You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Urodynamics Testing1 Apr 20132273 STANDARDIZED INTERPRETATION OF UROFLOWMETRIC PARAMETERS RESULTS IN HIGH INTER-OBSERVER CONCORDANCE AND OBSERVATIONAL REPRODUCIBILITY Diane B. Young, Edwin E. Morales, Xiayou Shi, and Stephen R. Kraus Diane B. YoungDiane B. Young San Antonio, TX More articles by this author , Edwin E. MoralesEdwin E. Morales San Antonio, TX More articles by this author , Xiayou ShiXiayou Shi San Antonio, TX More articles by this author , and Stephen R. KrausStephen R. Kraus San Antonio, TX More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2202AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The International Continence Society (ICS) established its “Good Urodynamics Practices” and “Standardization of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function” guidelines in 2002; both of these provided for standardized descriptive terminology for urodynamic studies. While interpretative reproducibility of other urodynamic components have been studied, a scientific assessment of the reproducibility of uroflowmetry interpretation has, to our knowledge, not been performed. The aim of this study was to determine whether use of these standardized criteria resulted in concordance and reproducibility between two separate observers. METHODS Utilizing the ICS 2002 definitions for the standardization of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), uroflowmetric data sets from 67 different females who originally presented with stress incontinence were evaluated by two separate blinded urodynamicists using the following criteria: urine flow pattern, maximum and mean flow rates, time to maximum flow rate, voided volume, and post-void residual volume (PVR). Description of uroflow pattern was standardized using ICS terminology and could only be categorized as continuous, intermittent, or fluctuating. Patients were excluded if uroflow voided volume was below 150 ml or if any of the reported criteria were missing. Data was analyzed for the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC) and the free-marginal kappa coefficient. Agreement for continuous numerical variables was pre-defined as a Pearson CC greater than 0.6. For qualitative values, the kappa statistic was pre-defined successful if also greater than 0.6. RESULTS The Pearson CC for each continuous variable and the kappa interobserver variability for the categorical variable of uroflowmetric flow pattern are reported below. The ICS uroflowmetric criteria demonstrated substantial inter-observer concordance with respect to flow pattern. The Pearson CC for the five independent variables show very high correlation. CONCLUSIONS Using ICS definitions and standardized terminology, our study demonstrates that interpretation of office uroflowmetry can be highly reproducible between clinicians and serve to guide collaboration between urologists and pelvic floor practitioners without reproduction of costly studies. Correlation Between Observers for Specific Uroflowmetric Parameters Uroflowmetric Parameter Pearson Correlation Coefficient / Weighted Kappa Value 95% Confidence Interval p-Value Maximum Flow Rate 0.9972 ±.0028 < .0001 Average Flow Rate 0.9996 ±.0003 < .0001 Time to Maximum Flow 0.9999 ±.00004 < .0001 Voided Volume 0.9959 ±.0041 < .0001 Post-Void Residual 0.9996 ±.0004 < .0001 Flow Pattern Classification 0.7357 ±.2755 < .0001 © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e932 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Diane B. Young San Antonio, TX More articles by this author Edwin E. Morales San Antonio, TX More articles by this author Xiayou Shi San Antonio, TX More articles by this author Stephen R. Kraus San Antonio, TX More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract