Use Of Analgesics Research Articles

In vitro studies support clinical trials showing platelet-rich fibrin-mediated local delivery of antibiotics improves outcomes in impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

Our previous clinical observations showed that platelet rich fibrin (PRF) can be used to deliver antibiotics to attenuate postoperative complications after unilaterally impacted mandibular third molar surgery (IMTMS). In order to begin understanding the mechanism involved in the beneficial in vivo effects of PRF-mediated delivery of antibiotics, in vitro studies were performed, which showed that PRF preparations containing amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or clindamycin significantly inhibited the growth of S. aureus bacteria. In our previous study, comparisons were made between control and treated groups. However, since variations among individual patients could possibly affect the results, the current study included patients with bilaterally symmetric impacted mandibular third molars, allowing us to compare control and antibiotic treatment within each patient. The effects of PRF preparations containing amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or clindamycin on IMTMS was tested in 60 clinical cases. Antibiotic-injected PRF treatment after bilaterally IMTMS resulted in significantly reduced pain, less use of analgesics, and reduced swelling and trismus compared to the control group (PRF without antibiotics) confirming our previous results after unilaterally IMTMS. The in vitro results support the hypothesis that in vivo delivery of antibiotics using PRF produces therapeutic effects after IMTMS by attenuating bacterial infection and inflammation.

Percutaneous plasma disc decompression through a lower surgical approach for the treatment of cervicogenic headache in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A retrospective cohort study.

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is the most common type of cervical spondylosis, frequently accompanied by cervicogenic headache (CEH). Percutaneous plasma disc decompression (PPDD) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) are minimally invasive techniques targeting cervical intervertebral discs or cervical nerves, and have been proven to be effective methods for treatment of CSR and CEH. The present study aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy and practicality of percutaneous plasma disc decompression (PPDD) via a lower surgical approach for the treatment of cervicogenic headache (CEH) and upper extremity radicular pain by analyzing clinical outcomes of patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) undergoing PPDD and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). Clinical data of patients with CSR who received PPDD (n=79) or PRF (n=92) at Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (Shanghai, China) and Jiashan County People's Hospital (Jiaxing, China) from January 2022 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The surgical site and procedure, bleeding volume, preoperative analgesic use and upper extremity symptoms, history of nerve block treatment and duration of disease were recorded, as well as relevant postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, nerve injury). The therapeutic effects [NRS (numeric rating scale) and NDI (neck disability index) score, and CEH remission rate at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment] of both surgical methods were investigated using the telephone follow-up. CEH remission rates at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery in the PPDD group were significantly higher than in the PRF group (78.8 vs. 43.5, P=0.016; 84.8 vs. 34.8, P=0.003 and 75.8 vs. 26.1%, P=0.005, respectively). The PPDD group showed higher NRS scores than the PRF group at 1 month after surgery (3 vs. 2, P<0.0001) and lower NRS scores than the PRF group at 6 months after surgery (2 vs. 3, P<0.0001). NDI scores in the PPDD group were significantly lower than those in the PRF group at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery (15.49 vs. 20.05, P=0.002; 16.06 vs. 20.10, P=0.003 and 9.90 vs. 13.80, P=0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.999). PPDD could significantly relieve CEH symptoms and upper extremity radicular pain in patients with CSR treated via a lower surgical approach and PPDD was more effective than PRF for long-term CEH remission and pain alleviation.

The knowledge profile, attitudes, and perioperative management of Chinese anesthesiologists towards patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional survey.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is increasingly encountered by anesthesiologists in clinical practice. However, research on managing these patients among anesthesiologists in China is scarce. This study aims to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perioperative management strategies for OSA patients among Chinese anesthesiologists. In this cross-sectional study, anesthesiologists from various hospitals across China were invited to complete a thirty-eight-item online questionnaire survey between October 1 and November 1, 2022. The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitude (OSAKA) scale was utilized to measure their knowledge and attitudes. A total of 470 valid participants were recruited for this research, resulting in a valid response rate of 73.3%. (1) While the majority of participants acknowledged the importance of identifying OSA during perioperative management, only 58.3% felt confident in managing OSA patients; (2) Anesthesiologists with higher professional titles and longer work experience exhibited greater confidence in managing OSA patients; (3) Just under half of the participants were familiar with the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires. Anesthesiologists with over 20 years of work experience were more likely to use the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires compared to those with less than 10 years of work experience (OR = 3.166, P < 0.001); (4) 71.1% of participants expressed approval regarding the preparation of sugammadex for muscle relaxation reversal, while only 32.8% approved the safety of opioid use for postoperative analgesia in OSA patients. The study displayed that Chinese anesthesiologists have inadequate knowledge and perioperative management of OSA than expected. However, they have positive attitudes towards the assessment and management of OSA. The study highlights the need for high-quality training to identify and manage OSA among Chinese anesthesiologists.

Prediction of transforaminal epidural injection success in sciatica (POTEISS): a protocol for the development of a multivariable prediction model for outcome after transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation or stenosis

BackgroundTransforaminal epidural injections (TEI) can alleviate symptoms and help to maintain physical functioning and quality of life in patients with lumbar radicular pain. We aim to develop a prediction model for patient outcome after TEI in patients suffering from unilateral lumbar radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) or single-level spinal stenosis (LSS). The secondary aim is to estimate short-term patient outcome differences between LDH and LSS patients, the association between psychological variables and patient outcome, the rate of additional injections, surgery and complications, and to explore the short-term cost-effectiveness of TEI.MethodsThis study is designed as a multi-centre, observational, prospective cohort study in two large regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients diagnosed with unilateral lumbar radicular pain secondary to LDH or LSS and congruent with MRI findings, who are referred for TEI along usual care pathways, are eligible for study participation. A total of 388 patients with LDH or LSS will be included. A pre-defined set of demographic, clinical and radiological variables will be used as the predictors in the model. The primary outcome measure is the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain. Secondary outcome measures include back pain, physical functioning, perceived recovery, pain coping strategies, anxiety and depression and use of analgesics and physical therapy. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 weeks after treatment. NRS leg pain and Likert perceived recovery data will be used as the dependent variables in a generalized linear mixed model for prediction of TEI outcome, with internal validation of performance (explained variation) by bootstrap resampling. Cost-effectiveness for a period of 6 weeks prior to and after treatment will be performed with decision-analytic modelling.DiscussionPatients with severe lumbar radicular pain often request additional treatment when conservative care is insufficient. TEI can offer relief of symptoms. Currently, it is not possible to predict responsiveness to this treatment for individual patients. This study is designed to explore predictors that can differentiate between patients that will and will not have a positive outcome after TEI. This information may support treatment strategies for this patient group.Trial registrationThis study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov database under registry number NCT04540068 on September 1, 2020.

Pharmacokinetics of single dose levobupivacaine after peri-incisional subcutaneous infiltration in anaesthetized domestic pigs.

Increasing use of pigs as models in translational research, and growing focus on animal welfare are leading to better use of effective analgesics and anaesthetics when painful procedures are performed. However, there is a gap in basic knowledge such as pharmacokinetics of different anaesthetics in these species. The main objective of our study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine in domestic pigs. Twelve female grower pigs weighing 31.17 ± 4.6 kg were subjected to general anaesthesia and experimental surgery, at the end of which they received 1 mg/kg levobupivacaine via peri-incisional subcutaneous infiltration. Plasma samples were collected before administration of levobupivacaine and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h thereafter. Concentrations of levobupivacaine were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Following single dose of levobupivacaine, all animals had measurable plasma concentrations 0.5 h after drug administration, with most peak concentrations observed at the 1-h time point. In all 12 animals, levobupivacaine was below the limit of quantification 48 h after drug administration. The mean maximum plasma concentration, area under the curve and half-life were determined to be 809.98 μg/l, 6552.46 μg/l h and 6.25 h, respectively. Plasma clearance, volume of distribution and weight-normalized volume of distribution were 4.41 l/h, 35.57 l and 1.23 l/kg, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations in our study were well below concentrations that were found to produce toxicity in pigs.

P61. Mortality, analgesic use, and care requirement after vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study of 18,387 older adult patients

P61. Mortality, analgesic use, and care requirement after vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study of 18,387 older adult patients

Global trends in opioid use for pain management in acute pancreatitis: A multicentre prospective observational study.

Since there is no current international consensus on the optimal approach for pain management in acute pancreatitis (AP), analgesic practices may vary across different healthcare settings. This study explored global disparities in analgesic use, in particular opioids, during admission and at discharge in hospitalised AP patients. This was a post hoc analysis of the prospective PAINAP database, which included all admissions for AP between April and June 2022 with a 1-month follow-up. Demographic details, analgesic use, and clinical outcomes were recorded during admission and at discharge. Odds ratios (ORs) for opioid use during admission and at discharge were identified using multivariable regression analyses. Amongst the 1864 patients (52% males, median age 56 (interquartile range, 41-71))across three different continents, simple analgesics were predominantly used as the primary analgesic (70%). Opioid use during admission was lowest in European centres (67%). Admission in Asian (OR, 2.53 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.59-4.04), p<0.001), and Australian (OR, 5.81 (95% CI, 3.19-10.56), p<0.001) centres was associated with opioid administration during admission compared with European centres. Increased pain severity, longer pre-admission pain duration, organ failure, and longer length of admission increased opioid use during admission. At discharge, Asian (OR, 2.01 (95% CI, 1.40-2.88), p<0.001) and Australian (OR, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.28-2.85), p=0.002) centres were associated with opioid prescription compared with European centres. Increased pain severity, longer pre-admission pain duration, acute necrotic collections, and walled-off necrosis also increased the likelihood of opioid prescription at discharge. There are substantial intercontinental differences in opioid use for AP pain. Accordingly, there is a need for international guidelines on pain management in AP.

Labor outcomes in caseload midwifery compared with standard midwifery care: A cohort study.

Research has shown caseload midwifery to increase the chance of vaginal birth, but this may not be the case in settings with high vaginal birth rates in standard care. This study investigated the association between caseload midwifery and birth mode, labor interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes at a large obstetric unit in Denmark. Cohort study including medical records on live, singleton births fr om June 2018 until February 2022. Exposure was caseload midwifery care compared with standard midwifery care. The primary outcome was birth mode, and secondary outcomes were other outcomes of labor. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by log-binomial regression. Among 16,110 pregnancies, 3162 pregnancies (19.6%) received caseload midwifery care. Caseload midwifery was associated with fewer planned cesareans (aRR 0.63 [95% CI 0.54-0.74]) and emergency cesareans (aRR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75-0.95]). No differences in labor induction, use of epidural analgesia, oxytocin augmentation, or anal sphincter tears were observed. Caseload midwifery performed more amniotomies (aRR 1.14 [95% CI 1.02-1.27]) and tended to perform more episiotomies (aRR 1.19 [95% CI 0.96-1.48]). Postpartum hemorrhage (aRR 0.90 [95% CI 0.82-0.99]) and low Apgar score were less likely (aRR 0.54 [95% CI 0.37-0.77]), and early discharge more likely (aRR 1.22 [95% CI 1.17-1.28]) in caseload midwifery. In caseload midwifery care, a higher vaginal birth rate was observed with no increase in adverse outcomes, mainly due to a lower likelihood of planned cesarean. Also, fewer children were born with low Apgar scores.

Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion as adjuvant analgesia in postoperative transplant patients in the pediatric ICU: Preliminary results of a feasibility study

AbstractThe opioid crisis has emphasized identification of opioid‐sparing analgesics. This study was designed as a prospective trial with retrospective control group to determine feasibility for implementing a high‐dose prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion for adjuvant analgesia in the pediatric intensive care unit. Approval was granted for study of children receiving total pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation and liver transplantation ages 3–18 years. Study exclusions were pregnancy, neuromuscular disease, hypersensitivity, preoperative creatinine &gt;1.5 times upper limit normal, arrhythmia or pacemaker presence, and clinician concern. Eleven patients were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2022. Magnesium sulfate bolus (50 mg/kg) followed by intravenous infusion (15 mg/kg/h) was initiated in the operating room and extended postoperatively (maximum 48 h). Serum magnesium levels were monitored serially. To prioritize safety, infusion dose was decreased by 5 mg/kg/h for levels greater than 3.5 mg/dL. Clinical team otherwise followed standard multimodal pain practice. Primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent per kg per day during intensive care course (maximum 7 days). Secondary outcomes focused primarily on magnesium safety, including hemodynamic variables, electrolyte variables, respiratory support, and opioid‐related side effects. There were no serious adverse events. Treatment group trended toward slightly higher intravenous fluid requirement (~1 bolus), however no increase in blood product. Treatment and control groups were otherwise comparable in targeted outcomes and overall adverse event profile. Use of a high‐dose magnesium sulfate infusion protocol for analgesic postoperative use in select transplant recipients appears feasible for continued optimization of study in the PICU.

The prevalence and predictors of discharge opioid overprescribing in opioid-naïve patients after breast, gynecologic, and head and neck cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study.

The management of pain following cancer-related surgeries involves the use of opioid analgesics. Nevertheless, there is little evidence characterizing the utility and prescription patterns of opioids after these procedures. Our primary aim was to identify patients from three types of cancer surgery who were overprescribed with opioids. The secondary aim was to determine the potential predictors of overprescribing in the same period. We conducted the study at a single cancer referral hospital. Opioid-naïve patients with breast, gynecologic, or head and neck cancer were studied. Patients were considered opioid-naïve if they had a history of opioid use ≤ 30mg oral morphine equivalent daily dose for less than seven days in the preceding three months before surgery. We recruited eligible participants by convenience sampling on the wards until at least 102 patients were included in the final analysis. After discharge, we followed up on the participants on day 7 via telephone using a structured proforma including questions to identify the last date and amount of opioid dose taken. The equivalent days of opioid use were calculated by their 24-hr use before discharge and the number of doses prescribed for discharge. Our primary outcome was the prevalence of overprescribing in the three surgical specialties defined as the number of patients taking less than 50% of discharge opioids within the first seven days after discharge. We examined the predictors on incidents of overprescribing using multivariable Poisson regression as the secondary outcome. We recruited 119 patients, and 107 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 59/107 (55%) patients found to be overprescribed with opioids. At discharge, they exhibited lower mean numerical rating scale pain scores, lower mean pain severity scores, higher equivalent days of opioids prescribed, and not used opioids in the last 24hr before discharge. The incidence of overprescribing was 2.4 times greater for patients prescribed with opioids without 24-hr opioid use (relative risk [RR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 4.35; P = 0.005). Similarly, the incidence of overprescribing was 1.7 times greater for patients who had opioids 24hr before discharge and were supplied with opioids for five equivalent days or more at the time of discharge (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.56; P = 0.02). Our study shows that the majority of recruited patients undergoing breast, gynecologic, or head and neck cancer surgery were overprescribed opioids. Individualized assessments on patients' 24-hr opioid requirements before discharge and supplying for less than five days are important considerations to reduce overprescribing in opioid-naïve patients after cancer surgery.

Anesthesia Management in Emergency and Trauma Surgeries: A Narrative Review.

Emergency and trauma surgeries present unique challenges for anesthesiologists due to the acuity of patient conditions and the need for rapid intervention. This review aims to provide insights into the optimal management of anesthesia in emergency and trauma surgery settings. We searched the National Institute of Health PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases between 2014 and 2024 to synthesize current evidence and best practices for anesthesia management during emergency and trauma surgeries. This literature review examines the evolving role of anesthesia in emergency and trauma surgeries, focusing on key considerations such as patient management, hemodynamic stability, and the choice of anesthetic agents. The review discusses recent advancements in anesthesia techniques, including the use of regional anesthesia and multimodal analgesia, to optimize patient outcomes while minimizing complications. Additionally, it discusses the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration among anesthesiologists, surgeons, and other healthcare professionals in delivering timely and effective care to critically injured patients.

Impact of acute therapeutic toxicities on anxiety during radiotherapy among Chinese patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional study.

147 Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) poses a significant threat to both psychological and physical health. This study aimed to depict the anxiety status of Chinese newly diagnosed nonmetastatic HNC patients during radiotherapy (RT) and to examine predictors of anxiety symptoms. Methods: Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic HNC patients who received RT at the Radiation Therapy Center of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from August 23,2023 to August 24,2023 were recruited into this study. Using Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (Zung SAS) to screen anxiety. Twenty-four common acute therapeutic toxicities (18 patient-reported and 6 clinician-rated) were assessed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-HN35) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, fifth version (CTCAE V5.0). Chi-square ( χ2) test and multivariate binary logistic regression stepwise forward selection: likelihood ratio (LR) method were applied to identify factors associated with anxiety. Results: A total of 457 patients were included ultimately. Up to 29.10% of the patients showed varying degrees of anxiety and the average SAS standardized score was 45.66 ± 8.83. Chi-square test manifested that sex, annual household income, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomit, pain, dysphagia, sense problems (smell and taste), speech problems, trouble in social eating, trouble in social contact, sexual frustration, teeth problems, difficulty in opening mouth, xerostomia, sticky saliva, coughing, feeling ill, use of analgesics, use of nutritional supplements and weight loss were related to anxiety ( p &lt; 0.05). But multivariate logistic regression only demonstrated fatigue (OR = 3.696, 95% CI = 2.096-6.519), speech problems (OR = 3.247, 95% CI = 1.554-6.783), sexual frustration (OR = 2.029, 95% CI = 1.232-3.341), nausea (OR = 3.075, 95% CI = 1.807-5.234), feeling ill (OR = 2.283, 95% CI = 1.215-4.291), use of nutritional supplements (OR = 1.930, 95% CI = 1.136-3.280) and difficulty in opening mouth (OR = 3.007, 95% CI = 1.081-8.363) as independent predictive factors of anxiety. Conclusions: The Chinese newly diagnosed nonmetastatic HNC patients suffered greatly from anxiety during RT. This study identified the predictive contribution of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and 24 common acute therapeutic toxicities to the vulnerability to anxiety, which can provide evidence and reference for medical staff to carry out psychological intervention.

The analgesic effect of non-nutritive sucking on neonates during invasive procedures

Background &amp; objective: Neonates admitted and treated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) often receive painful invasive procedures. In such situations, the treating physicians often find themselves in a fix regarding the use of analgesics to relieve their actual or potential pain. It has been observed that the sucking often distracts the neonates from their mild to moderate pain. We conducted this study to analyze the effectiveness of non-nutritive sucking as an analgesic for neonates who were to receive invasive procedures. Methodology: This experimental study implemented a post-test-only control group design, involving 64 neonates in the NICU, selected using a simple random sampling technique, who were then divided into two groups, with 32 neonates each in a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group was given non-nutritive sucking, while the control group was given standard intervention, then the pain response was measured in both groups. Next, the pain levels of the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The measurement results showed that there was a difference in the mean scores of pain response between treatment and control group, respectively 1.53125 and 5.8125. The P-value of the difference test was 0.000000004252, so that it could be interpreted that there was a significant difference in pain levels between the two groups. Conclusion: On the basis of the results of our study, it is concluded that non-nutritive sucking is an effective method for reducing the pain response in neonates during invasive procedures. Keywords: Infant; Non-nutritive sucking; Neonatal Intensive Care UNIT; Pain; Pain management Citation: Ratnaningsih T, Peni T, Firdausiyah N, Nugroho HSW. The analgesic effect of non-nutritive sucking on neonates during invasive procedures. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):640−645; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2511 Received: April 27, 2024; Reviewed: June 10, 2024; Accepted: June 19, 2024

Postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-centre historical cohort study.

Concerns around delayed emergence and opioid-induced ventilatory impairment in bariatric surgery can lead to intraoperative reliance on short-acting opioids and avoidance of long-acting analgesics with potential sedative effects. Nevertheless, an overly-conservative intraoperative analgesic strategy may result in significant pain at emergence and higher opioid requirements in later phases of care. We sought to establish the pattern of intraoperative analgesic use in bariatric surgical patients as well as their postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements. We undertook a single-centre historical cohort study. We explored associations between intraoperative analgesic interventions and pain scores and opioid requirements in postanesthesia care units (PACUs), and associations between the quality of analgesia at emergence and subsequent pain and patient-centred recovery outcomes. We extracted perioperative data for 939 patients who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery between January 2018 and October 2019. Only 39% of patients received long-acting opioids intraoperatively and there was minimal use of nonopioid analgesic adjuncts. Nearly 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pain on PACU arrival; 97% of patients received intravenous opioids for rescue analgesia (mean dose, 31mg oral morphine equivalents). Lower pain scores at PACU admission and discharge were associated with subsequent lower inpatient pain scores, lower opioid requirements, shorter time to ambulation, and shorter length of hospital stay. In bariatric surgical patients, effective intraoperative analgesic strategies that improve early pain control may have an impact on recovery and pain experience. Judicious use of intraoperative opioids coupled with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques should be considered and balanced against concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects in this patient population.

An observational study to compare the pain relief scores of epidural midazolam and buprenorphine for post-operative patients

Background: As it was mentioned, the risk of adverse effects and complications is more than what is expected. Hence, the use of epidural analgesia (EA) was decreased in the management of post-operative pain. Hence, there is a need for another pharmacological agent that is more effective. Manly studies reported that buprenorphine transdermal and sublingual both have significant pain relief scores. Aims and Objectives: The present study was undertaken to compare the pain relief scores of epidural midazolam and buprenorphine for post-operative patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 male and female participants, within the age group with the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II were recruited. After recruiting, they were randomly divided into two groups. Soon after the surgery, the pain scores were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale. Soon after recording the pain scores, the corresponding drugs were administered to the participants. Epidural midazolam 30 g/kg and buprenorphine 0.15 mg diluted in normal saline were administered to the corresponding groups for 24 h. Results: There is no significant difference in the demographic data of the participants in both groups. There was no significant difference observed between the two groups. Both are equally effective. Nausea and vomiting are the mild side effects observed in the majority of the patients in both groups. Conclusion: In the present study, we have observed similar actions by both drugs in the management of post-operative pain. The study not only adds to the literature about the effectiveness of these drugs but also explains the mild side effects. Hence, the study recommends the use of both these drugs in the management of post-operative pain so that patient satisfaction can be improved and the patient stay at the hospital can be minimized. Further, detailed and multi-center studies are recommended to generalize the results.

Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries.

The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes. A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays. The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.

Use of Analgesics and Sedatives in Nontraumatic Patients after Sudden Cardiac Arrest during the Peri-Resuscitation Period in the Emergency Department.

Background: While cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be life-saving for patients in cardiac arrest, it simultaneously puts them at risk for skeletal and soft tissue injuries. The prevalence of cardiovascular and thoracic wall injuries related to CPR varies significantly in the literature, from 21% to more than 78%. After restoration of circulation, ischemia-reperfusion brain injury ensues. Sedation is one of the interventions that can reduce its effects on brain cells. The purpose of this study was to analyse the use of analgesics and sedatives in nontraumatic patients after sudden cardiac arrest in the peri-resuscitation period in the emergency department. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. An analysis was performed on the electronic health records of 131 patients who underwent CPR, with ages ranging from 24 to 96 years. The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Chest wall injuries were assessed based on the results of X-ray imaging (n = 39; 31%) and computed tomography (n = 87; 69%). Of the 126 cases, 17.5% had rib fractures and 6.3% had rib and sternal fractures. Almost 78% of the patients (n = 102) received sedatives and/or analgesics during the peri-resuscitation period. Monotherapy was used in 85 cases. Among these drugs the most frequently mentioned were midazolam (45.2%), fentanyl (26.8%), and propofol (20.8%). Conclusions: As only two-thirds of the patients received sedation and half received analgesics, there is still room for a broader incorporation of analgesia and sedation into peri-resuscitation care protocols.

Assessment of survival prediction after surgery in spinal metastases patients using the Global Spine Study Tumor Group (GSTSG) risk calculator; an external validation from a tertiary cancer hospital.

We aim to validate the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) score compared to previous prognostic scoring systems in spinal metastasis. We conducted a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2022. The survival prediction was compared between the GSTSG, Tomita Score, Revised Tokuhashi Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) Nomogram. Single-variable factors associated with survival rate were analyzed using univariate Cox regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Receiver operating characteristic was used for external validity analysis at 3, 6, 12, and 24months. The overall survival rate was reported using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. 248 spinal metastasis patients were included. The mean age was 59.23 ± 12.55years. The mean duration of follow-up time was 470.29 ± 441.98days. The external validity of GSTSG was the highest at all follow-up times (sufficiently accurate AUC > 0.7), which was about the same as SORG at 3months (both AUC of GSTSG and SORG = 0.76) and higher than modified Tokuhashi and Tomita score at 12months (AUC of GSTSG = 0.78, SORG = 0.71, Tomita = 0.64, and modified Tokuhashi = 0.61, respectively). From our study, the Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicates that the significant factors related to survival rate are regular analgesic use of weak opioids, lung metastasis, and previous chemotherapy. Compared to other traditional spinal metastases prognostic scoring systems, GSTSG shows the highest AUC for external validity in all follow-up times up to 24months.

Short-term mobility in low-energy pelvic ring fractures after conservative treatment

BackgroundThe growing population of elderly people is leading to a rising number of pelvic ring fractures. These often involve combinations of pubic branch and sacrum fractures, as seen in lateral compression type 1 (LC1) and 2 (LC2) fractures or more precisely classified as fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). The combined impact on the anterior and posterior ring brings the risk of prolonged pain, resulting in decreased mobility and increased complications. Given the higher multimorbidity of this population, surgical treatment poses a greater risk of intra- and post-operative complications. Hence, the management and treatment of this particular type of fracture remain challenging. MethodsA retrospective data analysis of 41 patients (F/M; 27/14) treated conservatively for low-energy LC1 or LC2 fractures was performed between 2017 and 2020. The fractures were classified using Rommens’ FFP classification. The primary outcome was mobility at 2 and 6 weeks, assessed through chart analysis and phone interviews. To determine factors influencing patient outcomes fracture consolidation was assessed via X-ray analysis. As a secondary outcome logistic regression and decision tree analyzes were conducted. ResultsThe mean age at the time of fracture was 79.8 ± 12.5 (SD) years. Thirty-two patients regained mobility (F/M; 25/7) after 2 weeks. Another 7 patients were mobile after 6 weeks (F/M; 2/5). Two male patients did not regain mobility. Male sex emerged as the sole independent predictor of non-mobility at 2 weeks (p = 0.0037). Age, BMI, pubic branch fracture dislocation >5 mm, analgesic use of opiates, corticosteroid therapy, alcohol and smoking showed no association with mobility recovery. Fracture consolidation was observed in 73.2 % of patients (F/M; 21/9), while one female had no consolidation. Ten patients (F/M; 5/5) were lost to follow-up. ConclusionsOur study shows that LC1 (FFP IIb, IIc) and LC2 (FFP IIIc, IVb) fractures can be effectively treated conservatively, with successful remobilization within 6 weeks. The only independent negative predictor of early mobilization was male sex. Pubic branch displacement >5 mm did not affect the outcome. Therefore, conservative management proves to be a viable option for low-energy LC1 or LC2 fractures.Level of Evidence: IV (retrospective study).

Local anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in ENT surgery – a review of selected procedures

Surgeries and procedures in otolaryngology require close collaboration between anesthesiologists and ENT specialists, especially for operations involving the larynx and airways, which pose challenges for maintaining airway patency and visibility. Choosing the type of anesthesia, whether general or local, is crucial. This study examines the benefits and drawbacks of both types of anesthesia in tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, tympanostomy and myringotomy, and flexible endoscopic biopsy of the pharynx and larynx. A review of current guidelines, systematic reviews and relevant clinical cohort studies was conducted. The findings highlight several advantages of local anesthesia, including shorter operation times, reduced hospital stays, lower costs, decreased use of analgesics, and improved patient comfort.