The Ontario, Canada Pronto paleosols, which formed around 2.45 Ga on Archean granite, were studied through field observation, mineralogical study by microscope and microprobe, and chemical analyses of major and 45 trace elements, including rare earth elements (REEs). Since the first full description of its mineralogy and chemistry of major elements by Gay and Grandstaff [Gay, A.L., Grandstaff, D.E., 1980. Chemistry and mineralogy of Precambrian paleosols at Elliot Lake, Ontario, Canada. Precambrian Res. 12, 349–373], the Pronto paleosols are among the most cited paleosols of the Archean–early Proterozoic era, though several questions have been raised as to whether they are true in-place ancient soils. Results of this study show that the studied section meets the criteria for being in-place paleosols. Furthermore, the profile has no explicit traces of being strongly affected by hydrothermal alteration. The REE-containing accessory minerals were destroyed through weathering, and secondary phosphate minerals with REEs formed. All of these observations support the weathering origin of the Pronto paleosols. However, the profile should be identified as a saprolith, rather than paleosol, as even the uppermost samples exhibit the granitic texture of the parent rock. The samples in this study were collected mainly from two sites (Site I and Site II). Saprolith samples from Site I show the retention of ΣFe and increases of the Fe(III)/Fe(II) ratios and the chemical index of alteration (CIA) values toward the unconformity. As for the Site II samples, the ΣFe/Ti ratios show slight decreases with increasing CIA values in the upper part of section, whereas these samples also show the same trend of increasing Fe(III)/Fe(II) ratios as the samples from Site I. Microprobe analyses show that Fe from the parent rock distributes mainly in mafic minerals as hornblende, biotite, or chlorite, which were completely destroyed during the early stages of weathering. In the saprolith section, Fe is present in sericite aggregates in the form of obscure patches of iron oxide tens of micrometers in size. All these characteristics indicate that: (i) the Fe was not lost during soil formation at Site I and slight amount of Fe was lost at Site II; and (ii) ferrous Fe was quantitatively transformed to ferric Fe (i.e., oxidation) during soil formation. In the samples from both sites, the ratios of Al/Ti and Si/Ti decrease toward the top of the profile. Together with the destruction of minerals toward the unconformity, such as apatite, biotite and chlorite, the depletion of Al and Si suggests that the parental granite was weathered by an acidic weathering solution. During the Archean–early Proterozoic era, the high atmospheric partial pressure of CO 2 ( pCO 2) is the most probable candidate for producing the acidic weathering solution.
Read full abstract