After reading the paper by Wiesmueller and Zubrick (1998) on conditional symmetric instability (CSI) and equivalent potential vorticity (EPV), I agree with them that there has been a problem in getting operational forecasters to understand and properly use CSI concepts in their forecast routines. However, the problem is not entirely for a lack of model gridded data and tools to slice and dice them. The basic concepts for CSI have been poorly presented to forecasters. There are widespread misconceptions about CSI that appear in the Wiesmueller–Zubrick paper. CSI is a relatively easy concept for forecasters to grasp, so the confusion appears to be unnecessary. First I will provide an explanation for CSI that I have not seen anywhere in the literature. It was explained to me in this way at a scientific conference, and I apologize for forgetting the person’s name who offered me the explanation. Then I will point out some specific problems with the Wiesmueller–Zubrick paper with hopes that I can correct some of the misconceptions. First I want to review some basic parcel dynamics. There are three major forces in the atmosphere that can act on a parcel. The forces in the vertical are the pressure gradient force and gravity. In the horizontal they are again the pressure gradient force and the Coriolis force. Meteorologists call the balance of these vertical forces ‘‘hydrostatic’’ balance and the balance of these horizontal forces ‘‘geostrophic’’ balance. Imbalances occur when the pressure gradient force changes for the parcel. For example, a parcel of air warmer than its environment will experience an imbalance of forces with the larger upward pressure gradient force accelerating the parcel upward. Under certain conditions, perturbed air parcels may be accelerated away from their previous positions in space. Meteorologists call those unbalanced force
Read full abstract