The uranium isotopic and hydrogeochemical data of groundwaters in the Galilee, Betshean, Samaria and Beersheva regions of Israel, obtained from the published literature, have been re-interpreted according to new ideas gained from a study of uranium concentrations in groundwaters in Australia. It appears to be a general rule that the uranium concentration of natural waters is proportional to the HCO − 3 concentration in a way that is characteristic of individual aquifers. In the Israeli context, the major limestone and basaltic aquifers can be clearly distinguished, even to the extent of the mixing of waters from these two sources. The limitations of tracing groundwater bodies by the 234 U 238 U activity ratios vs. U-concentration plot are discussed and the need for interpreting uranium isotopic data in conjunction with hydrogeochemical data is demonstrated, which suggests that some of the earlier inferences made in the papers discussed, especially in regard to the Beersheva region could be reconsidered. The HCO − 3 vs. U correlation technique appears to be a good technique for tracing and delineating groundwater bodies in an oxidizing environment, irrespective of their size, residence time and conditions at the time of recharge.