Upper Intake Level Research Articles

Fat-soluble vitamins in food supplements: do the labels follow the recommended doses?

Introduction: Adequate vitamins consumption is indispensable for the maintenance of health and to prevent disease. Both poor and overdose intakes may result in adverse health effects [1]. Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) is the average daily level intake sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97-98%) healthy individuals [2]; Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) is the maximum level of total chronic daily intake of a nutrient judged to be unlikely to pose a risk of adverse health effects to humans [3]. Owing the ability of fat-soluble vitamins to accumulate in the liver and adipose tissue, they present a higher potential for toxic effects than water-soluble vitamins. The aim of this study was to evaluate if daily doses of fat-vitamins (vit) mentioned in food supplements (FS) labels are in conformity with the RDA defined by European Union Directive [4]. Materials and methods: A total of 165 FS sold in Portuguese pharmacies, supermarkets, health shops and on internet were examined for indicated daily intake and dosage of vitA, vitD, vitE and vitK. Selection criteria: oral solid pharmaceutical forms for adults, containing at least one fat-vitamin in its composition, as stated in the label, regardless of FS purpose. Results: 48% of the FS labels presented doses of one fat-vitamin > RDA and 23% FS with 2 or more vitamins > RDA. Only 30% of FS indicated all fat-vitamins doses ≤ RDA. It is noteworthy that some FS presented daily doses above UL defined by EFSA [3] (Table 1). Discussion and conclusions: Since fat-vitamins may be stored in the body and are slowly eliminated, the chronic intake of high doses should be monitored to prevent adverse effects of these vitamins (e.g. vitA: visual disorders, liver and kidney damage, birth defects; vitD: muscle and joint pain, cardiovascular and renal disorders; vitE: hemorrhage, higher risk of prostate cancer; vitK: coagulation disorders).This study revealed that the majority of FS labels recommended daily doses of fat-soluble vitamins above RDA, some even above UL. Therefore, it is crucial that doses of vitamins present in FS are reviewed ensuring the safety of these products.

Assessment of sequential extraction methods for the prediction of bioavailability of elements in plants grown on agricultural soils near to boron mines in Turkey

Two sequential extraction methods (BCR sequential extraction method and a newly proposed sequential extraction method) were used to evaluate the bioavailability of the elements from the contaminated soils to different plants. The concentrations of As, B, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in acid digests from different plants collected from the fields near to boron mines in Turkey were determined using ICP-MS. The levels of the elements in some plants exceeded the limits of maximum and guideline levels for As, Cd and Pb; Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (ULs) for Ni and B; Adequate Intakes (AIs) for Cr and Mn and Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) for Cu, Fe and Zn. The average Transfer Factor values for elements were in the order of B>Ni>Zn>Cu>Cr>Co>Fe>Mn>Cd>Pb>As. In most cases, Principal Component Analysis and correlation analysis showed that these methods gave similar results. However, the newly proposed sequential extraction method is a more detailed method, capable of separating metals associated with manganese oxides and iron as amorphous and crystalline fractions. Three different fractions are produced for these environmental phases instead of the BCR sequential extraction procedure in which they are represented together in the second fraction. The new method therefore specifically fractionates bioavailable manganese and iron to plants.

Principles of Hydration

Principles of Hydration

Evaluation of Tolerable Upper Intake Levels for Vitamin D in Children and Adolescents

In 2012, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggested a tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D at 100 µg/day for adults based on the risk of hypercalcaemia. EFSA concluded that consumption of up to 50 µg/day does not lead to hypercalcaemia in children and adolescents (10-17 years). Furthermore, EFSA stated that there is no reason to assume that children and adolescents in the phase of rapid bone formation and growth have a lower tolerance for vitamin D compared to adults, and a UL of 100 µg/day for adolescents aged 11-17 years and 50 µg/day in children 1-10 years, taking the smaller body size into account, was proposed.
 The Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) is currently revising the national regulation of maximum limits in food supplements (not yet harmonised in the European Economic Area (EEA)), including maximum limits for vitamin D. NFSA has therefore requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to evaluate the assumption in the EFSA opinion that children and adolescents can tolerate the same amount of vitamin D as adults due to rapid bone formation and growth. In children and adolescents with lower weight than adults, this assumption actually implies that adolescents can tolerate more vitamin D per kg body weight than adults. VKM is therefore requested to evaluate if there is scientific evidence that a UL at 50 µg/day for children (1-10 years) and 100 µg/day for adolescents (11-17 years) is safe.
 The present statement is prepared by members of the Panel on Nutrition, Dietetic Products and Novel Food and Allergy in VKM.
 Three literature searches were performed to find new relevant studies investigating high intakes of vitamin D in children and adolescents and the role of vitamin D in bone formation and growth.
 No studies supporting a higher tolerance to vitamin D in children and adolescents due to rapid bone formation and growth were retrieved in the literature search. Moreover, there is apparently no firm association between bone formation and vitamin D levels in children during their growth period into adolescence and adulthood. 
 No studies investigating high intakes of vitamin D in children 1-10 years were found. Furthermore, no studies that have examined safety issues and/or adverse effects of vitamin D supplementation in doses above 50 µg/day in adolescents were identified. It can therefore not be concluded that the UL at 50 µg/day in children (1-10 years) and 100 µg/day in adolescents (11-17 years) is safe.
 In the 2002 report from European Scientific Committee on Food (SCF), a UL was set at 25 µg/day for children aged 2-10 years, and 50 µg/day for adolescents aged 11-17 years (corresponding to the UL for adults at that time). To the best of knowledge no serious, harmful effects have been reported for these doses of vitamin D.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Molybdenum in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Level

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of molybdenum. VKM has also conducted scenario calculations to illustrate the consequences of amending maximum limits for molybdenum to 100, 250, 500 or 1000 µg/day in food supplements. The previous maximum limit was 250 µg/day.
 Molybdenum is as a cofactor for some important enzymes in humans. These enzymes are involved in the catabolism of sulfur amino acids and heterocyclic compounds, including purines and pyridines. A distinct molybdenum deficiency has not been described in animals when subjected to molybdenum restriction, despite considerable reduction in the activity of molybdoenzymes. Molybdenum deficiency is not observed in healthy humans. The estimated Adequate Intake (AI) proposed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is 65 µg per day for men and women. Legumes, grains, and nuts are major contributors of molybdenum in the diet. 
 Molybdenum is a potential antagonist to copper absorption, but symptoms of copper deficiencies due to excess molybdenum intake have only been observed in ruminants. Based on the effect on reproduction and growth in animals, tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) have been estimated to be 2 mg/day by the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2001 and 0.6 mg/day by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 2000. These ULs were based on the same scientific evidence, but IOM used an uncertainty factor (UF) of 30 and SCF used a UF of 100 because the evidence base was considered to be weak.
 Because of the limited safety data on molybdenum, VKM support the use of the default uncertainty factors at 100 for extrapolation of data from animal studies to humans. Additionally, molybdenum deficiency is very rare and no studies have indicated a nutritional need for additional molybdenum from dietary supplements. The ULs for children were derived by adjusting the adult UL according to default body weights. 
 According to the scenario estimations, only the highest suggested maximum limit of 1000 µg molybdenum from food supplements will lead to exceedance of the UL for adults. For 1-3 year old children, all the suggested maximum limits for molybdenum will lead to exceedance of the UL. In children 4-10 years, supplements with 250, 500 or 1000 µg molybdenum will lead to exceedance of the ULs, whereas for adolescents 11-17 years, the UL will be exceeded with supplemental doses at 500 or 1000 µg per day.
 VKM emphasises that the current assessment of maximum limits for molybdenum in food supplements is merely based on published reports concerning upper levels from the SCF (2000, EU), IOM (2001, USA), EVM (2003, UK) and NNR (2012, Nordic countries). VKM has not conducted any systematic review of the literature for the current opinion, as this was outside the scope of the terms of reference from NFSA.

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Vitamin K and Maximum Limits for Vitamin K in Food Supplements

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Vitamin K and Maximum Limits for Vitamin K in Food Supplements

Assessment of Dietary Intake of Manganese in Relation to Tolerable Upper Intake Level

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), evaluated the intake of manganese from the diet and 1, 5 or 10 mg manganese per day in food supplements. The former maximum limit for manganese in food supplements was 5 mg per daily dose. 
 Manganese (Mn) is an essential dietary mineral for mammals, and is a component of metalloenzymes such as superoxide dismutase, arginase and pyruvate carboxylase. Manganese is involved in amino acid-, lipid- and carbohydrate metabolism and in proteoglycan synthesis in bone formation. In 2013, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggested 3 mg/day to represent an adequate intake (AI) of manganese because data was considered insufficient to set an average requirement (AR).
 Reports of adverse effects resulting from manganese exposure in humans are associated primarily with inhalation in occupational settings. Excess oral exposure to manganese, especially from contaminated water sources, has been shown to cause permanent neurological disorder known as “manganism” which can be irreversible. The amount of manganese absorbed is inversely related to the concentration of manganese in the diet. This regulation seems to be part of the adaptive changes to the amount of dietary manganese intake, which allow the maintenance of manganese homeostasis over a wide range of intakes. Manganese is mainly absorbed as Mn(II), and absorption is reported to be below 10% of ingested manganese.
 The main route of elimination of manganese from the body is via bile to the small intestine, while very little is excreted in the urine. Half-life for manganese can vary from 13 to 37 days, with a longer half-life in women than in men, but large inter-individual variation exists. 
 In Norway, manganese content in drinking water is low, and does not contribute to any magnitude of manganese intake. Daily dietary intake of manganese in Norway is not known, but it is proposed that manganese intake is adequate in the Scandinavian countries (NNR Project Group, 2012). Results from the Swedish Market Basket study, 2015, indicate an average daily manganese intake of 4.2 mg per person and day. Calculations based on data from Denmark, 2013 and 2015, evaluate mean dietary intake of manganese to 3.9 mg/day for adults and up to 6.9 mg/day in the higher intake groups. EFSA report on an observed mean intake in EU around 3 mg/day for adults. Main contributor to dietary manganese intake is cereals (57%) followed by fruit, vegetables, nuts and coffee/tea. 
 Irreversible neurotoxic adverse effects from intakes of manganese close to adequate intakes have been reported in humans (SCF, 2000). The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) could not set a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL), because no relevant dose-response animal studies were found. Consequently SCF did not set a tolerable upper intake level (UL) for manganese. 
 VKM considers that any dose of manganese as an ingredient in food supplements may be associated with increased risk of negative health effects. 
 VKM emphasises that the current assessment of maximum limits for manganese in food supplements is merely based on published reports concerning upper levels from the IOM (2001, USA), SCF (2003, EU), EVM (2003, UK) and NNR (2012, Nordic countries). VKM has not conducted any systematic review of the literature for the current opinion, as this was outside the scope of the terms of reference from NFSA.

Vitamin and mineral supplement use in medically complex, community-living, older adults.

Individuals who take medications may benefit from using vitamin and/or mineral supplements (VMS) yet excess supplementation can lead to overuse (daily intake exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL)). This study assessed VMS use of medically complex, community-living, older adults. A chart review of 229 patients ≥50 years with new medication assessments between 2014 and 2017 indicated that 76.9% of patients used ≥1 VMS daily. The UL for one or more nutrients was exceeded by 39.8% of supplement users.

Excess micronutrient intake: defining toxic effects and upper limits in vulnerable populations.

Excessive micronutrient intake causes a variety of adverse health effects, depending on dose and duration. The risk of excess intake carries significant implications for micronutrient delivery interventions, particularly when such programs are overlapping. To minimize risk and provide public health guidance, several countries and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization have set upper intake levels (ULs) for various life-stage populations using the risk assessment framework. However, there is a lack of international consensus on the actual ULs due to variability in application of this framework and a scarcity of evidence from which to draw upon, especially for children. Often ULs for children are established through a downward weight-based extrapolation from adult ULs, which is not always appropriate. The published ULs of nine organizations are compared, recent population nutrient intake evidence is presented, and the toxic effects of key minerals and vitamins are reviewed. Finally, the evidence for toxicity and setting of ULs for each nutrient is discussed including a comment on our degree of confidence in the strength of existing individual ULs. Challenges with risk assessment and opportunities for strengthening the definition of ULs are discussed.

Is there a risk of adverse health effects from the consumption of fortified foods in Mexico?

according to the nutriment addition scheme from the current Mexican legislation, there is no data about overdose or adverse effects caused by a nutriment, or any information showing the risk for the population in Mexico. This work is classified as descriptive and observational. to assess the risk of consuming fortified food products (FFP) in Mexico. the study was done in three phases: a) selection of the FFP and acquisition of the information from the nutritional facts label; b) elaboration of six diets according to the socioeconomic status, both in rural and urban areas, based on the ENIGH and ENSANUT surveys; and c) comparison of these diets with regimes containing FFP, calculated for an adult-equivalent (2,828 kcal). the FFP represent 10% of all the products in the market, being milk, corn and wheat flour, and their byproducts the most abundant. The six diets containing FFP were deficient in calcium, ascorbic acid and vitamins D and E. However, vitamins from the B complex were over the recommendation values. In general, any added nutriment was over the tolerable upper intake levels (UL). we demonstrated that the nutriment concentrations in the FFP do not reach the UL values and are not a risk for the Mexican population; however, they improve the nutritional contribution of the FFP.

Applying international guidelines for calcium supplementation to prevent pre-eclampsia: simulation of recommended dosages suggests risk of excess intake in Ethiopia.

To simulate impact of Ca supplementation on estimated total Ca intakes among women in a population with low dietary Ca intakes, using WHO recommendations: 1·5-2·0 g elemental Ca/d during pregnancy to prevent pre-eclampsia. Single cross-sectional 24 h dietary recall data were adjusted using IMAPP software to simulate proportions of women who would meet or exceed the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) assuming full or partial adherence to WHO guidelines. Nationally and regionally representative data, Ethiopia's 'lean' season 2011. Women 15-45 years (n 7908, of whom 492 pregnant). National mean usual Ca intake was 501 (sd 244) mg/d. Approximately 89, 91 and 96 % of all women, pregnant women and 15-18 years, respectively, had dietary Ca intakes below the EAR. Simulating 100 % adherence to 1·0, 1·5 and 2·0 g/d estimated nearly all women (>99 %) would meet the EAR, regardless of dosage. Nationally, supplementation with 1·5 and 2·0 g/d would result in intake exceeding the UL in 3·7 and 43·2 % of women, respectively, while at 1·0 g/d those exceeding the UL would be <1 % (0·74 %) except in one region (4·95 %). Most Ethiopian women consume insufficient Ca, increasing risk of pre-eclampsia. Providing Ca supplements of 1·5-2·0 g/d could result in high proportions of women exceeding the UL, while universal consumption of 1·0 g/d would meet requirements with minimal risk of excess. Appropriately tested screening tools could identify and reduce risk to high Ca consumers. Research on minimum effective Ca supplementation to prevent pre-eclampsia is also needed to determine whether lower doses could be recommended.

Update of the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D for infants.

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to revise the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D for infants (≤ 1 year) set in 2012. From its literature review, the Panel concluded that the available evidence on daily vitamin D intake and the risk of adverse health outcomes (hypercalciuria, hypercalcaemia, nephrocalcinosis and abnormal growth patterns) cannot be used alone for deriving the UL for infants. The Panel conducted a meta‐regression analysis of collected data, to derive a dose–response relationship between daily supplemental intake of vitamin D and mean achieved serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Considering that a serum 25(OH)D concentration of 200 nmol/L or below is unlikely to pose a risk of adverse health outcomes in infants, the Panel estimated the percentage of infants reaching a concentration above this value at different intakes of vitamin D. Based on the overall evidence, the Panel kept the UL of 25 μg/day for infants aged up to 6 months and set a UL of 35 μg/day for infants 6–12 months. The Panel was also asked to advise on the safety of the consumption of infant formulae with an increased maximum vitamin D content of 3 μg/100 kcal (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/127 repealing Directive 2006/141/EC in 2020). For infants aged up to 4 months, the intake assessment showed that the use of infant formulae containing vitamin D at 3 μg/100 kcal may lead some infants to receive an intake above the UL of 25 μg/day from formulae alone without considering vitamin D supplemental intake. For infants aged 4–12 months, the 95th percentile of vitamin D intake (high consumers) estimated from formulae and foods fortified or not with vitamin D does not exceed the ULs, without considering vitamin D supplemental intake.

Protocol for the scientific opinion on the Tolerable Upper Intake Level of dietary sugars.

In June 2016, EFSA received a mandate from the national food competent authorities of five European countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) to provide a dietary reference value (DRV) for sugars, with particular attention to added sugars. A draft protocol was developed with the aim of defining as much as possible beforehand the strategy that will be applied for collecting data, appraising the relevant evidence, and analysing and integrating the evidence in order to draw conclusions that will form the basis for the Scientific Opinion on sugars. As EFSA wished to seek advice from stakeholders on this draft protocol, the NDA Panel endorsed it for public consultation on 12 December 2017. The consultation was open from 9 January to 4 March 2018. A technical meeting with stakeholders was held in Brussels on 13 February 2018, during the consultation period. After consultation with stakeholders and the mandate requestors, EFSA interprets this mandate as a request to provide scientific advice on an Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for (total/added/free) sugars, i.e. the maximum level of total chronic daily intake of sugars (from all sources) judged to be unlikely to pose a risk of adverse health effects to humans. The assessment concerns the main types of sugars (mono‐ and disaccharides) found in mixed diets (i.e. glucose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, lactose, maltose and trehalose) taken through the oral route. The health outcomes of interest relate to the development of metabolic diseases and dental caries. The final version of the protocol was endorsed by the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies on 28 June 2018.

Outcome of a public consultation on the Draft Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the update of the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D for infants

Outcome of a public consultation on the Draft Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the update of the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D for infants

Calculation of an Adequate Intake (AI) Value and Safe Range of Selenium (Se) for Chinese Infants 0-3Months Old Based on Se Concentration in the Milk of Lactating Chinese Women with Optimal Se Intake.

The required selenium intake for optimal health in Chinese residents was published in 2014. However, the adequate intake (AI) value for Chinese infants 0-3months old is not established. This study assessed the current selenium nutritional status of 264 lactating Chinese women from three geographical locations with different Se levels (Liangshan in Sichuan province, Enshi in Hubei province, and Xicheng District in Beijing), to screen mothers with optimal Se intake, and to modify the AI value of Se for Chinese infants 0-3months old. Milk and plasma Se concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx3), and plasma selenoprotein P (SEPP1) was measured by ELISA. Daily Se intake (Y, μg/day) in lactating Chinese woman was calculated from plasma Se concentrations (X, μg/L) using the formula logY = 1.623 log(X) + 3.433. Plasma Se concentrations in lactating Chinese women were 78.19 ± 25.71, 112.48 ± 24.57, and 183.83 ± 45.81μg/L from Se-deficient, Se-moderate, and seleniferous areas, respectively. Se intakes calculated from concentrations of plasma Se were 45.6 ± 21.69, 80.03 ± 27.69, and 223.10 ± 50.95μg/day, respectively. An optimal dietary Se intake is not lower than the recommended nutrient intake (RNI) but not more than the tolerable upper intake level (UL). A range of 78-400μg Se/day was defined as the optimal daily Se intake for lactating Chinese women. The percentages of mothers within this range in Sichuan, Beijing, and Enshi were 8.11, 45.13, and 6.06%, respectively. Based on milk Se concentrations of mothers with optimal daily Se intake, the adequate Se intake value and a safe range for Chinese infants 0-3months of age were calculated as 15.29 and 8-35μg Se/day, respectively. The Se status of Chinese lactating women has improved, particularly in traditionally Se-deficient and Se-toxic regions. A safe range for daily Se intake in Chinese infants may be regarded as a guideline for infant formula.

Trends in calcium supplementation, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014.

Long-term outcomes of supplemental calcium are inadequately understood. Recent research suggests that calcium from supplements may not be entirely free from unintended health consequences. Consequently, it is important to understand patterns and trends in use of calcium supplements. To report trends in supplemental calcium intake between 1999 and 2014, using NHANES data, overall and stratified by sex, race/ethnicity and age. A total of 42,038 adult NHANES participants were included in this analysis. For each survey period, we calculated the prevalence of calcium supplement use exceeding the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL), and mean daily supplemental calcium dose among calcium-containing supplement users. Sample weights were applied. Linear regression was used to examine trends. Overall, the prevalence of calcium supplement use at a dose ≥EAR increased between 1999 and 2000 and 2013-2014, from 2.5% (95% CI: 1.9-3.3%) to 4.6% (3.8-5.5%). Use ≥EAR peaked in 2003-2004 at 6.7% (5.3-8.5%) (p-quadratic trend<0.001). Mean supplemental calcium intake peaked in 2007-2008, thereafter decreasing (p-quadratic trend<0.001). The overall prevalence of intake ≥UL from supplemental calcium in 2013-2014 was 0.4% (0.2-0.8%). Use of supplemental calcium ≥UL peaked during 2007-2008 at 1.2% (0.7-2.0%). In all time periods, supplemental calcium intake tended to be greater among women, non-Hispanic whites and adults >60years. We described the prevalence of U.S. adults consuming supplemental calcium ≥UL and ≥ EAR. While few were consuming supplemental calcium ≥UL, consumption ≥EAR was not uncommon, especially among women, non-Hispanic whites and older adults.

Understanding Optimum Fluoride Intake from Population-Level Evidence.

Policy on fluoride intake involves balancing caries against dental fluorosis in populations. The origin of this balance lies with Dean's research on fluoride concentration in water supplies, caries, and fluorosis. Dean identified cut points in the Index of Dental Fluorosis of 0.4 and 0.6 as critical. These equate to 1.3 and 1.6 mg fluoride (F)/L. However, 1.0 mg F/L, initially called a permissible level, was adopted for fluoridation programs. McClure, in 1943, derived an "optimum" fluoride intake based on this permissible concentration. It was not until 1944 that Dean referred to this concentration as the "optimal" concentration. These were critical steps that have informed health authorities through to today. Several countries have derived toxicological estimates of an adequate and an upper level of intake of fluoride as an important nutrient. The US Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1997 estimated an Adequate Intake (AI) of 0.05 mg F/kg bodyweight (bw)/d and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of 0.10 mg F/kg bw/d. These have been widely promulgated. However, a conundrum has existed with estimates of actual fluoride intake that exceed the UL without the expected adverse fluorosis effects being observed. Both the AI and UL need review. Fluoride intake at an individual level should be interpreted to inform more nuanced guidelines for individual behavior. An "optimum" intake should be based on community perceptions of caries and fluorosis, while the ultimate test for fluoride intake is monitoring caries and fluorosis in populations.

Biomonitoring Equivalents for interpretation of urinary iodine

Iodine is an essential nutrient whose deficiency or excess exposure can cause adverse health effects. The primary sources of iodine exposure in the general population are iodized salt, dairy products, bread and sea food. Urinary iodine concentrations (UIC) have been measured by Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) and US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The Institute of Medicine (IOM), the US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and World Health Organization (WHO) have established exposure guidance values for nutrition (IOM Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), WHO Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI)) and toxicity (IOM Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL); ATSDR Minimal Risk Level (MRL), WHO International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI)). Using a urinary excretion fraction of 0.9, Biomonitoring Equivalents (BE) for the EAR, RDA, UL and MRL were derived for adults (60, 100, 730 and 450 μg/L, respectively) and children (50, 80, 580 and 360 μg/L, respectively). The population median UIC values from NHANES and CHMS for adults (140–181, 122–126 μg/L, respectively) and children (232, 189 μg/L, respectively) were above the criteria for assessing iodine nutrition, indicating that US and Canadian populations are likely to have adequate population iodine nutrition. The median UIC from NHANES and CHMS do not exceed BE values derived from exposure guidance values for toxicity.

Modelling of adequate and safe vitamin D intake in Danish women using different fortification and supplementation scenarios to inform fortification policies

PurposeFortification of foods with vitamin D may be a population-based solution to low vitamin D intake. We performed modelling of vitamin D from diet, fortified foods and supplements in a population of Danish women 18–50 years, a risk group of vitamin D deficiency, to inform fortification policies on safe and adequate levels.MethodsBased on individual habitual dietary vitamin D intake of female participants from the Danish National Survey of Dietary Habits and Physical Activity (DANSDA) (n = 855), we performed graded intake modelling to predict the intake in six scenarios increasing the vitamin D intake from a habitual diet without fish to habitual diet including fish, fortified foods and supplements (40/80 µg). Four different foods were used as potential foods to fortify with vitamin D.ResultsThe vitamin D intake was below the Average Requirement (AR) of 7.5 µg/day for 88% of the assessed women. Safe levels of intake (< 100 µg/day) were observed after adding four different fortified foods (plain yoghurt, cheese, eggs and crisp-bread) contributing with a total of 20 µg/day and a vitamin D supplement of 40 µg/day to the habitual diet. Consumption of fish, fortified foods and a vitamin D supplement of 80 µg resulted in intakes above the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) < 100 µg/day.ConclusionsIn a Danish female population with a low vitamin D intake, low-dose fortification of different foods with vitamin D may be an effective and safe population-based approach.

Dietary supplement use among cancer survivors and the general population: a nation-wide cross-sectional study

BackgroundUse of dietary supplements among cancer survivors is common and controversial, but information on the amount of nutrients from supplements among cancer survivors is limited. We examined the amount of nutrients and their contribution to total nutrient intake from supplements and compared these data between cancer survivors and cancer-free individuals. We also identified factors associated with supplement use among cancer survivors.MethodsWe identified 400 cancer survivors and 10,387 cancer-free individuals, aged ≥ 19 years, from the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) V-1, 2 (2010, 2011). We calculated the amount of nutrients consumed from foods and supplements, the percent contributions of supplement nutrients to total nutrient intakes and cancer survivors’ nutrient intakes relative to the Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) and the Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (ULs). We examined factors associated with supplement use among cancer survivors.ResultsWe found that 33.3% of cancer survivors and 22.1% of cancer-free individuals reported the use of dietary supplements. Compared to cancer-free individuals, cancer survivors had higher intakes of riboflavin, folate, and iron from foods (p < 0.05 for each), and higher intakes of calcium (p = 0.05) and vitamin C (p = 0.01) from foods and supplements. The similar pattern was observed for the percent contributions to total nutrient intake. Cancer survivors had higher proportion of participants below EARs than cancer-free individuals for thiamin and niacin (p < 0.05 for each). The proportions of cancer survivors below the EARs were 61.2% for calcium, 49.1% for riboflavin, and 43.5% for folate and the proportions of cancer survivors above the ULs were 3.3% for iron, and 2.3% for vitamin A. For female cancer survivors, education above an elementary school level, moderate physical activity, low vegetable intake, and high circulating vitamin D levels were associated with supplement use. For male cancer survivors, living in an urban area, no consumption of alcohol, and lower energy intake, were associated with supplement use.ConclusionsKorean cancer survivors have higher rate of dietary supplement use and higher contribution from supplements to total nutrient intake than cancer-free individuals. Demographic and lifestyle factors were associated with supplement use among cancer survivors.