You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Superficial1 Apr 20111753 RECURRENCE AND PROGRESSION RATES OF UROTHELIAL PAPILLOMAS OF THE URINARY BLADDER Ali Amin, Sheila Faraj, Alcides Chaux, Turki Al-hussain, Roni Cox, Michael Nagar, and George J. Netto Ali AminAli Amin Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Sheila FarajSheila Faraj Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Alcides ChauxAlcides Chaux Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Turki Al-hussainTurki Al-hussain Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Roni CoxRoni Cox Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Michael NagarMichael Nagar Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , and George J. NettoGeorge J. Netto Baltimore, MD More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2080AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Urothelial papilloma (UP) is a rare tumor of the genitourinary tract, usually seen in younger patients as an isolated, small papillary lesion. A recurrence rate of 0–31% and a lower than 10% risk of progression have been previously reported in UP. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with UP diagnosed in one institution. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest series on the long term follow up of urothelial papilloma. METHODS Fifty-three cases diagnosed between 1998 and 2009 as primary UP (without previous history of a higher grade lesion) were retrieved from the archives of our department. Medical records were reviewed and the primary care physician was contacted for follow-up information. Recurrence was defined as the subsequent development of any type of neoplastic urothelial lesion while progression was defined as the development of subsequent lesion of higher histological grade (urothelial dysplasia, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential [PUNLMP], low or high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma). Follow-up ranged from 1–60 months (mean 16.6, median 12 months). RESULTS The mean of age for the patients was 67.4 y (range 24–90 years). Overall recurrence was identified in 19 cases (35%); recurrence without progression was observed in 2 cases (3.7%) after a mean duration of 22.0 months (range 5–39 months), and recurrence with progression in 17 cases (32%) after a mean duration of 11.6 months (range 1–34 months) from initial UP diagnosis. The difference between the mean intervals of recurrence with and without progression was not statistically significant. None of the patients developed invasive urothelial carcinoma. Most frequent progression was to low-grade urothelial carcinoma in 7 cases (13%) followed by high-grade urothelial carcinoma (4 cases, 7%), urothelial dysplasia and PUNLMP (3 cases each, 5%). None of the 53 patients died of urothelial carcinoma; however seven patients died from unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS Although none of our patients developed invasive urothelial carcinoma or died of urothelial carcinoma, we found a relatively high rate of recurrence and progression in our UP cohort compared to previous series. Additional studies are still needed to evaluate the current risk of recurrence and progression in urothelial papillomas. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e703 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ali Amin Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Sheila Faraj Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Alcides Chaux Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Turki Al-hussain Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Roni Cox Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Michael Nagar Baltimore, MD More articles by this author George J. Netto Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract