AbstractThe identification and separation of chiral pesticides R/S‐profenofos are of great significance due to different biological toxicity of chiral isomers. In the study, we designed two novel ligands: (2,2′:6′,2″‐terpyridin)‐6‐yl(5‐methoxy‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl) methanethione (TMMT) and (2,2′:6′,2″‐terpyridin)‐6‐yl(5‐methoxy‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl) methanone (TMMO), and taking them as ligands coordinated with uranyl, two novel complexes [Uranyl‐TMMT]2+ and [Uranyl‐TMMO]2+ as receptors were successfully constructed. The complexation and enantioselectivity of two receptors towards R/S‐profenofos as guests were systematically unraveled based on the density functional theory (DFT) method. The results showed that the receptor [Uranyl‐TMMT]2+ containing thioamide group has stronger electron donating ability than the receptor [Uranyl‐TMMO]2+ containing amide group. All analyses including Mayer bond order (MBO), quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), localized orbital locator (LOL) function, molecular orbital, and infrared spectrum illustrated that the UX (X = S, O) bonds play a larger role than the UN bonds in the selective complexation of receptors towards guests; the US bond in [Uranyl‐TMMT]2+ is more covalent than the UO bond in [Uranyl‐TMMO]2+. The thermodynamic calculations showed that the separation factors of [Uranyl‐TMMT]2+ towards R/S‐PFFs were between 8356 and 1219 in different solvents, and the separation factors of [Uranyl‐TMMO]2+ towards R/S‐PFFs were at range of 4951–710. The separation factors exhibited that two receptors have stronger coordination and complexation ability to S‐PFF than to R‐PFF, while [Uranyl‐TMMT]2+ exhibited significantly greater recognition ability and enantioselectivity for guests R/S‐PFFs molecules than the receptor [Uranyl‐TMMO]2+.