You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: External Genitalia Reconstruction and Urotrauma (including transgender surgery) I (MP04)1 Sep 2021MP04-10 OES TUNICAL DEFECT LENGTH AFFECT FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES IN PENILE FRACTURE SURGERY? Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan, Ahmet Tevfik Albayrak, Cumhur Yesildal, Musab Ilgi, Ibrahim Halil Baloglu, Mithat Eksi, Kaya Horasanli, and Sinan Levent Kirecci Abdullah Hizir YavuzsanAbdullah Hizir Yavuzsan More articles by this author , Ahmet Tevfik AlbayrakAhmet Tevfik Albayrak More articles by this author , Cumhur YesildalCumhur Yesildal More articles by this author , Musab IlgiMusab Ilgi More articles by this author , Ibrahim Halil BalogluIbrahim Halil Baloglu More articles by this author , Mithat EksiMithat Eksi More articles by this author , Kaya HorasanliKaya Horasanli More articles by this author , and Sinan Levent KirecciSinan Levent Kirecci More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001971.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Penile fracture is urological emergency, which needs an urgent surgical intervention. In this study we aimed to report our single center surgical outcomes in patients who underwent penile fracture surgery and to investigate the relationship between these functional outcomes and the tunical defect lenght (TDL). METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (approval no. 1707). Forty-six patients who underwent emergency surgery with a diagnosis of penile fracture in our hospital between July 2010 and December 2018 were included in the study. Patients who were treated conservatively because they did not accept surgery and who did not attend a postoperative one-year follow-up were excluded from the study. The diagnosis was made by history, physical examination and ultrasound (US). Functional outcomes were assessed at third, sixth, and twelfth months postoperatively. International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score was used to assess the erectile function. Moreover, to evaluate the effect of the TDL on the outcomes, the patients were divided into two groups, length ≤10 mm and length >10 mm. The primary outcome of this study was the investigation of the relationship between the erectile function and theTDL. The secondary outcome was to investigate the detection rate of preoperative US according to the TDL. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 31 years. The cause of the fracture in 34 patients (74%) was sexual intercourse. The median TDL was 17 mm. Three patients (6.5%) with urethrorrhagia were diagnosed with urethral injury and primarily fixed during surgery. Erectile dysfunction was not observed in any of the patients during the follow-up, while 1 (2.2%) had penile curvature and 16 (34.8%) had penile nodules. IIEF-5 scores at the postoperative 3rd month were statistically lower in patients with a TDL >10 mm (n=34) compared to those with ≤10 mm (n=12) (18.7±2.9 vs. 20.7±2.2, p=0.036). However, this statistical difference disappeared in the 6th and 12th month follow-ups. Furthermore, the rate of penile nodules was found to be statistically higher in the patient group with TDL >10 mm at the end of the one-year follow-up period (44.1% vs. 8.3%, p=0.035). All 3 patients with urethral injury was in the TDL > 10 mm group. However, these 3 patients did not experience voiding deterioration consistent with urethral stricture during the 1-year follow-up.Additionally, it was observed that as the length of the defect increases, the sensitivity to US increases. While 25% of the group with TDL ≤ 10 mm experienced sensitivity, 94.1% in the group with TDL >10 mm, and this difference was statistically significant (p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of >10 mm TDL is associated with lower IIEF-5 scores in the early surgical period and higher rates of penile nodule formation. Also, preoperative US is highly sensitive to TDL >10 mm in penile fractures. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e71-e71 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan More articles by this author Ahmet Tevfik Albayrak More articles by this author Cumhur Yesildal More articles by this author Musab Ilgi More articles by this author Ibrahim Halil Baloglu More articles by this author Mithat Eksi More articles by this author Kaya Horasanli More articles by this author Sinan Levent Kirecci More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Read full abstract