Unresectable Stage Research Articles

Esophagitis and Pneumonitis Related to Concurrent Chemoradiation ± Durvalumab Consolidation in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Risk Assessment and Management Recommendations Based on a Modified Delphi Process

The addition of durvalumab consolidation to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) has fundamentally changed the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, concerns related to esophagitis and pneumonitis potentially impact the broad application of all regimen components. A Canadian expert working group (EWG) was convened to provide guidance to healthcare professionals (HCPs) managing these adverse events (AEs) and to help optimize the patient experience. Integrating literature review findings and real-world clinical experience, the EWG used a modified Delphi process to develop 12 clinical questions, 30 recommendations, and a risk-stratification guide. The recommendations address risk factors associated with developing esophagitis and pneumonitis, approaches to risk mitigation and optimal management, and considerations related to initiation and re-initiation of durvalumab consolidation therapy. For both AEs, the EWG emphasized the importance of upfront risk assessment to inform the treatment approach, integration of preventative measures, and prompt initiation of suitable therapy in alignment with AE grade. The EWG also underscored the need for timely, effective communication between multidisciplinary team members and clarity on responsibilities. These recommendations will help support HCP decision-making related to esophagitis and pneumonitis arising from cCRT ± durvalumab and improve outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Adjuvant Use of Pembrolizumab for Stage III Melanoma in a Real-World Setting in Europe

Background: Although data on patients treated with pembrolizumab are available from clinical trials and single-country real-world reports, to our knowledge no multi-country real-world studies have investigated the use of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment for stage III melanoma. Methods: We used the European Melanoma Registry (EUMelaReg), a disease entity-based registry specific for melanoma, to examine treatment and outcomes for adult patients with stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement who had complete resection and received adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. The primary objectives were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients as well as time on adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment (TOT), real-world recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) from adjuvant pembrolizumab initiation. Secondary objectives were time to next treatment (TTNT) after adjuvant use of pembrolizumab, next-line therapy for stage III and unresectable stage IV melanoma and overall survival (OS) from initiation of pembrolizumab. Results: Patients were stratified according to age, sex, BRAF status, number of positive lymph nodes and disease substage. Median TOT was 11.1 (9.2–11.5) months, median RFS was 29.6 [18.7–not reached (NR)] months and median DMFS was 32.4 (22.7–NR) months. TTNT was 29.9 (22.2–NR) months, while median OS was not reached. Conclusions: The results of this study offer insights into the real-world use of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant therapy for melanoma in Europe.

Real-world Prognostic Data on Unresectable Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy by Histological Type.

Objective The current standard treatment for locally advanced, unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) and durvalumab administration. Although reports have indicated that the prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma is poorer than that of adenocarcinoma, real-world data are currently inadequate. Methods The present study analyzed patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT at the study center between April 2018 and February 2022. These patients were retrospectively classified into adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma groups for an analysis of the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and patient background factors, including the age, performance status, smoking history, and pre-CCRT laboratory data. Results A total of 109 patients were included for the analysis; 25 were excluded, and 44 and 40 patients were classified into the adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma groups, respectively. The median PFS was significantly longer in the adenocarcinoma group than in the squamous cell carcinoma group [27.9 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 15.2-not achieved) vs. 9.63 (95% CI: 5.88-13.9) months; p<0.01]. Similarly, the median OS was significantly longer in the adenocarcinoma group than in the squamous cell carcinoma group [not achieved (95% CI: 48.1-not achieved) vs. 23.8 (95% CI; 14.6-not achieved) months; p<0.01]. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the histological type was the only prognostic factor for the PFS (p<0.05) and OS (p<0.05). Conclusion The median PFS and OS were poorer in patients with squamous cell carcinoma than in those with stage III NSCLC treated with CCRT and durvalumab. The histological type was an independent factor affecting the PFS and OS.

Exciting progress in targeted therapy innovation for unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC: the phase III LAURA study.

Exciting progress in targeted therapy innovation for unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC: the phase III LAURA study.

A retrospective comparison of induction chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation immunotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) usually bear high tumor burden and are not tolerated well to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by consolidation immunotherapy. We investigated the feasibility of chemoimmunotherapy as induction therapy before CRT for LA-NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed data from 91 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with either induction chemoimmunotherapy or chemotherapy before CRT. Tumor responses, survival statistics, and toxic effects were compared. The dosimetric parameters of the RT protocol were evaluated. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The overall response (ORR), the depth of response (DpR) were accessed at the end of CRT (ORRinduc+CRT, DpRinduc+CRT) and induction therapy (ORRinduc, DpRinduc). The median PFS (mPFS) were significantly longer in the chemoimmunotherapy induction group (13.5 months vs. 11.2 months; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.97; p=0.036). The ORRinduc+CRT, median DpRinduc+CRT (mDpRinduc+CRT) and mDpRinduc were significantly higher in the chemoimmunotherapy induction group (ORRinduc+CRT, 84.0% vs. 65.9%, p=0.044; mDpRinduc+CRT, 49.5% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.012; mDpRinduc, 38.5% vs. 28.0%, p=0.044). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) was similar between groups, with myelosuppression being the most common grade ≥ 3 AE. Regarding radiotherapy, adopting a mapping strategy with a 5-8 mm margin for clinical tumor volume resulted in decreased radiation doses to critical organs in the chemoimmunotherapy induction group. Chemoimmunotherapy induction therapy before CRT improves efficacy with comparable incidence of AEs compared to chemotherapy induction in LA-NSCLC patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Evaluation of Radiation Pneumonitis in a Phase II Study of Consolidation Immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LUN16-081

Purpose/Objective(s)The addition of immunotherapy (IO) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become common practice in eligible patients. Approaches to further improve outcomes and reduce treatment-related toxicity for these patients are needed. This study evaluates the risk of radiation pneumonitis after CCRT and its correlation with the radiation dose distribution, immunotherapy regimen (nivolumab vs nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and patient demographics across BTCRC-LUN16-081. Materials/MethodsPatients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after completion of CCRT were enrolled on BTCRC-LUN16-081, a randomized phase II trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of consolidative nivolumab versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab for six months. Radiation dose parameters, patient demographics, and toxicity events were evaluated among treatment arms for risk and severity of pneumonitis. ResultsOne-hundred and five patients were enrolled into two treatment arms, 54 patients received nivolumab alone and 51 patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Of these, 104 patients had dose volume histogram (DVH) information available. Within this cohort, 65 patients (62.5%) had stage IIIA and 39 patients (37.5%) had stage IIIB NSCLC disease per AJCC 7th edition. During the study, 29 patients (27.9%) were diagnosed with grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Utilizing logistic regression and evaluating different cut-offs for lung V20, patients with V20 >23% demonstrated significantly higher grade 2 or greater pneumonitis rates (37.1% vs. 16.2%, P = .031). No significant difference in rates of pneumonitis between arms were identified. Traditional lung DVH cut-offs (V5 of >65%, V20 of >35%, mean >20 Gy) were not associated with pneumonitis. ConclusionIn patients receiving nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab after definitive CCRT, lung V20 of >23% was associated with an increased risk of grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Radiation dose constraints for lungs in patients receiving consolidative IO after CCRT should continue to be evaluated and optimized when feasible.

A case of salvage surgery following chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab for initially unresectable superior sulcus tumor with N3 involvement

BackgroundDurvalumab after chemoradiation (PACIFIC regimen) provides favorable treatment outcomes for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The feasibility of salvage surgery after the PACIFIC regimen has been reported in some studies; however, its efficacy remains unclear. We herein present the first case of salvage surgery after the PACIFIC regimen for a superior sulcus tumor with N3 involvement, in which a pathological complete response was achieved.Case presentationA 53-year-old man with a left superior sulcus tumor with N3 (# 1L, #4R) involvement (adenocarcinoma, clinical T3N3M0/IIIC) underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (2 cycles of cisplatin plus vinorelbine with 60 Gy radiotherapy) followed by durvalumab treatment for 1 year at a previous hospital. The PACIFIC regimen provided a significant primary tumor shrinkage (diameter 3.1 cm to 0.5 cm) with the disappearance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in all nodes. Six months after the end of the PACIFIC regimen, only the primary tumor showed enlargement (diameter 0.5 cm to 2.0 cm). Accordingly, local tumor recurrence was suspected. Salvage surgery (left upper lobectomy with combined chest wall resection [1st to 4th rib]) was performed. The histological examination revealed no viable tumor cells (ypT0N0M0). At 7 months after salvage surgery, the patient remains alive with no signs of tumor recurrence.ConclusionsThe present case suggests that salvage surgery may be feasible after the PACIFIC regimen for superior sulcus tumors. A long-term follow-up is essential to determine the efficacy of salvage surgery.

EP.08F.12 Toxicity and Outcomes by Radio-Sensitizing Chemotherapy Regimen for Unresectable Stage III NSCLC in British Columbia, Canada

EP.08F.12 Toxicity and Outcomes by Radio-Sensitizing Chemotherapy Regimen for Unresectable Stage III NSCLC in British Columbia, Canada

EP.08F.05 Real World Evidence of Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Durvalumab in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC in Japan: AYAME Study

EP.08F.05 Real World Evidence of Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Durvalumab in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC in Japan: AYAME Study

OA12.03 Osimertinib After Definitive CRT in Unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC: Safety Outcomes from the Phase 3 LAURA Study

OA12.03 Osimertinib After Definitive CRT in Unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC: Safety Outcomes from the Phase 3 LAURA Study

EP.11A.27 Real-Life Study of Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Durvalumab.

EP.11A.27 Real-Life Study of Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Durvalumab.

EP.08D.15 Radical Surgery after Induction Therapy for Initially Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

EP.08D.15 Radical Surgery after Induction Therapy for Initially Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PD-L1 as a Biomarker for the Efficacy of Durvalumab in Stage III EGFR Mutant NSCLC.

Durvalumab consolidation is less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFR M+) NSCLC. Studies of durvalumab on EGFR M+ NSCLC as an expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of durvalumab on PD-L1 expression in EGFR M+ patients. This study included 249 unresectable stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Cox multivariate analysis was performed based on EGFR and PD-L1 statuses: EGFR M-, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort A); EGFR M-, PD-L1 <50% (cohort B); EGFR M+, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort C); and EGFR M+, PD-L1 <50% (cohort D). Overall, 31 of 249 (12.4%) and 218 of the 249 (87.6%) patients had EGFR M+ and EGFR M- NSCLC, respectively. Median PFSs and OSs did not differ (PFS: 16.6 vs. 18.7 months, p=0.591; OS: 37.4 vs. 35.7 months, p=0.271). Median PFS of cohort A did not significantly differ from the median PFSs of cohorts B and C, but it was significantly longer than the median PFS of cohort D (23.7 vs. 15.2 months, p=0.045). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that cohort D exhibited a worse PFS (adjusted hazard ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.66, p=0.025) compared with cohort A. Median OSs were not different between the four cohorts. Durvalumab consolidation provided similar benefit in EGFR M+ patients with PD-L1 ≥50% compared with EGFR M- patients. A therapeutic role of durvalumab in patients with EGFR M+, high PD-L1 unresectable stage III NSCLC should be considered.

Recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer.

Lung cancer has a poor prognosis, and further improvements in outcomes are needed. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of unresectable lung cancer, and there have been recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer. However, to date, there have been few reviews on the improvement in treatment outcomes associated with high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Thus, this review aimed to summarize the recent developments in radiotherapy techniques and indicate the future directions in the use of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable stage I lung cancer has been reported to improve local control rates without severe adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis. For locally advanced lung cancer, a combination of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors dramatically improves treatment outcomes, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enables safer radiation therapy with less frequent pneumonitis. Particle beam therapy, such as carbon-ion radiotherapy and proton beam therapy, has been administered as advanced medical care for patients with lung cancer. Since 2024, it has been covered under insurance for early stage lung cancer with tumors ≤ 5cm in size in Japan. In addition to chemotherapy, local ablative radiotherapy improves treatment outcomes in patients with oligometastatic stage IV lung cancer. A particular problem with radiotherapy for lung cancer is that the target location changes with respiratory motion, and various physical methods have been used to control respiratory motion. Recently, coronavirus disease has had a major impact on lung cancer treatment, and cancer treatment during situations, such as the coronavirus pandemic, must be performed carefully. To improve treatment outcomes for lung cancer, it is necessary to fully utilize evolving radiotherapy modalities, and the role of radiotherapy in lung cancer treatment is expected to increase.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus relatlimab

Abstract The use of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been a pivotal advancement in treating advanced melanoma, yet their efficacy is limited. The approval of relatlimab (RELA), a lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG-3) antibody, in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), a PD-1 inhibitor, marked a significant stride toward enhancing treatment efficacy for metastatic and unresectable stage 3 and 4 melanoma. This combination has been shown to synergistically improve antitumor activity and effector T-cell activity in the tumor microenvironment, despite limited data on real-world outcomes. Our retrospective review at a tertiary cancer center of patients with stage 3 and 4 melanoma treated with NIVO-RELA revealed an overall response rate (ORR) of 39%, with notable improvements in median PFS and ORR, especially in first-line treated patients. Our study highlights the superior efficacy of NIVO-RELA over previous reports, demonstrating its significant potential in the treatment landscape of advanced melanoma.

Osimertinib after definitive chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses of central nervous system efficacy and distant progression from the phase III LAURA study

Distant metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a poor prognostic factor that negatively impact quality of life. The central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of distant progression in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor recommended for advanced EGFRm NSCLC and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFRm NSCLC. In LAURA (NCT03521154), osimertinib demonstrated statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC without progression during/following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). CNS efficacy and time to death or distant metastases (TTDM) analyses are reported here. Patients without progression during/following definitive platinum-based CRT were randomised 2 : 1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg daily) or placebo until progression [by blinded independent central review (BICR)] or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was PFS by BICR. CNS PFS by neuroradiologist BICR and TTDM by BICR were secondary endpoints. Overall, 216 patients were randomised (143 osimertinib, 73 placebo). Median CNS PFS by neuroradiologist BICR was not reached [95% confidence interval (CI) not calculable (NC)-NC] with osimertinib versus 14.9 months (95% CI 7.4 months-NC) with placebo; hazard ratio (HR) for CNS PFS: 0.17 (95% CI 0.09-0.32). CNS PFS analysis by investigator assessment was consistent with BICR assessment. The cumulative incidence of CNS progression at 12 months was 9% (95% CI 5% to 14%) with osimertinib and 36% (95% CI 24% to 47%) with placebo. There was clinically meaningful improvement in TTDM with osimertinib versus placebo; HR for TTDM: 0.21 (95% CI 0.11-0.38). The cumulative incidence of distant metastases at 12 months was 11% (95% CI 6% to 17%) with osimertinib and 37% (95% CI 26% to 48%) with placebo. Osimertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in CNS PFS and TTDM versus placebo, supporting osimertinib post-CRT as the standard of care in unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC.

A phase II study of weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in older adults with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LOGIK1902).

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is little evidence supporting its use in older adults. Low-dose daily carboplatin combined with thoracic radiotherapy is considered a standard regimen for this population. To establish a simple and feasible carboplatin administration method, we conducted a study of weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for older adults with locally advanced NSCLC. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial included patients aged ≥75 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients received chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions plus concurrent weekly carboplatin at an area under curve of 2 mg mL-1 min-1). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. From July 2020 to June 2022, 37 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and 36 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The ORR was 63.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6-77.5). Median PFS was 14.6 months (95% CI = 9.1-18.1). Median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI = 17.4-not reached). Grade 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in one patient (2.8%) each. Weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy was safe in older adults with locally advanced NSCLC, and promising activity was observed.

ASCO 2024: Advances in lung cancer treatments and care: A new standard of care therapy based on the results of the LAURA study underscores the need for testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with unresectable stage III lung cancer.

ASCO 2024: Advances in lung cancer treatments and care: A new standard of care therapy based on the results of the LAURA study underscores the need for testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with unresectable stage III lung cancer.

Consolidation ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Versus Durvalumab or Observation After Chemoradiation in Unresectable Stage III ALK-Positive NSCLC

IntroductionPatients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC typically have poor response to immunotherapy; the benefit of consolidation durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC remains unclear. Herein, we compare the efficacy and safety of consolidation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) versus durvalumab or observation after concurrent chemoradiation. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study using a multicenter study of 17 institutions globally. Patients with unresectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC treated between 2015 and 2022 were included. Patients received ALK TKI, durvalumab, or observation after concurrent chemoradiation. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were classified by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Outcomes were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. ResultsA total of 67 patients were included, of whom 39 (58%) were female. Median age was 57 (interquartile range: 49–67) years. Furthermore, 15 received consolidation ALK TKI, 30 received durvalumab, and 22 underwent observation. Baseline characteristics were similar across the three groups other than differences in race. After adjusting for stage, age, and nodal status, median rwPFS was significantly longer for ALK TKI (rwPFS not reached, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.7– not reached) versus durvalumab (11.3 mo, 95% CI: 8.9–18.5, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.026–0.5, p-adjusted [p-adj] = 0.006) or observation (7.2 mo, 95% CI: 3.4–10.6, HR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.009–0.2, p-adj < 0.0001). Durvalumab significantly improved median rwPFS compared with observation (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19–0.71, p-adj = 0.002). Median OS in the ALK TKI and durvalumab cohorts was significantly improved compared with patients on observation (ALK TKI-observation: p = 0.04; durvalumab-observation: p = 0.03). TrAE of any grade occurred in eight (53%) and 11 (37%) patients treated with ALK TKI and durvalumab, respectively. Grade greater than or equal to three trAEs occurred in 27% (n = 4) of patients treated with ALK TKI and 6.7% of patients treated with durvalumab. ConclusionsPatients with ALK-positive NSCLC experience significantly improved rwPFS when treated with consolidation ALK TKI therapy, surpassing outcomes found with either durvalumab or observation. Although both ALK TKI therapy and durvalumab offer an extension in OS compared with observation alone, it seems that ALK TKI therapy is the superior choice, underscoring its pivotal role in enhancing patient survival.

LBA51 Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and treatment responses in chemotherapy-ineligible patients (pts) with unresectable stage III NSCLC from the phase II DUART trial

LBA51 Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and treatment responses in chemotherapy-ineligible patients (pts) with unresectable stage III NSCLC from the phase II DUART trial