Trends in the Transnational Protest Movement Michael D. Richardson Sherlock Holmes once famously remarked that what was curious about the “incident of the dog in the night-time” was that the dog did not bark. Observers of the 2008 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, might have likewise noticed an uncharacteristic silence in the air. This year, the World Social Forum (WSF), which has staged annual anti-Davos protests since 2001 in cities from Porto Alegre to Nairobi, asked its members to stay home.1 Rather than hold a single, attention-grabbing counter-demonstration, the WSF encouraged activists across the globe to organize local press conferences and other events in their communities “to confront this important neo-liberal gathering of the elites.”2 This rejection of centrally coordinated protest in favor of a diffuse, grassroots effort reveals two important new trends in what has been called the “transnational protest movement,” or the “global justice movement.”3 For one thing, protesters have come to define themselves more by what they stand against than what they stand for . “What unites [the movement’s] different elements,” according to one scholar, “is not a demand for specific reforms, but the rejection of ‘global capitalism’ and its influence on culture and human relations.”4 A second key trend is the movement’s eschewal of a centralized, bureaucratic structure. Protests are organized via the Internet, but specific tactics and even agenda items are left to the discretion of activists on the ground.5 This approach has given rise to a string of loose activist networks that depend very little on a central leader or common ideology.6 On paper, at least, the protest movement appears to share many policy goals with more mainstream nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Indeed, the two groups have plenty of common ground to tread. But at the same time, a rift has grown between these potential allies as they struggle to be heard by governments, international institutions, and the general public.7 One activist author complained that many NGOs are “[l]lacking in imagination” and torn between competing impulses to work with the street movement, on the one hand, and to negotiate directly with power holders, on the other. As a result, some NGOs can actually become vehicles for the containment of political dissent.8 So long as this rift persists, activists risk being drowned out by NGOs that have well-cultivated ties to both political elites and the press.9 [End Page 155] The question remains as to how international organizations and governments such as the United States should respond to these trends in the protest movement. One approach has been avoidance. Massive urban protests in Seattle, Genoa, and elsewhere have led international conference organizers to move their meetings away from contentious city streets. The Group of Eight nations, for example, held its last summits in the small German town of Heiligendamm, and in 2008 at the remote Japanese island of Hokkaido. The other tactic has been to give NGOs a “seat at the table,” thereby permitting them to voice their concerns in the policymaking process.10 But so long as that seat is only open to established, mainstream organizations, it is safe to say that the transnational protest movement will live on. Footnotes 1. Dougherty, Carter. “Anti-Davos Takes a Breather.”International Herald Tribune . January 24, 2008, Finance Section, p. 16. 2. World Social Forum 2008. “World Social Forum 2008: A Global Day of Action and Mobilization.” http://www.wsf2008.net/eng/node/3621 . 3. There is some debate as to whether recent protests constitute a “movement,” but these terms are generally associated with the rise of global civil society and with widespread campaigns against states and international organizations that promote neo-liberal agendas. See Della Porta, Donatella, and Sidney Tarrow. “Transnational Processes and Social Activism: An Introduction.” In Transnational Protest & Global Activism , edited by Donatella Della Porta and Sidney Tarrow, p. 1–17. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2005. 4. Clark, John, and Nuno Themudo. “The Age of Protest: Internet-Based ‘Dot Causes’ and the ‘Anti-Globalization’ Movement.” In Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action , edited by John Clark, p. 109–126. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2003. 5...