 1,165 days (0–3,152 days). 149 (54%) and 70 (25%) received basiliximab and thymoglobulin induction, respectively. Thirty-one (11%) received VORI, following use of ATG in the setting of induction (68%) or rejection (32%). VORI was started at median of 6 days (0–1,008 days) post-HT for a mean duration of 97 days (5–251 days). Overall, 23 IFIs occurred in 23 recipients (8%) at mean 283 days post-HT (range 2–1,579 days), including seven Aspergillus (one occurring after VORI completion), seven invasive Candida (five with candidemia), two Rhizopus, one Cunninghamella, two histoplasma, two blastomyces, one Cryptococcus, and one multifocal cutaneous Alternaria. ConclusionTargeted VORI resulted in reduced incidences of both early and overall IFI after HT although this did not reach statistical significance. Since instituting this strategy, we have observed a single case of aspergillosis following VORI discontinuation. Overall and 1-year mortality were not impacted. The use of antifungal prophylaxis following HT requires continued investigation both to determine efficacy and toxicity in this patient population.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

971. Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections (IFI) in Acute Leukemia (AL) Patients Receiving Antifungal Prophylaxis

BackgroundA major challenge in patients with AL receiving chemotherapy is to decrease the risk of IFI during the prolonged neutropenic period. Even with antifungal prophylaxis, the incidence of breakthrough IFI can be as high as 14%. Our objectives were to determine the incidence of all IFI and breakthrough IFI, to define risk factors associated with IFI, and to assess outcomes.MethodsSingle-center retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients admitted to the University of Michigan for AL from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. Chart review determined co-morbidities, chemotherapy regimens, antifungal prophylaxis, occurrence of IFI as determined by EORTC/MSG criteria, and outcomes. Chi-square, Fischer’s, ANOVA, and binary logistic regression tests were performed when appropriate.ResultsOf 363 patients, all but 4 had acute myeloid leukemia (AML); 124 had a stem cell transplant (SCT). A total of 103 (28%) had proven (n = 13), probable (n = 22), or possible (n = 68) IFI. Considering only those 35 patients who had proven or probable IFI, the only risk factor for development of IFI by logistic regression analysis was IFLAG chemotherapy (P = .006). Mold infections occurred in 27 patients: Aspergillus (19), Mucorales (5), both Aspergillus and Mucorales (1), Alternaria (1), and Scedosporium (1). Additionally, 5 patients had invasive candidiasis and 3 had Pneumocystis. Eighteen of 35 patients (51%) had breakthrough IFI while on posaconazole suspension (6), fluconazole (5), micafungin (5) or voriconazole (2). Factors significantly associated with breakthrough IFI were SCT (P = .04), neutrophils <500, ≥10 days at diagnosis (P = .002) and prophylaxis with posaconazole suspension (P = .003). Twelve-week mortality in proven and probable IFI was 31% (11/35). Nine of 11 deceased patients had breakthrough IFI; 8 of whom (5 with mold IFI and 3 with invasive candidiasis) died of the fungal infection.ConclusionPatients receiving chemotherapy for AL remain at risk for IFI despite the the use of antifungal prophylaxis. In our study, prophylaxis with posaconazole suspension was found to be an independent risk factor for breakthrough IFI. Mortality was high among patients with breakthrough IFI.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Clinical risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients: Results of an international cohort study.

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a frequent complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Clinical risk factors for IA have not been fully characterized, especially in the era of extensive anti-fungal prophylaxis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical risk factors associated with IA in LTRs. The secondary objective was to assess the mortality in LTRs who had at least 1 episode of IA compared with LTRs who never had experienced IA. We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 900 consecutive adults who received lung transplants between 2005 and 2008 with 4years of follow-up. Risk factors associated with IA were identified using univariate and multiple regression Cox proportional hazards models. Anti-fungal prophylaxis was administered to 61.7% (555 of 900) of patients, and 79 patients developed 115 episodes of IA. The rate to development of the first episode was 29.6 per 1,000 person-years. Aspergillus fumigatus was the most common species isolated (63% [72 of 115 episodes]). Through multivariate analysis, significant risk factors identified for IA development were single lung transplant (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.10; p = 0.02,) and colonization with Aspergillus at 1 year post-transplantation (hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.49; p = 0.003,). Cystic fibrosis, pre-transplant colonization with Aspergillus spp, and use of anti-fungal prophylaxis were not significantly associated with the development of IA. Time-dependent analysis showed IA was associated with higher mortality rates. Incidence of IA remains high in LTRs. Single-lung transplant and airway colonization with Aspergillus spp. within 1 year post-transplant were significantly associated with IA.

The burden of Invasive Aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancy: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Successful treatment of haematological malignancies is frequently complicated by Invasive Aspergillosis (IA), a life-threatening fungal infection that occurs in at least 10% of haemato-oncological patients. Case fatality rates (CFR) may fluctuate over time, depending on host pathogen interactions as well as on treatment and quality of patient care. We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of current - i.e. 2008-revised EORTC-MSG criteria era - incidence and case fatality rates (CFR) of IA in patients with haematological malignancy. A systematic search according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to identify all literature reporting populations with a haematological malignancy and the incidence of IA, defined according to the EORTC/MSG 2008 criteria. Pooled cumulative incidences and CFR within 100 days were estimated using a random effects model for predefined patient populations and stratified by use of prophylaxis. The systematic literature search yielded 1285 publications of which n = 49 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 16.815 patients were involved of which 1056 (6.3%) developed IA. IA risk ranged from 4% (during remission-induction, with prophylaxis) to 11% (during remission-induction, without prophylaxis). Antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a lower rate of IA, especially in the pre-HSCT population. The pooled CFR within 100 days was 29% (95% CI: 20-38%). This study confirms that IA is a relevant threat in the treatment of haematological cancer despite the universal use of antifungal prophylaxis. These outcomes inform scientists and other stakeholders about the current burden of IA and may be used to direct, implement and improve antifungal stewardship programs.

ID: 1046 Antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: drug use evaluation at Vietnam National Institute of Hemotology and Blood transfusion

&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; *For correspondence:&#x0D; tungson94@gmail.com&#x0D; &#x0D; Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.&#x0D; Received: 2017-07-13 &#x0D; Accepted: 2017-08-04&#x0D; Published: 2017-09-05&#x0D; &#x0D; Copyright The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access by BioMedPress (BMP).&#x0D; This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients were known to be in high risk of fungal infection. However, not all HSCT patients need antifungal prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of the use of antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients and to evaluate the appropriateness of use.&#x0D; Methods: In this observational prospective study, adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients without using antifungal treatment were recruited from start of stem cell transfusion in Vietnam National Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion (from April to December 2016) to end of antifungal prophylaxis or start of antifungal treatment. Appropriateness was defined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Clinically significant Drug-drug interactions related to antifungals were defined based on Hansten and Horn’s Drug interaction and management 2013.&#x0D; Results: 38 patients (mean age: 35.7 ± 12.0; 57.9% male) were admitted, included 21 autologous and 17 allogeneic HSCT recipients. After HSCT, 3 deaths, 1 to ICU, 1 IFI. Azoles prophylaxis was given to 100% of patients with median 17.5 days (13 - 47.5). Fluconazole was the most used antifungal agents, in 94.7% of patients and 74.5% of episodes. 10 patients had been changed antifungal agents. Indication was appropriate in 44.7%, 0% in autologous and 100% in allogeneic group. In patients with appropriate indication, choice of antifungal agents was 100% appropriate. 100% of patients used inappropriate dosage, mostly lower than recommeded dosage with azoles. 12.7% had appropriate prophylactic time. Potential drug-drug interactions were identified in 92.1% of patients. Most frequent interactions involved azoles-diazepam (80.4% of episodes) and azoles-immunosuppressive drugs (49% of episodes).&#x0D; Conclusion: Our evaluation revealed a high proportion of inappropriate of antifungal prophylaxis. An antifungal stewardship programme is needed to strengthen rational use of antifungal in this specific circumstance.

Current Trends in Candidemia and Species Distribution Among Adults: Candida glabrata Surpasses C. albicans in Diabetic Patients and Abdominal Sources.

Candidemia rate and species distribution vary according to the type of patients, country of origin and antifungal prophylaxis use. To present current candidemia epidemiological trends. A retrospective examination of candidemia in adults (≥18 years-old) hospitalised from 2007 to 2015. Cases were identified through the microbiology laboratory. Candida species were distinguished based on colony morphology and VITEK-2 YBC cards, (bioMerieux, Durham, NC, USA). Patient characteristics, species distribution, source and outcome were assessed. We encountered 275 patients (294 episodes) with candidemia. The rate of candidemia dropped in 2010 (P = 0.003) without further decline. Nearly all cases (97.5%) were healthcare-associated. C. albicans (n = 118) and C. glabrata (n = 77) proportions varied without a discernable trend. C. glabrata was more common in diabetics [52.9% vs. 32.0% (non-diabetics); P = 0.004] and abdominal sources [53.3% vs. 35.5% (other sources); P = 0.03], especially gastric/duodenal foci [88.9% vs. 44.1% (other abdominal foci); P = 0.02]. All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 43.3% without changes over time or differences between C. albicans and C. glabrata. In conclusion, the candidemia rate remains stable after a decline in 2010. C. albicans remains the most common species but C. glabrata predominates in diabetics and abdominal sources. These findings suggest possible species-related differences in colonisation dynamics or pathogenicity.