Urban Academic Emergency Department Research Articles

Exploring Reasons for Loss to Follow-up in Pregnancy of Unknown Location: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Objective: To quantify proportions of loss to follow-up in patients presenting with a pregnancy of unknown location and explore patients' perspectives on follow-up for pregnancy of unknown location. A pregnancy of unknown location is a scenario in which a patient has a positive pregnancy test but the pregnancy is not visualized on transvaginal ultrasound. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with pregnancy of unknown location who presented to an urban academic emergency department or complex family planning outpatient office. We sought to calculate the proportion of patients lost to follow-up, defined as inability to contact the patient within 2 weeks. We then conducted focus groups of patients diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location. We used thematic analysis to identify themes related to follow-up. Results: We reviewed 464 charts of patients diagnosed with pregnancy of unknown location. The median age in this cohort was 27 with most patients identifying as Black (80%, n = 370) and using public insurance (67%, n = 315). When looking at loss to follow-up rates, Black patients experienced loss to follow-up (20%, n = 72) more often than White patients (4%, n = 2; p = 0.003). Focus group participants had a mean age of 31.8+/-4.8, and the majority were of Black race (n = 16, 72.7%). Participants identified barriers to follow-up including the long duration of management, general inconvenience, and poor communication with their health care team. Participants felt a burden of responsibility to learn about their condition and to self-advocate for their follow-up and communication of results. Conclusions: These data indicate that Black patients are more likely to experience loss to follow-up compared with White patients during monitoring for pregnancy of unknown location. Patients identified many barriers to follow-up and felt that successful follow-up required substantial self-efficacy.

Emergency Department-Based Physical Function Measures for Falls in Older Adults and Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of GAPcare.

Falls are the leading reason for injury-related emergency department (ED) visits for older adults. The Geriatric Acute and Post-acute Fall Prevention Intervention (GAPcare), an in-ED intervention combining a medication therapy management session delivered by a pharmacist and a fall risk assessment and plan by a physical therapist, reduced ED revisits at 6 months among older adults presenting after a fall. Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between measures of function obtained in the ED and clinical outcomes. This was a secondary analysis of data from GAPcare, a randomized controlled trial conducted from January 2018 to October 2019 at 2 urban academic EDs. Standardized measures of function (Timed Up and Go [TUG] test, Barthel Activity of Daily Living [ADL], Activity Measure for Post Acute Care [AM-PAC] 6 clicks) were collected at the ED index visit. We performed a descriptive analysis and hypothesis testing (chi square test and analysis of variance) to assess the relationship of functional measures with outcomes (ED disposition, ED revisits for falls, and place of residence at 6 months). Emergency department disposition status refers to discharge location immediately after the ED evaluation is complete (eg, hospital admission, original residence, skilled nursing facility). Among 110 participants, 55 were randomized to the GAPcare intervention and 55 received usual care. Of those randomized to the intervention, 46 received physical therapy consultation. Median age was 81 years; participants were predominantly women (67%) and White (94%). Seventy-three (66%) were discharged to their original residence, 14 (13%) were discharged to a skilled nursing facility and 22 (20%) were admitted. There was no difference in ED disposition status by index visit Barthel ADLs (P = .371); however, TUG times were faster (P = .016), and AM-PAC 6 clicks score was higher among participants discharged to their original residence (P ≤ .001). Participants with slower TUG times at the index ED visit were more likely to reside in nursing homes by six months (P = .002), while Barthel ADL and AM-PAC 6 clicks did not differ between those residing at home and other settings. Measures of function collected at the index ED visit, such as the AM-PAC 6 clicks and TUG time, may be helpful at predicting clinical outcomes for older adults presenting for a fall. Based on our study findings, we suggest a novel workflow to guide the use of these clinical measures for ED patients with falls.

Understanding Barriers and Distress Experienced Among Cancer Patients: Analysis from an Urban Academic Emergency Department.

The purpose of this study was to examine barriers and facilitators to compliance for cancer care in patients utilizing an emergency department (ED)-based assessment. Adult ED patients who either had active cancer or a history of cancer were enrolled between August 2020 and Jan 2022 for this prospective cohort study. We piloted the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the predictors of high distress. Of the 152 patients enrolled, 73% were Black patients, 11% were non-Hispanic White, and 16% included patients from other racial and ethnic groups (including 10.5% Hispanic patients); 73% of the sample had active cancer. The current ED visit was cancer related for 44%. The mean score on the Distress Thermometer was 4 (SD = 2; range 0-8) with 30% having a high distress level of ≥ 6. Having an active cancer and race/ethnicity were significant predictors of high distress. Patients who had active cancer had three times (aOR = 3.01; 95% CI 1.12-8.10) higher odds of experiencing high distress in the past week compared to those who did not have active cancer, after adjusting for race/ethnicity and reason for visit. Practical problems and physical problems were the most common, with 43% (n = 66) and 40% (n = 61) of the patients reporting these problems, respectively. Despite significant progress in cancer care, cancer patients/survivors face difficulty in transitioning between care environments and end up seeking episodic care in the ED and experience a high level of distress.

Implementation of a Suicide Risk Screening Clinical Pathway in a Children's Hospital: A Feasibility Study.

Youth suicide is a pressing global concern. Prior research has developed evidence-driven clinical pathways to screen and identify suicide risk among pediatric patients in outpatient clinics, emergency departments (ED) and inpatient hospital units. However, the feasibility of implementing these pathways remains to be established. Here, we share the results of a hospital-wide "youth suicide risk screening pathway" implementation trial at an urban academic pediatric hospital to address this gap. A 3-tier "youth suicide risk screening pathway" using The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) was implemented for patients aged 10 to 26 years who received care at an urban academic pediatric hospital's emergency department or inpatient units. We retrospectively reviewed implementation outcomes of this pathway from January 1 to August 31, 2019. The feasibility of this implementation was measured by assessing the pathway's degree of execution, fidelity, resource utilization, and acceptability. Of 4108 eligible patient encounters, 3424 (83%) completed the screen. Forty-eight (1%) screened acute positive, 263 (8%) screened nonacute positive and 3113 (91%) screened negative. Patients reporting positive suicide risk were more likely to be older and female, although more males required specialty mental health evaluations. Pathway fidelity was 83% among all positive screens and 94% among acute positive screens. The clinical pathway implementation required 16 hours of provider training time and was associated with slightly longer length of stay for inpatients that screened positive (4 vs 3 days). Sixty-five percent of nurses and 78% of social work providers surveyed supported participation in this effort. It is feasible to implement a youth suicide risk screening pathway without overburdening the system at an urban academic pediatric hospital.

Emergency department communication with diverse caregivers and persons living with dementia: A qualitative study.

Research to date has detailed numerous challenges in emergency department (ED) communication with persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their caregivers. However, little is known about communication experiences of individuals belonging to minoritized racial and ethnic groups, who are disproportionately impacted by dementia and less likely to be included in dementia research. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 29 caregivers of PLWD from two urban academic hospital EDs with distinct patient populations. The first site is an ED in the Northeast serving a majority White, English-speaking, and insured population. The second site is an ED in the South serving a majority Black and/or Hispanic, Spanish-speaking, and underinsured population. Interviews lasted an average of 25 min and were digitally recorded and transcribed. We used an inductive approach to analyze interview transcripts for dominant themes and compared themes between sites. Our sample included caregivers of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. Caregivers cared for PLWD who spoke English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, and Vietnamese. We identified three themes. First, caregiver advocacy was central to experiences of ED communication, particularly when PLWD primarily spoke a non-English language. Second, routine care plans did not address what mattered most to participants and PLWD. Participants felt that care arose from protocols and did not address what mattered most to them. Third, White English-speaking caregivers in Site 1 more commonly expected ED staff to engage them in care decision-making than Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern caregivers in Site 2. Language barriers amplify the higher intensity care needed by PLWD in the ED. Strategies should be developed for communicating with PLWD and caregivers about what matters most in their ED care.

Perspectives of Black Patients on Racism Within Emergency Care

Numerous Black individuals experience racism persistently throughout their lives, with repercussions extending into health care settings. The perspectives of Black individuals regarding emergency department (ED) care, racism, and patient-centered approaches for dismantling structural racism remain less explored. To qualitatively explore the perspectives and experiences of Black patients related to race, racism, and health care following a recent ED visit. In this qualitative study, the audio from semistructured interviews of Black patients discharged from an academic urban ED between August 2021 to April 2022 were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The main outcomes encompassed the main themes from the analysis of the interviews with Black patients regarding their perspectives on race, racism, and clinical care. A total of 25 Black patients (20 [80%] female; mean [SD] age, 44.6 [12.9] years) discharged from the ED were interviewed. Three broad domains were identified: (1) racism in health care; (2) ED clinical care; and (3) recommendations for improvement. Within these domains, the first 2 were grouped into specific themes. Within the first domain, racism in health care, 7 themes were identified using thematic analysis: (1) a history of medical racism; (2) dismissiveness; (3) patient expectations on encountering racism; (4) medical mistrust; (5) health literacy; (6) postencounter outcomes, and (7) discrimination beyond but associated with race. Within the second theme, ED clinical care, 5 themes were identified using the same thematic analysis method: (1) discharge plan; (2) patient experience; (3) waiting room perceptions; (4) medication treatment; and (5) pain management. The third domain, recommendations for improvement, incorporated patient-generated suggestions for enhancing the Black patient experience. In this qualitative study, the fabric of clinical care delivery in the ED was intricately woven with Black patients' experiences of racism. Patients expressed a pervasive sense of mistrust, skepticism, and dismissiveness at the system level. Instances of racism were consistently highlighted by patients from their entry to the ED to discharge. These perspectives illuminate the pervasive nature of racism in clinical care, providing valuable insights for exploring patient-centered approaches to foster antiracist cultures in the ED and throughout the broader medical landscape.

The Value of an Emergency Medicine Virtual Observation Unit

We implemented a virtual observation unit in which emergency department (ED) patients receive observation-level care at home. Our primary aim was to compare this new care model to in-person observation care in terms of brick-and-mortar ED length of stay (inclusive of ED observation unit time) as well as secondarily on inpatient admission and 72-hour return visits (overall and with admission). In a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data on ED observation patients from January 1, 2022 to December 29, 2022 from an academic urban ED, we used propensity matching to compare virtual to in-person observation patients on outcomes of interest. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and reason for observation. We also conducted real-time review of all virtual observation cases for potential safety concerns. Of 8,218 observation stays, 361 virtual observation patients were matched with 361 in-person observation patients. Virtual observation patients experienced lower median brick-and-mortar ED + EDOU LOS [14.6 (IQR 10.2, 18.9) versus 33.3 (IQR 28.1, 38.1) hours] and lower inpatient admission rates (10.2% [SD 5.0] versus 24.7% [SD 11.3]). The 72-hour return rate was higher for virtual observation patients (3.6% [SD 3.0] versus 2.5% [SD 3.0]). Among those with return visits, the rate of inpatient admission was higher among virtual observation patients (53.8% [SD 3.2] versus 11.1% [13.0]). There were no significant patient safety events recorded. Virtual observation unit patients used fewer hours in ED and ED observation relative to on-site observation patients. This new care delivery model warrants further study because it has the potential to positively impact ED capacity.

Clinical Trials Studying Suicide Risk Reduction: Who is Excluded From Participation

Objective The use of exclusion criteria in clinical trials can cause research participants to differ markedly from clinical populations, which negatively impacts generalizability of results. This study identifies and quantifies common and recurring exclusion criteria in clinical trials studying suicide risk reduction, and estimates their impact on eligibility among a clinical sample of adults in an emergency department with high suicide risk. Method Recent trials were identified by searching PubMed (terms suicide, efficacy, effectiveness, limited to clinical trials in prior 5 years). Common exclusion criteria were identified using Qualitative Content Analysis. A retrospective chart review examined a one-month sample of all adults receiving psychiatric evaluation in a large urban academic emergency department. Results The search yielded 27 unique clinical trials studying suicide risk reduction as a primary or secondary outcome. After research fundamentals (e.g. informed consent, language fluency), the most common exclusion criteria involved psychosis (77.8%), cognitive problems (66.7%), and substance use (63.0%). In the clinical sample of adults with high suicide risk (N = 232), psychosis exclusions would exclude 53.0% of patients and substance use exclusions would exclude 67.2% of patients. Overall, 5.6% of emergency psychiatry patients would be eligible for clinical trials that use common exclusion criteria. Conclusions Recent clinical trials studying suicide risk reduction have low generalizability to emergency psychiatry patients with high suicide risk. Trials enrolling persons with psychosis and substance use in particular are needed to improve generalizability to this clinical population.

Implementation and analysis of a multifaceted intervention for alcohol use disorder from a single academic urban emergency department.

From 2006 to 2014, alcohol-related visits to the emergency department (ED) increased by 76% in the United States, highlighting the need for improved ED-driven interventions addressing alcohol use disorder (AUD). Naltrexone is an FDA-approved medication for AUD shown to decrease craving and self-administration of alcohol. While oral naltrexone and extended-release naltrexone have been long utilized in primary care and inpatient hospital settings, the use of naltrexone in the ED is limited. This study implemented and analyzed a multifaceted intervention regarding ED naltrexone prescribing at a large safety net, academic, urban hospital. A baseline assessment of preintervention conditions and perspectives on naltrexone prescribing was conducted through a chart review and standardized interviews with ED providers, respectively. The interview results guided design of interventions that addressed identified barriers. These included provider education, prescribing aids, and zero-cost naltrexone tablets supplied by the ED pharmacy to patients upon discharge. Between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020, of 753 unique patients who had a primary diagnosis or chief complaint containing the word "alcohol," only five (0.66%) were prescribed naltrexone. ED providers identified lack of training regarding naltrexone, lack of a prescribing protocol, and limited patient and provider education materials as barriers to prescribing naltrexone. Following the intervention, among 278 eligible patients, 11 oral naltrexone prescriptions were written (3.96%) between April 13, 2021, and August 1, 2021. This represents a sixfold increase over the preintervention period. An intervention to increase ED oral naltrexone prescriptions for AUD was successfully implemented, addressing lack of provider education, lack of prescribing resources, and patient barriers to accessing prescribed medications. Longer-term follow-up is needed to assess the efficacy and sustainability of these interventions. Nevertheless, ED clinicians are well positioned to initiate naltrexone prescriptions for patients presenting with AUD.

Second- and third-year medical students' clinical encounters in the emergency department.

Experiential learning theory suggests that direct clinical experiences facilitate learning. Previous literature has focused primarily on the experiences of fourth-year medical students. As more students gain early clinical exposure, it is important to understand the types of patients seen by junior students. This study aims to categorize the clinical experiences of early (M2 and M3) students in the emergency department (ED). A retrospective review of the electronic health record of patients seen by M2s and M3s on a 2-week emergency medicine rotation at a single urban academic ED in the Midwest was performed. Data elements extracted included total number of patients seen, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), disposition, and chief complaint. Students were not mandated to see any particular patients. Medical students (248) saw 2994 total patients from 2018 to 2022. The median number of patients seen by each student was 12.0 (range 1-32). Pediatric patients made up 6.5% (n = 194) of total patients. Encounters were primarily ESI 2 or 3, which accounted for 89.4% of all patients (n = 2676). The most encountered complaints were abdominal pain, chest pain, and dyspnea, making up 15.6% (n = 467), 8.7% (n = 260), and 5.5% (n = 165), respectively, of total cases. Obstetrics/gynecology, hematologic, and environmental disorders were the least frequently encountered domains. No students saw all Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM)-recommended complaints. There is significant variability in the ED encounters of M2s and M3s, with wide ranges of patient volume and presentations. This study provides some evidence that early students may not be meeting CDEM recommendations.

Abstract 346: Deep Learning Approach for Predicting Good Neurological Outcome for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Background: Cardiac arrest continues to pose a significant public health burden, with over 350,000 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occurring each year in the United States, and nearly 90% of them being fatal. The objective of this work was to develop a deep learning model that can accurately predict the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) in adult OHCA cases. Methods: Adult OHCA cases at an urban academic emergency department were enrolled between 2018-2023. We evaluated data collected post return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at the first hour. Six different groups of data were tested for the prediction of CPC score: (1) Post-Rosc Vitals, (2) Pre-hospital & ED data points, and (3) Hospital Admission data points. The second group of exploratory research variables include: (4) ultrasound variables, (5) biomarkers and (6) Sex steroid hormones. The figure below illustrates the prediction framework for cardiac arrest patients, post ROSC, admitted to the hospital. Results: Of the total of 109 cases that were enrolled, 45% were female and 48% were Black. More than one-third (35%) were discharged alive but only 20% had a CPC of 1-2. While the base model with clinical and demographic variables had an AUC of 0.54, addition of subsequent variables improved the AUC substantially. The AUC improved to 0.59, 0.67 and 0.78 when hormones, ultrasound and biomarker variables were added, respectively, to the base model. However, the optimal model included all variables, resulting in a noteworthy AUC score of 0.861. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the significance of incorporating novel variables to comprehensively evaluate the outcomes of cardiac arrest patients so that better prediction models can be developed, potentially aiding in modifying procedures and any necessary measures to shift the outcome in favor of preserving patients' lives after OHCA.

274 Patient Utilization and Feedback After a Novel Pain Coach Educator and Integrative Pain Management Toolkit Session in an Urban Academic Emergency Department

274 Patient Utilization and Feedback After a Novel Pain Coach Educator and Integrative Pain Management Toolkit Session in an Urban Academic Emergency Department

154 Food Insecurity and Social Determinants of Health in an Urban Academic Emergency Department

154 Food Insecurity and Social Determinants of Health in an Urban Academic Emergency Department

Racial Differences in Triage for Emergency Department Patients with Subjective Chief Complaints.

Introduction: Black and Hispanic patients are frequently assigned lower acuity triage scores than White patients. This can lead to longer wait times, less aggressive care, and worse outcomes. In this study we aimed to determine whether these effects are more pronounced for patients with subjective complaints. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis for all adult visits between 2016-2019 at an urban academic emergency department (ED) with acuity-based pods. We determined rates of initial high-acuity triage both across all patients and among the subset located in the high-acuity pod at time of disposition (either through initial assignment or subsequent up-triage). Analysis was performed for common chief complaints categorized as subjective (chest pain, dyspnea, any pain); observed (altered mental status); numeric (fever, hypotension); or protocolized (stroke, ST-elevation myocardial infarction). We constructed logistic regression models to control for age, race, gender, method of arrival, and final disposition. Results: We analyzed 297,355 adult ED visits. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to be triaged to high-acuity beds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.79 for Black, and aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.90 for Hispanic patients). This effect was more pronounced for those with subjective chief complaints, including chest pain (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.79 for Black and 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99 for Hispanic patients), dyspnea (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92 and 0.8, 95% CI 0.72-0.99), and any pain (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92 and 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97, respectively). Among patients in the high-acuity pod at time of disposition, Black and Hispanic patients were disproportionately triaged to lower acuity pods on arrival (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.33-1.63 for Black and aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40 for Hispanic adults), with significant differences observed only for subjective chief complaints. No differences were observed for observed, objective, or protocolized complaints in either analysis. Conclusion: Black and Hispanic adults, including those who ultimately required high-acuity resources, were disproportionately triaged to lower acuity pods. This effect was more pronounced for patients with subjective chief complaints. Additional work is needed to identify and overcome potential bias in the assessment of patients with subjective chief complaints in ED triage.

Patient Perspectives on Seeking Emergency Care for Acute Low Back Pain and Access to Physical Therapy in the Emergency Department.

Low back pain is a common reason for visiting the emergency department (ED), yet little is known about patient motivations for seeking emergency care. The purpose of this study was to explore patient perspectives on visiting the ED for low back pain to inform a more patient-centered approach to emergency care. We conducted focus group discussions and individual interviews among patients visiting an urban academic ED for acute low back pain. We recruited participants from an ongoing prospective study of 101 patients receiving either ED-initiated physical therapy or usual care. We conducted discussions, and interviews using an a priori developed discussion guide. We audio recorded, transcribed, and iteratively content analyzed the data using a consensual qualitative approach until thematic saturation was reached. We conducted 4 focus group discussions among 18 participants (median age 46.5 years, 66.7% women, 61.1% Black) and individual interviews with 27 participants (median age 45 years, 55.6% women, 44.4% White). No new themes emerged during the fourth and final focus group. We identified 5 summary themes: (1) the decision to seek emergency care for low back pain is motivated by severe pain, resulting disability, and fears about a catastrophic diagnosis, (2) participants sought various goals from their ED visit but emphasized the primacy of pain control, (3) participants were reluctant to use pain medications but also acknowledged their benefit, (4) participants perceived a number of benefits from direct access to an ED physical therapist in the ED, and (5) participation in physical therapy ultimately facilitated recovery, but the pain was a barrier to performing exercises. These patient perspectives and resulting themes may be used to inform a more patient-centered emergency care experience and contextualize quantitative research findings on ED care for low back pain.

Food Insecurity Prevalence in Patients with Cancer Presenting to an Urban Academic Emergency Department in the United States

ABSTRACT Food insecurity (FI) affects 11.1% of U.S. households with higher rates for patients in the emergency department (ED) and those with cancer. A convenience sample of patients undergoing cancer treatment at an academic medical center’s ED was used to understand FI prevalence using the HFIAS tool. A total of 105 patients enrolled in-person or telephone. FI prevalence was 14.3%. Participants preferred fresh produce, meal delivery service, or money for food compared to food bank services. About 75% felt the COVID-19 pandemic impacted their access to food. FI affects patients with cancer in the ED at higher rates than the US.

Patient perceptions of microaggressions and discrimination toward patients during emergency department care.

Disparities in emergency department (ED) care based on race and ethnicity have been demonstrated. Patient perceptions of emergency care can have broad impacts, including poor health outcomes. Our objective was to measure and explore patient experiences of microaggressions and discrimination during ED care. This mixed-methods study of adult patients from two urban academic EDs integrates quantitative discrimination measures and semistructured interviews of discrimination experiences during ED care. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) scale and were invited for a follow-up interview. Transcripts of recorded interviews were analyzed leveraging conventional content analysis with line-by-line coding for thematic descriptions. The cohort included 52 participants, with 30 completing the interview. Nearly half the participants were Black (n = 24, 46.1%) and half were male (n = 26, 50%). "No" or "rare" experiences of discrimination during the ED visit were reported by 22/48 (46%), some/moderate discrimination by 19/48 (39%), and significant discrimination in 7/48 (15%). Five main themes were found: (1) clinician behaviors-communication and empathy, (2) emotional response to health care team actions, (3) perceived reasons for discrimination, (4) environmental pressures in the ED, and (5) patients are hesitant to complain. We found an emergent concept where persons with moderate/high DMS scores, in discussing instances of discrimination, frequently reflected on previous health care experiences rather than on their current ED visit. Patients attributed microaggressions to many factors beyond race and gender, including age, socioeconomic status, and environmental pressures in the ED. Of those who endorsed moderate to significant discrimination via survey response during their recent ED visit, most described historical experiences of discrimination during their interview. Previous experiences of discrimination may have lasting effects on patient perceptions of current health care. System and clinician investment in patient rapport and satisfaction is important to prevent negative expectations for future encounters and counteract those already in place.

Assessment of Gender Bias During Paramedic-Physician Handoffs.

Objective Gender bias against female physicians has been frequently demonstrated and associated with negative feelings toward their careers. Gender bias has also been demonstrated in prehospital clinical care. However, potential gender bias during paramedic-physician handoffs has not been studied. This study aimed to identify gender bias during interactions between prehospital personnel and emergency physicians at the time of patient handoff. Methods An observational study was conducted at an urban academic emergency department. Observers were trained to record information from paramedic-physician handoffs but were blind to the nature of the study. The primary outcome was to whom paramedics initially directed the focus of their handoff report based on physician gender, with secondary outcomes of to whom paramedics directed most of their report and whether they asked about further questions based on physician gender. Results There were 784 observed handoffs. There was no significant association between the gender of the physician and which physician received first attention (χ2{1, N = 782} = 0.9736, p = 0.3238) or majority attention (χ2{1, N = 780} = 1.9414, p = 0.1635). Paramedics were more likely to ask questions to male attendings than female attendings (χ2 {1, N = 784} = 4.4319, p = 0.0353). Conclusion We identified limited differences in communication based on gender between paramedics and physicians during emergency department patient handoffs.

Demographic predictors of emergency service utilization patterns in youth at risk of suicide.

To explore demographic predictors of Emergency Department (ED) utilization among youth with a history of suicidality (i.e., ideation or behaviors). Electronic health records were extracted from 2017 to 2021 for 3094 8-22 year-old patients with a history of suicidality at an urban academic medical center ED in the Mid-Atlantic. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess for demographic predictors of ED utilization frequency, timing of subsequent visits, and reasons for subsequent visits over a 24-month follow-up period. Black race (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.11-1.92), Female sex (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.26-2.03), and having Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.37-2.14) were associated with increased utilization, while being under 18 was associated with lower utilization (<12: OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.26-0.56; 12-18: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.35-0.63). These demographics were also associated with ED readmission within 90 days, while being under 18 was associated with a lower odds of readmission. Among patients with a history of suicidality, those who identify as Black, young adults, patients with Medicaid, and female patients were more likely to be frequent utilizers of the ED within the 2 years following their initial visit. This pattern may suggest inadequate health care access for these groups, and a need to develop better care coordination with an intersectional focus to facilitate utilization of other health services.

Perspectives of Clinicians and Staff at Community-Based Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Settings on Linkages With Emergency Department–Initiated Buprenorphine Programs

An increasing number of emergency departments (EDs) are initiating buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) and linking patients to ongoing community-based treatment, yet community-based clinician and staff perspectives regarding this practice have not been characterized. To explore perspectives and experiences regarding ED-initiated buprenorphine among community-based clinicians and staff in geographically distinct regions. This qualitative study reports findings from Project ED Health, a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study designed to evaluate the impact of implementation facilitation on ED-initiated buprenorphine with referral to ongoing medication treatment. Clinicians and staff from community-based treatment programs were identified by urban academic EDs as potential referral sites for ongoing OUD treatment in 4 cities across the US in a formative evaluation as having the capability to continue medication treatment. Focus groups were held from April 1, 2018, to January 11, 2019, to examine community OUD treatment clinician and staff perspectives on accepting patients who have received ED-initiated buprenorphine. Data were analyzed from August 2020 to August 2022. Data collection and analysis were grounded in the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) implementation science framework, focusing on domains including evidence, context, and facilitation. A total of 103 individuals (mean [SD] age, 45.3 [12.0] years; 76 female and 64 White) participated in 14 focus groups (groups ranged from 3-22 participants). Participants shared negative attitudes toward buprenorphine and variable attitudes toward ED-initiated buprenorphine. Prominent barriers included the community site treatment capacity and structure as well as payment and regulatory barriers. Perceived factors that could facilitate this model included additional substance use disorder training for ED staff, referrals and communication, greater inclusion of peer navigators, and addressing sociostructural marginalization that patients faced. In this study of community-based clinicians and staff positioned to deliver OUD treatment, participants reported many barriers to successful linkages for patients who received ED-initiated buprenorphine. Strategies to improve these linkages included educating communities and programs, modeling low-barrier philosophies, and using additional staff trained in addiction as resources to improve transitions from EDs to community partners.