Unresurfaced Patella Research Articles

Leaving the Patella Unresurfaced Does Not Increase the Risk of Short-Term Revision Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR).

Introduction The benefit of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains uncertain, with conflicting evidence regarding associated revision rates and clinical outcomes. Although initial studies have reported higher revision rates associated with unresurfaced patellae, recent evidence questions the necessity of routine patellar resurfacing. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of revision following TKA performed with and without patellar resurfacing using data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). Material and methods The AJRR was queried for all patients aged 65 and older undergoing elective TKA between January 2012 and March 2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Cases were linked using supplemental Centers for Medicare and Medicaid data. Cases with hybrid fixation, highly constrained implants, and revision components were excluded. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with a resurfaced patella and those without. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) curves and cause-specific Cox models were utilized to assess all-cause revision risk, adjusting for sex, age, femoral design (cruciate retaining vs posterior stabilized), fixation type (cemented vs cementless), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results Of the 390,304 TKAs with minimum two-year follow-up in our cohort, 22,829 had no patellar resurfacing performed. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) revealed no significant difference in all-cause revision (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.13, p=0.656), revision for mechanical loosening (HR=1.61 [0.88, 2.93], p=0.122), or revision for infection (HR=1.02 [0.79, 1.33], p=0.860) associated with patellar resurfacing status. Conclusion Our study found that patients with an unresurfaced patella do not face an increased short-term revision risk following TKA. These findings challenge the necessity of routine patellar resurfacing and underscore the importance of considering other factors, such as femoral design, patient comorbidities, and implant-related variables in revision risk stratification.

Global Trends in Patellar Resurfacing From 2004 to 2022

BackgroundInternational rates of patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are highly variable. This study sought to determine how trends in patellar resurfacing rates have changed between 2004 and 2022. In addition, we investigated how modern rates of revision have varied between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA among national joint registries. MethodsData between 2004 and 2022 was obtained either from the publicly available joint registry annual reports, a literature review, or via direct correspondence with registry personnel in Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, and India. Only English language national joint registries or data via direct correspondence with registry administrators were utilized. Additionally, the 10-year cumulative risk of revision TKA with and without patellar resurfacing was pulled from those registries that had this data available. ResultsThere were persistent differences in the rates of patellar resurfacing among countries. Australia documented a 40% increase in patellar resurfacing rates, while other countries demonstrated modest or little change in resurfacing rates. This may indicate that surgeons are making the decision to resurface based on national TKA revision rates. The average rates of patellar resurfacing in primary TKA ranged from 4% in Sweden to 94% in the United States. Canada, the United States, Australia, and Switzerland documented a lower risk of revision when the patella was resurfaced, while Sweden, conversely, showed a higher risk of revision with resurfacing. ConclusionsRates of patellar resurfacing in primary TKA were highly variable among countries, as were rates of change over time. It appears that the optimal patellar resurfacing strategy may depend mostly on unique patient factors and surgeon expertise. Future studies should attempt to elucidate the individual patient characteristics that contribute to increased risks of revision or anterior knee pain to determine who will most benefit from patellar resurfacing in primary TKA.

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Midterm Results

BackgroundLeaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae. MethodsA total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively. ResultsA total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035). ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature. Level of EvidenceIV.

Longer term follow up of outcomes following implantation of a modular rotating hinge knee prosthesis: 53 implants at mean 7.6 year follow up

BackgroundRotating hinge knee replacements are becoming more common but have historically had high complication and failure rates. This study is one of the largest to assess the implant survival and patient outcomes of a third-generation rotating hinge knee replacement at a single tertiary orthopaedic centre. MethodsData for consecutive operations at our tertiary unit between 2006 to 2020 were assessed with review of electronic patient and radiology records. The Oxford Knee Score was used to assess outcomes and the Kaplan Meier method used to estimate survivorship. Results53 rotating hinge knees were implanted in 46 patients (13 male, 33 female) at a mean age of 67.8 years. 21 were primary and 32 were revision procedures. Indications for use of this implant included instability, loosening, fracture and infection. Survivorship was 77.8% at the mean follow up of 7.6 years. A total of 29 complications were noted with ongoing pain, stiffness, infection and patellofemoral symptoms being the most common. 8% of unresurfaced patellas required a subsequent secondary resurfacing. The Oxford Knee Score demonstrated a significant improvement from 14.6 preoperatively to 27.5 at one year postoperatively, which was maintained in the longer term. ConclusionThe third-generation rotating hinge knee implant in use at our unit has improved outcomes for patients. The survivorship of the implant is comparable to the published literature, although there is a paucity of data. The complication rates remain relatively high and patients should be counselled appropriately. We advise resurfacing the patella to avoid the need for secondary procedures.

Variations in Trochlear Morphology of Contemporary and Legacy Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses: A Review of 22 Designs

BackgroundThe morphology of the trochlear compartment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses is a major determinant of postoperative patello-femoral kinematics, particularly with unresurfaced patellae. The objective of this study was to quantify and compare the trochlear morphology of a large series of contemporary and legacy TKA designs. MethodsThe 3-dimensional surface models of 22 femoral components (13 contemporary and 9 legacy) were created using high-resolution laser scanning. The trochlear profile of each component was analyzed from proximal to distal in 15° increments around the trochlear axis. In each profile, the following variables were measured: sulcus angle, medio-lateral deviation of the sulcus, the height and width of the facets, and the trochlear groove orientation. ResultsIn the contemporary group, the sulcus angle decreased progressively along the trochlear arc to varying degrees, except for 2 symmetrical designs, whereas the sulcus angle of the legacy designs showed considerable variability. The height of the medial facet was very strongly correlated with that of the lateral facet in the contemporary group (R2 = 0.89), whereas the correlation was weak for the legacy designs (R2 = 0.36). Moreover, the trochlear sulcus deviated laterally from distal to proximal in 10 contemporary designs and 7 legacy designs, resulting in a trochlear groove orientation of 4.2 to 11.1° and 4.3 to 10.5°, respectively. In the remaining 5 designs (3 contemporary and 2 legacy), the sulcus was vertical. ConclusionsThere is more consistency in trochlear morphology of contemporary TKA designs compared to that of legacy designs, yet there are still large variations between different designs.

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

BackgroundThe decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). MethodsThe American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs. ResultsRates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755). ConclusionThere was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BackgroundLeaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity. MethodsA total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up. ResultsPreoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135). ConclusionIn contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up. Level of EvidenceIII.

Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA.

Introduction:The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) acceptable to leave in a native patella during unresurfaced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of patellofemoral OA severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing.Methods:One hundred ninety-three primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patellofemoral OA severity was graded on severity, marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and chondral damage using accepted grading systems. Patellar tilt and tibiofemoral alignment were measured radiographically. PROMs were evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up.Results:In multivariate regression, preoperative lateral patella Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 was associated with superior change in Knee Society Score pain with level walking, higher absolute change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P ≤ 0.029), and knees ‟always feeling normal” (odds ratio [OR] 3.12; P = 0.005). Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas grades and Outerbridge classification scores did not significantly influence PROMs.Discussion:Worse preoperative OA severity in the lateral patellar facet, graded with the Kellgren-Lawrence system, predicted superior knee-specific PROMs in patients with unresurfaced patellae after contemporary TKA. This observation supports the clinical finding that patients with more severe OA have optimized patient outcomes and highlights the minimal contribution of patella OA to knee function after primary TKA.

Correlations of typical pain patterns with SPECT/CT findings in unhappy patients after total knee arthroplasty

PurposeThe diagnostic process in patients after painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. The more clinical and radiological information about a patient with pain after TKA is included in the assessment, the more reliable and sustainable the advice regarding TKA revision can be. The primary aim was to investigate the position of TKA components and evaluate bone tracer uptake (BTU) using pre-revision SPECT/CT and correlate these findings with previously published pain patterns in painful patients after TKA.MethodsA prospectively collected cohort of 83 painful primary TKA patients was retrospectively evaluated. All patients followed a standardized diagnostic algorithm including 99m-Tc-HDP-SPECT/CT, which led to a diagnosis indicating revision surgery. Pain character, location, dynamics and radiation were systematically assessed as well as TKA component position in 3D-CT. BTU was anatomically localized and quantified using a validated localization scheme. Component positioning and BTU were correlated with pain characteristics using non-parametric Spearman correlations (p < 0.05).ResultsBased on Spearman’s rho, significant correlations were found between pain and patients characteristics and SPECT/CT findings resulting in nine specific patterns. The most outstanding ones include: Pattern 1: More flexion in the femoral component correlated with tender/splitting pain and patella-related pathologies. Pattern 3: More varus in the femoral component correlated with dull/heavy and tingling/stinging pain during descending stairs, unloading and long sitting in patients with high BMI and unresurfaced patella. Pattern 6: More posterior slope in the tibial component correlated with constant pain.ConclusionThe results of this study help to place component positioning in the overall context of the "painful knee arthroplasty" including specific pain patterns. The findings further differentiate the clinical picture of a painful TKA. Knowing these patterns enables a prediction of the cause of the pain to be made as early as possible in the diagnostic process before the state of pain becomes chronic.Level of evidenceLevel III

Subchondral Bone Condition and Intraoperative Grading of Cartilage Degeneration Underneath Patella Unrelated to the Clinical Outcome after TKA with Unresurfaced Patella.

The degree of cartilage degeneration assessed intraoperatively may not be sufficient as a criterion for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is useful for detecting osteoarthritic involvement deeper in the subchondral bone. The purpose of the study was to determine whether SPECT/CT reflected the cartilage lesion underneath the patella in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and whether clinical outcomes after TKA without patellar resurfacing differed according to the severity of patellofemoral (PF) OA determined by visual assessment and SPECT/CT findings. This study included 206 knees which underwent TKA. The degree of cartilage degeneration was graded intraoperatively according to the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Subjects were classified into low and high uptake groups according to the degree of bone tracer uptake (BTU) on SPECT/CT in the PF joint. The Feller's patella score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed preoperatively and postoperative 1 and 2 years. The increased BTU in the PF joint was associated with more severe degenerative cartilage changes underneath the patella (p < 0.001). The risk for the presence of denudated cartilage was greater in the high uptake group (odds ratio = 5.89). There was no association between clinical outcomes and visual grading of patellar cartilage degeneration or the degree of BTU on SPECT/CT. The visual assessment of the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella and preoperative SPECT/CT evaluation of the PF joint were not predictive of clinical outcome after TKA with unresurfaced patella.

Uporaba intraoralnega skenerja za analizo površin pogačice pri totalni artroplastiki kolena

Using an intra-oral scanner for surface and evaluation is a novelty in orthopaedics. We introduced this method to compare the congruence between patellar and femoral component surfaces. The compared patellar surfaces were created either with resurfacing, retention of an un-resurfaced patella or patelloplasty, a reshaping method where both facets are resected to match the trochlear surface. In our prospective clinical study, two patients had their patellar surfaces scanned during knee endoprosthesis (Genesis II, Smith & Nephew) implantation, using TRIOS® (3Shape) intraoral laser scanner. Each patient’s patella was scanned three times. First, the original joint surface was scanned after arthrotomy, then scanned again after reshaping the patellar surface and finally scanned after resurfacing with the appropriate standard implant was performed. The acquired surface data were evaluated using CloudCompare software. A mathematical algorithm was used to achieve the best proximity between these surfaces. Distances between the surfaces were measured throughout 0–120° of knee flexion. We defined the measure of proximity as contact area On average, the area magnitude was 2.91±0.82 mm using the un-resurfacing method, 3.19±0.95 mm using the resurfaced method and 3.84±0.91 mm using patelloplasty. Leaving the patella un-resurfaced resulted in an improved area magnitude. The proximity of the surfaces increased with knee flexion until 75°. With this study, the use of an intra-oral scanner for the surface analysis and intraoperative congruence evaluation was demonstrated. This method could contribute to a better understanding of patellofemoral congruence during total knee arthroplasty.

Outcomes of Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty for Secondary Osteonecrosis of the Knee

BackgroundSecondary osteonecrosis of the knee (SOK) generally occurs in relatively young patients; at advanced stages of SOK, the only viable surgical option is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a retrospective study to investigate implant survivorship, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of contemporary cemented bicompartmental TKA with/without patellar resurfacing for SOK. MethodsThirty-eight cemented TKAs in 27 patients with atraumatic SOK, mean age 43 years (17 to 65), were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-four percent had a history of corticosteroid use, and 18% had a history of alcohol abuse. Patellar osteonecrosis was coincidentally found in six knees (16%), and all were asymptomatic without joint collapse. The mean followup was 7 years (2 to 12). Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks, 1 year, then every 2 to 3 years. ResultsNinety-two percent had implant survivorship free from revision with significant improvement in KSS. Causes of revision included aseptic tibial loosening (one), deep infection (one), and instability with patellofemoral issues (one). Four of six cases also with patellar osteonecrosis received resurfacing, including one with periprosthetic patellar fracture after minor trauma, with satisfactory clinical results after conservative treatment. None of the unrevised knees had progressive radiolucent lines or evidence of loosening. An unresurfaced patella, use of a stem extension or a varus-valgus constrained prosthesis constituted 18%, 8% and 3%, respectively. ConclusionCemented TKAs with selective stem extension in patients with SOK had satisfactory implant survivorship and reliable outcomes. Secondary osteonecrosis of the patella should be carefully evaluated prior to operation.

Literature review of the causes of pain following total knee replacement surgery: prosthesis, inflammation and arthrofibrosis

Adverse knee pain occurs in 10–34% of all total knee replacements (TKR), and 20% of TKR patients experience more pain post-operatively than pre-operatively. Knee pain is amongst the top five reasons for knee replacement revision in the United Kingdom. The number of TKRs is predicted to continue increasing due to the ageing population.A narrative literature review was performed on the different causes of pain following TKR. A database search on Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar was conducted to look for articles related to TKR, pain, and cause. Articles were selected based on relevance, publication date, quality of research and validation. Relevant sections were added to the review.One hundred and fourteen articles were identified and potential causes of TKR pain included: arthrofibrosis, aseptic loosening, avascular necrosis, central sensitization, component malpositioning, infection, instability, nerve damage, overstuffing, patellar maltracking, polyethylene wear, psychological factors and unresurfaced patella.It is important to tailor our approach to address the individual causes of pain. Certain controllable risk factors can be managed pre-operatively to minimize post-operative pain. Risk factors help to predict adverse pain outcomes and identify specific causes.There are multiple causes of pain following TKR. Some factors will require further extensive studies, and as pain is a commonly attributed reason for TKR revision, its underlying aetiologies should be explored. Understanding these factors helps to develop effective methods for diagnosis, prevention and management of TKR pain, which help to improve patient outcomes.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:534-543. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200031

Influence of patellar implantation on the patellofemoral joint of an anatomic customised total knee replacement implant: A case study.

Few studies have been conducted to investigate kinematics and kinetics of the patellofemoral joint under physiological muscle forces and ankle joint loads. In this study, a preliminary design of a customised total knee implant was proposed and created. To compare the influences of different patella treatment scenarios, a dynamic knee simulation model was created with patient-specific muscle forces and ankle joint loads that are calculated from an OpenSim musculoskeletal model. The goal is to improve patellar implant-bone connection and restore patellofemoral joint mobility. Identical dynamic boundary conditions were applied on an unresurfaced patella and three different dome-shaped patellar implants. It was found that the unresurfaced patella and patellar implants resulted in different motions of patellar internal rotation and medial tilt. The size of the dome-shaped patellar implant affected the motion and loading of the patellofemoral joint. When the exposed patella bone was not fully covered by the patellar implant, the patella bone then contacted the femoral component during knee flexion. This would most likely lead to anterior knee pain and subsequent revision.

The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundPatellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon’s preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced. MethodsData from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed. ResultsFor all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001). ConclusionResurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.

Insufficiency fracture of the unresurfaced patella following total knee arthroplasty

Insufficiency fracture of the unresurfaced patella following total knee arthroplasty

Coronal femoral TKA position significantly influences in vivo patellar loading in unresurfaced patellae after primary total knee arthroplasty.

As patellar tracking and loading is influenced by tibial tuberosity and trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patellar height, thickness and tilt as well as TKA component position, it was our hypothesis that these parameters significantly correlate with patellar BTU intensity and localization in SPECT/CT. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether TKA component position as well as the height, thickness and tilt of the unresurfaced patella influences the intensity and the distribution pattern of BTU in SPECT/CT. A total of 62 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA without patellar resurfacing were prospectively included. Demographic data such as age, gender, side and type of primary TKA were noted. All patients underwent clinical and radiological examination in a specialized knee clinic, including standardized radiographs (anterior-posterior and lateral weight bearing, patellar skyline view) and Tc-99m-HDP-SPECT/CT before, 12 and 24months after TKA. SPECT/CT images were analysed on 3D reconstructed images. Rotational, sagittal and coronal position of the tibial and femoral TKA components was assessed using a previously validated analysis software. Measurements of BTU including intensity and anatomical distribution pattern were also performed from 3D data. The patellar height, thickness and tilt were measured, and the distance between TT and TG was measured using axial CT images. Univariate analysis was performed to identify any correlations between BTU and TKA component position and patellar measurements (p<0.05). The highest median BTU was measured in the superior posterior parts of the patella. A statistically significant correlation was found between valgus alignment of the femoral TKA and increased BTU at the lateral patellar regions (p<0.05). External rotation of the tibial TKA correlated with increased BTU at the lateral superior joint adjacent part (p<0.05). No correlation was found between the tibial TKA position (varus-valgus, anterior and posterior slope), TT-TG distance, patellar height and patellar BTU values. A significant correlation of increased patellar BTU was found with femoral valgus TKA alignment. These findings highlight the importance of femoral TKA position in coronal plane with regard to post-operative patellar tracking. Moreover, these facts might explain anterior knee pain in unhappy TKA with femoral valgus alignment. Diagnostic study, Level II.

Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundTo resurface or not to resurface the patella remains a controversy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes associated with selectively not resurfacing the patella. MethodsThis was a historical cohort study of 15,497 patients with 21,371 primary TKA procedures performed at a single institution between 1985 and 2010. The cohort included 402 (2%) knees with unresurfaced patellae and 20,969 knees with all-polyethylene patellae designs. Reasons for not resurfacing the patella were documented. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of complications and revisions among procedures with unresurfaced patellae. ResultsAccording to the surgeon, reasons for not resurfacing were normal cartilage (226, 56%), young patient (30, 8%), thin patella (53, 13%), and surgeons' choice (93, 23%). In age, sex, and calendar year-adjusted analyses, the risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.46) and all-cause revisions (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89) were significantly higher after TKA with unresurfaced patellae. However, after adjusting for femoral component types and operative diagnoses, these associations were no longer significant. The only group with significantly worse outcomes were those with a thin patellae with increased risk of complications (HR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.70, 4.17) and revisions (HR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.35, 15.02). Yet, the excess risk in the thin patellae group was mainly due to infections, and not related to unresurfaced patellae. ConclusionSelectively not resurfacing the patella seemed to provide similar results compared with routine resurfacing.

International Rates of Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, 2004-2014

BackgroundPatella resurfacing is performed in >80% of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in the United States, yet far fewer patellae are resurfaced internationally. Recent registry data have begun to question the long-held belief that patellar resurfacing yields lower revision rates. Multiple current meta-analyses have not shown a difference in patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, or knee society scores based on patellar resurfacing. MethodsWe sought to determine how the rates of patellar resurfacing have changed over the past 10 years worldwide (2004-2014). Data were abstracted from the annual reports of 7 national joint registries, literature review, or via direct correspondence with registry administrators. ResultsAverage rates of patellar resurfacing from 2004 to 2014 ranged from 4% (Norway) to 82% (United States). The largest decrease in resurfacing rates was in Sweden (15%-2%), whereas the biggest increase was in Australia (44%-59%). In 2010, only 48,367 of 137,813 (35%) primary TKAs from all registries outside the United States were resurfaced. Meta-analyses have demonstrated no difference in anterior knee pain or satisfaction scores but do consistently report increased revision rates for unresurfaced patellae. Recent Swedish registry data, however, showed a reverse trend toward higher revision rates after resurfacing. ConclusionDespite recent registry data and meta-analyses demonstrating equivalent outcomes among resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA, worldwide trends in patellar resurfacing have changed little over the past decade. Most countries outside the United States continue to resurface a much smaller proportion of patellae.

Diagnostic Algorithm for Residual Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Although total knee arthroplasty is a successful and cost-effective procedure, patient dissatisfaction remains as high as 50%. Postoperative residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty, with or without crepitation, is a major factor that contributes to patient dissatisfaction. The most common location for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty is anteriorly. Because residual pain has been associated with an un-resurfaced patella, this review includes only registry data and total knee arthroplasty with patella replacement. Some suggest that the pathogenesis of residual knee pain may be related to mechanical stimuli that activate free nerve endings around the patellofemoral joint. Various etiologies have been implicated in residual pain, including (1) low-grade infection, (2) midflexion instability, and (3) component malalignment with patellar maltracking. Less common causes include (4) crepitation and patellar clunk syndrome; (5) patellofemoral symptoms, including overstuffing and avascular necrosis of the patella; (6) early aseptic loosening; (7) hypersensitivity to metal or cement; (8) complex regional pain syndrome; and (9) pseudoaneurysm. Because all of these conditions can lead to residual pain, identifying the etiology can be a difficult diagnostic challenge. Often, patients with persistent pain and normal findings on radiographs and laboratory workup may benefit from a diagnostic injection or further imaging. However, up to 10% to 15% of patients with residual pain may have unexplained pain. This literature review summarizes the findings on the causes of residual pain and presents a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate an accurate diagnosis for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty.