Use Of Antiemetics Research Articles

Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting guideline adherence in pediatric and adult patients: a systematic review.

This study describes chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control rates in pediatric and adult patients who did or did not receive guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review of studies published in 2000 or later that evaluated CINV control in patients receiving guideline-consistent vs. guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis and reported at least one CINV-related patient outcome. Studies were excluded if the guideline evaluated was not publicly available or not developed by a professional organization. Over-prophylaxis was defined as antiemetic use recommended for a higher level of chemotherapy emetogenicity than a patient was receiving. We identified 7060 citations and retrieved 141 publications for full-text evaluation. Of these, 21 publications (14 prospective and seven retrospective studies) evaluating guidelines developed by six organizations were included. The terms used to describe CINV endpoints and definition of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis varied among studies. Included studies either did not address over-prophylaxis in their definition of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (48%; 10/21) or defined it as guideline-inconsistent (38%; 8/21) or guideline-consistent (3/21; 14%). Eleven included studies (52%; 11/21) reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one CINV endpoint in patients receiving guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis. Ten reported a statistically significant improvement. This evidence supports the use of guideline-consistent prophylaxis to optimize CINV control. Institutions caring for patients with cancer should systematically adapt CINV CPGs for local implementation and routinely evaluate CINV outcomes.

The Association of Guideline-Directed Prophylaxis with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis in pediatric patients recommend escalation of the number of antiemetics based on a preoperative estimate of PONV risk. These recommendations have been translated into performance metrics, most notably by the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG), used at over 25 children's hospitals. The impact of this approach on clinical outcomes is not known. We performed a single-center, retrospective study of pediatric general anesthetic cases from 2018 to 2021. PONV risk factors were defined using MPOG definitions: age ≥3 years, volatile use ≥30 minutes, PONV history, long-acting opioids, female ≥12 years, and high-risk procedure. Adequate prophylaxis was defined using the MPOG PONV-04 metric: 1 agent for 1 risk factor, 2 agents for 2 risk factors, and 3 agents for 3+ risk factors. PONV was defined as documented postoperative nausea/emesis or administration of a rescue antiemetic. Given the nonrandomized allocation of adequate prophylaxis, we used Bayesian binomial models with propensity score weighting. A total of 14,747 cases were included, with PONV in 11% (9% adequate prophylaxis versus 12% inadequate). Overall, there was evidence for reduced incidence of PONV with adequate prophylaxis: weighted median odds ratio 0.82 (95% credible interval, 0.66-1.02; probability of benefit, 0.97) and weighted marginal absolute risk reduction 1.3% (-0.1% to 3.1%). In unweighted estimates, there was an interaction between sum of risk factors and the association of adequate prophylaxis with PONV, with reduced incidence in patients with 1 to 2 risk factors (probability of benefit 0.96 and 0.95) but increased incidence in patients with 3+ risk factors receiving adequate prophylaxis (probability of benefit 0, 0.01, and 0.03 for 3, 4, and 5 risk factors). This was attenuated by weighting, with persistent benefit in 1 to 2 risk factors (probability of benefit 0.90 and 0.94) but equalization of risk in 3+ risk factors. Guideline-directed PONV prophylaxis is inconsistently associated with incidence of PONV across the guideline-defined risk spectrum. This phenomenon, and its attenuation with weighting, is consistent with 2 points: dichotomous risk-factor summation ignores differential effects of individual components, and prognostic information might exist beyond these risk factors. PONV risk at a given sum of risk factors is not homogeneous, but rather is determined by the unique composition of risk factors and other prognostic attributes. These differences appear to have been identified by clinicians, prompting use of more antiemetics. Even after accounting for these differences, however, addition of a third agent did not further reduce risk.

Real-world (RW) antiemetic use and its association with duration of oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) maintenance in patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the United States (US).

e23259 Background : Oral-AZA was approved in the US in Sep 2020 for maintenance treatment of transplant-ineligible pts with AML in remission following intensive chemotherapy. Approval was based on the QUAZAR trial (NCT01757535), which showed that Oral-AZA was associated with longer survival outcomes than placebo in this pt population. Both the prescribing information and clinical guidelines recommend antiemetic prophylaxis with Oral-AZA for at least the first 2 cycles to prevent the most common adverse events, nausea and vomiting. However, the extent to which antiemetics are being used with Oral-AZA in the real world is not yet well understood. This study aimed to examine the use of antiemetics among pts with AML receiving Oral-AZA in RW clinical practice and to determine whether this has any association with duration of therapy (DoT). Methods : This was a retrospective, observational study using Flatiron Health electronic health record data from Jan 2014 to Apr 2023. Eligible pts were ≥18 years and had a diagnosis of AML and ≥1 order for Oral-AZA on or after Sep 1, 2020. The index date was date of Oral-AZA initiation. Pts were followed until death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study. Pt characteristics were assessed on the index date; antiemetic use was assessed at index and over the follow-up period. For each pt, each 28-day cycle of Oral-AZA was denoted as “covered” or “not covered” by antiemetics according to whether the pt had ≥14 days of antiemetics available during the cycle. Total DoT was measured for Oral-AZA using cumulative incidence curves and compared between pts with their first 2 cycles covered and those without. Results: 189 pts with AML were included. Mean age was 66 years, 52% were female, 56% had evidence of prior cytarabine use, and 10% had a prior stem cell transplant. 152 pts had ≥2 cycles of Oral-AZA. Overall, less than half of pts (48%) had a claim for an antiemetic on the index date. 16% never initiated an antiemetic between index and the end of follow-up; in the remaining 84%, the mean time from the index date to antiemetic initiation was 57 days and 29% had a time to antiemetic initiation of > 56 days. Only 9% (14/152) of pts had both their first 2 Oral-AZA cycles covered by antiemetics. Overall, pts had a median of 5 Oral-AZA cycles. Pts with antiemetic coverage of their first 2 cycles had a median of 8.5 Oral-AZA cycles versus 6 in those without. The median DoT was longer for pts with antiemetic coverage of cycles 1 and 2 than those without (258 days vs 154 days). Conclusions: These findings suggest that antiemetics are not currently widely utilized with Oral-AZA in RW US clinical practice. This may reduce DoT and could potentially impact the likelihood of observing RW efficacy outcomes like those in the QUAZAR trial. Further studies are required to examine the association between guideline-recommended antiemetic use and clinical outcomes.

Pooled analysis on characteristics of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in clinical studies.

12118 Background: The efficacy and safety profile of T-DXd has been established in patients (pts) with various tumor types, and nausea and vomiting are the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). T-DXd study protocols were refined over time to recommend prophylaxis (eg, neurokinin or serotonin receptor antagonists and/or steroids) before T-DXd treatment, in line with antiemetic and institutional guidelines. We conducted a pooled, post hoc analysis capturing safety information across tumor types; we report results on nausea and vomiting. While this analysis was not designed to assess antiemetic effectiveness, it reveals the incidence of nausea and vomiting in clinical trials of T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg in more detail across a large dataset. Methods: 1449 pts treated with ≥1 dose of 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd (every 3 wks) were included from 7 phase 1-3 clinical trials in metastatic HER2+ and HER2-low breast cancer, HER2+ gastric cancer, and HER2-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (DESTINY-Breast01, -Breast02, -Breast03, -Breast04, -Lung01, -Lung02, and the first-in-human phase 1 study J101 in multiple tumor types; study enrollment starting 2015-2021). Regardless of antiemetic use (including prophylaxis), the incidence, severity, time to onset, and duration of nausea and vomiting TEAEs were assessed along with event outcomes. Results: Of 1449 pts receiving T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg (median [range] number of 3-wk treatment cycles: 13 [1-60]), 74.6% (n=1081) experienced nausea, and 41.6% (n=603) reported vomiting. Most pts had grade 1/2 nausea (41.2%/27.6%) and/or vomiting (26.2%/12.8%). Grade 3 TEAEs of nausea were reported in 5.8% of pts, with grade ≥3 TEAEs of vomiting observed in 2.6% of pts. By the data cutoff for each trial, 66.9% of pts with nausea and 87.6% with vomiting had their symptoms resolve. Most pts who experienced nausea and vomiting did so during the initial 21 days (cycle 1; n=879 [81.3%] and 336 [55.7%], respectively; 35.8% of all pts received antiemetic prophylaxis at cycle 1); both TEAEs declined notably in subsequent cycles. Rates of drug discontinuation, dose reduction, and drug interruption due to nausea and vomiting were generally low (Table). Conclusions: Most nausea and vomiting events were reported during the first 3 wks of treatment and resolved. Appropriate prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting is a key management strategy and allows pts to benefit from longer treatment durations with T-DXd. Ongoing studies are exploring the implementation and impact of prophylaxis for T-DXd–related emesis. Clinical trial information: NCT03248492 , NCT03523585 , NCT03529110 , NCT03734029 , NCT03505710 , NCT04644237 , NCT02564900 . [Table: see text]

The effect of breathing exercises on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: A randomized controlled trial

PurposeThis research was conducted as a randomized controlled study to examine the effect of breathing exercises on managing chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. MethodsA randomized controlled trial design was used, including an intervention group doing breathing exercises and a control group receiving standard care for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The sample was selected from patients hospitalized in the bone marrow transplantation unit. A total of 70 autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients (35 intervention and 35 control participants).Several variables were evaluated, including the frequence and degree of nausea and vomiting, the patient's nutritional status, and the need for antiemetics. Data were analyzed and interpreted using Mann Whitney U, Pearson chi-square test, Independent t-test, Mann Whitney U, and multiple linear regression. ResultsIt was found that there was a negative relationship between the number of breathing exercises, the number of nausea and vomiting and the severity of nausea. As the number of breathing exercises increased, the number nausea and vomiting, and severity of nausea decreased significantly (p < 0.05). It was found that the use of antiemetics decreased in the intervention group. Furthermore, it was found that the intervention group had higher daily food consumption on the 3rd, 7th, and 9th days (p < 0.05). ConclusionBreathing exercises were a practical approach to managing chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting.

Risks of peri- and postoperative complications with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

To assess whether adults with diabetes on oral hypoglycaemic agents undergoing general endotracheal anaesthesia during nine common surgical procedures who are glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) users, compared with non-users, are at increased risk of six peri- and post-procedure complications. A retrospective observational cohort analysis of over 130 million deidentified US adults with diabetes (defined as being on oral hypoglycaemic agents) from a nationally representative electronic health dataset between 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2023 was analysed. Cohorts were matched by high-dimensionality propensity scoring. We compared the odds of six peri- and postoperative complications in GLP1-RA users and non-users. A sensitivity analysis compared these odds in GLP1-RA users to non-users with diabetes and obesity. We measured the odds of (a) a composite outcome of postoperative decelerated gastric emptying, including antiemetic use, ileus within 7 days post-procedure, gastroparesis diagnosis, gastric emptying study; (b) postoperative aspiration or pneumonitis; (c) severe respiratory failure; (d) postoperative hypoglycaemia; (e) inpatient mortality; and (f) 30-day mortality. Among 13 361 adults with diabetes, 16.5% were treated with a GLP1-RA. In the high-dimensionality propensity score-matched cohort, GLP1-RA users had a lower risk of peri- and postoperative complications for decelerated gastric emptying and antiemetic use compared with non-users. The risk of ileus within 7 days, aspiration/pneumonitis, hypoglycaemia and 30-day mortality were not different. A sensitivity analysis showed similar findings in patients with diabetes and obesity. No increased risk of peri- and postoperative complications in GLP1-RA users undergoing surgery with general endotracheal anaesthesia was identified.

Palliative care for patients with gastroesophageal cancer at all stages: a narrative review.

Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer is a highly morbid disease with a poor prognosis. While uncommon in the United States, globally it is ranked as the sixth or seventh most common cancer depending on survey tool. GEJ cancer presents a unique and challenging symptom profile for patients at all disease stages, regardless of histology. Even patients with early stage disease experience debilitating cancer-related symptoms and treatment side effects. The heavy symptom burden associated with this disease includes dysphagia, nausea and vomiting, pain, anxiety, depression and malnutrition. These symptoms require a multidisciplinary approach involving local therapies including radiation and stent placement, systemic cancer-directed therapy, nutritional support, and supportive medical management. This review aims to examine the unique symptom burden experienced by patients with GEJ cancer and provide an updated overview of symptom management techniques. A PubMed search was conducted using the terms "gastroesophageal junction cancer AND palliative care". Articles published from 2008 to 2022 with a primary focus on supportive care for patients with GEJ cancers were reviewed. A total of 119 articles were identified and screened in our database search. Of these, 22 full text articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Seventeen articles addressed technical interventions for the alleviation of dysphagia, 1 article focused on nutrition, 1 article described the impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards, 1 article presented the effect of home nurse visits, 1 article described the use of antiemetics, and 1 article was a narrative review of supportive care. In this narrative review, we examine specific supportive care needs in the GEJ cancer population. While the predominant symptom addressed in the literature is dysphagia, patients with GEJ cancer carry a complex symptom burden from diagnosis, through cancer-directed therapy to end-of-life care. Early referral to specialty palliative care should be considered for all patients with GEJ cancer to foster symptom management and delivery of goal concordant care.

Evaluation of Antiemetic Consistency in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Among NHL Patients in Sana'a, Yemen.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a prevalent and distressing adverse effect that can negatively affect a patient's quality of life and treatment adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of antiemetic use with standard guidelines and to examine the factors influencing it. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Oncology Center (NOC) of Al-Jomhouri Teaching Hospital, Sana'a, Yemen, from November 2022 to September 2023. Demographic data, chemotherapy and antiemetic regimens, dosages, and patient-related risk factors were collected via direct interviews, medical records, and treatment charts. This study evaluated the consistency of antiemetic practices among non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) patients using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. The chi-squared test and regression were used to determine the factors associated with guideline consistency. A total of 251 patients with NHL were recruited for the study; 57.4% were male and 60.6% were aged between 18-49. Most of the patients received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (81.3%). The overall consistency with the NCCN guidelines was only 23.9%, with antiemetic drug selection and dosage reported inconsistently in 62.9% and 16.7% of patients, respectively. Furthermore, 62.5% of the patients received an under-prescribed antiemetic prophylactic regimen. Treatment duration, number of chemotherapy cycles, emetogenic risk potential, and overall patient risk, as well as age, sex, and marital status, were significantly associated with guideline inconsistency (p < 0.05). This study revealed a notable gap in the consistency of antiemetic prescriptions among patients with NHL. Inappropriate drug selection, dosing, and under-prescription are common problems. Patient regimen risk factors significantly influenced the consistency of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Personalized approaches are essential to enhance adherence to guidelines and improve antiemetic strategies.

Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol Reduces Discharge Times Compared with Inhaled General Anesthesia in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shoulder arthroscopy is commonly performed at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) with use of an interscalene block and inhaled general anesthesia (IGA). However, an alternative option known as total intravenous anesthesia with propofol (TIVA-P) has shown promising results in reducing recovery time for other surgeries. The objective of this study was to assess whether there is a clinically meaningful difference in post-anesthesia care unit phase-I (PACU-I) time following shoulder arthroscopy between patients receiving an interscalene block with IGA and those receiving an interscalene block with TIVA-P. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy performed by a single surgeon at the ASC of our institution between 2020 and 2023 were enrolled. Enrollment was conducted in blocks, with up to 3 planned interim analyses. After 2 blocks, enrollment was halted because the study arms demonstrated a significant difference in the primary outcome measure, PACU-I time. A total of 96 patients were randomized into the TIVA-P and IGA groups; after patient withdrawals, the groups comprised 42 and 40 patients, respectively. Patients underwent shoulder arthroscopy with use of the anesthesia method corresponding to their assigned group. Pain, satisfaction, antiemetic use, perioperative interventions, surgical time, PACU-II time, postoperative care time, and total time until discharge were recorded and were analyzed with use of chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests with a significance cutoff of 0.0167 to account for the interim analyses. Across groups, 81.7% of patients were non-Hispanic White and 58.5% were male. Significant differences were observed between the TIVA-P and IGA groups with respect to median PACU-I time (0.0 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 0.0 to 6.0 minutes] versus 25.5 minutes [IQR, 20.5 to 32.5 minutes]; p < 0.001) and median total time until discharge (135.5 minutes [IQR, 118.5 to 156.8 minutes] versus 148.5 minutes [IQR, 133.8 to 168.8 minutes]; p = 0.0104). The TIVA-P group had a 9.1% quicker discharge time, primarily as a result of bypassing PACU-I (66.7% of patients) and spending 25.5 fewer minutes there overall. The TIVA-P group also had a lower rate of antiemetic use than the IGA group (59.5% versus 92.5% of patients; p = 0.0013). No significant differences were detected between the TIVA-P and IGA groups in terms of median pain improvement (1.0 [IQR, 0.0 to 2.0] versus 1.0 [IQR, 0.0 to 2.0]; p = 0.6734), perioperative interventions (78.6% versus 77.5% of patients, p = 1.0000), or median patient satisfaction (4.0 [IQR, 4.0 to 4.0] versus 4.0 [IQR, 3.8 to 4.0]; p = 0.4148). TIVA-P showed potential to improve both PACU-I time and the total time until discharge while reducing antiemetic use without impacting pain or satisfaction. TIVA-P thus warrants consideration by orthopaedic surgeons for use in shoulder arthroscopy performed at ASCs. Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Reducing Opioid Use After Posterior Lumbar Spinal Decompression and Fusion.

Despite improvements in drug therapy and treatment of lumbar spinal disorders, dependence on opioid medication for postoperative pain control remains a concern nationwide. This study assessed the ability to diminish the reliance on opioid medication postoperatively with the Food and Drug Administration-approved local anesthetic liposomal bupivacaine in open posterior lumbar decompression and fusion procedures. In addition, the possible effects of this modality on other parameters were studied regarding patients and their recovery. A retrospective chart review of 198 patients who underwent an open posterior lumbar laminectomy and fusion surgery with instrumentation treated by a single surgeon in a single institution was conducted. Ninety-nine patients who received liposomal bupivacaine administered intraoperatively were then matched by age, sex, and procedure with the same number of patients treated prior to the availability of liposomal bupivacaine. We evaluated how the use of liposomal bupivacaine affected the requirement for postoperative opioid medication, as well as related changes in length of stay, the use of antiemetics, and urinary retention postoperatively. The patients who received liposomal bupivacaine required less than half of the morphine milligram equivalents of narcotic medications during their hospital stay compared with patients who did not receive liposomal bupivacaine (approximately 57% reduction). The findings of this study suggest that the addition of liposomal bupivacaine to traditional pain management modalities can augment pain management for patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery, as evidenced by the significant decrease in postoperative morphine milligram equivalents required. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):244-248.].

Antiemetic Effect of Rikkunshito, a Japanese Kampo Herbal Medicine, on Cisplatin-induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Nationwide Database Study in Japan.

Objective The effect of Rikkunshito, a Japanese herbal Kampo medicine, on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been evaluated in several small prospective studies, with mixed results. We retrospectively evaluated the antiemetic effects of Rikkunshito in patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy using a large-scale database in Japan. Methods The Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2019 was used to compare adult patients with malignant tumors who had received Rikkunshito on or before the day of cisplatin administration (Rikkunshito group) and those who had not (control group). Antiemetics on days 2 and 3 and days 4 and beyond following cisplatin administration were used as surrogate outcomes for CINV. Patient backgrounds were adjusted using the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, and outcomes were compared using univariable regression models. Results We identified 669 and 123,378 patients in the Rikkunshito and control groups, respectively. There were significantly fewer patients using intravenous 5-HT3-receptor antagonists in the Rikkunshito group (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.87; p=0.023) on days 2 and 3 of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Conclusion The reduced use of antiemetics on day 2 and beyond of cisplatin administration suggested a beneficial effect of Rikkunshito in palliating the symptoms of CINV.

Trends in low-value cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To assess the association between the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and change in low-value cancerservices. In this retrospective cohort study, we used administrative claims from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment, a repository of medical and pharmacy data from US health plans representing more than 80 million members, between January 1, 2016, and March31, 2021. We used linear probability models to investigate the relation between the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and 4 guideline-based metrics of low-value cancer care: (1) conventional fractionation radiotherapy instead of hypofractionated radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer; (2) non-guideline-based antiemetic use for minimal-, low-, or moderate- to high-risk chemotherapies; (3) off-pathway systemic therapy; and (4) aggressive end-of-life care. We identified patients with new diagnoses of breast, colorectal, and/or lung cancer. We excluded members who did not have at least 6 months of continuous insurance coverage and members with prevalent cancers. Among 117,116 members (median [IQR] age, 60[53-69] years; 72.4% women), 59,729 (51.0%) had breast cancer, 25,751 (22.0%) had colorectal cancer, and 31,862(27.2%) had lung cancer. The payer mix was 18.7% Medicare Advantage or Medicare supplemental and 81.2% commercial non-Medicare. Rates of low-value cancer services exhibited minimal changes during the pandemic, as adjusted percentage-point differences were 3.93 (95%CI, 1.50-6.36) for conventional radiotherapy, 0.82 (95% CI, -0.62 to 2.25) for off-pathway systemic therapy, -3.62 (95% CI, -4.97 to -2.27) for non-guideline-based antiemetics, and 2.71(95% CI, -0.59 to 6.02) for aggressive end-of-life care. Low-value cancer care remained prevalent throughout the pandemic. Policy makers should consider changes to payment and incentive design to turn the tide against low-value cancer care.

Inconsistency in steroid use as antiemetics in clinical trial protocols involving immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy.

This study aims to investigate the use of steroids as antiemetics in clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy. Focusing on phase III trials registered before August 2023, it evaluated the consistency of steroid use guidelines. Out of 3452 trials screened, 44 were selected for in-depth review. The findings indicate a considerable variation: 13 trials did not specify the use of antiemetics, while 31 provided criteria for antiemetics, with 13 conforming to local standards, six to international guidelines, and five allowing either. Seven trials recommended effective antiemetics without detailed criteria. This inconsistency led to a range of steroid dosages, with only 11 trials advocating for minimizing or avoiding steroids for antiemetic purposes. The research highlights the lack of uniformity in antiemetic steroid use in trials, reflecting diverse clinical practices and underscoring the need for further research to understand the implications on treatment outcomes.

Guidelines for Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum and Implementation in Clinical Practice in Norway: A Descriptive Study

Background. The severe pregnancy complication hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) requires intravenous fluids, antiemetics, and nutrition to prevent maternal and fetal complications. Several guidelines exist for the treatment of HG within and across countries. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the guideline issued by the Norwegian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology (NGF) was implemented in clinical practice by comparing department treatment protocols and assessing provided treatment. Methods. Department protocols for the treatment of HG were requested from all Norwegian gynecology departments and compared to the NGF guideline regarding the use of Pregnancy Unique Quantification of Emesis (PUQE-24) score, antiemetics, thiamine, and fluid and nutritional therapy. Additionally, we performed a retrospective chart review of provided treatment during 2017–2019 at four hospitals. Results. In all, 28 of 39 (72%) departments replied, of which 11 reported using the NGF guidelines unaltered. Of the 17 local department protocols in use, 16 closely resembled the NGF guidelines regarding the use of PUQE score, fluid therapy, nutritional treatment, and thiamine. Eight department protocols differed slightly from the NGF guidelines regarding the antiemetic medication treatment pathway, and two recommended antiemetic medication not supported by national or international guidelines. The retrospective chart review of 343 patients at four hospitals showed that the provided care aligned with the guidelines regarding intravenous fluids and the use of PUQE score, and the use of antiemetics mostly aligned with the treatment pathway provided in the NGF guideline. However, the proportion of patients receiving ondansetron varied between 32% and 79% and thiamine from 38 to 86% between hospitals. Overall, few patients were provided with nutritional treatment by partial peripheral nutrition (14%), enteral tube feeding (8%), or total parenteral nutrition (1.5%). Conclusion. The NGF guideline was used unaltered or largely integrated in department protocols. Treatment data suggest that the guideline was implemented in clinical practice, but differences in the provision of ondansetron and thiamine suggest geographical inequality of care. Infrequent use of nutritional treatment by parenteral nutrition or enteral feeding tube could suggest improvements in pharmacological symptom management or undertreatment of malnutrition.

Use of a Combination Lavender/Peppermint Aromatherapy Patch During Port Catheter Placement Under Monitored Anesthesia Care Does Not Reduce Time to Discharge Readiness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Intraoperative anxiety is a common problem when Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) is used instead of general anesthesia during minor surgical procedures such as port catheter placement. Nonpharmacological anxiolytics such as aromatherapy have been studied for their effects on preoperative anxiety, but no placebo-controlled study of aromatherapy during surgeries under MAC has yet been performed. Methods: After IRB approval, 70 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a lavender/peppermint aromatherapy patch (Elequil Aromatabs®; Beekley Corporation) or a matching placebo patch. The primary outcome, time to readiness for discharge from postoperative acute care units (PACU; min), was assessed every 15 min until a modified postanesthesia recovery score for ambulatory patients (PARSAP) score of 18 or higher was reached. In the preoperative holding area, the assigned patch/placebo was activated and affixed to a folded towel placed aside the subject's head, contralateral to the side of the planned surgery. The towel and patch/placebo were discarded when the subject left the operating room (OR). Results: No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups on the primary outcome of time to discharge readiness (mean [standard deviation, SD]: 82 [15] vs. 89 [21] min, respectively, p = 0.131). No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups on the secondary outcomes of intraoperative midazolam dose, intraoperative opioid dose, intraoperative ondansetron dose, or intraoperative promethazine dose. No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups in the proportion of subjects requiring rescue postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) medication in the PACU or the proportion of subjects requiring opioids in the PACU. No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups in pain intensity in PACU, average PONV score in PACU, or patient satisfaction in PACU. PACU patient satisfaction was high for both the patch and placebo groups (35/35 [100%] vs. 32/34 [94%] "very satisfied," p = 0.239). Conclusions: Aromatherapy treatment is not indicated intraoperatively to reduce anxiety or the use of antiemetics in patients requiring Port catheter placement. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05328973.

Intraoperative Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Microvascular Decompression

We performed this study to investigate the effect of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential (IBAEP) changes on the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after microvascular decompression (MVD) for neurovascular cross compression. A total of 373 consecutive cases were treated with MVD. The use of rescue antiemetics after surgery was used as an objective indicator of PONV. IBAEP monitoring was routinely performed in all. The use of rescue antiemetics was significantly associated with female sex (OR=3.427; 95% CI, 2.077-5.654; P < 0.001), PCA use (OR=3.333; 95% CI, 1.861-5.104; P < 0.001), and operation time (OR=1.017; 95% CI, 1.008-1.026; P < 0.001). A Wave V peak delay of more than 1.0milliseconds showed a significant relation with the use of rescue antiemetics (OR=1.787; 95% CI, 1.114-2.867; P= 0.016) and a strong significant relation with the use of rescue antiemetics more than 5 times (OR=2.426; 95% CI, 1.372-4.290; P= 0.002). A wave V peak delay of more than 1.0milliseconds might have value as a predictor of PONV after MVD. More detailed neurophysiological studies will identify the exact pathophysiology underlying PONV after MVD.

Retrospective analysis of real-world prescribing data for managing cisplatin-based chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in China.

The current utilization of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) and the impact of updated guidelines on prescription patterns of antiemetic drugs among Chinese patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) remain undetermined. This study aims to analyze the present situation of Chinese cancer patients using antiemetic drugs and assess the appropriateness of antiemetic regimens. Prescription data were collected between January 2015 and December 2020 from cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy at 76 hospitals in six major cities in China. Trends in the use of antiemetic drugs, prescribing patterns and adherence to antiemetic guidelines were assessed. Among the 108,611 patients included in this study, 6 classes and 17 antiemetic drugs were identified as monotherapy or combination therapy in 93,872 patients (86.4%), whereas 14,739 patients (13.6%) were administered no antiemetic treatment. 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs) and glucocorticoids were the two most frequently used classes of antiemetics, followed by metoclopramide. NK1RAs were underused across the six cities, only 9332 (8.6%) and 1655 (1.5%) cisplatin-based treatments were prescribed aprepitant and fosaprepitant, respectively. Prescriptions of olanzapine and lorazepam were very low throughout the study period. In prescribing patterns of antiemetic drugs, dual combination regimens were the most common (40.0%), followed by triple combination therapy and monotherapy (25.8% and 15.1%, respectively). Overall, the adherence to antiemetic guidelines for patients undergoing cisplatin-based regimens was only 8.1% due to inadequate prescription of antiemetic drugs. Finally, our study also revealed that 5-HT3RAs and glucocorticoids were overprescribed in 8.8% and 1.6% of patients, respectively. The current study reveals suboptimal utilization of recommended antiemetic drugs for managing cisplatin-based HEC-induced nausea and vomiting in China. Improving the management of CINV is crucial, and these findings provide valuable insights into optimizing antiemetic drug practices.

Renal caliculi: Types, mechanism, therapeutic approaches encompassing role of GAGS, MGP, Hormones, UPTF1, CAI, Osteopontin

Kidney stones are deposits in the renal pelvis, calyces, and ureters and reside in urine. Kidney stones undergo biomineralization pathogenesis via nucleation, aggregation, and growth of caliculi. The greater prevalence of kidney stones in men than in women may be due to the link between sex hormones. Kidney equilibrium is maintained with glycosaminoglycans inhibiting growth and aggregation. Sialylated glycoforms of urinary prothrombin fragment 1 prevent calcium stone development. Crystal adherence to tubules is inhibited by CAI, and osteopontin inhibits calculi formation. Medical treatments involve the use of alpha blocker, potassium citrate, thiazide, NSAIDS, opioids, antiemetics and other drugs used in treatment of kidney stone, Alpha adrenoceptor blockers, calcium channel blockers and corticosteroids help to expel renal stones, chemolytic treatment and it could be necessary to remove stones surgically if they are affecting kidney function with the use of techniques. Use of catheter, ultrasound, using a flexible scope equipped with a laser, HDAC inhibitors and many are recent advances in treatment lithiasis.

Effect of Propofol Infusion on Need for Rescue Antiemetics in Postanesthesia Care Unit After Volatile Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent after volatile anesthesia. We hypothesized that coadministration of propofol with volatile anesthetic compared to pure volatile anesthetics would decrease the need for postoperative antiemetic treatments and shorten recovery time in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). We retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent procedures using general anesthesia with volatile agents, with or without propofol infusion, from May 2018 through December 2020, and who were admitted to the PACU. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations with robust variance estimates to assess whether propofol was associated with decreased need for rescue antiemetics. Among 47,847 patients, overall IPTW rescue antiemetic use was 4.7% for 17,573 patients who received propofol and 8.2% for 30,274 who did not (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.61; P <.001). This effect associated with propofol was present regardless of the intensity of antiemetic prophylaxis (OR, 0.59, 0.51, and 0.58 for 0-1, 2, and ≥3 antiemetics used, respectively), procedural duration (OR, 0.54, 0.62, and 0.47 for ≤2.50, 2.51-4.00, ≥4.01 hours), and type of volatile agent (OR, 0.51, 0.52, and 0.57 for desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane) (all P <.001). This effect was dose dependent, with little additional benefit for the reduction in the use of PACU antiemetics when propofol rate exceeded 100 μg/kg/min. Patients who received rescue antiemetics required longer PACU recovery time than those who did not receive antiemetics (ratio of the geometric mean, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28-1.33; P <.001), but use of propofol did not affect PACU recovery time (ratio of the geometric mean, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P =.56). The addition of propofol infusions to volatile-based anesthesia is associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the need for rescue antiemetics in the PACU regardless of the number of prophylactic antiemetics, duration of procedure, and type of volatile agent used, without affecting PACU recovery time.

The efficacy of gastric aspiration in reducing postoperative vomiting after oral and maxillofacial surgery: A meta-analysis.

Gastric aspiration is applied in oral and maxillofacial procedures to reduce postoperative vomiting (POV), yet its clinical benefit remains largely uncertain. Our study aimed to determine the role of gastric aspiration in the amelioration of POV by a meta-analysis. With adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, global recognized databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central, were searched to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of gastric aspiration in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The incidence and the number of episodes of POV and the frequency of rescue antiemetic use were extracted as parametric data for pooled estimation. Funnel plots and Egger's test were utilized to assess bias. The recommendation of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After detailed evaluation, 5 RCTs containing 274 participants were eventually included. The results of pooled estimation indicated that gastric aspiration could not reduce the incidence of POV (risk ratio [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.73, 1.21], P = .621), the number of episodes of POV (standard mean difference [95% CI] = -0.13 [-0.45, 0.19], P = .431) or the frequency of rescue antiemetic use (RR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.49, 1.52], P = .609). No publication bias was detected by the funnel plot and Egger test. The overall recommendation of evidence was rated low regarding each outcome. Based on current evidence, gastric aspiration is not recommended for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Meanwhile, more large-scale high-quality RCTs are needed.