Urethra D10 Research Articles

169Yb-based high dose rate intensity modulated brachytherapy for focal treatment of prostate cancer

PurposeThis study compares conventional 192Ir-based high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 169Yb-based HDR intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for focal prostate cancer treatment. Additionally, the study explores the potential to generate less invasive treatment plans with IMBT by reducing the number of catheters needed to achieve acceptable outcomes. Methods and MaterialsA retrospective dosimetric study of ten prostate cancer patients initially treated with conventional 192Ir-based HDR-BT and 5-14 catheters was employed. RapidBrachyMCTPS, a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system was used to calculate and optimize dose distributions. For 169Yb-based HDR IMBT, a custom 169Yb source combined with 0.8 mm thick platinum shields placed inside 6F catheters was used. Furthermore, dose distributions were investigated when iteratively removing catheters for less invasive treatments. ResultsWith IMBT, the urethra D10 and D0.1cc decreased on average by 15.89 and 15.65 percentage points (pp) and the rectum V75 and D2cc by 1.53 and 11.54 pp, respectively, compared to the conventional clinical plans. Similar trends were observed when the number of catheters decreased. On average, there was an observed increase in PTV V150 from 2.84 pp with IMBT when utilizing all catheters to 8.83 pp when four catheters were removed. PTV V200 increased from 0.42 to 2.96 pp on average. Hotspots in the body were however lower with IMBT compared to conventional clinical plans. Conclusions169Yb-based HDR IMBT for focal treatment of prostate cancer has the potential to successfully deliver clinically acceptable, less invasive treatment with reduced dose to organs at risk.

Dosimetric benefits and preclinical performance of steerable needles in HDR prostate brachytherapy

Prostate cancer patients with an enlarged prostate and/or excessive pubic arch interference (PAI) are generally considered non-eligible for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT). Steerable needles have been developed to make these patients eligible again. This study aims to validate the dosimetric impact and performance of steerable needles within the conventional clinical setting.HDR BT treatment plans were generated, needle implantations were performed in a prostate phantom, with prostate volume > 55 cm3 and excessive PAI of 10 mm, and pre- and post-implant dosimetry were compared considering the dosimetric constraints: prostate V100 > 95 % (13.50 Gy), urethra D0.1cm3 < 115 % (15.53 Gy) and rectum D1cm3 < 75 % (10.13 Gy).The inclusion of steerable needles resulted in a notable enhancement of the dose distribution and prostate V100 compared to treatment plans exclusively employing rigid needles to address PAI. Furthermore, the steerable needle plan demonstrated better agreement between pre- and post-implant dosimetry (prostate V100: 96.24 % vs. 93.74 %) compared to the rigid needle plans (79.13 % vs. 72.86 % and 87.70 % vs. 81.76 %), with no major changes in the clinical workflow and no changes in the clinical set-up.The steerable needle approach allows for more flexibility in needle positioning, ensuring a highly conformal dose distribution, and hence, HDR BT is a feasible treatment option again for prostate cancer patients with an enlarged prostate and/or excessive PAI.

Development of patient and catheter specific error thresholds for high dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

In-vivo source tracking has been an active topic of research in the field of high-dose rate brachytherapy in recent years to verify accuracy in treatment delivery. Although detection systems for source tracking are being developed, the allowable threshold of treatment error is still unknown and is likely patient-specific due to anatomy and planning variation. The purpose of this study was to determine patient and catheter-specific shift error thresholds for in-vivo source tracking during high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT). A module was developed in the previously described graphical processor unit multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm. The module generates systematic catheter shift errors retrospectively into HDRPBT treatment plans, performed on 50 patients. The catheter shift model iterates through the number of catheters shifted in the plan (from 1 to all catheters), the direction of shift (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, cranial, and caudal), and the magnitude of catheter shift (1-6mm). For each combination of these parameters, 200 error plans were generated, randomly selecting the catheters in the plan to shift. After shifts were applied, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were re-calculated. Catheter shift thresholds were then derived based on plans where DVH parameters were clinically unacceptable (prostate V100<95%, urethra D0.1cc>118%, and rectum Dmax>80%). Catheter thresholds were also Pearson correlated to catheter robustness values. Patient-specific thresholds varied between 1 to 6mm for all organs, in all shift directions. Overall, patient-specific thresholds typically decrease with an increasing number of catheters shifted. Anterior and inferior directions were less sensitive than other directions. Pearson's correlation test showed a strong correlation between catheter robustness and catheter thresholds for the rectum and urethra, with correlation values of -0.81 and -0.74, respectively (p<0.01), but no correlation was found for the prostate. It was possible to determine thresholds for each patient, with thresholds showing dependence on shift direction, and number of catheters shifted. Not every catheter combination is explorable, however, this study shows the feasibility to determine patient-specific thresholds for clinical application. The correlation of patient-specific thresholds with the equivalent robustness value indicated the need for robustness consideration during plan optimization and treatment planning.

Comparison of Low Dose Rate and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost Techniques in Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Toxicity.

The ASCENDE-RT trial has been criticized for higher rates of chronic severe toxicity (18% genitourinary (GU)) than expected with a low dose rate (LDR) boost technique. We compared clinical outcomes of LDR and high dose rate (HDR) boost in the acute and chronic setting from a large single institution experience over a continuous 20-year period, with a focus on GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity during treatment of prostate cancer. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with LDR boost (2003 - 2013) and HDR boost (2014 - 2018). Clinical and treatment-related prognostic factors including age, stage, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), dosimetry details, and toxicity data were recorded. Toxicity was scored according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Multi-variable analysis (MVA) was performed to evaluate variables associated with toxicity. A total of 184 men were evaluated (87 LDR and 97 HDR) with a median follow-up of 7.1 years and 4.0 years, respectively. Most patients (92% LDR and 57% HDR) received ADT in addition to BT. The median EBRT dose was 46 Gy for LDR and 45 Gy for HDR (range 25 - 50 Gy). Prostate D90% was similar at 104% and 105% in the LDR and HDR groups, respectively. Urethra D10% and Rectum V100% were both higher with LDR compared to HDR with 155% vs 119% and 0.436% vs 0.073%, respectively. Severe (grade 3+) toxicity was rare (Table 1), with 3.4% of LDR patients experiencing grade 3 chronic GU toxicity. With HDR, 3.1% and 1% of patients experienced acute and chronic grade 3 GU toxicity, respectively. Although non-severe GU toxicity (grade 1-2) was similar between groups (95% LDR vs 89% HDR, p = 0.16), LDR patients experienced more grade 2 GU events (80.5% acute; 82.8% chronic) compared to HDR patients (45.4% acute; 57.7% chronic). There were no severe GI toxicities in the acute or chronic period. Non-severe acute GI toxicity was more common with HDR, while non-severe chronic GI toxicity was more common with LDR. On MVA, acute GU toxicity (any grade) was associated with short term ADT (p = 0.01) and Urethra D10% (p < 0.05); Chronic GU toxicity (any grade) was associated with age (p = 0.09) and Prostate V150cc (p = 0.07) but not BT boost technique. This comparative retrospective analysis of BT boost techniques reveals the overall rate of severe GU and GI toxicity to be low with both LDR and HDR. HDR boost appears to have a slightly more favorable ratio of Grade 1 to Grade 2 GU toxicity and improved urethra/rectum dosimetry. Our analysis suggests that the dosimetric advantages of HDR may deliver small reductions in GU toxicity.

Dosimetric Parameters Predictive of Treatment-Related Toxicity in High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer and is increasingly being offered as a 2-fraction protocol. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal dosimetric planning parameters to use, or whether there is any benefit summating dosimetric parameters from more than one implant. Our goal is to determine planning parameters associated with disease control, toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Data were collected on 83 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received 2 fractions of 13.5 Gy HDR brachytherapy without androgen-deprivation therapy as part of a randomized phase II clinical trial. An in-house deformable, registration algorithm was used to co-register and dose-summate the plans from both implants for each patient. Acute and late GU and GI toxicities were measured using CTCAE 4.0 and HRQOL was measured in urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains using the EPIC scores. Treatment efficacy was assessed through PSA measurement and imaging with or without biopsy where indicated. Covariates included baseline clinical factors, disease characteristics and treatment dosimetric parameters. Cox proportional hazards was performed to evaluate covariates impact on treatment toxicity and efficacy, and logistic regression analysis evaluated covariates impact on HRQOL. Among the 83 patients, median prostate volume was 46.7cm3. Median summated planning target volume receiving 100% prescription dose (PTV V100%) was 97.4%, median PTV V150% 42.4% and median PTV V200% 15.5%. Median highest dose to the 1cm3 rectum (D1cc) was 66.9% of the prescription dose and median rectum V80% was 0.008cm3. Median urethral D1cc was 99.0% of the prescription dose, median urethral Dmax 121.7% and median urethral D10% 116.2%. Grade ≥2 GI toxicity was uncommon (3.7% acute and 8.5% late), but grade ≥2 GU toxicity was reported in 73.2% (acute) and 46.3% (late) patients. Rectum D1cc and V80% were found to be significantly associated with grade 2 or higher acute GI toxicity, while use of a-blocker at baseline was associated with grade ≥2 acute GU toxicity. Similarly, use of a-blocker was associated with late grade ≥2 GU toxicity, but with no dosimetric associations. No other variables were associated with treatment-related toxicities. Only rectum D1cc was significantly associated with changes in bowel EPIC scores. Estimated 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 93.9% and 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 3.8%. HDR monotherapy with 27 Gy delivered in 2 fractions in treatment of prostate cancer is well tolerated with high rates of disease control and minimal toxicity. Dose summation between 2 fractions of HDR brachytherapy is feasible, with rectal dose predicting acute GI toxicity. The lack of association between dose metrics and urinary toxicity raises the potential for further dose escalation.

Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is commonly used to treat prostate cancer. Existing HDR planning systems solve the dwell time problem for predetermined catheters and a single energy source. Additional degrees of freedom can be obtained by relaxing the catheters' pre-designation and introducing more source types, and may have a dosimetric benefit, particularly in improving conformality to spare the urethra. This study presents a novel analytical approach to solving the corresponding HDR planning problem. The catheter and dual-energy source selection problem was formulated as a constrained optimization problem with a non-convex group sparsity regularization. The optimization problem was solved using the fast-iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (FISTA). Two isotopes were considered. The dose rates for the HDR 4140 Ytterbium (Yb-169) source and the Elekta Iridium (Ir-192) HDR Flexisource were modeled according to the TG-43U1 formalism and benchmarked accordingly. Twenty-two retrospective HDR prostate brachytherapy patients treated with Ir-192 were considered. An Ir-192 only (IRO), Yb-169 only (YBO), and dual-source (DS) plan with optimized catheter location was created for each patient with N catheters, where N is the number of catheters used in the clinically delivered plans. The DS plans jointly optimized Yb-169 and Ir-192 dwell times. All plans and the clinical plans were normalized to deliver a 15Gy prescription (Rx) dose to 95% of the clinical treatment volume (CTV) and evaluated for the CTV D90%, V150%, and V200%, urethra D0.1cc and D1cc, bladder V75%, and rectum V75%. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for each structure. The DS plans ubiquitously selected Ir-192 as the only treatment source. IRO outperformed YBO in organ at risk (OARs) OAR sparing, reducing the urethra D0.1cc and D1cc by 0.98% ( ) and 1.09% ( ) of the Rx dose, respectively, and reducing the bladder and rectum V75% by 0.09 ( ) and 0.13 cubic centimeters (cc) ( ), respectively. The YBO plans delivered a more homogenous dose to the CTV, with a smaller V150% and V200% by 3.20 ( ) and 1.91 cc ( ), respectively, and a lower CTV D90% by 0.49% ( ) of the prescription dose. The IRO plans reduce the urethral D1cc by 2.82% ( ) of the Rx dose compared to the clinical plans, at the cost of increased bladder and rectal V75% by 0.57 ( ) and 0.21 cc ( ), respectively, and increased CTV V150% by a mean of 1.46 cc ( ) and CTV D90% by an average of 1.40% of the Rx dose ( ). While these differences are statistically significant, the clinical differences between the plans are minimal. The proposed analytical HDR planning algorithm integrates catheter and isotope selection with dwell time optimization for varying clinical goals, including urethra sparing. The planning method can guide HDR implants and identify promising isotopes for specific HDR clinical goals, such as target conformality or OAR sparing.

Being certain about uncertainties: a robust evaluation method for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including the combination of uncertainties

In high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy the combined effect of uncertainties cause a range of possible dose distributions deviating from the nominal plan, and which are not considered during treatment plan evaluation. This could lead to dosimetric misses for critical structures and overdosing of organs at risk. A robust evaluation method to assess the combination of uncertainties during plan evaluation is presented and demonstrated on one HDR prostate ultrasound treatment plan retrospectively. A range of uncertainty scenarios are simulated by changing six parameters in the nominal plan and calculating the corresponding dose distribution. Two methods are employed to change the parameters, a probabilistic approach using random number sampling to evaluate the likelihood of variation in dose distributions, and a combination of the most extreme possible values to access the worst-case dosimetric outcomes. One thousand probabilistic scenarios were run on the single treatment plan with 43.2% of scenarios passing seven of the eight clinical objectives. The prostate D90 had a standard deviation of 4.4%, with the worst case decreasing the dose by up to 27.2%. The urethra D10 was up to 29.3% higher than planned in the worst case. All DVH metrics in the probabilistic scenarios were found to be within acceptable clinical constraints for the plan under statistical tests for significance. The clinical significance of the results from the robust evaluation method presented on any individual treatment plan needs to be compared in the context of a historical data set that contains patient outcomes with robustness analysis data to ascertain a baseline acceptance.

Determining Combined Modality Dosimetric Constraints by Integration of IMRT and LDR Prostate Brachytherapy Dosimetry and Correlation with Toxicity

Intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing combination external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy have demonstrated increased genitourinary (GU) toxicity. We have previously demonstrated a method to combine EBRT and LDR dosimetry. In this work, we use this technique for a sample of patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, correlate with clinical toxicity, and suggest preliminary summed organ-at-risk constraints for future investigation. Intensity modulated EBRT and 103Pd-based LDR treatment plans were combined for 138 patients using biological effective dose (BED) and deformable image registration. GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were compared with combined dosimetry for the urethra, bladder, and rectum. Differences between doses in each toxicity grade were assessed by analysis of variance (α=0.05). Combined dosimetric constraints are proposed using the mean organ-at-risk dose, subtracting 1 standard deviation for a conservative recommendation. The majority of our 138-patient cohort experienced grade 0 to 2 GU or GI toxicity. Six grade 3 toxicities were noted. Mean prostate BED D90 (± 1 standard deviation) was 165.5±11.1 Gy. Mean urethra BED D10 was 230.3±33.9 Gy. Mean bladder BED was 35.2±11.0 Gy. Mean rectum BED D2cc was 85.6±24.3 Gy. Significant dosimetric differences between toxicity grades were found for mean bladder BED, bladder D15, and rectum D50, but differences between individual means were not statistically significant. Given the low incidence of grade 3 GU and GI toxicity, we propose urethra D10 <200 Gy, rectum D2cc <60 Gy, and bladder D15 <45 Gy as preliminary dose constraints for combined modality therapy. We successfully applied our dose integration technique to a sample of patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Incidence of grade 3 toxicity was low, suggesting that combined doses observed in this study were safe. We suggest preliminary dose constraints as a conservative starting point to investigate and escalate prospectively in a future study.

PHSOR10 Presentation Time: 1:15 PM: Dosimetry Comparison Platform for Diffusing Alpha Emitters Radiation Therapy (DaRT) in Focal Prostate Brachytherapy

<h3>Purpose</h3> Dosimetry calculation for diffusing alpha emitters radiation therapy (DaRT) is challenging because it needs to combine both diffusion modelling and radiation transport computation. We have developed a 3D dosimetry platform to compare standard focal Ir-192 HDR and Ra-224 DaRT dosimetry for real prostate focal brachytherapy cases. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> For DaRT dose calculation, diffusion length data on prostate tumors was based on autoradiography measurements performed 4-5 days post treatment. Leakage probability was inferred from blood and urine measurements from DaRT patients. The MIM Symphony software (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, OH) was installed for dosimetry calculation for both standard Ir-192 source and DaRT needles (AphaTAU Medical, Jerusalem, Israel) for treatment planning. For testing purposes, the dose calculation was performed on 5 focal prostate brachytherapy cases using the standard focal dosimetry technique. <h3>Results</h3> For DaRT dose calculation, TG-43 parameters were calculated in prostate for permanent implantation of 3 microCi needles: anisotropy function, dose-rate constant, radial-dose function and geometry function. For standard dose calculation, parameters used in MIM Symphony were validated with our clinical Oncentra platform. For 5 patients, standard focal HDR brachytherapy dosimetry calculation was performed retroactively. Prescription doses were 13 or 15 Gy at the PTV. Doses to organs at risk were also evaluated: Urethra D10% (16-91%) and Rectum V75cc (0-0,6 cc), for example. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A 3D dose calculation technique was developed for DaRT based on diffusion modelling and radiation transport. With the use of this technique integrated into the MIM Symphony treatment planning software, we have developed a 3D dosimetry comparison platform for DaRT and standard (HDR or LDR) prostate brachytherapy. The advantage of DaRT for OAR protection can thus be retrospectively studied with this platform on a cohort of prostate patients from our clinic.

Sunday, June 19, 202210:00 AM - 10:15 AMPO47 Presentation Time: 10:00 AM: Dose Distribution of Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy (Iodine-125) in Comparison to Temporary Interstitial Brachytherapy (Iridium-192) with a Hydrogel Spacer for Prostate Cancer

<h3>Purpose</h3> Brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer can be applied as permanent interstitial brachytherapy BT (LDR, low dose rate) and temporary interstitial brachytherapy BT (HDR, high dose rate), applied also alternatively in many centers. The aim of the study was to analyze the dose distribution in- and outside the prostate. <h3>Methods</h3> The intraoperative dose distribution of 102 LDR-BT patients was compared with the dose distribution of 109 HDR-BT patients (232 HDR-BT fractions). A hydrogel spacer (HS) (10ml) was only applied before HDR-BT. For the analysis of the dose coverage outside the prostate, a 5mm margin was added to prostate volume (PV+). Prostate V100 and V150 denote the PV covered by 100% and 150% of the prescription dose, while prostate D90 and urethra D30 denote the minimum dose in 90% of the PV and 30% of the urethral volume. <h3>Results</h3> The comparison of volume and dose values is shown in the table. HDR-BT patients had on average a slightly larger PV, but considerably larger PV+. The only not significantly different value comparing both methods was prostate V100. LDR-BT was characterized by a considerably more inhomogeneous dose distribution and higher doses to the urethra. However, the minimum dose in 90% of PV+ was lower. As a consequence of the HA in HDR-BT patients, the dose to the rectum was considerably lower. <h3>Conclusion</h3> In comparison to HDR-BT, LDR-BT is characterized by a more inhomogeneous dose inside the prostate, a higher dose to the urethra and a slightly less steep dose drop-off around the prostate. The dose to the rectal wall can be considerably reduced applying the HS.

Determining Combined Modality Dosimetric Constraints by Integration of IMRT and LDR Prostate Brachytherapy Dosimetry

Determining Combined Modality Dosimetric Constraints by Integration of IMRT and LDR Prostate Brachytherapy Dosimetry <h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and prostate brachytherapy is one standard of care for men with prostate cancer. Dosimetric correlation of organ at risk (OAR) has been limited by the lack of spatial registration and differences in biological effectiveness between EBRT and brachytherapy dose. This study utilized a validated technique to spatially combine three-dimensional biological effective dose (BED) distributions from different modalities to more accurately depict a composite dose. We use this technique to correlate dosimetry with genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in an effort to propose conservative dosimetric tolerances for OARs during combination therapy for prostate cancer. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> The study cohort consisted of 144 intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with combination therapy. Patients received 45 Gy using IMRT, either by static field or modulated arc, and 100 Gy using ¹⁰³Pd. Dosimetry was converted voxel-by-voxel to BED and combined using deformable image or inherent DICOM registration. Acute and late GU and GI toxicity was scored using CTCAE and correlated with combined BED. Biological effective doses for each toxicity group were compared using analysis of variance (α=0.05). <h3>Results</h3> Using dose methodology, the mean prostate BED was 223.5 ± 24.2 Gy. Mean urethral dose and D10 were 182.5 ± 22.8 and 232.0 ± 37.0 respectively. Mean rectal dose and D2cc were 33.2 ± 7.9 and 86.4 ± 24.4 respectively. CTCAE toxicity is reported in Table 1. Overall, there was minimal grade 3+ toxicity. No statistical differences were noted among any of the toxicity grades and there was no correlation between urethral or rectal dose and toxicity. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study demonstrates the feasibility of using the spatial combination of biologic effective doses for OARs in combination EBRT and brachytherapy for prostate cancer. In this study cohort, the level of toxicity was generally less than reported elsewhere. This dataset serves as an opportunity to propose using combined constraints as a conservative estimate for future studies to estimate OAR tolerances. Initially, we propose conservative combination constraints equal to one standard deviation below our mean patient dosimetry: Urethra D10 < 160 Gy and Rectum D2cc < 60 Gy. The process of establishing a useful BED between two different treatments can help redefine OAR tolerances and has applicability for other treatment sites with combined therapy such as cervix cancer and re-irradiation.

Feasibility of online adaptive HDR prostate brachytherapy: A novel treatment concept

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of online adaptive transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT) through retrospective simulation of source positioning and catheter swap errors on patient treatment plans. MethodSource positioning errors (catheter shifts in 1 mm increments in the cranial/caudal, anterior/posterior, and medial/lateral directions up to ±6 mm) and catheter swap errors (between the most and least heavily weighted) were introduced retrospectively into DICOM treatment plans of 20 patients that previously received TRUS HDRPBT. Dose volume histogram (DVH) indices were monitored as errors were introduced sequentially into individual catheters, simulating potential errors throughout treatment. Whenever DVH indices were outside institution thresholds: prostate V100% <95%, urethra D0.1cc >118% and rectum Dmax >80%, the plan was adapted using remaining catheters (i.e., simulating previous catheters as previously delivered). The final DVH indices were recorded. ResultsProstate coverage (V100% >95%) could be maintained for source position errors up to 6 mm through online plan adaptation. The source position error at which the urethra D0.1cc and rectum Dmax was able to return to clinically acceptable levels using online adaptation varied between 6 mm to 1 mm, depending on the direction of the source position error and patient anatomy. After introduction of catheter swap errors to patient plans, prostate V100% was recoverable using online adaptation to near original plan characteristics. Urethra D0.1cc and rectum Dmax showed less recoverability. ConclusionOnline adaptive HDRPBT maintains the prostate V100% to clinically acceptable values for majority of directional shifts. However, the current online adaptive method may not correct for source position errors near organs at risk.

HDR prostate brachytherapy plan robustness and its effect on in-vivo source tracking error thresholds: A multi-institutional study.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect of departmental planning techniques on appropriate in‐vivo source tracking error thresholds for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) treatments, and to determine if a single in‐vivo source tracking error threshold would be appropriate for the same patient anatomy.MethodsThe prostate, rectum, and urethra were contoured on a single patient transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) dataset. Anonymized DICOM files were disseminated to 16 departments who created an HDR prostate BT treatment plan on the dataset with a prescription dose of 15 Gy in a single fraction. Departments were asked to follow their own local treatment planning guidelines. Source positioning errors were then simulated in the 16 treatment plans and the effect on dose–volume histogram (DVH) indices calculated. Change in DVH indices were used to determine appropriate in‐vivo source tracking error thresholds. Plans were considered to require intervention if the following DVH conditions occurred: prostate V100% < 90%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectumtt Dmax > 80%.ResultsThere was wide variation in appropriate in‐vivo source tracking error thresholds among the 16 participating departments, ranging from 1 to 6 mm. Appropriate in‐vivo source tracking error thresholds were also found to depend on the direction of the source positioning error and the endpoint. A robustness parameter was derived, and found to correlate with the sensitivity of plans to source positioning errors.ConclusionsA single HDR prostate BT in‐vivo source tracking error threshold cannot be applied across multiple departments, even for the same patient anatomy. The burden on in‐vivo source tracking devices may be eased through improving HDR prostate BT plan robustness during the plan optimisation phase.

A Prospective Study of High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy or Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Intra-Prostatic Recurrence: Toxicity and Long Term Clinical Outcome

BackgroundUp to half of patients with localized prostate cancer experience biochemical relapse within 10 years after definitive radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the toxicity, dose to the organs at risk (OARs), and efficacy of dose-intensified focal salvage radiotherapy.Methods and MaterialThirty-three patients (median age 68.8 years) with histologically confirmed relapse after primary definitive radiotherapy were enrolled between 2012 and 2019. No patients had metastases at imaging or in bone marrow aspiration. Twenty-three patients were treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy to the recurrent tumor, defined at multiparametric MRI, with 3 fractions of 10 Gy with two weeks interval, and 10 patients by stereotactic body radiotherapy with 35 Gy to the local recurrence and 25 Gy to the whole prostate in 5 fractions. We used the RTOG-scoring system to grade genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal toxicity (GI) at three months (acute), and at 12, 24, and 36 months (late). Dose-volume histogram parameters to the local recurrence and the OARs were obtained and 2 Gy equivalent (EQD2) total dose was calculated using the linear-quadratic model with α/β = 3 Gy. Efficacy was assessed by the progression-free interval and overall survival.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 81 months (range 21–115). The cumulative moderate to severe GI and GU toxicities were 3.0% (1/33) and 15.2% (5/33). Six patients had grade 1 acute GI toxicity, none had grade 2 or 3. One patient had grade 3 acute GU toxicity, two had grade 2, and fourteen had grade 1. One patient had late GI toxicity grade 2 and eight had grade 1. Four patients had late GU toxicity grade 2 and eight had grade 1. No patients had grade 3 late toxicity. The mean total D90 to the recurrent tumor was 77.7 ± 17.0 Gy. The mean total rectum D2cc was 17.0 ± 7.9 Gy and the mean total urethra D0.1cc was 29.1 ± 8.2 Gy. Twenty-eight patients had re-irradiation without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Nine of these are still relapse-free and 10 had a recurrence-free interval longer than 2 years.ConclusionThe toxicity of salvage radiotherapy was mild to moderate. One-third of the patients achieved long-term stable disease without ADT and one-third had a recurrence-free interval longer than 2 years. Some patients progressed rapidly and probably did not benefit from re-irradiation.

Correlations between intraplan and postplan parameters in I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy using loose seeds or linked seeds.

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate seed arrangement by comparing two different methods (linked seeds and loose seeds). A total of sixty-one patients (28 linked seed brachytherapy cases and 33 loose seed brachytherapy cases) with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy. Modified peripheral loading was the method used for seed placement. The parameters evaluated were as follows: prostate D90, V100, and V150; urethral D90, D10, and D5; and rectal V100 (RV100) and D2 (RD2). Coefficient parameters (r and r2) were assessed by regression analysis. Prostate V150, urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, and RD2 showed significant correlations between both methods in all patients. Urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, and RD2 showed significant correlations in patients who received linked seed brachytherapy. Prostate V150, urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, RV100, and RD2 showed significant correlations in patients who received loose seed brachytherapy. Urethral D90, urethral D10, urethral D5, and RD2 showed significant correlations in the linked seed and loose seed brachytherapy analyses. In contrast, prostate D90 and prostate V100 showed no correlation. Parameters of normal organ damage showed good correlations between intraplan and postplan parameters. These parameters may be useful to determine normal organ damage during guided brachytherapy with two different methods (linked seeds and loose seeds).

Dose differentiated high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a feasibility assessment of MRI-guided dose escalation to dominant intra-prostatic lesions.

Prostate brachytherapy is routinely performed with trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)- or computed tomography (CT)-based planning that cannot delineate dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs). In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based planning allows for more accurate DIL delineation and dose escalation. This study assessed the maximum achievable dose escalation to DILs. We retrospectively identified 24 patients treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy boost (15 Gy in 1 fraction). All patients had a pre-treatment prostate MRI with 1-3 DILs. MRIs were used to delineate DILs and were co-registered to TRUS intra-procedure. Treatment plans were experimentally re-optimized to escalate DIL dose. Dosimetric indices from the original and re-optimized plans were compared using two-tailed paired t-test. Re-optimized plans were deemed acceptable if they achieved all of the following criteria: prostate D90 > 100%, prostate V100 > 90%, urethra D10 < 118%, rectum V80 < 0.5 cc, bladder D1cc < 75%, or if they did not exceed organs at risk (OARs) doses of the original plan. The mean DIL D90 was significantly increased from 134% of the prescription dose on the original plans to 154% on the re-optimized plans. The mean urethra D10 and mean bladder D1cc were significantly reduced from 123% to 117% and from 72% to 65%, respectively. Prostate D90 was reduced from 106% to 102%, and prostate V100 was reduced from 93% to 91%. We re-optimized HDR brachytherapy plans to escalate DILs dose to a mean D90 of > 150% while maintaining favorable prostate coverage and OARs doses. We propose DIL D90 dose of > 150% (22.5 Gy) as an achievable goal.

Urethral and bladder dose–effect relations for late genitourinary toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial

Purpose or objectivesThe FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed that by adding a focal boost to conventional fractionated EBRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer, the five-year biochemical disease-free survival increased, without significantly increasing toxicity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between radiation dose to the bladder and urethra and genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade ≥2 in the entire cohort. Material and methodsThe dose–effect relations of the urethra and bladder dose, separately, and GU toxicity grade ≥2 (CTCAE 3.0) up to five years after treatment were assessed. A mixed model analysis for repeated measurements was used, adjusting for age, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline GU toxicity grade ≥1 and institute. Additionally, the association between the dose and separate GU toxicity subdomains were investigated. ResultsDose-effect relations were observed for the dose (Gy) to the bladder D2 cm3 and urethra D0.1 cm3, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.14 (95% CI 1.12–1.16, p < 0.0001) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.11–1.14, p < 0.0001), respectively. Additionally, associations between the dose to the urethra and bladder and the subdomains urinary frequency, urinary retention and urinary incontinence were observed. ConclusionFurther increasing the dose to the bladder and urethra will result in a significant increase in GU toxicity following EBRT. Focal boost treatment plans should incorporate a urethral dose-constraint. Further treatment optimization to increase the focal boost dose without increasing the dose to the urethra and other organs at risk should be a focus for future research, as we have shown that a focal boost is beneficial in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity and Quality of Life Following Single Fraction High Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Little is known about optimal dose constraints when high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is used as monotherapy for prostate cancer. Most dose constraints for HDR monotherapy were extrapolated from predictors of toxicity when HDR brachytherapy was combined with external beam radiotherapy as a boost. We sought to determine clinical and dosimetric predictors of toxicity and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in men treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Eligible patients were treated with single fraction HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy on two prospective clinical trials at a single institution. Patients in the first trial (HDR-mono) received a single fraction of 19 Gy without a dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) boost, and patients from the second trial (MARS) received 19 Gy in a single fraction with an MRI-guided DIL boost to ≥ 23 Gy. ADT was not used. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate clinical (age, IPSS score, prostate volume, alpha blocker use at baseline, and receipt of a DIL boost) and dosimetric (prostate V100, V150, V200, D90, Urethral Dmax and D10, and Rectal Dmax and V80) predictors of CTCAE v4 acute/late toxicity and HRQOL changes measured with expanded prostate index composite (EPIC). Three classifications of late minimally clinically important changes (MCICs) were evaluated: small (> 0.5 standard deviation [SD]), moderate (> 1.0 SD) and severe (> 2.0 SD) declines compared to baseline. <h3>Results</h3> 147 patients were included (87 from HDR-mono, 60 from MARS). Median follow-up was 62.8 months. Only increasing prostate size predicted acute GU toxicity ≥ grade 2 (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09, <i>P</i> = 0.021). On multivariable regression, predictors of late GU toxicity ≥ grade 2 were not receiving a DIL boost (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.88–7.83, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher baseline IPSS score (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.89–3.18, <i>P</i> = 0.015). Rectal and urethral dose constraints were not associated with late GU/GI toxicity ≥ grade 2. Contrary to our hypothesis, small (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81–0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and moderate (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.037) urinary MCICs were less frequent in those with higher urethral Dmax. No impact of urethra D10 on urinary MCICs was seen. Rectal Dmax and V80 did not predict bowel MCIC changes at any threshold. <h3>Conclusion</h3> We were unable to identify dose constraints that were predictive of late toxicity or relevant HRQOL changes in single fraction HDR brachytherapy. This suggests dose parameters used in these trials were safe, and that minor variability in plan dosimetry likely has little clinical significance. While increasing urethral Dmax paradoxically predicted for less frequent urinary MCICs, we do not believe this finding is clinically relevant. Further research exploring optimal dose constraints to be used in HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer is warranted.

Reduction of toxicity in brachytherapy using a new technique

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to elucidate the usefulness of a dose evaluation method for reducing late genitourinary (GU) toxicity in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) of prostate cancer. Methods and MaterialsGU toxicity was scored in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The prostatic urethra was divided into three segments (base = B, midgland = M, apex = A), which were subclassified into seven subgroups (B, M, A, BM, BA, MA, BMA) using a D10% color map of the urethra. Significance testing was conducted on urethral D0.1% and D10% among the seven subgroups. Grade < 2 GU toxicity was also implemented. ResultsData of 174 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR-BT combined with external beam radiotherapy between November 2011 and July 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 74 (53–84) years, and median followup period was 44 (6–69) months. The number of Grade < 2 and Grade ≥ 2 toxicity was significantly different in the M subgroup than in the other subgroups (p < 0.05), suggesting increased radioresistance in the midgland urethra. ConclusionsA high-dose-area evaluation method using a urethral D10% color map may be helpful in reducing late GU toxicity in HDR-BT for prostate cancer.

Live implant dosimetry may be an effective replacement for postimplant computed tomography in localized prostate cancer patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy

PurposeTo determine if Live Implant Dosimetry (LIDO) utilizing intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is equivalent to postimplant CT dosimetry (either day 0 or day 30) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) treated with low dose rate (LDR) prostate seed brachytherapy. Methods and MaterialsThe treated population consisted of 628 men with localized (T1-T2) PC. All d'Amico risk categories (low, intermediate, and high) were included, and 437 patients were treated with monotherapy (160 Gy) [low and low tier intermediate], and the remainder (191) [high tier intermediate and high risk] with an implant boost (106 Gy) post external beam radiation, to a volume including the prostate and seminal vesicles (46 Gy). LIDO with intraoperative TRUS, postimplant CT (day 0 and day 30) were performed in all cases. Prostate volumes (V), V100 (prostate) and dose (D) D90 (prostate), D30 (urethra), and Rectum D2cc, were recorded. No urinary catheter was used on Day 30 CT. ResultsMore than 91.33% of monotherapy patients reached the target D90 according to LIDO while only 82.99% of Day 0 CT and 92.82% of Day 30 CT achieved target D90. When considering V100, monotherapy patients recorded target dosimetry in 90.93%, 82.31%, and 92.02% of cases assessed by LIDO, Day 0 CT and Day 30 CT, respectively. Strong correlations are observed in D90, Rectum D2cc and Urethra D30 across imaging modalities but V100 and V150 were poorly correlated due to the relative quantification of this parameter and high degree of error in measurement. Of all monotherapy patients with satisfactory dosimetry on LIDO, 94.82% reached target D90 at day 30 CT and 94.19% reached target V100. ConclusionsLIDO and CT are both effective tools for assessing postimplant dosimetry. Patients with satisfactory LIDO dosimetry are highly likely to have equivalent dosimetry on CT at follow-up, indicating that postimplant CT may be eliminated in PC a patients implanted with this technique.