Updated Recommendations Research Articles

Current State of Evidence-Based Long-Term Monitoring Protocols for Breast Plastic Surgery Patients

BackgroundRecommendations for breast surveillance following breast plastic surgery are frequently changing. Establishing guidelines for long-term monitoring protocols may help identify treatable conditions and prevent untoward sequelae. We sought to evaluate the current state of evidence-based long-term monitoring protocols for patients following breast augmentation, reduction, and breast reconstruction.MethodsOfficial guidelines from various American societies and international societies were analyzed for alignment in evidence-based recommendations regarding breast surveillance.ResultsThe most recent US FDA update recommends magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound starting 5–6 years after surgery and every 2–3 years thereafter. Discrepancies exist among professional societies: the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) aligns with the FDA, while the American Society of Breast Surgeons and American College of Radiology (ACR) find no role for imaging for asymptomatic cases. Ultrasound is first-line for any implant concerns, with MRI if necessary. European societies oppose routine breast implant imaging. Breast reduction patients lack unique screening protocols; monitoring aligns with age and cancer risk factors. Following mastectomy and breast reconstruction, most organizations advocate for annual clinical examinations, with more frequent examinations initially. Evidence suggests that physical examination is sufficient to detect local cancer recurrence, with imaging only indicated if there is concern for recurrence. No surveillance imaging is recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, or ASPS; however, ACR recommends mammography for autologous reconstruction only.ConclusionMultispecialty and regulatory body alignment may promote provider and patient adherence. Ongoing studies of long-term outcomes are needed to strengthen the level of evidence for monitoring guidelines.

National Trends in PSA Cancer Screening With Parallel Investigation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Analysis of the CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System From 2012 to 2022

Introduction/BackgroundFrom 2012 to 2022 there have been numerous revisions in the United States Preventative Task Force guidelines for prostate cancer screening, including advising against PSA testing to allowing shared-decision making for men aged 55 to 69. We sought to observe trends in PSA testing rates in relation to the changing guidelines. Conversely, colorectal cancer screening recommendations remained consistent for patients aged 50-75 and we sought to use this as a comparison to observe the effect of differing guidelines. MethodsThe Centers for Disease Control Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is a national database of surveys on health-related behaviors and preventive medical services. We extracted responses from 2012 to 2022 regarding both prostate and colorectal cancer screening. Our primary variable of interest was prostate cancer screening while colorectal cancer screening served as a positive control. ResultsProstate cancer screening decreased among respondents from 70.1% in 2012 to 59.7% in 2022. However, there was a significant rebound in prostate cancer screening prevalence in 2022. In contrast, colorectal cancer screening rates steadily increased from 70.7% in 2012 to 78% in 2022. The annual percentage of men who had received prostate cancer screening was statistically different year to year. ConclusionsTrends in the rate of screening for prostate and colorectal cancer appeared to adapt to the updated recommendations. However, further investigation regarding lower income levels, minority groups, and uninsured men are essential to address the social and racial disparities seen in prostate cancer screening. Efforts to promote shared-decision making may improve effective cancer screening.

Strongyloides stercoralis infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Strongyloides stercoralis infection remains of concern due to its high associated morbidity among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) and the risk of donor-derived infection (DDI). We review key aspects of epidemiology to inform screening for and treatment of chronic infection among organ transplant candidates to reduce the risk of infectious complications in the posttransplant setting. In this work, we offer guidance regarding the optimal management of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated infection and offer recommendations regarding posttreatment surveillance and the potential need for repeat treatment during subsequent periods of augmented immunosuppression. This review also provides updated recommendations for screening of deceased and living donors as recently proposed by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network's Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. Risk reduction of Strongyloides infection in the SOTR population can be further enhanced by optimized treatment of infection, posttreatment surveillance during at-risk periods and recent proposed policy shifts to universal donor screening.

Frailty in Oncology: Updated Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Frailty is a clinical condition associated with aging and resulting in increased risk of adverse outcomes upon exogenous or endogenous stressors. In oncology, cancer treatment itself can be a stressor event. In older cancer patients, frailty therefore not only enhances the probability of age-related health events such as institutionalization or falls, but also of treatment complications such as toxicity and interruption or discontinuation of therapy. As demonstrated by recent randomized-controlled trials conducted in older cancer patients receiving systemic treatment, the evaluation of frailty by geriatric assessment (GA) followed by an adjustment of the oncological therapy as well as targeted frailty interventions help to improve cancer treatment tolerability and feasibility. Based on these data, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) updated the clinical practice guidelines for the assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older adults receiving systemic cancer therapy. The guideline recommends the use of a new GA-tool named 'practical geriatric assessment' (PGA) to foster the implementation of GA-based frailty assessment and management in routine cancer care. This article describes the background and key aspects of these recent advances.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of combined calcium 600 mg and cholecalciferol 2000 IU for treating vitamin D deficiency: Results from a nationwide study with focus in osteoporosis

IntroductionTreatment of calcium (Ca) and vitamin D (VD) deficiency (VDD) is crucial for health, especially in bone conditions, such as low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis. Despite updates in clinical guideline recommendations, no studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of administering 2000 IU of cholecalciferol combined with calcium. Thus, the main objective of this study was to evaluate VD levels following treatment with Ca 600 mg/ cholecalciferol 2000 IU in real-life clinical practice. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 302 adult patients receiving Ca 600 mg/D3 2000 IU orodispersible tablets, daily for ≥24 weeks. The primary outcome was 25-hydroxivitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels following treatment. Key secondary outcomes included changes in serum 25(OH)D levels and other bone metabolism (BM) parameters, safety and tolerability. The protocol was approved by a Research Ethics Committee. Results285 patients were evaluated (mean age [SD]: 67.4 [12.6] years old; 88.4 % women; basal serum 25(OH)D: 20.0 [8.6] ng/mL); 80.7 % reported previous history of osteoporosis/low BMD (osteopenia) and 37.2 % had received other Ca/VD prior to start study treatment. Median treatment duration was 38.5 weeks [range 24.0–82.4]. Overall, 94.4 % of patients increased serum 25(OH)D following treatment to a mean of 36.3 [11.8] ng/mL (p < 0.001 vs. baseline). Patients with basal VDD, significantly increased serum 25(OH)D to a mean over 30 ng/mL; no significant change found in repleted patients (basal 25(OH)D level ≥ 30 ng/mL). PTH was significantly reduced after treatment, with no clinically relevant effect on serum Ca or phosphate. Three non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. A post-hoc analysis on osteoporotic patients revealed virtually identical results in this population. ConclusionTreatment with Ca 600 mg/cholecalciferol 2000 IU for at least 24 weeks is effective and safe, especially in osteoporosis. Patients with VDD significantly increase plasma 25(OH)D to optimal range for bone health, with no clinically relevant changes on other bone metabolism parameters other than reducing secondary hyperparathyroidism. The magnitude of 25(OH)D increase directly correlates with the severity of VDD, with no effect in basally repleted patients.

Ibero-American Consensus for the Management of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis: Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations.

Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare malignant disease with a poor prognosis, secondary to peritoneal dissemination of abdominopelvic soft tissue sarcomas. Its rarity, together with the characteristic histological heterogeneity and the historically poor response to systemic treatments, has prevented the establishment of widely accepted treatment criteria with curative intent. In this sense, radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with peritonectomy procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), widely used in peritoneal carcinomatosis with excellent results, have not had the same evolutionary development in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis. A multidisciplinary working group of experts in sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery established a series of recommendations based on current scientific evidence for the management of peritoneal sarcomatosis, taking into account the different histological subgroups of abdominopelvic sarcomas that can cause it depending on their origin: retroperitoneal sarcomas, uterine sarcomas, and visceral/peritoneal sarcomas of GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and non-GIST origin. This article shows the results of sarcoma experts' voting on the recommendations presented during the I Ibero-American Consensus on the Management of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis, which took place during the recent celebration of the III Hispanic-Portuguese Meeting for Updates on the Treatment of Sarcomas.

The Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Cancer (v2024.0).

Background: Recent publications underscore the need for updated recommendations addressing less radical surgery for <2 cm tumors, induction chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for locally advanced stages of cervical cancer, as well as for the systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Aim: To summarize the current evidence for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cervical cancer and provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. Methods: Developed according to AGREE II standards, the guidelines classify scientific evidence based on the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System criteria. Recommendations are graded by evidence strength and consensus level from the development group. Key Results: (1) Early-Stage Cancer: Stromal invasion and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) from pretreatment biopsy identify candidates for surgery, particularly for simple hysterectomy. (2) Surgical Approach: Minimally invasive surgery is not recommended, except for T1A, LVSI-negative tumors, due to a reduction in life expectancy. (3) Locally Advanced Cancer: concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) followed by brachytherapy (BRT) is the cornerstone treatment. Low-risk patients (fewer than two metastatic nodes or FIGO IB2-II) may consider induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by CCRT and BRT after 7 days. High-risk patients (two or more metastatic nodes or FIGO IIIA, IIIB, and IVA) benefit from pembrolizumab with CCRT and maintenance therapy. (4) Metastatic, Persistent, and Recurrent Cancer: A PD-L1 status from pretreatment biopsy identifies candidates for Pembrolizumab with available systemic treatment, while triplet therapy (Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/chemotherapy) becomes a PD-L1-independent option. Conclusions: These evidence-based guidelines aim to improve clinical outcomes through precise treatment strategies based on individual risk factors, predictors, and disease stages.

Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing in Pregnancy: Time to Improve Adherence and Update Recommendations.

The aim of the study is to evaluate adherence to national recommendations for Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhea) testing during pregnancy including tests for cure/clearance and for persistence/potential reinfection at time of delivery. We evaluated results of chlamydia and gonorrhea nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) performed by major national reference laboratory from January 2010 through July 2022. Of 3,519,781 uniquely identified pregnant individuals, we identified 4,077,212 pregnancies. Among pregnancies that had chlamydia or gonorrhea testing, 3.7% (149,422/4,055,016) and 0.4% (15,858/ 4,063,948) were initially positive, respectively. Initial tests occurred in the first trimester for approximately 88%. Of those initially chlamydia test positive, 71% were retested; 15.8% in <4 weeks and 37.3% >8 weeks (similarly for gonorrhea). Among patients initially test positive in early/mid pregnancy, more than one-third had no evidence of late pregnancy retesting. Individuals who were initially test negative and subsequently retested positive were approximately 50% likely to have the last available result be positive. Among all whom initially tested positive and were retested, 6.8% and 4.0%, were positive for chlamydia and gonorrhea, respectively on their last test before estimated delivery. There was no subsequent negative test before estimated delivery for 35.1% and 36.9% chlamydia or gonorrhea infected patients, respectively. Adherence to current recommendations is suboptimal and may not be adequate to reduce disease burden. Professional societies and practice plans should work to encourage better adherence to existing guidelines to protect the health of women and their newborns. We propose recommendations that may be helpful in reducing disease burden.

EULAR recommendations 2023 on the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus-Implications for treatment in Germany

The 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) faced several tasks: the newly approved medications anifrolumab and voclosporin as well as the additional approval of belimumab for lupus nephritis had to be conceptionally fitted into the management of SLE. Novel data on hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids, additional results for the treat-to-target goals remission and low disease activity and experience with respect to vaccinations and infections had to be considered. Additionally, EULAR specified aslightly modified structure. The update was further developed with 5overarching principles and 13recommendations. An SLE activity score is required for each patient visit. All SLE patients should receive hydroxychloroquine at atarget dose of 5 mg/kg body weight. Glucocorticoids should only be used if necessary and reduced to not more than 5 mg prednisone equivalent daily in the long-term or, even better, tapered off. If the target of remission or low disease activity is not reached, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate and/or belimumab or anifrolumab should be used. For lupus nephritis, Euro-Lupus cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate are options for induction therapy and mycophenolate or azathioprine for maintenance. In the case of severe nephritis, the addition of belimumab or acalcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. It is important that treatment should be continued for at least 3years. This review article describes the details of the new recommendations against the background of relevant studies in recent years and classifies them in the clinical context.

The phenotype of systemic lupus erythematosus as a factor in rational therapy choosing

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a variety of clinical manifestations, which are defined as separate phenotypes of the disease. Despite the universality of immunopathological reactions, which are based on the formation of anti-nuclear antibodies and antibodies to native DNA, the spectrum and severity of immunological disorders in individual phenotypes are different. The role of type I interferons (IFN) in the SLE pathogenesis has now been proven. Hypersecretion of IFN-α and IFN-β leads to the production of antibodies against the components of the cell nucleus through activation of the native and adaptive immunity system. The current treatment strategy provides for achieving remission or low activity with immunosuppressants, including selective ones, such as biological agents. According to the updated international recommendations, anifrolumab, monoclonal antibodies against type I IFN, which has demonstrated high efficacy in the treatment of SLE with skin-mucous and joint lesions., can be used for the treatment of SLE along with rituximab and belimumab. The article presents our own clinical observation on the analysis of the effecacy and safety of anifrolumab in the treatment of a young patient with high-activity SLE and pronounced skin manifestations. It was shown that after the first injections of the drug, there was a rapid dynamics of skin and joint syndrome, the activity of SLE decreased from maximum to minimum according to the SELENA-SLEDAI index. The results obtained confirm the rationale of including anifrolumab in the treatment regimen in cases of insufficient previous therapy.

From Guidelines to Practice: A Programmatic Model for Implementation of the Updated Infant Feeding Recommendations for People Living with HIV.

From Guidelines to Practice: A Programmatic Model for Implementation of the Updated Infant Feeding Recommendations for People Living with HIV.

Chinese Expert Consensus on the Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Non‑small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations (2024 Edition)

The standard clinical practice of managing the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations was elaborated in Chinese expert consensus on non‑small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (2023 edition), and this rare subset has gradually attracted attention recently. With the deepening of treatment area exploration and the approval of new targeted drugs, there are more options for the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, based on the previous version of consensus, the expert panel has updated this consensus on the standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins mutation NSCLC through reference to literature and clinical data, and combined with the experts' own clinical experience. The updated recommendations includes disease congnition, testing methods, therapy and recent relevant clinical trials for NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation, in order to provide better medication reference for clinical physicians. .

Cardiomyopathies matter: a multistakeholder european initiative to improve patient outcomes through effective health policies

Abstract Background/Introduction Cardiomyopathies are common and affect up to 1:250 of the population. Despite conferring a risk for sudden cardiac death and substantial disease burdens that could be reduced through better awareness, detection and care, cardiomyopathy care is rarely incorporated in European and national health policies. New European Society of Cardiology cardiomyopathy guidelines (1) could substantially benefit care but need to be supported by effective policies. Cardiomyopathies Matter is a Europe-wide, multistakeholder initiative aiming to raise awareness about cardiomyopathies and to ensure they receive the policy attention they warrant from EU and national decision-makers. Methods Cardiomyopathies Matters participants include experts from the fields of cardiology, cardiac nursing, economics, and patient advocacy, coordinated by a Secretariat, representing 36 countries and 6 patient advocacy groups (PAGs). A Policy Roadmap and other publications were co-created based on i) reviews of published and grey literature, and ii) input from topic experts and PAGs through 2 group workshops, individual consultation meetings, and a modified nominal group technique reviewing successive drafts toward consensus approval. Results The Roadmap (2) identifies unmet needs and challenges throughout the patient care pathway and offers holistic EU and national policy recommendations to address these and improve patient outcomes (Figure 1). These include policy measures to support early and accurate diagnosis, access to expert multidisciplinary care, guidelines-informed disease investigation and management, holistic support and empowerment of patients and carers, and research and innovation. Key aspects for nurses and allied health professionals include the need for 1)improved knowledge and awareness to promote early diagnosis; 2)rapid referral systems to multidisciplinary care and access to specialist cardiomyopathy or heart failure nurses care coordination, 3)genetic counselling (index cases and cascade/family screening), and 4)support of patients and families. Building on existing examples of good practice at national expert centre networks (e.g. France, Spain, UK),Cardiomyopathies Matter published updated policy recommendations for the European Union mandate (3), which are now being adopted more widely. National initiatives are underway or in development in Belgium, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, and Spain. Local actions include multistakeholder roundtables and events, national Roadmap publications, events, educational activities, and media outreach. Conclusions EU and national Cardiovascular Health Action Plans are needed, with specific attention to cardiomyopathies and other inherited CVDs. Cardiomyopathies Matter fosters collaboration between healthcare professionals, PAGs and policymakers to promote policies that ensure all patients and families have access to guidelines-informed care.Figure 1Cardiomyopathy Priorities

Barriers to initial COVID-19 booster among U.S. adults who completed a primary vaccine series in the CHASING COVID cohort, September 2021 - October 2022.

It is crucial to understand factors associated with COVID-19 booster uptake in the U.S. given the updated COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. Using data from a national prospective cohort (N=4,616) between September 2021-October 2022, we examined socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioral factors of initial booster uptake among participants fully-vaccinated with the primary COVID-19 vaccines series. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the associations of each factor with time to initial booster uptake. Most participants (86.5%) reported receiving their initial booster. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, region, and employment, participants with greater risk for severe COVID-19 had similar booster uptake compared with those with lower risk (aHR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.14). Participants with greater barriers to healthcare (aHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.96), food insecurity (aHR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.89), and housing instability (aHR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.90) were less likely to report receiving initial booster compared with those without those barriers. Factors motivating the decision to vaccinate changed from safety-related concerns for the primary series to perceived need for the booster. It is key to address economic and health access barriers to achieve equitable COVID-19 vaccine uptake and continued protection against COVID-19.

Automatically Recommend Code Updates: Are We There Yet?

In recent years, large pre-trained Language Models of Code (CodeLMs) have shown promising results on various software engineering tasks. One such task is automatic code update recommendation, which transforms outdated code snippets into their approved and revised counterparts. Although many CodeLM-based approaches have been proposed, claiming high accuracy, their effectiveness and reliability on real-world code update tasks remain questionable. In this paper, we present the first extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art CodeLMs for automatically recommending code updates. We assess their performance on two diverse datasets of paired updated methods, considering factors such as temporal evolution, project specificity, method size, and update complexity. Our results reveal that while CodeLMs exhibit higher performance in settings that ignore temporal information, they struggle in more realistic time-wise scenarios and generalize poorly to new projects. Furthermore, CodeLM performance decreases significantly for larger methods and more complex updates. Furthermore, we observe that many CodeLM-generated “updates” are actually null, especially in time-wise settings, and meaningful edits remain challenging. Our findings highlight the significant gap between the perceived and actual effectiveness of CodeLMs for real-world code update recommendation and emphasize the need for more research on improving their practicality, robustness, and generalizability.

Updated recommendations for action according to the guidelines “Musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents”

Updated recommendations for action according to the guidelines “Musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents”

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment, Diagnostic Imaging, and Microbiological Evaluation in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

As the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the panel presents 21 updated recommendations. These recommendations span risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

The pre-transplant evaluation: Considerations for trainees and early career transplant infectious diseases clinician.

Transplant infectious disease (TID) clinicians are integral to the pre-transplantation evaluation. Pre-transplant evaluations allow clinicians to assess risk factors for latent infections and relevant exposures to potential pathogens, address immunizations, and optimize patients' health and understanding of life after transplant. However, there is not a standardized approach to the pre-transplant evaluation. This article reviews the details of performing successful pre-transplant evaluations, including updated recommendations on available vaccines and contemporary opinions on marijuana use. This resource can be used for teaching with trainees or for early career TID clinicians.

Updates in the Management of HIV During Pregnancy.

Human immunodeficiency virus in pregnant people remains a significant public health issue worldwide. The rate of perinatal transmission is 15% to 40% but can be decreased to less than 1% with appropriate antenatal management. Previous recommendations included a protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy, infant prophylaxis, performance of cesarean section for uncontrolled viremia, and the use of formula for infant feeding. However, recent updates include first line of integrase inhibitor-based regimens and supporting parental choices for safe lactation. In this review, we summarize and provide updated recommendations for the care of people living with human immunodeficiency virus during pregnancy.

Updated Clinical Recommendations for Multiple Sclerosis by Saudi Neurology Experts

Abstract This study presents an update on clinical recommendations in the diagnosis and management of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This has been accomplished through a systematic effort by a committee of leading neurology experts appointed by the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia to review the latest scientific literature on MS to enhance the care of MS patients. These recommendations encompass multifaceted aspects of MS care, facilitate an optimized approach for healthcare providers, and include diagnosis, management, and special considerations unique to pwMS.