Upper Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation Pressure Research Articles

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Abnormalities and Esophageal Motility Recovery After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia.

Abnormalities in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in patients with achalasia and the impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on the UES and esophageal body remain uncertain. To outline the prevalence and nature of UES abnormalities across different achalasia subtypes, as well as evaluate POEM's therapeutic efficacy on UES and esophageal body. A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with achalasia between January 2019 and December 2023 was conducted. POEM was performed on all patients, and preoperative and 6-month postoperative high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) data were obtained, along with the Eckardt symptom scores. A total of 64 patients (34 females, 30 males) who underwent POEM for achalasia (type I: 18, type II: 38, type III: 8) during the study period were included. Among the 64 patients, 42 (65.6%) exhibited abnormalities in the UES, as observed on HREM. The majority of those exhibiting abnormalities demonstrated impaired relaxation of the UES (46.9%), followed by a combination of hypertensive basal UES pressure (UESP) and impaired UES relaxation (12.5%). The dysphagia score and Eckardt score before POEM were significantly greater in the UES abnormality group than in the normal UES group (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.040 and 6.2 ± 1.8 vs. 5.0 ± 1.6, p = 0.008, respectively). UESP and UES relaxation pressure (UESRP) decreased significantly following POEM across all types of achalasia (p < 0.05). All type I patients continued to exhibit no contractility after undergoing POEM. Pan-esophageal pressurization and spastic contractions were absent in patients with type II and type III achalasia following POEM. The high prevalence of UES abnormalities among patients with achalasia may serve as a compensatory mechanism. Patients with type II and III showed partial recovery of peristalsis following POEM.

Swallowing biomechanics before and following multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea.

The effect of contemporary multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea on swallowing is unclear. This study assessed the biomechanical swallowing function in participants with obstructive sleep apnea pre- and post-modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue. In this prospective, longitudinal study, adults diagnosed with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea who underwent modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue surgery had swallowing biomechanics assessed using high-resolution pharyngeal manometry and analyzed with swallowgateway.com. Symptomatic swallowing difficulty was evaluated using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (≥ 234). General linear mixed-model analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference pre- and post-modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue. Data are presented as mean [95% confidence intervals]. High-resolution pharyngeal manometry assessments were conducted in 10 participants (7 men; median age 50 [interquartile range 36-65]) preoperatively and repeated postoperatively at 9 months [interquartile range 6-13]. Self-reported dysphagia was unchanged following surgery (Sydney Swallow Questionnaire =149 [53, 447] to 168 [54, 247]; P = .093). High-resolution pharyngeal manometry outcomes indicated reduced mesopharyngeal pressures (148 [135, 161] to 124 [112, 137] mm Hg s cm; P = .011), reduced hypopharyngeal pressures (113 [101, 125] to 93 [84, 102] mm Hg s cm; P = 0.011), and reduced upper esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure (5 [4, 6] to 2 [1,3] mm Hg; P = 0.001) but no change to velopharyngeal pressures (135 [123, 147] to 137 [117, 157] mm Hg s cm; P = .850) postsurgery. Modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty may have less implications on the swallow mechanism than previously suspected. In contrast, the reduction in mesopharyngeal contractile pressures associated with coblation channeling of the tongue, although within normal limits, may affect bolus propulsion. Biomechanical alterations were insufficient to worsen self-reported swallowing function. Schar MS, Omari TI, Woods CW, etal. Swallowing biomechanics before and following multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1167-1176.

S3570 One and Done? Revisiting Need for Repeat Esophageal Manometry in Patients With Persistent Symptoms

Introduction: Achalasia is a motility disorder characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and failure of the LES to relax in response to swallowing. High resolution manometry (HRM) has been established as the gold standard for diagnosis; however, the utility of repeat manometry has been investigated in only a limited number of reports. Whether repeat manometry provides new information or changes the diagnosis remains unclear Case Description/Methods: 70y/o female with GERD, PUD, cervical spondylosis, and rheumatoid arthritis, presented in 2015 with dysphagia to solids. Initial work-up included EGD which showed an esophageal web. She was started on acid suppression therapy without improvement. In 2017 she underwent HRM which showed an abnormal median integrated relaxation pressure of 39.6(n< 15mmHg) and an elevated upper esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure of 13.7(n< 12mmHg). 70% of swallows were failed with 30% of swallows peristaltic with normal distal contractile integral. There was incomplete bolus clearance in all swallows. Patient met Chicago Classification 3.0 criteria for esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. However, given the large presence of non-peristaltic swallows, the possibility of an evolving achalasia was considered. Due to worsening symptoms, patient underwent barium esophagram (BE) ;in 2018 which did not suggest achalasia. There was however, small residual of contrast in the distal esophagus with delayed emptying suggesting a motility disorder. She then underwent video swallow study which was unrevealing. She again underwent BE; in 2019 revealing a prominent cricopharyngeus muscle causing narrowing of the esophageal lumen during the swallowing phase. She subsequently underwent repeat HRM which was consistent with Type II Achalasia per Chicago classification 3.0. LES pressure was elevated at 43.8 mmHg, UES pressure was normal (6.2 mmHg). 100% of all contractions had pan esophageal pressurization deeming them non-peristaltic. Patient had incomplete bolus clearance in all swallows. Of note, patient was not on any medications, including benzodiazepines or opioids, that would impact motility studies. Due to persistent symptoms, patient underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy with significant improvement of symptoms. Discussion: HRM is the gold standard for identifying causes of esophageal dysmotility. In patients whose symptoms progress over time, there is high utility in performing repeat manometry to evaluate the cause of their dynamic symptoms, as treatment options may change

Altered swallowing biomechanics in people with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea.

Dysphagia is a common but under-recognized complication of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the mechanisms remain poorly described. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess swallowing symptoms and use high-resolution pharyngeal manometry to quantify swallowing biomechanics in patients with moderate-severe OSA. Nineteen adults (4 female; mean (range) age, 46 ± 26-68 years) with moderate-severe OSA underwent high-resolution pharyngeal manometry testing with 5-, 10-, and 20-mL volumes of thin and extremely thick liquids. Data were compared with 19 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean (range) age, 46 ± 27-68 years). Symptomatic dysphagia was assessed using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire. Swallow metrics were analyzed using the online application swallowgateway.com. General linear mixed model analysis was performed to investigate potential differences between people with moderate-severe OSA and controls. Data presented are means [95% confidence intervals]. Twenty-six percent (5 of 19) of the OSA group but none of the controls reported symptomatic dysphagia (Sydney Swallow Questionnaire > 234). Compared with healthy controls, the OSA group had increased upper esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure (-2 [-1] vs 2 [1] mm Hg, F = 32.1, P < .0001), reduced upper esophageal sphincter opening (6 vs 5 mS, F = 23.6, P < .0001), and increased hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure (2 [1] vs 7 [1] mm Hg, F = 19.0, P < .05). Additionally, upper pharyngeal pressures were higher, particularly at the velopharynx (88 [12] vs 144 [12] mm Hg⋅cm⋅s, F = 69.6, P < .0001). High-resolution pharyngeal manometry identified altered swallowing biomechanics in people with moderate-severe OSA, which is consistent with a subclinical presentation. Potential contributing mechanisms include upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction with associated upstream changes of increased hypopharyngeal distension pressure and velopharyngeal contractility. Schar MS, Omari TI, Woods CM, etal. Altered swallowing biomechanics in people with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(9):1793-1803.

Myotomy of Distal Esophagus Influences Proximal Esophageal Contraction and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation in Patients with Achalasia After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy.

Background/AimsThe motility change after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia is currently focused on lower esophageal sphincter (LES). This study aims to investigate the correlation of motility response between distal and proximal esophagus after POEM.MethodsA total of 32 achalasia patients who received POEM and high-resolution manometry (HRM) were included for analysis. Eckardt score was used to assess symptom improvement. HRM was applied for studying motility. Main parameters analyzed were (1) LES: resting pressure (restP), 4-second integrated relaxation pressure; (2) esophageal body (EB): contractile integral of distal segment with myotomy (CI-DM) and proximal segment without myotomy (CI-PNM); and (3) upper esophageal sphincter (UES): relaxation pressure (UES-RP).ResultsThere were 6 type I, 17 type II, and 9 type III achalasia patients included for analysis. (1) Eckardt score, LES tone, CI-DM, CI-PNM and UES-RP were reduced remarkably after POEM (P < 0.001). (2) no significant correlation was noted between LES tone and contractile intergral of EB. (3) a positive linear correlation of CI-DM and CI-PNM changes was detected (P < 0.001). (4) the change of UES-RP was positively correlated with the change of contractile integral of EB (P < 0.001).ConclusionsMyotomy of the distal esophagus would attenuate proximal EB contraction and assist UES relaxation in achalasia patients after POEM.

338 Maturation and Stimulus-Volumes Modulate Pharyngeal Provocation Induced Pharyngeal Rhythms in Human Premature Infants

Introduction: Human disease models can help to better understand the pathophysiology and systematically characterize its consequences. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysphagia is a common sequela of a number of disorders including CVA, reflux disease and aging. Intrinsic disorders of the UES such as fibrosis and inflammation can result in its diminished distensibility and restrict its opening causing dysphagia. Aim: To characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restricted UES model in humans. Methods: We studied 15 patients (8 male, age 65±11 years) with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade simple device comprised of two components that could be comfortably worn around the neck: an elastic band and a cushion (5 X 3 X 2.5 CM). The cushion was placed horizontally at the center of the cricoid cartilage. By adjusting the elastic band, we selectively applied 0, 20, 30, 40 mmHg pressure perpendicular to the cricoid laryngeal structure inducing equivalent resistance against UES opening. In this model, the UES, in addition to relaxation, has to overcome the externally imparted pressure to open. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined using high-resolution manometry, which recorded from entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. We tested dry, 5 and 10ml swallows x 3. Results: Application of the external pressure band increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 cm without the band to 3.1, 3.5 and 3.7 cm for 20, 30, 40mmHg cricoid restrictive pressure, respectively (p<0.05). Increased restrictive pressure against UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intra-bolus pressure (IBP) during all swallowed volumes (figure). Similarly, increased UES restrictive pressure resulted in increased UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all swallowed volumes (table, p<0.05). Swallowed volume had no effect on pharyngeal peak pressure, duration or velocity. None of these were affected by restrictive external UES pressures. Deglutitive velopharygeal pressure progressively increased with increased swallowed volume (p<0.05). These pressures were also not affected by UES restrictive external pressure. Conclusions: Acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure in humans manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES trans-sphincteric flow observed in disorders that are accompanied by reduced UES opening. These pressure characteristics include increased hypopharyngeal intra-bolus as well as nadir deglutitive UES relaxation pressures. This model can potentially be helpful in better understanding of UES pathophysiology. The effect of external cricoid (UES restrictive) pressure on UES nadir pressure

337 Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES) Expedites Swallowing Recovery in Dysphagia Post-Acute Stroke: a Phase II Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: Human disease models can help to better understand the pathophysiology and systematically characterize its consequences. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysphagia is a common sequela of a number of disorders including CVA, reflux disease and aging. Intrinsic disorders of the UES such as fibrosis and inflammation can result in its diminished distensibility and restrict its opening causing dysphagia. Aim: To characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restricted UES model in humans. Methods: We studied 15 patients (8 male, age 65±11 years) with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade simple device comprised of two components that could be comfortably worn around the neck: an elastic band and a cushion (5 X 3 X 2.5 CM). The cushion was placed horizontally at the center of the cricoid cartilage. By adjusting the elastic band, we selectively applied 0, 20, 30, 40 mmHg pressure perpendicular to the cricoid laryngeal structure inducing equivalent resistance against UES opening. In this model, the UES, in addition to relaxation, has to overcome the externally imparted pressure to open. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined using high-resolution manometry, which recorded from entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. We tested dry, 5 and 10ml swallows x 3. Results: Application of the external pressure band increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 cm without the band to 3.1, 3.5 and 3.7 cm for 20, 30, 40mmHg cricoid restrictive pressure, respectively (p<0.05). Increased restrictive pressure against UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intra-bolus pressure (IBP) during all swallowed volumes (figure). Similarly, increased UES restrictive pressure resulted in increased UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all swallowed volumes (table, p<0.05). Swallowed volume had no effect on pharyngeal peak pressure, duration or velocity. None of these were affected by restrictive external UES pressures. Deglutitive velopharygeal pressure progressively increased with increased swallowed volume (p<0.05). These pressures were also not affected by UES restrictive external pressure. Conclusions: Acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure in humans manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES trans-sphincteric flow observed in disorders that are accompanied by reduced UES opening. These pressure characteristics include increased hypopharyngeal intra-bolus as well as nadir deglutitive UES relaxation pressures. This model can potentially be helpful in better understanding of UES pathophysiology. The effect of external cricoid (UES restrictive) pressure on UES nadir pressure

336 A Human Model of Restricted UES Opening and Its Characteristic Pharyngeal and UES Deglutitive Pressure Phenomena

Introduction: Human disease models can help to better understand the pathophysiology and systematically characterize its consequences. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysphagia is a common sequela of a number of disorders including CVA, reflux disease and aging. Intrinsic disorders of the UES such as fibrosis and inflammation can result in its diminished distensibility and restrict its opening causing dysphagia. Aim: To characterize the pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena in an experimentally induced restricted UES model in humans. Methods: We studied 15 patients (8 male, age 65±11 years) with various supraesophageal reflux symptoms. To induce UES restriction, we used a handmade simple device comprised of two components that could be comfortably worn around the neck: an elastic band and a cushion (5 X 3 X 2.5 CM). The cushion was placed horizontally at the center of the cricoid cartilage. By adjusting the elastic band, we selectively applied 0, 20, 30, 40 mmHg pressure perpendicular to the cricoid laryngeal structure inducing equivalent resistance against UES opening. In this model, the UES, in addition to relaxation, has to overcome the externally imparted pressure to open. Deglutitive pharyngeal and UES pressure phenomena were determined using high-resolution manometry, which recorded from entire pharynx, UES and proximal esophagus. We tested dry, 5 and 10ml swallows x 3. Results: Application of the external pressure band increased the length of the UES high pressure zone from 2.5 cm without the band to 3.1, 3.5 and 3.7 cm for 20, 30, 40mmHg cricoid restrictive pressure, respectively (p<0.05). Increased restrictive pressure against UES resulted in a significant increase in hypopharyngeal intra-bolus pressure (IBP) during all swallowed volumes (figure). Similarly, increased UES restrictive pressure resulted in increased UES nadir deglutitive relaxation pressure for all swallowed volumes (table, p<0.05). Swallowed volume had no effect on pharyngeal peak pressure, duration or velocity. None of these were affected by restrictive external UES pressures. Deglutitive velopharygeal pressure progressively increased with increased swallowed volume (p<0.05). These pressures were also not affected by UES restrictive external pressure. Conclusions: Acute experimental restriction of UES opening by external cricoid pressure in humans manifests the pressure characteristics of increased resistance to UES trans-sphincteric flow observed in disorders that are accompanied by reduced UES opening. These pressure characteristics include increased hypopharyngeal intra-bolus as well as nadir deglutitive UES relaxation pressures. This model can potentially be helpful in better understanding of UES pathophysiology. The effect of external cricoid (UES restrictive) pressure on UES nadir pressure