Urinary Antigen Detection Test Research Articles

Evaluation of urinary antigen detection methods for rapid diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia

We have evaluated urine specimens of presumptive cases of legionnaires' disease (110 cases, 173 sample), collected in the past eight years (April, 1990-August, 1998) with the Binax EIA kit which detects the soluble antigen of Legionella pneumophila serogroup (SG) 1, and the Biotest EIA kit which detects Legionella species. Seven cases (19 specimens) were positive for the Binax EIA kit, and nine cases (22 specimens) were positive for the Biotest EIA kit. The sensitivity for culture, PCR, IFA method were 100%, 100%, and 50%, the specificity for these method were 93%, 97.1%, and 90% respectively. Overall agreements for these method were 93.5%, 97.4%, 86.8%, these results suggested that the urinary antigen detection test had high sensitivity and specificity. Our study indicated that concentrated urine samples increase sensitivity. We also evaluated the capabilities of both EIAs to detect soluble antigens were extracted from bacterial suspension of 18 strains of 5 Legionella species by heating. Both assays detected L. pneumophila serogroups 1 to 14, L. bozemanii. The Binax EIA proved to be useful as the Biotest EIA for diagnosis of legionellosis caused by Legionella species and serogroups other than L. pneumophila serogroup 1. Some cases have been shown to excrete antigen for prolonged period of times despite recovery from infection, so that the patient's history should be sought. The urine antigen detection EIA methods proved to be rapid and easy to use, detect antigen in the early stage of the disease with high sensitivity and specificity. Its use for the definition of legionellosis should be considered in Japan.

Clinical and diagnostic characteristics of Legionella pneumonia

We have characterized clinical and diagnostic features in 18 cases of Legionella pneumonia. Age average of patients was 62.0 years old (male:female = 14:4) and underlying diseases were observed in 12 patients. Legionella pneumonia were diagnosed in 3, 5, 8 and 9 cases by culture, serum antibody measurement, urinary antigen detection and PCR, respectively. Sixteen cases were caused by L. pneumophila, while the other 2 cases were L. bozemanii pneumonia and L. pneumophila or L. dumoffii pneumonia. Chest X-rays of those patients showed multiple pneumonia shadows in 14 cases, alveolar shadows in 10 cases, pleural effusion in 5 cases. Blood-gas analysis on admission indicated hypoxemia in all cases with abnormal A-a DO2. Laboratory findings showed abnormal data in WBC, CRP, LDH, CPK and liver function tests (ex. GOT, GPT) in most cases. Serum antibody testing showed positive by 5 weeks after onset of pneumonia, but 10 cases of Legionella pneumonia diagnosed by other techniques were judged to be negative. In urinary antigen detection test, 6 and 2 cases showed positive 1 and 4 weeks after onset of pneumonia, respectively. Macrolide antibiotics were administered in all cases during the episode, but delay of macrolide administration was observed in 3 of 4 cases of dead outcome. Serum antibody measurement, urinary antigen detection and PCR, in addition to culture to bacteria, may be required for exact diagnosis of Legionella infection.