Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Research Articles

Risk and Prognosis of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the clinical features of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the background, thrombus site, treatment, and outcome of 76 UEDVT patients. Results: Of the 76 UEDVT patients, 44 (57.9%) were men, and 51 (67.1%) were complicated by malignancy, 44 (57.9%) had an indwelling central vein (CV) catheter, 8 (10.5%) had concomitant pulmonary embolization (PE), and 33 (43.3%) were symptomatic. Regarding the thrombus site, the right internal jugular vein was the most common, with 30 cases (35.3%). As regards the treatment method, 53 patients (69.7%) received oral anticoagulants. In 2015, when direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was covered by insurance, there were 44 UEDVT cases, of which 34 (77.3%) received DOACs. Outcomes at a mean observation period of 37.5±41.5 months included 40 deaths (52.6%) with a mean survival of 16.3±21.3 months. The most common cause of death was malignancy, with 33 cases (82.5%). Conclusion: In the background of UEDVT, the combination of indwelling CV catheter placement and malignancy was frequently observed. While the risk of recurrence or PE complications is low, the prognosis of UEDVT complicated by malignancy is extremely poor.

Treatment of upper-extremity outflow thrombosis.

Approximately 10% of all cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occur in the upper extremities. The most common secondary cause of upper-extremity DVT (UEDVT) is the presence of a venous catheter. Primary UEDVT is far less common and usually occurs in patients with anatomic abnormalities of the costoclavicular space causing compression of the subclavian vein, called venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS). Subsequently, movement of the arm results in repetitive microtrauma to the vein and its surrounding structures causing apparent 'spontaneous' thrombosis, or Paget-Schrötter syndrome. Treatment of UEDVT aims at elimination of the thrombus, thereby relieving acute symptoms, and preventing recurrence. Initial management for all UEDVT patients consists of anticoagulant therapy. In patients with Paget-Schrötter syndrome the underlying VTOS necessitates a more aggressive management strategy. Several therapeutic options exist, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, surgical decompression through first rib resection, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the vein. However, several controversies exist regarding their indication and timing.

The importance of the costoclavicular space in upper limb primary deep vein thrombosis, a study with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique enhanced by a blood pool agent

Primary upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) can be divided into idiopathic and effort thrombosis. Anatomical factors probably play an important role in effort thrombosis, whereas the cause remains mostly unknown in idiopathic thrombosis. The primary objective of this study was to examine the anatomy of the subclavian region and evaluate how these factors contribute to primary UEDVT. The secondary objective was to investigate if venous compression correlates with post thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Fifteen patients and 15 controls were enrolled in the study. The subclavian region (the costoclavicular distance and vessel area) was examined by MRI enhanced by a blood-pool contrast agent (Vasovist). The MRI was performed in two arm positions: alongside and elevated. PTS and disability were quantified with the modified Villalta score and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) test. The costoclavicular distance was significantly narrower in the UEDVT patients with the arms alongside the body but there was a significant difference only in the left arm with the arms elevated. Area of the subclavian vein: When comparing the patients non-thrombotic arm with the controls, there was a significant difference only when the arms in the supine position. Disability: There was a high correlation between DASH, Villalta and VAS but no correlation between the MRI measurement and patient's symptoms or the Villalta Score. Our results suggest that primary UEDVT is dependent on the subclavian anatomy and area of vena subclavia.

Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Upper Extremity

Case 1: A 34-year-old previously healthy male office manager was admitted with acute onset of heaviness, pain, and functional impairment of his right arm. The arm was cyanotic and massively swollen (Figure 1). For the past weeks, he reported transient paresthesia of his right arm during overhead activities and was unable to perform repetitive or strenuous arm exercise. He had a fracture of the right clavicle after a ski accident 5 years previously. The fracture was managed conservatively. There was no personal or family history of thrombosis. Conventional phlebography confirmed axillary and subclavian vein thrombosis (Figure 2, top), and treatment with intravenous unfractionated heparin was started. Figure 1. Clinical presentation of case 1 with massive swelling and cyanosis of the right arm (left). One day after pharmacomechanical thrombolysis, signs of thrombosis have markedly improved (right). Figure 2. Baseline digital subtraction venogram from case 1 with extensive filling defects in the axillary subclavian veins (top). Control venogram after 15 hours of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy confirmed resolution of filling defects and restored venous flow (middle). Positional venography obtained during abduction of the right arm confirmed the venous thoracic outlet syndrome with residual stenosis of the subclavian vein at the costoclavicular junction (white arrow, bottom). Case 2: A 55-year-old man with lung cancer presented with swelling, heaviness, and pain in his left arm 1 week after completion of chemotherapy administered via a left-sided indwelling central venous catheter. Axillary and subclavian vein thrombosis was confirmed by ultrasonography. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was initiated, and the catheter was removed 3 days later because it was no longer functional. At 1 week, pain and functional impairment had not improved, and the circumference of the left upper arm had increased by 2 cm. Case 3: A 65-year-old woman with metastatic ovarian cancer presented with swelling of the face and both arms, headache, …

Hereditary and acquired thrombophilia in patients with upper extremity deep-vein thrombosis

The prevalence of coagulation disorders in patients with upper extremity deep-vein thrombosis (UE-DVT) is unknown due to only a few observational studies of limited size reporting varying results. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with UE-DVT compared to patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LE-DVT). One hundred fifty consecutive patients (15 to 91 years of age) with UE-DVT were recruited from the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) registry. Three hundred LE-DVT patients matched for gender and age served as controls. Thrombophilia screening included tests for the factor V Leiden mutation, the prothrombin G20210A mutation, antiphospholipid antibodies and factor VIII (FVIII), protein C, protein S and antithrombin activities. At least one thrombophilia was present in 34.2% of UE-DVT and 39.2% in UE-DVT that was unrelated to venous catheters relative to 55.3% in LE-DVT patients (p<0.001). In particular, a persistently elevated FVIII is less likely to be found in UE-DVT patients than in those with LE-DVT and is the only thrombophilia that is differentially expressed after controlling for established VTE risk factors [OR 0.46, (95% CI 0.25-0.83)]. Although less prevalent than in LE-DVT patients, thrombophilia is a common finding in patients with UE-DVT, especially in those with thrombosis that is unrelated to venous catheters.

Prothrombin G20210A mutation and oral contraceptive use increase upper-extremity deep vein thrombotic risk

The role played by a hypercoagulable state, either inherited or acquired, in the pathogenesis of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) remains a question of debate. We performed a case-control study including 79 patients with a first objectively confirmed episode of UEDVT, 31 secondary and 48 primary, and 165 healthy controls. Nine patients (11.4%) with UEDVT were carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation vs. six (3.7%) in controls; P = 0.025, OR: 3.39 (95% CI 1.16 to 9.88). No statistical difference was observed between cases and controls for the factor V Leiden mutation, AT, protein C or protein S deficiency and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACAs). Thirteen (35.1%) UEDVT patients were oral contraceptive (OC) users vs. 12 (16%) controls; P = 0.020, OR: 2.89 (95% CI 1.16-7.21). When secondary UEDVT patients were compared with controls, no differences were observed in any of the risk factors analysed. On the other hand, when primary UEDVT was considered, six (12.5%) patients were carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation vs. six (3.7%) controls; P = 0.031, OR: 3.76 (95% CI 1.15-12.26). Regarding ACAs, a borderline statistical significance was observed when primary UEDVT was compared with controls, P = 0.048; OR: 4.88 (95% CI 1.05-22.61). In primary UEDVT, 52% of the fertile women were OC users vs. 16% of controls; P = 0.001, OR: 5.78 (95% CI 2.13-15.67). When the interaction of both factors, i.e. prothrombin G20210A mutation and OC intake, were considered, the risk increased markedly, indicating a synergistic effect as observed with other thrombotic locations. In patients with primary UEDVT screening for antithrombin, protein C and protein S deficiency and APC resistance would not be justified, although it might be reasonable to determine the carrier status of the prothrombin G20210A mutation only in OC users.

Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Background— Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) occurs spontaneously or sometimes develops as a complication of pacemaker use, long-term use of a central venous catheter (CVC), or cancer. Methods and Results— To improve our understanding of UEDVT, we compared the demographics, symptoms, risk factors, prophylaxis, and initial management of 324 (6%) patients with central venous catheter (CVC)–associated UEDVT, 268 (5%) patients with non–CVC-associated UEDVT, and 4796 (89%) patients with lower-extremity DVT from a prospective US multicenter DVT registry. The non–CVC-associated UEDVT patients were younger (59.2±18.2 versus 64.2±16.9 years old; P<0.0001), less often white (65% versus 73%; P<0.01), leaner (body mass index [BMI] 26.8±7.1 versus 28.5±7.3 kg/m2; P<0.001), and more likely to smoke (19% versus 13%; P=0.02) than the lower-extremity DVT patients. By way of propensity analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis, we determined that an indwelling CVC was the strongest independent pre...