Untreated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Comparison of efficacy of gefitinib and osimertinib for untreated EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with poor performance status

BackgroundThere is a dearth of studies on the efficacy and safety of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors osimertinib (OSI) and gefitinib (GEF) in treating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), even in patients with poor performance status (PS). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed and compared data of 113 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 2–4 who were administered OSI 80 mg/day or GEF 250 mg/day from May 2016 to March 2022. ResultsThe GEF group (39 patients; median age: 74 years) included 20 patients with a PS of 2, 17 with a PS of 3, and 2 with a PS of 4. The OSI group (74 patients; median age: 76 years) included 48 patients with a PS of 2, 24 with a PS of 3, and 2 with a PS of 4. The overall response rates were 69% and 66% in the GEF and OSI groups, respectively. The disease control and PS improvement rates were 89% and 51% in both groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival in the GEF and OSI groups was 6.9 and 9.2 months, respectively (p = 0.15). The OSI group experienced better overall survival than the GEF group (median: 20.9 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.0031). The incidence of pneumonitis was 10% and 11% in the GEF and OSI groups, respectively. One treatment-related death owing to pneumonitis occurred in the GEF group. ConclusionsOSI may be a useful treatment for untreated EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with poor PS.

Impact of Cachexia and First-Line Systemic Therapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: NEJ050A.

Cancer cachexia complicates advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, it remains unclear how often cachexia occurs and how it affects the course of chemotherapy in patients receiving first-line systemic therapy. We conducted a multicentre, prospective observational study and enrolled previously untreated NSCLC patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2 and cachexia between September 2020 and September 2021. The primary outcome measure was the trends in the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment and Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale [FAACT (A/CS)] scores by cohort. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of cachexia before the initiation of first-line systemic therapy, quality of life (QOL) measures, body weight (BW) changes, and efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapy. A total of 887 consecutive patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 0-2 who were initiated on first-line systemic therapy were evaluated. A total of 281 patients (31.7%) experienced BW loss consistent with the criteria of cachexia, and 186 were evaluated for QOL, BW and outcome measurements. Overall, 180/186 patients received first-line systemic therapy. Cohort 1 (targeted therapy), cohort 2 [cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTx) ± immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] and cohort 3 (ICIs) included 42, 98 and 40 patients, respectively. There were significant variations in QOL trends by cohort, with chemotherapy-associated emesis affecting early appetite-related QOL. The change in the FAACT (A/CS) score at 1 week from baseline was worse in cohort 2 (the least square mean change ± standard error: -3.0 ± 0.9) than in cohorts 1 (1.6 ± 1.2, p = 0.003) and 3 (1.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.002); meanwhile, the change at 6 weeks was worse in cohort 1 (-1.5 ± 1.2) than in cohorts 2 (3.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.001) and 3 (3.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.004). BW reduction was observed in all cohorts within 6 weeks of therapy initiation. The targeted therapy cohort demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) to CTx ± ICIs cohort or ICIs cohort (median PFS was 9.7 months, 6.3 months, 3.1 months, in cohort 1, 2, 3, respectively (cohort 1 vs. cohort 2: HR, 0.58, p = 0.018; cohort 1 vs. cohort 3: HR, 0.41, p = 0.001); median OS was not reached, 15.8 months, 9.9 months, respectively (cohort 1 vs. cohort 2: HR, 0.52, p = 0.033; cohort 1 vs. cohort 3: HR, 0.37, p = 0.003). Approximately 1/3 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC have cachexia. Appetite-related QOL trends vary based on the type of first-line systemic therapy in cachectic NSCLC patients, and the PFS and OS of these patients seemed to be shorter.

Genomic correlates of the response to first-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade plus chemotherapy has become the new first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet not all NSCLC patients benefit from this regimen. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in untreated advanced NSCLC. We integrated clinical, genomic, and survival data from 287 patients with untreated advanced NSCLC who were enrolled in one of five registered phase 3 trials and received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. We randomly assigned these patients into a discovery cohort (n=125), a validation cohort (n=82), and a control cohort (n=80). The candidate genes that could predict the response to PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy were identified using data from the discovery cohort and their predictive values were then evaluated in the three cohorts. Immune deconvolution was conducted using transcriptome data of 1014 NSCLC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. A genomic variation signature, in which one or more of the 15 candidate genes were altered, was correlated with significantly inferior response rates and survival outcomes in patients treated with first-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in both discovery and validation cohorts. Its predictive value held in multivariate analyses when adjusted for baseline parameters, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, and tumor mutation burden. Moreover, applying both the 15-gene panel and PD-L1 expression level produced better performance than either alone in predicting benefit from this treatment combination. Immune landscape analyses revealed that tumors with one or more variation in the 15-gene panel were associated with few immune infiltrates, indicating an immune-desert tumor microenvironment. These findings indicate that a 15-gene panel can serve as a negative prediction biomarker for first-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Comparison of platinum combination chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab versus platinum combination chemotherapy plus nivolumab–ipilimumab for treatment-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (JCOG2007): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and an antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1, with or without an antibody to CTLA-4, has improved the survival of individuals with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated the survival benefit of adding a CTLA-4 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy plus a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known driver oncogenes were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (four cycles) plus pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab group) or platinum-based chemotherapy (two cycles) plus nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivolumab-ipilimumab group). The primary endpoint was overall survival and assessed in all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs031210013, and is now closed to new enrolment and is ongoing. Between patient accrual initiation on April 6, 2021, and discontinuation of the trial on March 30, 2023, 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group had a treatment-related death. Because of the high number of treatment-related deaths, patient accrual was terminated early, resulting in 295 patients (236 [80%] male and 59 [20%] female) enrolled; the primary analysis was done on the basis of 117 deaths (fewer than the required 329 deaths). By May 25, 2023 (data cutoff), overall survival did not differ significantly between the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and the pembrolizumab group (median 23·7 months [95% CI 17·6-not estimable] vs 20·5 months [17·6-not estimable], respectively; hazard ratio 0·98 [90% CI 0·72-1·34]; p=0·46). Non-haematological adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 87 (60%) of 146 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and 59 (41%) of 144 patients in the pembrolizumab group. The pembrolizumab group tended to have a better quality of life compared with the nivolumab-ipilimumab group. The safety and efficacy data suggest an unfavourable benefit-risk profile for nivolumab-ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, although a definitive conclusion awaits an updated analysis of overall survival. The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Clinical and molecular significance of homologous recombination deficiency positive non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese population: An integrated genomic and transcriptional analysis.

The clinical significance of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and prostate cancer has been established, but the value of HRD in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully investigated. This study aimed to systematically analyze the HRD status of untreated NSCLC and its relationship with patient prognosis to further guide clinical care. A total of 355 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients were retrospectively enrolled. HRD status was assessed using the AmoyDx Genomic Scar Score (GSS), with a score of ≥50 considered HRD-positive. Genomic, transcriptomic, tumor microenvironmental characteristics and prognosis between HRD-positive and HRD-negative patients were analyzed. Of the patients, 25.1% (89/355) were HRD-positive. Compared to HRD-negative patients, HRD-positive patients had more somatic pathogenic homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations, higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (P<0.001), and fewer driver gene mutations (P<0.001). Furthermore, HRD-positive NSCLC had more amplifications in PI3K pathway and cell cycle genes, MET and MYC in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutant NSCLC, and more PIK3CA and AURKA in EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC. HRD-positive NSCLC displayed higher tumor proliferation and immunosuppression activity. HRD-negative NSCLC showed activated signatures of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II, interferon (IFN)-γ and effector memory CD8+ T cells. HRD-positive patients had a worse prognosis and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) to targeted therapy (first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs) (P=0.042). Additionally, HRD-positive, EGFR/ALK wild-type patients showed a numerically lower response to platinum-free immunotherapy regimens. Unique genomic and transcriptional characteristics were found in HRD-positive NSCLC. Poor prognosis and poor response to EGFR-TKIs and immunotherapy were observed in HRD-positive NSCLC. This study highlights potential actionable alterations in HRD-positive NSCLC, suggesting possible combinational therapeutic strategies for these patients.

Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC.

Amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) has shown clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated or osimertinib-pretreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (in an open-label fashion), osimertinib (in a blinded fashion), or lazertinib (in a blinded fashion, to assess the contribution of treatment components). The primary end point was progression-free survival in the amivantamab-lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group, as assessed by blinded independent central review. Overall, 1074 patients underwent randomization (429 to amivantamab-lazertinib, 429 to osimertinib, and 216 to lazertinib). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-lazertinib group than in the osimertinib group (23.7 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.85; P<0.001). An objective response was observed in 86% of the patients (95% CI, 83 to 89) in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and in 85% of those (95% CI, 81 to 88) in the osimertinib group; among patients with a confirmed response (336 in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and 314 in the osimertinib group), the median response duration was 25.8 months (95% CI, 20.1 to could not be estimated) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 18.5), respectively. In a planned interim overall survival analysis of amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib, the hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05). Predominant adverse events were EGFR-related toxic effects. The incidence of discontinuation of all agents due to treatment-related adverse events was 10% with amivantamab-lazertinib and 3% with osimertinib. Amivantamab-lazertinib showed superior efficacy to osimertinib as first-line treatment in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080.).

OSIRAM-1/TORG1833: Overall survival results of a randomized phase II study of osimertinib plus ramucirumab versus osimertinib alone as initial chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

8613 Background: Dual inhibition of the EGFR/VEGF pathways has demonstrated superior efficacy with 1st generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining osimertinib (Osi), a 3rd generation TKI considered the standard of care, with ramucirumab (Ram). We have previously shown the result of progression free survival (PFS) as a primary endpoint, the median PFS was 20.0 months for Osi+Ram and 24.0 months for Osi, hazard ratio of 1.054 (95% CI 0.674-1.648). In further analyses, we aimed to examine the effects of this combination therapy on overall survival (OS). Methods: Previously untreated EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. Asymptomatic and/or treated brain metastases were included. Eligible patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive Osi (80mg) every day either without or with Ram (10mg/kg) every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, stratified according to gender and the type of EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion, L858R). The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by the independent blinded radiologic reviewer. Secondary endpoints included PFS assessed locally, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), OS and safety. Results: Between November 2018 and April 2020, 122 patients (Osi+Ram: 59, Osi: 63) were enrolled. The patients' characteristics were well balanced. 59% were females, and 61% had an exon 19 deletion. Median age was 70 years old (range, 29-86). With a median follow up of 36.0 months, the median OS was 43.4 months (95% CI 36.5-N.R.) for Osi+Ram and N.R. (95% CI 41.3-N.R.) for Osi, resulting in a hazard ratio of 1.159 (95% CI 0.645-2.083, p = 0.62). Median treatment duration for Ram was 140 (14-1239) days. Ram was discontinued in 45 patients (76%) by the treatment related adverse effects. Common reasons for Ram discontinuation were platelet count decreased (n=14), proteinuria (n=12), neutrophil count decreased (n=11), pneumonitis (n=3), bleeding (n=3) and infection (n=3). Pneumonitis was observed in 16% in Osi, 9% in Osi+Ram, with grade 3 observed in 2% of both arms. Conclusions: Both treatment arms demonstrated sustained OS over 43 months. However, this study did not show an advantage of biweekly Ram administration with Osi in terms of PFS and OS. Notably, there was surpassed increase of early discontinuation of Ram due to higher adverse events. Clinical trial information: 2080224085 .

Improving Prediction of Survival and Progression in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Immunotherapy Through Machine Learning of Circulating Tumor DNA.

To use modern machine learning approaches to enhance and automate the feature extraction from the longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data and to improve the prediction of survival and disease progression, risk stratification, and treatment strategies for patients with 1L non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using IMpower150 trial data on patients with untreated metastatic NSCLC treated with atezolizumab and chemotherapies, we developed a machine learning algorithm to extract predictive features from ctDNA kinetics, improving survival and progression prediction. We analyzed kinetic data from 17 ctDNA summary markers, including cell-free DNA concentration, allele frequency, tumor molecules in plasma, and mutation counts. Three hundred and ninety-eight patients with ctDNA data (206 in training and 192 in validation) were analyzed. Our models outperformed existing workflow using conventional temporal ctDNA features, raising overall survival (OS) concordance index to 0.72 and 0.71 from 0.67 and 0.63 for C3D1 and C4D1, respectively, and substantially improving progression-free survival (PFS) to approximately 0.65 from the previous 0.54-0.58, a 12%-20% increase. Additionally, they enhanced risk stratification for patients with NSCLC, achieving clear OS and PFS separation. Distinct patterns of ctDNA kinetic characteristics (eg, baseline ctDNA markers, depth of ctDNA responses, and timing of ctDNA clearance, etc) were revealed across the risk groups. Rapid and complete ctDNA clearance appears essential for long-term clinical benefit. Our machine learning approach offers a novel tool for analyzing ctDNA kinetics, extracting critical features from longitudinal data, improving our understanding of the link between ctDNA kinetics and progression/mortality risks, and optimizing personalized immunotherapies for 1L NSCLC.

The Design for a Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter Study of CtDNA-Guided Treatment With Furmonertinib Combined Therapy or Furmonertinib Alone for Untreated Advanced EGFR Mutant Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: The FOCUS-C Study

BackgroundThird-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have significant antitumor activity to advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with classic EGFR mutations. However, EGFR-TKI monotherapy shows poor efficacy in patients whose circulating tumor cell DNA (ctDNA) of EGFR mutations cannot be rapidly cleared. Materials and MethodsAs a third-generation TKI, furmonertinib has shown superior antitumor activity and minor toxicity. The FOCUS-C study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT05334277) to explore the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib plus pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab versus furmonertinib monotherapy in untreated advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC patients without EGFR clearance after the induction therapy of furmonertinib. Patients with EGFR clearance will still receive furmonertinib as Arm A. Patients without ctDNA clearance will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio as Arm B1 (furmonertinib), Arm B2 (furmonertinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed for 4 cycles, and then furmonertinib and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy) and Arm B3 (Arm B2 regimen plus bevacizumab). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) in Arm B2/B1. Secondary endpoints include PFS in Arm B3/B1, PFS in Arm A/B1, PFS in Arm B3/B2, objective response and disease control rate, overall survival and safety in all Arms. Exploratory endpoints are focused on the efficacy based on plasma NGS at different timepoints. ConclusionThis study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of furmonertinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab verses furmonertinib alone in untreated patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC without EGFR clearance.

Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy for Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemotherapy) for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have reported consistent associations with event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) pending longer follow-up for overall survival data. To assess the pooled benefit of ICI-chemotherapy in 2-year EFS and pCR among patients with NSCLC and examine the impact of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors. Full-text articles and abstracts in English were searched in EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through November 1, 2023, and in oncology conference proceedings from January 1, 2008, to November 1, 2023. Phase 2 or 3 RCTs with neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy with or without adjuvant ICIs vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with or without placebo or observation in patients with previously untreated NSCLC staged IB to IIIB were included. Data extraction of prespecified data elements was performed by 2 reviewers using a structured data abstraction electronic form. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Two-year EFS and pCR were the outcomes of interest in patients who received neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy (experimental arm) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm). Aggregated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event outcomes (2-year EFS) and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes (pCR) with their respective 95% CIs were calculated. Eight trials with 3387 patients were included, with some concerns of risk of bias as assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration method, mainly related to outcomes measurements. Neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy was associated with improved 2-year EFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.66; P < .001) and increased pCR rate (RR, 5.58; 95% CI, 4.27-7.29; P < .001) in the experimental vs control treatment arms. This association was not significantly modified by the main patient characteristics; tumor- or treatment-related factors, including tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status; type of platinum-compound chemotherapy; number of cycles of neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy; or addition of adjuvant ICIs. Patients whose tumor cells were negative for PD-L1 were at higher risk of relapse (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) than were those with low (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71) or high PD-L1 (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.58) (P = .005). In this systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant ICI-chemotherapy RCTs in patients with early-stage NSCLC, 3 cycles of neoadjuvant platinum-based ICI-chemotherapy were associated with a meaningful improvement in 2-year EFS and pCR.

Abstract CT055: Efficacy of YK-029A, a novel EGFR TKI, in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutation

Abstract In the multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 clinical trial (NCT05767866), we evaluated safety and tolerability of YK-029A in various EGFR mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have reported efficacy of YK-029A in untreated NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutation[1]. This time we report efficacy of YK-029A in patients with acquired EGFR T790M mutation after failure of first or second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Method: This dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 trial recruited previously treated NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation or patients with EGFR ex20ins or EGFR rare mutations. In dose-escalation phase, patients with EGFR T790M mutation were enrolled. YK-029A was given at doses of 50, 100, 150, 200 to 250 mg/day (3+3 design). In dose-expansion phase, patients with EGFR T790M, EGFR ex20ins, or EGFR rare mutations were enrolled. The primary objective was safety. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were explored. Efficacy of YK-029A in EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC was assessed by the investigators. Results: A total of 114 patients were recruited into the study. Safety profile of the first 108 patients was reported previously[1]. By the cut-off date on Sep 12, 2023, 38 patients harbored EGFR T790M mutation were included in efficacy analysis. All these patients were previously treated with first or second generation EGFR-TKIs. The objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1) was 65.8% (95%CI: 48.6%-80.4%) and disease control rate (DCR) was 84.2% (95%CI: 68.7%-94.0%). With a median follow-up time of 8.2 months,the median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.0 months (95%CI: 7.75-NR). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Among the 8 patients with measurable brain metastases, intracranial ORR was 75% (95%CI: 35.6%-95.6%) . Conclusions: YK-029A has promising activity in previously treated NSCLC patients harboring EGFR T790M mutation. Reference[1] DUAN J, WU L, YANG K, et al. Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of YK-029A in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: A Phase 1 Trial [J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2023. Citation Format: Rui Wan, Yi Fung Chau, Jun Zhao, Zhe Liu, Mingfang Zhao, Yanqiu Zhao, Xiumei Dai, Yueyin Pan, Zhihong Zhang, Yu Yao, Kunyu Yang, Lin Wu, Yanyan Xie, Bi Chen, Yixuan Yang, Yongqi Guo, Jie Wang, Jianchun Duan. Efficacy of YK-029A, a novel EGFR TKI, in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT055.

Abstract CT114: Phase 1 study of the anti-immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 (ILT4) monoclonal antibody MK-4830 plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Abstract Background: ILT4 is an immunosuppressive receptor commonly expressed on myeloid cells. Antagonism of ILT4 may induce a proinflammatory state and stimulate antitumor T-cell response, especially with PD-(L)1 blockade. In the dose escalation phase of a first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT03564691), the anti-ILT4 IgG4 monoclonal antibody, MK-4830, in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced solid tumors. Here, we present safety, efficacy, and biomarker analyses for MK-4830 + pembro from the multi-cohort expansion phase of patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced HNSCC or NSCLC. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with previously untreated advanced HNSCC and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 (cohort D) or NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 status (cohorts E and F) were enrolled. Pts in all cohorts received either MK-4830 800 mg (cohorts D and E) or 1600 mg (cohort F) + pembro 200 mg Q3W for ≤35 cycles. Primary end points were safety and ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Exploratory end points included DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment and evaluating possible biomarkers of response to MK-4830 + pembro. Results: At data cut-off (September 27, 2023), 35, 47, and 11 pts were enrolled and received treatment in cohorts D, E, and F, respectively. Median study follow-up was 34.4 mo (range, 26.5-42.4) in cohort D, 35.9 mo (22.4-39.8) in cohort E, and 38.7 mo (37.6-39.6) in cohort F. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 33 pts (94%) in cohort D, 43 pts (91%) in cohort E, and 10 pts (91%) in cohort F. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 20 pts (57%) in cohort D, 26 pts (55%) in cohort E, and 6 pts (55%) in cohort F; grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 5 pts (14%), 4 pts (9%), and 1 pt (9%), respectively. One pt in cohort E and 1 pt in cohort F died due to a TRAE (pneumonitis and pneumonia, respectively). ORR was 24% (95% CI, 11-41) in cohort D, 30% (17-45) in cohort E, and 27% (6-61) in cohort F. Median DOR was 16.4 mo (range, 2.2+ to 24.4+) in cohort D, 14.8 mo (4.2+ to 32.9+) in cohort E, and 8.4 mo (3.0-21.5) in cohort F. Median PFS was 5.2 mo (95% CI, 2.0-8.0) in cohort D, 4.3 mo (1.8-8.1) in cohort E, and 3.3 (1.2-7.6) in cohort F. In cohort D, T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not enrich for response to MK-4830 + pembro. In cohorts E and F, PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) and TcellinfGEP trended higher in pts with response to MK-4830 + pembro than pts with no response; TMB did not trend with response. Conclusions: In pts with advanced HNSCC or NSCLC, first-line MK-4830 + pembro had a manageable AE profile with modest antitumor activity. Consistent with what was previously observed for pembro alone, a trend was observed between PD-L1 TPS and response to MK-4830 + pembro in pts with NSCLC. Citation Format: Byoung Chul Cho, John Hilton, Cristina P. Rodriguez, Marcelo Bonomi, Lillian L. Siu, Marta Gil-Martin, Shabana Siddiqi, Nicole M. Myer, Leah Suttner, Douglas Wilson, Omobolaji Akala, Rafal Dziadziuszko. Phase 1 study of the anti-immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 (ILT4) monoclonal antibody MK-4830 plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT114.

Abstract CT032: Promotive clinical effects of pembrolizumab with necitumumab in patients having advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression of 50% or higher in a phase II study (K-TAIL-202)

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab is the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, combination therapies comprising pembrolizumab and ipilimumab, tiragolumab, or lenvatinib have not demonstrated superior efficacy in this patient group. This study explored the effectiveness of the novel combination of pembrolizumab and necitumumab as first-line therapy in patients having advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression of 50% or higher. Methods: Patients with untreated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression of 50% or higher received pembrolizumab and necitumumab every 3 weeks up to 35 cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The sample size was calculated using 80% power with a one-sided alpha error of 10%, a threshold ORR of 39.0%, and an expected ORR of 54.8%. Results: From December 2020 to March 2023, 50 patients were enrolled. Patient characteristics were as follows: male/female patients: 38/12; median age: 72 years (range: 51-90 years); histology, adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma/other: 35/15/5; and PS, 0/1: 20/30. At the time of the primary analysis, the ORR was 76.0% (95% CI: 61.9%-86.9%), with 2.0%, 74.0%, 10.0%, and 8.0% of the patients showing complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. The median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI, 10.3 to not reached) and the median OS was not reached. Common toxicities included rash (86%) and hypomagnesemia (60%). Grade 3 interstitial lung disease was noted in 5 patients (10%) and grade 5 cardiac arrest in 1 patient (2%). Conclusion: Combination therapy comprising pembrolizumab and necitumumab demonstrated a 76.0% ORR, meeting the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicities. The regimen showed promising clinical activity in patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression, warranting further investigation. Clinical trial ID: jRCT2031200248. Citation Format: Atsushi Horiike, Hiroshi Wakui, Shunichi Sugawara, Yuji Minegishi, Sadatomo Tasaka, Sojiro Kusumoto, Toshio Sakatani, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yukio Hosomi, Yuichi Tambo, Tsuneo Shimokawa, Hiroo Ishida, Eisaku Miyauchi, Katsuhiko Naoki, Tatsuro Fukuhara, Emiko Mura, Toshiaki Tsurui, Risako Suzuki, Nana Iriguchi, Tomoyuki Ishiguro, Yuya Hirasawa, Ryo Manabe, Masahiro Shimokawa, Ryotaro Ohkuma, Hirotsugu Ariizumi, Yutaro Kubota, Kazuyuki Hamada, Sachiko Takenoshita, Kakei Ryu, Takehiko Sambe, Eisuke Inoue, Satoshi Wada, Kiyoshi Yoshimura, Hironori Sagara, Shinichi Kobayashi, Takuya Tsunoda. Promotive clinical effects of pembrolizumab with necitumumab in patients having advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression of 50% or higher in a phase II study (K-TAIL-202) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT032.

Abstract CT283: Phase 3 MK-2870-007 study: MK-2870 (SKB264) plus pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) monotherapy is a standard of care first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% without actionable genetic alterations; however, some patients do not respond to therapy or experience disease progression. Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) is another candidate for anticancer treatment and overexpression of TROP2 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC. MK-2870 (SKB264) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of the humanized TROP2 monoclonal antibody, a hydrolytically cleavable linker, and the cytotoxic drug KL610023. In patients with relapsed or refractory locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, MK-2870 monotherapy showed encouraging antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile. The complementary mechanisms of action of MK-2870 and pembrolizumab may provide more potent antitumor activity when given in combination compared with each therapy alone. To investigate this further, the MK-2870-007 study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of MK-2870 to pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. Trial Design: Approximately 614 eligible patients aged ≥18 y with previously untreated histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV (per American Joint Committee on Cancer v8.0) NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations (nonsquamous only); ECOG PS 0 or 1; and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 will be enrolled. Patients with well-controlled HIV are permitted. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W for up to 18 cycles plus MK-2870 4 mg/kg Q2W or pembrolizumab 400 mg IV Q6W alone until progressive disease, intercurrent illness, patient withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, prolonged interruption of study drug, or until maximum number of cycles (18 cycles for pembrolizumab). Randomization stratification factors include ECOG PS (0 vs 1), histology (squamous vs nonsquamous), TROP2 expression (low vs medium vs high), and geographic region (East Asia vs North America/Western Europe/Australia vs Rest of World). The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS, ORR, and duration of response per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Tumor imaging will occur at baseline, Q6W until wk 48, and Q12W thereafter until PD, start of new anticancer treatment, or withdrawal of consent. PD-L1 TPS will be assessed centrally using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Agilent Technologies, Carpinteria, CA). AEs will be graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Enrollment began in December 2023 and is currently ongoing. Citation Format: Nikolaj Frost, Razi Ghori, Ananya Roy, Ana Tablante Nunes, James Chih-Hsin Yang. Phase 3 MK-2870-007 study: MK-2870 (SKB264) plus pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT283.

Clinical phase II trial shows that combining osimertinib and afatinib resistance EGFR recurrent mutation in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

Treatment options for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations are limited due to resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Osimertinib or afatinib alone, in a preclinical model, created drug-resistant clones with EGFR secondary mutations, but their combination inhibited the emergence of these mutations. In a Phase II trial, we looked into the alternating-dose therapy of osimertinib and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Patients with stage IV NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation who had never received treatment were included. Every eight weeks, osimertinib (80 mg/day) and afatinib (20 mg/day) were given in alternate cycles. Utilising circulating tumour DNA collected both before and after therapy, genomic analysis was carried out. The median progression-free survival among the 50 enrolled patients was 21.3 months. A total of 70.3% of respondents responded. Overall median survival was not attained. 35 plasma samples were acquired after the development of resistance; 5 of these samples displayed an elevated MET gene copy number and 3 displayed a BRAF mutation. However, no secondary EGFR mutation was found. The effectiveness of our approach was comparable to that of osimertinib alone, as had been observed in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations in the past. The treatment may stop the emergence of EGFR secondary mutations that lead to medication resistance, despite the small sample size. To determine the importance of this treatment, more research is required.

Immunotherapy or Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Adults With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy combination treatment (ICI-chemotherapy) is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable oncogene alterations, but there are few data on ICI-chemotherapy for patients 75 years and older. To inform the choice of first-line drugs in clinical practice and assess the safety and efficacy of ICI-chemotherapy combination treatment in older adult patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. This retrospective cohort study included 58 centers in Japan. The cohort consisted of patients 75 years and older with clinical stage IIIB, IIIC, IV, postoperative or radiotherapy recurrent NSCLC. Patients started first-line systemic therapy between December 2018 and March 2021. Those receiving first-line molecular targeted drugs were excluded. The data were analyzed from February 2022 to October 2022. Systemic therapy. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. A total of 1245 patients (median [range] age, 78 [75-95] years; 967 [78%] male) with NSCLC were included in the cohort. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression of less than 1% occurred in 268 tumors (22%); 1% to 49% in 387 tumors (31%); 50% and higher in 410 tumors (33%), and unknown expression in 180 tumors (14%). Median OS was 20.0 (95% CI, 17.1-23.6) months for the 354 patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy (28%); 19.8 (95% CI, 16.5-23.8) months for the 425 patients receiving ICI alone (34%); 12.8 (95% CI, 10.7-15.6) months for the 311 patients receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy (25%); and 9.5 (95% CI, 7.4-13.4) months for the 155 patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy (12%). After propensity score matching, no differences in OS and PFS were found between the patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy vs ICI alone. Each group consisted of 118 patients. For PD-L1 expression of 1% and higher the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.67-1.42; P = .90), and the PFS HR was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.67-1.25; P = .59). Significance was also not reached when separately analyzed for lower or higher PD-L1 expression (1%-49% or ≥50%). However, grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 86 patients (24.3%) treated with ICI-chemotherapy and 76 (17.9%) with ICI alone (P = .03). In this study, ICI-chemotherapy combination treatment did not improve survival and increased the incidence of grade 3 and higher immune-related adverse events compared with ICI alone in patients 75 years and older. Based on these results, ICI alone may be recommended for older adult patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC.

The efficacy of furmonertinib in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations in a real-world setting: a single institutional experience.

Furmonertinib is the standard treatment option in the first-line setting for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in China. However, there are limited real-world data available. We conducted a retrospective study at a single center, analyzing a cohort of 73 NSCLC patients who tested positive for EGFR mutations and were treated with furmonertinib as their initial therapy between August 2022 and December 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. The median observation period was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-20.0). The median PFS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.6-24.4). OS data were not yet mature. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between PFS and factors such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, presence of brain or liver metastases, sex, age, EGFR mutation status, or number of metastatic sites. However, multivariate analysis indicated a potential trend toward extended PFS in patients younger than 65 years (p = 0.053, 95% CI, 0.10-1.02), although the p-value was only marginally significant. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (24%), anemia (36%), and liver injury (32%); however, only four cases experienced severe adverse events. In a real-world setting, furmonertinib appears to be a favorable treatment option for EGFR-mutated patients. The manageable nature of adverse events further supports its use in clinical practice.

Tanreqing suppresses the proliferation and migration of non-small cell lung cancer cells by mediating the inactivation of the HIF1α signaling pathway via exosomal circ-WDR78

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as regulators of cancer progression, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tanreqing (TRQ), a traditional Chinese medicine, is used clinically for respiratory diseases. RT-qPCR quantified circ-WDR78 expression in NSCLC cells. Cell growth, apoptosis, invasion, and migration were assessed by functional assays. RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP), luciferase reporter, and RNA pull-down assays determined the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network of circ-WDR78. The interaction between HIF1α and CD274 (PD-L1) promoter was analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Circ-WDR78 expression was up-regulated in TRQ-treated NSCLC cells. Functionally, circ-WDR78 exhibited anti-tumor effects in these cells. Additionally, circ-WDR78 could also induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation by down-regulating HIF1α expression, promoting autophagy. Mechanistically, circ-WDR78 destabilizes HIF1α via the miR-1265/FBXW8 axis. TRQ-induced exosome secretion from NSCLC cells inhibits PD-L1 expression, preventing immune escape. We found that TRQ-treated NSCLC cells secrete exosomes to transmit circ-WDR78 to untreated NSCLC cells, inhibiting the malignancy of recipient tumor cells. In conclusion, TRQ inhibits NSCLC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration through exosomal circ-WDR78-mediated inactivation of the HIF1α signaling pathway, providing potential insight into TRQ injection for NSCLC treatment. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Non-small cell lung cancer cells with uncommon EGFR exon 19delins variants respond poorly to third-generation EGFR inhibitors

BackgroundThis study compared the clinical efficacy of first-, second-, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19delins variants. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 19delins mutations who were treated with third- and first-generation EGFR TKIs. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to verify the sensitivity of these mutations to distinct generations of TKIs. Molecular simulation was used to investigate the structural characteristics of the EGFR mutant molecules. ResultsIn a multicenter cohort of 1,526 patients, 37 (2.4 %) had uncommon EGFR 19delins mutations. Twenty-four patients were treated with first-generation EGFR TKIs, and third-generation TKIs were administered to ten patients as frontline therapy. Patients carrying EGFR exon 19delins mutations who were given third-generation TKIs exhibited comparatively shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to those who received first-generation EGFR inhibitors; median PFS: 6.9 months vs. 19.1 months (p < 0.001), Median OS: 19.1 months vs. 32.6 months (p < 0.001). In vivo and in vitro studies revealed that uncommon EGFR 19delins variants exhibit limited sensitivity to third-generation EGFR inhibitors in contrast to first- and second-generation EGFR inhibitors. The molecular binding affinity of third-generation EGFR TKIs toward uncommon EGFR 19delins mutations was less than that of first- and second-generation EGFR inhibitors. ConclusionsUncommon EGFR 19delins variants respond poorly to third-generation EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC. Uncommon EGFR 19delins mutations may serve as an unfavorable predictive factor for the efficacy of third-generation EGFR TKI therapy, offering potential guidance for future clinical decision-making.

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the phase III CheckMate 227 Part 2 trial

In CheckMate 227 Part 1, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥1% versus chemotherapy. We report results from CheckMate 227 Part 2, which evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Seven hundred and fifty-five patients with systemic therapy-naive, stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR mutations or ALK alterations were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. OS in all randomized patients was a hierarchically tested secondary endpoint. At 19.5 months' minimum follow-up, no significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC [median OS 18.8 versus 15.6 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95.62% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.08, P= 0.1859]. Descriptive analyses showed OS improvement with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in all randomized patients (median OS 18.3 versus 14.7 months, HR 0.81, 95.62% CI 0.67-0.97) and in an exploratory analysis in squamous NSCLC (median OS 18.3 versus 12.0 months, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.97). A trend toward improved OS was seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, regardless of the tumor mutation status of STK11 or TP53, regardless of tumor mutational burden, and in patients with intermediate/poor Lung Immune Prognostic Index scores. Safety with nivolumab plus chemotherapy was consistent with previous reports of first-line settings. CheckMate 227 Part 2 did not meet the primary endpoint of OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Descriptive analyses showed prolonged OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy in all-randomized and squamous NSCLC populations, suggesting that this combination may benefit patients with untreated metastatic NSCLC.