Comparison of Low Dose Rate and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost Techniques in Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Toxicity.

Abstract

The ASCENDE-RT trial has been criticized for higher rates of chronic severe toxicity (18% genitourinary (GU)) than expected with a low dose rate (LDR) boost technique. We compared clinical outcomes of LDR and high dose rate (HDR) boost in the acute and chronic setting from a large single institution experience over a continuous 20-year period, with a focus on GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity during treatment of prostate cancer. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with LDR boost (2003 - 2013) and HDR boost (2014 - 2018). Clinical and treatment-related prognostic factors including age, stage, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), dosimetry details, and toxicity data were recorded. Toxicity was scored according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Multi-variable analysis (MVA) was performed to evaluate variables associated with toxicity. A total of 184 men were evaluated (87 LDR and 97 HDR) with a median follow-up of 7.1 years and 4.0 years, respectively. Most patients (92% LDR and 57% HDR) received ADT in addition to BT. The median EBRT dose was 46 Gy for LDR and 45 Gy for HDR (range 25 - 50 Gy). Prostate D90% was similar at 104% and 105% in the LDR and HDR groups, respectively. Urethra D10% and Rectum V100% were both higher with LDR compared to HDR with 155% vs 119% and 0.436% vs 0.073%, respectively. Severe (grade 3+) toxicity was rare (Table 1), with 3.4% of LDR patients experiencing grade 3 chronic GU toxicity. With HDR, 3.1% and 1% of patients experienced acute and chronic grade 3 GU toxicity, respectively. Although non-severe GU toxicity (grade 1-2) was similar between groups (95% LDR vs 89% HDR, p = 0.16), LDR patients experienced more grade 2 GU events (80.5% acute; 82.8% chronic) compared to HDR patients (45.4% acute; 57.7% chronic). There were no severe GI toxicities in the acute or chronic period. Non-severe acute GI toxicity was more common with HDR, while non-severe chronic GI toxicity was more common with LDR. On MVA, acute GU toxicity (any grade) was associated with short term ADT (p = 0.01) and Urethra D10% (p < 0.05); Chronic GU toxicity (any grade) was associated with age (p = 0.09) and Prostate V150cc (p = 0.07) but not BT boost technique. This comparative retrospective analysis of BT boost techniques reveals the overall rate of severe GU and GI toxicity to be low with both LDR and HDR. HDR boost appears to have a slightly more favorable ratio of Grade 1 to Grade 2 GU toxicity and improved urethra/rectum dosimetry. Our analysis suggests that the dosimetric advantages of HDR may deliver small reductions in GU toxicity.