HomeStrokeVol. 39, No. 1Response to Letter by Dawson et al Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBResponse to Letter by Dawson et al Sergio Amaro, Víctor Obach and Álvaro Cervera Anna M. Planas Ángel Chamorro Sergio AmaroSergio Amaro Institute of Neurosciences, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Search for more papers by this author , Víctor ObachVíctor Obach Institute of Neurosciences, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Search for more papers by this author and Álvaro CerveraÁlvaro Cervera Institute of Neurosciences, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Search for more papers by this author Anna M. PlanasAnna M. Planas Institute for Biomedical Research (IIBB)-Spanish Research Council (CSIC), IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain Search for more papers by this author Ángel ChamorroÁngel Chamorro Institute of Neurosciences, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Search for more papers by this author Originally published29 Nov 2007https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.503532Stroke. 2008;39:e10Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: November 29, 2007: Previous Version 1 Response:We appreciate the interest generated by our recent report describing that the dual treatment with tPA and uric acid (UA) is feasible, safe and able to decrease lipid peroxidation in patients with acute ischemic stroke.1 In our view, this research effort complies well with the thorough and thoughtful debate requested by Dawson and colleagues, although these investigators reproduce previous worries expressed in this section of the journal.2 Our current encouraging results, together with the experimental data that we have gathered in the ischemic rat brain,3 pave the way to further clinical evaluation in a larger efficacy trial, as we have supported.4 Our methods adhere to current recommendations on good experimental research and clinical trial design. However, only further study will unveil whether the transient elevation of UA levels is harmful5 or beneficial in patients with acute stroke.6 As we have cautioned,7 this approach is independent of the (unsettled) potential relationship between chronic elevation of UA and cardiovascular disease.DisclosuresNone.1 Amaro S, Soy D, Obach V, Cervera A, Planas AM, Chamorro A. A pilot study of dual treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and uric acid in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2007; 38: 2173–2175.LinkGoogle Scholar2 Weir CJ, Muir SW, Walters MR, Lees KR. Yin and Yang of uric acid in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2004; 35: e11–e20.LinkGoogle Scholar3 Romanos E, Planas AM, Amaro S, Chamorro A. Uric acid reduces brain damage and improves the benefits of rt-PA in a rat model of thromboembolic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007; 27: 14–20.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Chamorro A, Planas AM, Muner DS, Deulofeu R. Uric acid administration for neuroprotection in patients with acute brain ischemia. Med Hypotheses. 2004; 62: 173–176.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Weir CJ, Muir SW, Walters MR, Lees KR. Serum urate as an independent predictor of poor outcome and vascular events after acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1951–1957.LinkGoogle Scholar6 Chamorro A, Obach V, Cervera A, Revilla M, Deulofeu R, Aponte JH. Prognostic significance of uric acid serum concentration in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1048–1052.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Chamorro A, Planas AM. Yin and yang of uric acid in patients with stroke. Response. Stroke. 2004; 35: e11–e12.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails January 2008Vol 39, Issue 1 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.503532 Originally publishedNovember 29, 2007 PDF download Advertisement
Read full abstract