Uprighting Of Molars Research Articles

Effects of first premolar extraction on maxillary and mandibular third molar angulation after orthodontic therapy

Background/AimsTo compare the change in the angulation of developing mandibular third molar in both first premolar extraction and non-extraction cases and to determine whether premolar extraction results in a more mesial movement of the mandibular buccal segment and causes favorable rotational changes in the mandibular third molar tilt, which can enhance later eruption of the third molars. Materials and methodsPretreatment (T1) and post treatment (T2) panoramic radiographs were taken of 25 subjects (age 14–19 years) who had been treated by the extraction of all the first premolars and 25 subjects who had been treated with non-extraction. The horizontal reference plane was used to measure and compare the changes in the angles of the developing mandibular third molars. ResultsThe mean uprighting of the maxillary third molars seen in the extraction group was 4 ± 9° on the left side and −17 ± 13° on the right side following treatment (T2 _ T1). For the non-extraction group the mean difference was −16 ± 12° on the left side and 2 ± 13° on the right side. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (P _ 0.021 on the right side and P _ 0.041 on the left side). Mandibular 3rd molars in extraction group showed no statistical significant change in the angulation. ConclusionPremolar extractions had a positive influence on the developing maxillary third molar angulations both on right and left. Mandibular 3rd molar have shown change in the angulation but not statistically significant. Non-extraction therapy did not have any adverse effect.

Correction of dental Class III with posterior open bite by simple biomechanics using an anterior C-tube miniplate

In the correction of dental Class III molar relationship in skeletal Class II patients, uprighting of the mandibular posterior segments without opening the mandible is an important treatment objective. In the case reported herein, a C-tube miniplate fixed to the lower labial symphysis and connected with a nickel-titanium reverse-curved archwire provided effective uprighting of the lower molars, without the need of orthodontic appliances on the mandibular anteriors. Using this approach, an appropriate magnitude of force is exerted on the molars while avoiding any negative effect on the mandibular anteriors.

Mandibular lip bumper for molar torque control

Treatment effects of lip bumpers alone include flaring of the mandibular incisors, distalization and uprighting of the mandibular first molars, and buccal expansion of the canines, premolars, and molar. Lip forces are transmitted through this appliance onto the molars. Moreover the lip bumper is able to derotate, expand or constrict, upright and reinforce the anchorage whereas torque control is lacking. Aim of this paper is the presentation of a new type of lip bumper that allows the molar torque control.

Influence of First Premolar Extraction on Mandibular Third Molar Angulation

To compare the angular changes in the developing mandibular third molars in both first premolar extraction and nonextraction cases and to determine whether premolar extraction results in a more mesial movement of the mandibular buccal segment and causes favorable rotational changes in the mandibular third molar tilt, which can enhance later eruption of the third molars. Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) panoramic radiographs were taken of 25 subjects who had been treated by the extraction of all the first premolars and 25 subjects who had been treated with nonextraction. The horizontal reference plane was used to measure and compare the changes in the angles of the developing mandibular third molars. The mean uprighting of the mandibular third molars seen in the extraction group was 8.2 +/- 5.4 degrees on the left side and 6.3 +/- 6.5 degrees on the right side following treatment (T2 - T1). For the nonextraction group the mean difference was 1.3 +/- 4.3 degrees on the left side and 1.7 +/- 5.4 degrees on the right side. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (P = .012 on the right side and P < .001 on the left side). Premolar extractions had a positive influence on the developing third molar angulations. Nonextraction therapy did not have any adverse effects.

Minor Tooth Movements Using Microimplant Anchorage: Case Reports

For the treatment of extruded or tipped molars, various conventional techniques have been used. But those methods may lead to undesirable movement of the anchorage units and lengthen treatment time because of limited tooth-borne anchorage potential. Introduction of microimplants as orthodontic anchorage has expanded treatment possibilities because of their advantages. Some advantages are a less complex surgical procedure, decrease in cost, immediate loading, and their ability to be placed in any area of the alveolar bone. This article will illustrate clinical experiences in patients who were treated with the intrusion of overerupted molars, the up-righting of tilted molars, and other clinical applications for minor tooth movements. Anchorage control was achieved with the surgical insertion of titanium microimplants for immediate loading in the alveolar bone. When needed, minimal fixed appliances were used and orthodontic treatment was completed without any other complications.

Cephalometric evaluation of open bite treatment with NiTi arch wires and anterior elastics

The aim of this study was to evaluate cephalometrically the effects of open bite treatment with NiTi arch wires and anterior elastics. The study group comprised of 17 patients who displayed a high angle skeletal pattern, along with an anterior open bite. After initial leveling, 0.016 × 0.022 inch upper accentuated-curve and lower reverse-curve arch wires were placed, with anterior elastics applied in the canine regions. Cephalometric assessment was carried out on lateral head films taken at the beginning of treatment and on average 2.8 months after open bite closure was obtained. The results of this study indicated that open bite closure had been achieved mainly by extrusion of the lower incisors and uprighting of the upper incisors. The functional occlusal plane was leveled by extrusion of lower premolars and uprighting of lower molars. Lateral cephalograms obtained from 10 patients who had been available after 1 year postretention were used to evaluate relapse changes. During the follow-up period, position of the upper and lower incisors and the inclination of the occlusal plane were maintained. However, extrusion of upper and lower molar teeth resulted in a reduction in overbite. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:555-62)

Treatment mechanics in Class III open bite malocclusion with Tip Edge technique

Nonextraction treatment with nonorthognathic intervention for treatment of a skeletal Class III open bite malocclusion was performed. Light traction with effective uprighting of the lower dentition with Tip Edge brackets (TP Orthodontics, La Porte, Ind.) and anteriorly placed Class lIl elastics was the modus operandi. Class lIl elastics can prevent elongation of the upper molars and yet can cause the upper dentition to move forward. Ni-Ti wire with a reverse curve of Spee helped both the uprighting and depression of the mandibular molars. The present case was treated with the Kim philosophy 1,2 but employing tip Edge brackets. This combination was found to be very easy to manipulate and achieved good results in a very short period of time. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:1-7.)

The surgical uprighting of mandibular second molars

The mandibular second molars can become impacted beneath the crown of the first molars and fail to erupt normally. A study of 22 cases with follow-up periods of at least 18 months shows the results obtained by surgical uprighting of these teeth. Of 22 teeth, one has been lost but none of the remaining 21 has developed infection or required root treatment, and all are in good occlusion. Six teeth give a normal response to electrical pulp testing. In most cases, with judicious bone removal, the second molar is firm and stable after uprighting and requires no splinting, but in some cases temporary stabilization is required. The bone defect normally seen mesially after uprighting reossifies both clinically and radiographically. (A M J O RTHOD D ENTOFAC O RTHOP 1995;108:180-3.)

The effect of a lip bumper on lower dental arch dimensions and tooth positions.

The effect of a lip bumper on the dimensions of the lower dental arch and on the inclination of the incisors and first molars was studied in 40 children, aged 9-12 years. The children wore their lip bumper full time for 7-10 months. The effects of the lip bumper therapy were recorded on dental casts and profile cephalograms made before and after the treatment. The positions and stages of development of the lower second molars were determined on pretreatment intra-oral radiographs. The lip bumper treatment resulted in an increase of the dental arch widths between the molars, premolars, and canines. The arch length increased through proclination of the incisors and uprighting of the first molars. The stages of development and the positions of the second molars had no influence on the effect of the treatment. Simultaneous treatment in the maxilla with a headgear, a transpalatal arch or a removable plate had no influence on the outcome of the lip bumper therapy.

Periodontal changes in furcations resulting from orthodontic uprighting of mandibular molars: James G. Burch, Bayzit Bagci, Doreen Sabulski, and Charles Landrum Quintessence Int 1992;23(7):509–13

Periodontal changes in furcations resulting from orthodontic uprighting of mandibular molars: James G. Burch, Bayzit Bagci, Doreen Sabulski, and Charles Landrum Quintessence Int 1992;23(7):509–13

Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets.

The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical and the dentofacial effects of using repelling SmCo5 magnets for distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously. Ten consecutive patients, aged 12.0-15.6 years, with Class II malocclusion and moderate space deficiency in the upper jaw were orthodontically treated using prefabricated repelling SmCo5 magnets. The magnets were attached buccally in the premolar and first molar area to a fixed orthodontic applicance. When the magnets were activated, the molars could move freely distally. The tooth movements were analysed by measurements on dental casts, lateral photographs of dental casts, and lateral skull radiographs before and after treatment. The mean treatment time was 16.6 weeks and all maxillary molars could be distalized to a Class I relationship. The mean molar crown movement was 4.2 mm, and the maxillary first molars tipped distally and rotated disto-buccally by 8.0 and 8.5 degrees, respectively. The reciprocal forces resulted in a slightly increased inclination of the upper incisors. It was found that simultaneous distalization of first and second maxillary molars with repelling magnets could be an alternative to ordinary orthodontic treatment methods. As the molar distalization was achieved during a relatively short period, occlusal adjustment, including uprighting and derotation of the maxillary molars as well as post-treatment retention, seems recommendable.

The uprighting of tilted molar teeth and the intrusion of over-erupted posterior teeth

Abstract The uprighting of tipped molars and the intrusion of over-erupted individual teeth by the orthodontist prior to bridge construction can be of considerable assistance to the dental practitioner. Often uprighting and intrusion are necessary in the same mouth and these two movements are discussed and illustrated by some case histories. The uprighting mechanism is identical to that of some other authors and the fixed intrusion appliance is an adaptation of the uprighting mechanism. However the removable intrusion appliance is a fresh approach to the problem of over-erupted teeth.