PurposeTo determine the quality of renal tract ultrasound (US) imaging records performed in children for evaluation of urinary tract infection (UTI) by multiple professionals with different levels of experience in a dedicated academic children's hospital. MethodsRetrospective analysis of US images and reports for children ≤ 13-years with first presentation of a UTI. 9 Operators (6 consultant radiologists and 3 sonographers) were anonymised and the adequacy of their US images and reports were evaluated for the following categories; Image acquisition, Image labelling, Metric labelling, and Final reporting. The frequency of the reporting quality of the elements assessed was compared between radiologists and sonographers using Chi-square or fisher exact test. ResultsRenal tract US studies for 100 children (20 males, 80 females) with first UTI episode were assessed. Mean age was 4.5 ± 3.4 years. 54% of the studies were performed by sonographers and 46% by radiologists.Kidneys and pre-micturition bladder scans were acquired in more than 96% of exams by both sonographers and radiologists. Kidney image and metric labelling was adequate in almost all exams (98-100%) with the exception of plane labelling which was not routinely done by US operators (less than 3%).Sonographers performed consistently better than radiologists in post-micturition bladder scanning, pre- and post-micturition bladder labelling and renal length reporting (p<0.05).Least to be recorded by US operators (both radiologists and sonographers) were doppler scan acquisitions (less than 3%), bladder wall thickness labelling (less than 3%), and renal calculi reporting (less than 1%). ConclusionThe inconsistency of the reporting quality between the different elements assessed highlights the difference in US training and experience received by sonographers and radiologists. A pro-forma structured reporting template may ensure US operators provide consistent, thorough and good quality ultrasound images and reports.