You have accessJournal of UrologyUrothelial Cancer: Markers + Natural History & Pathophysiology1 Apr 2011363 PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF BIOMARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOAMA: PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF CELL CYCLE REGULATORS Ramy Youssef, Tyler Arendt, Nicholas Cost, Arthur Sagalowsky, Yair Lotan, and Vitaly Margulis Ramy YoussefRamy Youssef Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Tyler ArendtTyler Arendt Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Nicholas CostNicholas Cost Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Arthur SagalowskyArthur Sagalowsky Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Yair LotanYair Lotan Dallas, TX More articles by this author , and Vitaly MargulisVitaly Margulis Dallas, TX More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.449AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prognostic role of a panel of tissue biomarkers in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Since 2007, primary tumors of patients treated with radical nephroureterctomy (RNU) for high grade UTUC were prospectively evaluated for expression of p53, p21, p27, Cyclin E, and pRB/Ki−67. Standardized, automated immunohistochemical staining and scoring were utilized in conjunction with bright field microscopy imaging and advanced color detection software. The relationship between tumor markers and pathological parameters as well as oncologic outcomes was assessed. RESULTS The study included 28 patients with 16 (57%) renal pelvis and 12 (43%) ureteral tumors. At a median follow up of 20 months, 8 (29%) patients experienced systemic disease progression and 7 (25%) died from UTUC. Expression of p53, p21, p27, Cyclin E, and pRB/Ki−67 was altered in 12 (46%), 5 (18%), 10 (36%), 1 (4%) and 25 (89%) tumors, respectively. Unfavorable prognostic bio−score (>2 altered markers) was associated with non−organ confined UTUC at RNU (>pT2 and/or pN1−2). Specifically, 9 (50%) of 18 patients with non organ confined UTUC demonstrated unfavorable prognostic bio−score, compared to 1 (10%) patient with organ confined UTUC (p=0.048). Median cancer−specific survival of patients with >2 altered biomarkers was 14.0 months, and it was not reached in patients with < 2 altered markers (HR 3.766, p=0.052). CONCLUSIONS The preliminary analysis of this ongoing prospective study demonstrates that tissue biomarkers can be utilized for prediction of non−organ confined disease and overall oncologic outcomes after RNU for UTUC. Further study will determine if tissue biomarkers can be employed for patient risk−stratification and integration of peri−operative systemic chemotherapy into management paradigm of UTUC. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e148 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ramy Youssef Dallas, TX More articles by this author Tyler Arendt Dallas, TX More articles by this author Nicholas Cost Dallas, TX More articles by this author Arthur Sagalowsky Dallas, TX More articles by this author Yair Lotan Dallas, TX More articles by this author Vitaly Margulis Dallas, TX More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...