Ureteral Wall Thickness Research Articles

Predictive value of NCCT quantitative analysis for proximal and middle impacted ureteral stones.

The purpose of the study was to explore the predictive value of preoperative quantitative NCCT analysis for proximal and middle ureteral stone impaction. Data of 128 patients who diagnosed with proximal and middle ureteral stones were analyzed. Stone size, upper diameter of the ureter(D1), lower diameter of the ureter (D2), CT attenuation of the ureter above the stone (HA, 'HU above'), CT attenuation of the ureter below the stone (HB, 'HU below'), CT attenuation values of the stone's proximal segments (C1), CT attenuation values of the stone's distal segments (C2), and ureteral wall thickness(UWT)were recorded. Logistic regression was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of the data to determine the independent predictors of proximal and middle ureteral stone impaction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive performance. Among the 128 patients, 52 (40.6%) had impacted stones, while 76 (59.4%) did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone size > 9.45mm (OR = 1.372, 95% CI = 1.071-1.756, P = 0.012), UWT > 3.22mm (OR = 4.217, 95% CI = 2.165 ~ 8.213, P < 0.001)、DDR > 2.10 (OR = 4.901, 95% CI = 1.797 ~ 13.365, P = 0.002)and HBA > 1.58 (OR = 5.237,95% CI = 1.502 ~ 18.259, P = 0.009)were independent risk factors for predicting ureteral stone impaction. In conclusion, stone size, UWT, DDR, and HBA show crucial predictive value for impaction of stones.

Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage

Stone size and location are key factors in predicting spontaneous stone passage (SSP), but little attention has been paid to the influence of radiological signs of stone impaction (RSSI). This research aims to determine whether RSSI, alongside stone size, can predict SSP and to evaluate the consistency of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measurements among observers. In this retrospective study, 160 patients with a single upper or middle ureteral stone on acute non-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) were analysed. Patient data were collected from medical records. Measurements of RSSI, including UWT, ureteral diameters, and average attenuation above and below the stone, were taken on NCCT by four independent readers blind to the outcomes. The cohort consisted of 70% males with an average age of 51 ± 15. SSP occurred in 61% of patients over 20 weeks. The median stone length was 5.7 mm (IQR: 4.5–7.3) and was significantly shorter in patients who passed their stones at short- (4.6 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) and long-term (4.8 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) follow-up. For stone length, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting SSP was 0.90 (CI 0.84–0.96) and only increased to 0.91 (CI 0.85–0.95) when adding ureteral diameters and UWT. Ureteral attenuation did not predict SSP (AUC < 0.5). Interobserver variability for UWT was moderate, with ± 2.0 mm multi-reader limits of agreement (LOA). The results suggest that RSSI do not enhance the predictive value of stone size for SSP. UWT measurements exhibit moderate reliability with significant interobserver variability.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict impacted ureteral stones via machine learning.

To develop and evaluate a nomogram for predicting impacted ureteral stones using some simple and easily available clinical features. From June 2019 to July 2022, 480 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) for ureteral calculi were enrolled in the study. From the eligible study population between June 2019 and December 2020, a training and validation set was randomly generated in a 7:3 ratio. To further evaluate the generalization performance of the nomogram, we performed an additional validation using the data from January 2021 to July 2022. Lasso regression analysis was used to identify the most useful predictive features. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression algorithm was applied to select independent predictive features. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The Hosmer-Lemeshow Test was utilized to evaluate the overall goodness of fit of the nomogram. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that flank pain, hydronephrosis, stone length/width, HU below (Hounsfield unit density of the ureter center below the stone), HU above/below (HU above divided by HU below) and UWT (ureteral wall thickness) were ascertained as independent predictors of impacted ureteral stones. The nomogram showed outstanding performance within the training dataset, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.907. Moreover, the AUC was 0.874 in the validation dataset. The ROC curve, calibration curve, DCA curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow Test suggested that the nomogram maintains excellent clinical applicability and demonstrates commendable performance. Similar results were achieved in the test dataset as well. We established a nomogram that can be effectively used for preoperative diagnosis of impacted ureteral stones, which is of great significance for the treatment of this disease.

CT-Based Predictors of Spontaneous Ureteral Stone Passage.

To assess CT-scan based parameters, particularly ureteral wall thickness (UWT), in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage. Cross-sectional, analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from June to November 2023. Patients with symptomatic, single, radio-opaque, unilateral ureteral stones having size ≤10 mm with normal kidney functions, diagnosed by non-contrast CT-scan KUB, and treated by conservative option for four weeks were enrolled. Clinical and radiological predictors for stone passage (SP), including stone size, area, laterality, location, density, degree of hydronephrosis, maximal UWT at the stone site, and ureteral diameter and density above and below the stone, were evaluated. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of stone passage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the optimal cut-off for UWT. Among 34 eligible patients, 22 (64.7%) passed their stones spontaneously. Patients who passed had smaller stone size and area and lesser UWT. Stone location, laterality, degree of hydronephrosis, stone density, ureteral wall diameter, and density above and below stones were not associated with SP. Multivariate analysis revealed maximum UWT as the independent predictor of SP, with a cut-off of 1.95 mm and an accuracy of 0.94. UWT was the single most convincing factor for the spontaneous passage of ureteral stone in this study. By applying UWT's optimal cut-off value, it might be an extremely significant tool when taking decisions in daily practice. Ureteral wall thickness, Medical expulsive therapy, Non-contrast computed tomography.

PREDICTIVE FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESS OF MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH DISTAL URETERAL STONE

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors affecting spontaneous stone passing in patients who received medical expulsive therapy due to distal ureteral stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From September 2022 to October 2023, a total of 148 patients with distal ureteral stones sized 4-10 mm were included. Patients received silodosin 4 mg as medical expulsive therapy and were followed up for a maximum of four weeks. The patient- and stone-related variables affecting spontaneous stone passage were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 42.92±12.78 years. The stone expulsion rate was 64.2%. The rate of spontaneous stone passage was significantly higher in patients with lower stone size, stone burden, ureteral wall thickness, distance of the stone to the ureterovesical junction, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and hydronephrosis grade. (all, p&amp;lt;0.05). The distance of the stone to the ureterovesical junction, ureteral wall thickness, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent predictors of spontaneous passage (p:0.036, p:0.001, p:0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The distance of stone to the ureterovesical junction, ureteral wall thickness, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio can be useful parameters to estimate spontaneous stone expulsion. These factors play important roles in decision-making for the management of distal ureteral stones.

Predictive role of ureteral wall thickness and patient characteristics in endoscopic treatment outcomes for ureteral stricture disease following stone surgery

PurposeTo evaluate the role of certain radiological parameters and patient characteristics in predicting the success of endoscopic treatment in ureteral stricture disease.MethodsFifty one adult patients with ureteral stricture disease (< 1 cm) after developing due to upper ureteral stones with ureteroscopic laser disintegration were included and in addition to stone and patient parameters, radiological parameters including ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the impacted stone site were also measured on computed tomography (CT) images. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: Patients with endoscopic treatment success and Group 2: Patients with endoscopic treatment failure. The possible relationship between the UWT values and other radiological parameter was comparatively evaluated.ResultsMean UWT value assessed at the treated stone site was significantly higher in cases unresponsive to endoscopic treatment with values of 2.77 ± 1.03 mm and 4.25 ± 1.32 mm in Group 1 and 2 respectively. A cut off value 3.55 mm for UWT was found to be highly predictive for endoscopic treatment failure.ConclusionsOur current results indicated that assessment of UWT value at the obstructing stone could be helpful enough to predict the likelihood of failure following endoscopic management of strictures with high sensitivity and specificity. Evaluation of this particular parameter could let the endourologists to look for more rational treatment alternatives with necessary measures taken on time.

Area of hydronephrosis is a useful predictive factor of impacted ureteral stones.

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy for impacted stones is challenging, but it is important to predict impacted stones preoperatively. Hydronephrosis, which is evaluated by a grading system, is often apparent in impacted stones. However, the currently used grading system is a qualitative evaluation. We, therefore, focused on a quantitative evaluation: the area of hydronephrosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the area of hydronephrosis could predict impacted stones more accurately than Society for Fetal Urology grade. We retrospectively identified 160 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones at our hospital between January 2014 and April 2022. Impacted stones were defined as stones fixed to the ureteral wall that could not be moved by means of ureteroscopic manipulation or water pressure. Of the 160 patients, 54 (33.8%) had impacted stones. Comparing patient characteristics, there were significant differences in stone size, ureteral wall thickness, Society for Fetal Urology grade, renal pelvic width and area of hydronephrosis (all P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that area of hydronephrosis was the more significant predictive value (area under the curve 0.781) compared with Society for Fetal Urology grade (area under the curve 0.676, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that significant independent predictive factors of impacted stones were thicker ureteral wall thickness and larger area of hydronephrosis (both P < 0.01). The area of hydronephrosis and ureteral wall thickness were significant predictors of impacted stones in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones. These factors may be useful for selecting the treatment and preoperative settings.

Optimal duration of medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral stones: a critical evaluation

To evaluate the optimal duration of Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) application for distal ureteric stones on a time period based manner. 89 patients with 5–10 mm distal ureter stones received tamsulosin (0.4 mg) for MET and diclofenac sodium (75 mg) for analgesia. Patients were evaluated once a week for 4 weeks. Radiologic stone passage was evaluated by kidney ureter bladder (KUB) and ultasonography where non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) was also performed if needed. While 23 cases (28.4%) were SF after first week, 23 were SF (28.4%) after 2 weeks, 9 cases (11.1%) after 3 and lastly 7 cases (8.6%) became SF after four weeks. Nineteen (23.5%) cases were not SF after 4 weeks. A positive relationship was found between the time period elapsed for stone passage and ureteral wall thickness (UWT) along with the degree of hydronephrosis. In addition, mean number of renal colics and emergency department (ED) visits were found to be higher in patients passing stones in the 4th week along with the ones who could not despite MET. SFR for distal ureteric stones sizing 5–10 mm was higher within the first 3 weeks under MET application. Thus, waiting for a longer period of time may result in increased analgesic and unnecessary MET treatment with increased risk of emergency department visits and additional costs as well. We believe that other options could be considered in such cases who are not SF at the end of the first 3 weeks.

Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?

PurposeWe aimed to define factors affecting the non-invasive overall treatment success (medical expulsive therapy (MET) ± shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)) for uncomplicated ureteral steinstrasse (SS) clearance.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent SWL for renal stones between 2017 and 2021. Patients with uncomplicated SS were included. All patient’s demographic and radiological data, e.g., age, gender, pre-SWL stenting, SS site, type, leading stone size in widest diameter (< 10 mm and ≥ 10 mm), ureteral wall thickness (UWT) in mm against the leading stone were collected. If SS was diagnosed, medical treatment was given for 4 weeks. In case of MET failure, either SWL for the leading stones + MET or direct URS was done. Non-invasive treatment success (SFR) was considered if complete clearance of SS occurred with no complications or the need for invasive intervention.ResultsA total of 145 patients were included with mean age of 45.9 ± 12.4 years. SFR in case of MET only occurred in 27.9%. Complications happened in 26 patients (17.9%). Non-invasive treatment SFR was achieved in 78 patients (53.8%) totally where SS type I, leading stone size ≤ 10 mm type and decreased UWT around the leading stone increased treatment success.ConclusionUreteral wall thickness is an important factor predicting SS management success. Besides the decreased UWT, non-invasive management should be offered for type I SS with leading stone ≤ 10 mm.

Ureteral stricture formation after endoscopic removal of obstructing stones: could it be predicted with well-assessed radiological parameters?

The possible role of well-assessed radiological parameters in the prediction of ureteral stricture formation in cases with impacted obstructive ureteral calculi has been evaluated. 46 adult patients with or without ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscopic stone management were included. In addition to stone size and some certain radiological parameters including ureteral wall thickness (UWT) of the involved ureter at the impacted stone site was also measured and noted on computed tomography (CT) images. Parameters were evaluated in two subgroups of cases, namely: Group 1: patients in whom a ureteral stricture formed after endoscopic stone removal and Group 2: patients normal ureteral anatomy without any stricture formation. The possible relationship between the UWT values and degree of hydronephrosis (HN) with subsequent stricture formation was comparatively evaluated. All of the stones were proximal ureteral calculi in both groups. Both the degree of HN and proximal ureteral diameter (PUD) parenchymal was higher in cases with stricture formation. In addition, mean parenchymal thickness was lower and mean values of UWT measurements at the stone site were 3.70 ± 0.97mm and 2.17 ± 0.26mm in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. A cutoff value 2.49mm for UWT was found to be highly predictive for stricture formation. UWT value calculated at the obstructing stone site was found to be predictive enough for the likelihood of ureteral stricture formation with high sensitivity and specificity . This evaluation along with some other radiological parameters may enable the urologists to follow such cases on this aspect with necessary measures taken.

Evaluation of Factors Influenced on the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Generally, there are many methods for the treatment of urinary stones, of which percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive and highly effective method, and now become the first-line management for urinary stones, especially in the cases of complex stones and staghorne calculi. Accurate assessment of stone location, stone morphology, degree of hydronephrosis as well as urinary system abnormalities is extremely important in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the S.T.O.N.E score as well as other factors that influenced the effectiveness of PCNL. Descriptive study on 71 patients with kidney stones, who underwent multi-slice CT scan of the urinary system before PCNL and then PCNL at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from July 2022 to July 2023. All patients received the informed consent and agreed to participate in the study. The factors included the stone area, the track length (from the skin surface to the stone central), the degree of urinary tract dilatation, the number of involved calyces, the density of stone, the renal parenchyma thickness, the ureteral wall thickness and fat infiltration measured on MSCT non-contrast phase. These factors were used to predict the effectiveness of PCNL including the stone clearance rate (SCR) and the operation time. The mean age of the patient group was 53.8±12.3. The male/female ratio was 1.54. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the following factors and the operation time: the stone area (<400, 400-799, 800-1599 and >1600 mm2), the degree of urinary tract dilatation (no or might and moderate or severe dilatation), the number of involved calyces (≤ 2, 3 and staghorne calculi), the renal parenchyma thickness (<18 mm and ≥18mm). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the following factors and the surgery time (p>0.05): the track length (<100 and ≥100 mm), and the stone density (<950 and ≥950 HU). Regarding the S.T.O.N.E score (included five factors: Size, Track length, Obstruction, Number of involved calyces, and Evaluation of stone density), there was a strong correlation between S.T.O.N.E score and the surgery time (p<0.001, r=0.94), and the SCR (p=0.001, r=-0.97). The evaluation of these factors played an important role in the prediction of the effectiveness of PCNL.

AI prediction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for ureteral stones by machine learning-based analysis with a variety of stone and patient characteristics.

We propose an artificial intelligence prediction method for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment outcomes by analysis of a wide variety of variables. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 171 patients from between January 2009 and November 2019 that underwent shock wave lithotripsy at Wakayama Medical University, Japan, for ureteral stones shown on preoperative non-contrast computed tomography. This prediction method consisted of stone area extraction, stone analyzing factor extraction from non-contrast computed tomography images, and shock wave lithotripsy treatment result prediction by a non-linear support vector machine for analysis of 15 input and automatic measurement factors. Input factors included patient age, skin-to-stone distance, and maximum ureteral wall thickness, and the automatic measurement factors included 11 non-contrast computed tomography image texture factors in the stone area and stone volume. Permutation feature importance was also applied to the artificial intelligence prediction results to analyze the importance of each factor relating to estimate decision grounds. The prediction performance was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation, it obtained 0.742 of the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The proposed method is shown by these results to have robust data diversity and effective clinical application. As a result of permutation feature importance, some factors that showed high p-values in the significant difference tests were thought to have a high contribution to the proposed prediction method. Future issues include validation using a larger volume of high-resolution clinical non-contrast computed tomography image data and the application of deep learning.

Development of a new scoring system predicting medical expulsive therapy success on 4-10mm distal ureteral stones: medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS).

Ureteral stone passage by using medical expulsive therapy (MET) are affected by numerous radiological and clinical parameters. We aimed to construct a scoring system, which would be based on clinical and computed tomography (CT)-derived data, to predict the success of the MET approach. 186 patients presenting to urology clinic or emergency department with unilateral single 4-10mm distal ureteral stone and who had MET were included. All patients were divided into two groups as the MET-successful group and the MET-unsuccessful group. The success rate of MET was 67.2%. Stone size ≥ 6.5mm, stone density > 1078 HU, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) > 2.31mm, ureteral diameter (UD) > 9.24mm, presence of periureteral stranding (PUS) and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were stated as the independent risk factors. Based on the regression coefficients on multivariate logistic regression analysis, 1 point for stone size > 6.5mm, 2 points for stone density > 1078 HU, 2 points for UWT > 2.31mm, 3 points for UD > 9.24mm, 1 point for presence of PUS and 1 point for presence of DM were assigned to patients for each risk factor. Higher medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS) indicated lower MET success. All patients were classified into three risk groups according to METSS: low risk (0-3 points; success percentage: 92.8%); intermediate risk (4-5 points; success percentage: 60.4%) and high risk (6-10 points; success percentage: 8.3%). The METSS seems to separate successfully the patients with a favorable or adverse constellation of factors.

Outcomes of primary ureteroscopic lithotripsy: The role of maximum ureteral wall thickness at the site of stone impaction.

To verify if the maximum thickness of the ureteral wall at the stone site (m-UWT) can affect the outcomes of primary retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy (P-URSL) within a single-center dataset. We retrospectively reviewed data on 354 consecutive URSL performed from January 2020 to May 2022 at "Fondazione Poliambulanza" in Brescia (Italy). We included patients older than 18 years who underwent URSL for a single ureteral stone with a maximum diameter ranging from 5 to 10 mm. Patients with anatomical abnormalities, a positive preoperative urinary culture, or without a NCCT performed during the acute event were excluded. Patients were treated in an emergency setting (P-URSL within 48 h from the diagnosis of acute ureteral colic) or in a delayed one (D-URSL after a period of maximum 90 days of ureteral double-j stenting). For the resulting 139 patients we recorded demographic, clinical and stone-related features and perioperative data. We processed these data by univariate and multivariate analysis, and with a logistic regression analysis. Of the 139 included procedures, 63 were P-URSL and 76 D-URSL. At the univariate analysis we found that stone diameter (OR 0.845, p = 0.017), stone volume (OR 0.023, p = 0.001), stone density (OR 0.998, p = 0.000) and m-UWT (OR 0.499, p = 0.013) are predictors of P-URSL. Stone density (OR 0.998, p = 0.002) is an independent predictor of P-URSL at the multivariate analysis. At a logistic regression analysis, a distal ureteric position (OR 0.189, p = 0.014), stone diameter (OR 1.289, p = 0.006), and m-UWT (OR 2.297, p = 0.02) were found to be statistically significant predictors of incomplete stone clearance in patients undergoing P-URSL. m-UWT is the only predictor of short-term postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing P-URSL (OR 3.386, p < 0.001). From a descriptive analysis, it emerged that an increased m-UWT (>2 mm) significantly correlates to an endoscopic finding of ureteritis' signs and to an increase in operative time, hospital stay and post-procedural stenting time. A m-UWT greater than 2 mm also correlates with a lower stone free rate (SFR) and with a significant increase in both short and long-term postoperative complications. Our study confirmed a connection between m-UWT and poor endoscopic findings, as well as a direct correlation with the main morphometric parameters of the stone and finally with the outcomes of P-URSL itself. Further studies are necessary to validate our results, so that m-UWT might be routinely considered a useful tool in the decision-making process for P-URSL.

Ureteral Wall Thickness (UWT) is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ureteral stone impaction is associated with unfavorable endourologic outcomes, however reliable predictors of stone impaction are limited. We aimed to assess the performance of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) on non-contrast computed tomography as a predictor of ureteral stone impaction and failure rates of spontaneous stone passage, shockwave lithotripsy, and retrograde guidewire and stent passage. This study was completed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA). A search was conducted in April 2022 for all adult, human and English language studies investigating UWT using PROSPERO, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global and SCOPUS. A systematic review and meta-analysis using random effects model were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS score. Fourteen studies with a pooled population of 2987 patients were included for quantitative analysis and 34 studies were included in our qualitative review. Meta-analysis findings suggest that a thinner UWT is associated with more favorable subgroup stone outcomes. Thinner UWT suggests a lack of stone impaction and was associated with improved rates of spontaneous stone passage, successful retrograde guidewire and stent placement, and improved shockwave lithotripsy outcomes. Studies lack a standardized UWT measurement protocol. UWT is a non-invasive measure that predicts ureteral stone impaction and thin measurements are predictive of successful outcomes. Variability in measurement methods confirms that a standardized UWT protocol is needed, and the clinical utility of UWT is yet to be determined.

A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy.

Background and objective In this study, we aimed to analyze the association of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measured on non-contrast CT (NCCT) with stone impaction as found in ureteroscopy (URS). Materials and methods We analyzed 43 patients who underwent URSand pneumatic/laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones from May to November 2022. TheUWT was measured by an experienced radiologist on NCCT. Clinical predictors of the impacted stone were calculated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the UWT cutoff to apply it for impaction with different parameters. We also evaluated the association of intra- and postoperative parameters of the two groups with UWT. Results Out of the 43 patients with stones, 26 (60.46%) patients had impacted stones. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the site (left-sided stone impacted more commonly), stone size, stone density [Hounsfield unit (HU)], hydronephrosis, UWT, and duration between initial presentation and surgery, and multivariate analysis was utilized to assess stone density, as well as UWT's association with impacted stones. The ROC curve showed a cutoff of 3.5 mm for UWT with an accuracy of 0.83. HighUWT (≥3.5 mm) was associated with a significantly lower stone-free rate, more complications, and mean operative time as compared to low UWT (<3.5 mm) (p<0.05). Conclusion Based on our findings, high UWT is associated with high rates of impacted stones and a lower stone-free rate when compared to low UWT.

Value of preoperative ureteral wall thickness in prediction of impaction of ureteric stones stratified by size in laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the role of preoperative UWT in the prediction of impaction of ureteral stones stratified according to stone size in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.Patient and methodsThis study included 154 patients submitted to URSL for ureteral stones. Radiological data comprised the presence of hydronephrosis, anteroposterior pelvic diameter (PAPD), proximal ureteric diameter (PUD), and maximum UWT at the stone site. Collected stone characteristics were stone size, side, number, site, and density.ResultsThe study included 154 patients subjected to URSL. They comprised 74 patients (48.1%) with impacted stones and 80 (51.9%) with non-impacted stones. Patients were stratified into those with stone size ≤ 10 mm and others with stone size > 10 mm. In the former group, we found that stone impaction was significantly associated with higher PAPD, PUD, and UWT. In patients with stone size > 10 mm, stone impaction was related to higher UWT, more stone number, and higher frequency of stones located in the lower ureter. ROC curve analysis revealed good power of UWT in discrimination of stone impaction in all patients [AUC (95% CI) 0.65 (0.55–0.74)] at a cut-off of 3.8 mm, in patients with stone size ≤ 10 mm [AUC (95% CI) 0.76 (0.61–0.91)] at a cut-off of 4.1 mm and in patients with stone size > 10 mm [AUC (95% CI) 0.72 (0.62–0.83)] at a cut-off of 3.0 mm.ConclusionsStratifying ureteric stones according to size would render UWT a more practical and clinically-oriented approach for the preoperative prediction of stone impaction.

The Impact of Ureteral Wall Thickness on Spontaneous Passage and Development of Long-term Ureteral Stricture in Patients with Ureteral Stone

To evaluate the association of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) with spontaneous passage (SP) of ureteral stones and formation of ureteral stricture (US) in patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy for ureteral stones. Cohort study. Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, between January 2019 and June 2021. One hundred and sixty-nine patients with ureteral stones were restrospetively reviewed for maximum stone diameter, stone density, degree of hydronephrosis, parenchymal thickness, and UWT measurement from CT images. The patients were divided into two groups; patients who had (group 1) and had not (group 2) undergone SP of ureteral stones. These two groups were compared for stone characteristics and UWT. Ureterorenoscopy was performed on 52 patients who did not experience SP. Data related to the passage of guide wire and radio-opaque material, drainage method, ureteral wall injury and patients who developed US were recorded. Ureterorenoscopy group were divided into two groups of patients who did and did not develop stricture. These two groups were compared for stone characteristics and perioperative findings. Of the 169 patients, 106 (62,7%) patients spontaneously passed stones. Ureterorenoscopy was performed on 52 patients. US developed in 9 (17%) patients. Maximum stone diameter, density, and antero-posterior (AP) diameter of the renal pelvis and UWT were statistically different between both groups. The degree of hydronephrosis, ureteral wall injury, density, AP diameter of the stones, parenchyma thickness, length of hospital stay, and UWT were found to be significantly increased in the stricture group. UWT is a simple measurement that can be used to predict SP of ureteral stones. It can also predict the development of US after ureterorenoscopy in long-term. Ureteral calculi, Ureterorenoscopy, Ureteral wall thickness, Ureteral stricture.

Non-contrast computed tomography-based factors in predicting ESWL success: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We assessed the efficacy of some predictive factors that can be measured with non-contrast computed tomography and may affect ESWL success with a systematic review and meta-analysis. All data sources were broadly investigated up to April 2022. Data were extracted from the relevant studies and analyzed with RevMan software. In a random effects model, standard mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) values were given with 95% confidence intervals. In total, pooled analysis included 7148 patients in 43 studies. The combined effect estimate showed significant differences between the ESWL success and ESWL failure groups in terms of Hounsfield unit (HU), Hounsfield density (HD), skin to stone distance (SSD), ureteral wall thickness (UWT), stone volume, stone area, abdominal fat parameters, diameter of proximal ureter, and hydronephrosis. However, perinephric stranding and renal cortical thickness were not found to be statistically significant between the study groups. HU, HD, SSD, UWT, stone volume, stone area, abdominal fat parameters, diameter of proximal ureter and hydronephrosis are effective factors for prediction of ESWL success. It is important to decide on treatment before the procedure for stones with appropriate diameter for ESWL.

The Impact of Ureteral Wall Thickness on Spontaneous Passage and Development of Long-term Ureteral Stricture in Patients with Ureteral Stone

The Impact of Ureteral Wall Thickness on Spontaneous Passage and Development of Long-term Ureteral Stricture in Patients with Ureteral Stone