Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with PD-L1 Expression Status in Japan.

Atezolizumab has demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the IMpower110 trial. The aim of this study was to evaluate thecost-effectiveness of atezolizumab as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable advanced NSCLC, including programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive probability testing, from the perspective of healthcare costs in Japan. A cost-effectiveness analysis model for atezolizumab, including PD-L1-positive probability testing, was used toconstruct a partitioned survival model with three health states. To assess the robustness, aprobabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted. The acceptable probability wasdefined asthe probability of willingness-to-pay (WTP) over theincremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Multiple repetitions at WTP thresholds were calculated by continuously reducing the atezolizumabprice. The ICER per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for atezolizumab therapy only for patients with high PD-L1 expressioncompared to platinum-based chemotherapy for all patients was 31,975,792 yen per QALY. This is higher than the WTP threshold of 15,000,000yen. If the cost of atezolizumab were reduced to 54% of theoriginal cost (563,917 yen), the strategy of using atezolizumab for patients with high PD-L1 could become more cost-effective. The results indicated that atezolizumab was not cost-effective compared to platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable advanced NSCLC. However, we suggest that the price of atezolizumab shouldbe reduced to 54% of theoriginal cost to meet the WTP threshold of 15,000,000 yen per QALY.

The timing of durvalumab administration affects the risk of pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeThe PACIFIC study has demonstrated that the administration of durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve both overall survival and progression-free survival rates in patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. While the latest NCCN guidelines recommend this combination regimen, they do not specify the optimal timing for administering durvalumab after completing radiotherapy. The PACIFIC study suggested initiating durvalumab within 42 days of completing radiotherapy, but early administration of the drug may increase the incidence of pneumonitis. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether the time interval between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of durvalumab treatment is associated with the risk of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3), which is the primary endpoint, as well as progression-free survival, which is the secondary endpoint.MethodsA comprehensive search of clinical trials in PubMed and EMBASE was conducted up to March 2023 to identify clinical trials involving locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer patients who were treated with durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy. Meta-analysis was performed on single-arm studies to estimate the incidence of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3) and progression-free survival in all studies, as well as in studies that administered durvalumab within 42 days after completion of radiotherapy.ResultsThis meta-analysis consisted of nine studies with a total of 2560 patients. The analysis showed that the incidence of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3) was 5.36% [95%CI (0.03, 0.08), I2 = 18.41%, p = 0.29], while the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 57.91% [95%CI (0.53, 0.63), I2 = 10.57%, p = 0.35]. Furthermore, when the duration between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of durvalumab treatment was shorter than 42 days, the incidence of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3) was 4.12% [95%CI (0.02, 0.06), I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.56], with a 1-year progression-free survival rate of 61.03% [95%CI (0.51, 0.71), I2 = 59.06%, p = 0.09].ConclusionOverall, based on the available evidence, it appears that there is no significant increase in pneumonitis or decrease in progression-free survival (PFS) when the time interval is less than 42 days and a shorter interval between treatment sessions does not necessarily have a detrimental effect on the rate of pneumonitis. We recommend that clinicians carefully evaluate the specific circumstances of each patient to determine the optimal timing for initiating immunotherapy.

Impact of Lymphopenia on Treatment Outcomes in Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between lymphopenia and radiotherapy (RT) parameters. Moreover, to investigate the prognostic role of lymphopenia, and treatment and patient-related factors. Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) with consolidative durvalumab offers the best chance for cure in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) may negatively impact outcomes. Fifty-four patients treated with CRT and durvalumab from 2017 to 2021 at a single academic center were prospectively included. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), and neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were analyzed before (TLR1), and after CRT (TRL2), before durvalumab initiation (TRL3), and 3 months after CRT (TRL4). Patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's Exact tests. Nonparametric continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. Association of continuous clinical and dosimetric variables with hematologic toxicity was performed with Spearman's correlation. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess the probability of PFS and OS Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the effect of covariates on disease control rate. Variables that were strongly associated in univariate Cox regression analyses were entered into a multivariable Cox model. All statistical tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using STATA version 15.1. The median follow-up was 28.4 months (m). N2-3 disease showed worse TRL2 compared to N0-1 (p = 0.013). Table 1 shows RT parameters related to TLR2. Median time to durvalumab initiation after CRT was 47 days. Patients who started durvalumab later than 42 days had a greater decrease in lymphocytes at the end of CRT compared to those who started earlier. (70.1 vs 58.8%, p = 0.025). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 39.4 and 22.4m, respectively. Disease control rate (DCR) with durvalumab consolidation was 70.8%. Patients with NLR >4 prior to durvalumab initiation achieved a lower DCR compared to those with a NLR ≤4 (85.7 vs 14.3%, p = 0.005). CRT-related immunosuppression is associated with delayed durvalumab initiation and worse DCR. Larger PTV and higher lung and heart doses are associated with TRL. Median real-world OS and PFS are similar to those in the PACIFIC trial.

CtDNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Sensitive and reliable biomarkers for early detection of recurrence are needed to improve post-definitive radiation risk stratification, disease management, and outcomes for patients with unresectable early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). This prospective, multistate single-center, cohort study investigated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status with recurrence in patients with unresectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent definitive RT. A total of 70 serial plasma samples from 17 NSCLC patients were collected before, during, and after treatment. A personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay was used to track a set of up to 16 somatic, single nucleotide variants in the associated patient's plasma samples. Pre-treatment ctDNA detection rate was 82% (14/17) and varied based on histology and stage. ctDNA was detected in 35% (6/17) of patients at the first post-RT timepoint (median of 1.66 months following the completion of RT), all of whom subsequently developed clinical progression. At this first post-RT time point, patients with ctDNA-positivity had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 24.2, p=0.004], and ctDNA-positivity was the only significant prognostic factor associated with PFS (HR: 13.4, p=0.02) in a multivariate analysis. All patients who developed clinical recurrence had detectable ctDNA with an average lead time over radiographic progression of 5.4 months, and post-RT ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). Personalized, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring can detect recurrence early in patients with unresectable NSCLC patients undergoing curative radiation and potentially risk-stratify patients who might benefit most from treatment intensification.

Predictors, surrogate, and patient-reported outcomes in immunotherapy and salvage surgery for unresectable lung cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

Medical treatment has changed drastically in recent years, especially for advanced stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), for which the development of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy significantly increased survival and quality of life. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcome predictors, the surrogate outcomes, and the patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for initially unresectable NSCLC. Patients affected by an initially unresectable NSCLC and identified between March 2014 and December 2021 who received immunotherapy alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were collected. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient-reported outcomes were recorded using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life (QoL) Group questionnaire-Lung Cancer 29 Module to compare differences in symptoms and QoL at two different times, 30days and 1year after surgery. Surgical, pathological records, and patient-reported outcomes (at 30days and 1year after surgery) were reviewed. Complete pathological remission was achieved in 7 patients (36.8%) and major pathological remission in 3 patients (15.7%). The median overall survival in the study group is 19months (range: 2-57.4). Of 19 patients, 16 (84.2%) are alive to date, of which 2 (10.5%) have a local recurrence. At 30days from surgery, the main symptoms reported by EORTC Module were coughing, shortness of breath, the side effect of treatment, fear of progression, and surgery-related problems. Induction immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy can be considered for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC, and after the downstaging, the possibility of surgery could be re-evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting with high rates of R0 resection. In this selected and highly motivated group of patients, the QoL and symptoms after salvage surgeries are acceptable and even better than those reported in the literature.

Efficacy and surgical safety of sequential surgical resection after pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for initial unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionNeoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is effective in resectable NSCLC. However, its role in unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgical resection to treat initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients. MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 59 initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients who received induction pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy between June 2019 and April 2022. Clinical characteristics, radiological and pathological responses, and survival outcomes were collected and evaluated. ResultsFifity-nine initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients were identified and divided into surgery (n = 23) and non-surgery (n = 36) groups with a median follow-up time of 15.0 months. The median PFS/DFS of the surgery group was significantly longer than the non-surgery group (not reached vs. 15.5 months, p = 0.0031). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the OS rate was 100% (23/23) in the surgery group and 83.3% (30/36) in the non-surgery group. The pathological analysis suggested that 13 of 23 patients (56.5%) achieved major pathological response (MPR) or pathological complete response (pCR), and more squamous cell carcinoma cases were observed in the MPR group compared to the non-MPR group (p = 0.034). All patients in the surgery group had an R0 resection, and no surgical-related mortality was recorded; only three patients (13.0%) experienced any postoperative complications. ConclusionIn this retrospective study, surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was promising for initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients, with a high MPR rate and good surgical safety.

Beyond PACIFIC: Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Durvalumab According to Treatment Received and PD-L1 Expression.

Adjuvant durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of PACIFIC revealed no OS benefit in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. This retrospective analysis assesses the real-world impact of durvalumab on OS according to PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). Patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC treated by CRT, with available PD-L1 TPS, from 1 March 2018 to 31 December 2020, at BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada were included. Patients were divided into two groups, CRT + durvalumab and CRT alone. OS and PFS were analyzed in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% and <1% subgroups. A total of 134 patients were included in the CRT + durvalumab group and 117, in the CRT alone group. Median OS was 35.9 months in the CRT + durvalumab group and 27.4 months in the CRT alone group [HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83), p = 0.003]. Durvalumab improved OS in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.81), p = 0.003, n = 175], but not in the <1% subgroup [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.44-1.42), p = 0.4, n = 76]. This retrospective study demonstrates a statistically significant improvement in OS associated with durvalumab after CRT in PD-L1 ≥ 1%, but not PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Variables not accounted for may have biased the survival analysis. A prospective study would bring more insight.

Long-term survival outcome of radiation therapy for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Single center experience at Hospital 175.

142 Background: Lung cancer represents a significant global health burden, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most prevalent form of this disease. While surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for early-stage NSCLC, patients with locally advanced or inoperable NSCLC require alternative therapeutic strategies. Purpose: to assess the long-term survival data and determine the associated factors impacting survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with inoperable stage III of NSCLC who received radiation therapy at Hospital 175 from January 2019 to June 2022. The patients had a performance status score (PS) of 0-2 and only one primary lung tumor. We collected patients' background information, including age, gender, pathology, TNM, combination chemotherapy, PET/CT characteristics, and radiotherapy plan parameters. All patients received radiotherapy, at a dose equivalent to 60Gy or more. During radiation therapy, patients were monitored for radiation toxicity. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate overall survival (OS) rate and the Cox regression model to identify the risk factors affecting the treatment outcomes. Results: A total of 240 cases, male: 75%, PS 0, 1, 2 respectively: 24%, 72%, 4%. Histopathological types: squamous cell (9%), glandular cell (83.5%), others (7.5%). Which, subgroups of stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC: are 32%, 48%, and 20%. The rate of patients having chemotherapy before radiation was 80.3%, and having PET/CT scans was 43.5%. Patients with radiation alone: 73.4% and concurrent chemoradiotherapy: 26.6%. Median follow-up time: 16.3 months, median OS: 19.5 months. OS rates after 1, 2, and 3 years are 76.2%, 38.8%, and 27.4%, respectively. The most common toxicity was grade 2 esophagitis. Patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy had a better prognosis than those who received radiation therapy alone. Regimen of radiation therapy, age, histopathological type, and lymph node metastasis were significant factors affecting overall survival outcomes. Conclusions: Radiotherapy is an essential part of treatment for inoperable NSCLC. The best survival benefit is achieved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Besides, age, lymph node metastasis, and histopathological type are also potential factors that can influence patient outcomes.

Lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma difficult for immunohistochemical diagnosis can be distinguished by lipid profile

In patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, histological diagnosis is frequently based on small biopsy specimens unsuitable for histological diagnosis when they are severely crushed and do not retain their morphology. Therefore, establishing a novel diagnostic method independent of tissue morphology or conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers is required. We analyzed the lipid profiles of resected primary lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) specimens using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The specimens of 26 ADC and 18 SQCC cases were evenly assigned to the discovery and validation cohorts. Non-target screening on the discovery cohort identified 96 and 13 lipid peaks abundant in ADC and SQCC, respectively. Among these 109 lipid peaks, six and six lipid peaks in ADC and SQCC showed reproducibility in target screening on the validation cohort. Finally, we selected three and four positive lipid markers for ADC and SQCC, demonstrating high discrimination abilities. In cases difficult to diagnose by IHC staining, [cardiolipin(18:2_18:2_18:2_18:2)-H]− and [triglyceride(18:1_17:1_18:1) + NH4]+ showed the excellent diagnostic ability for ADC (sensitivity: 1.00, specificity: 0.89, accuracy: 0.93) and SQCC (sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.83, accuracy: 0.87), respectively. These novel candidate lipid markers may contribute to a more accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment strategy for unresectable NSCLC.

Salvage surgery for advanced non-small cell lung cancer following previous immunotherapy: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe development of systemic chemotherapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided patients with unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) an opportunity to undergo surgical intervention after initial treatment. However, no consensus regarding the indication for salvage surgery in these patients has been reached.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent salvage surgery for advanced NSCLC (cStage IIIA–IVB) after treatment with ICIs from January 2018 to December 2022 at Aizu Medical Center and Fukushima Medical University Hospital. We evaluated the patients’ clinical data, calculated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and assessed the survival benefit using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThirteen patients underwent salvage surgery after immunotherapy. All patients achieved downstaging after initial chemotherapy. Eleven patients underwent lobectomy, and one patient underwent extirpation of intra-abdominal lymph nodes. The mean surgery time and intraoperative blood loss were 242.2 min and 415.1 g, respectively. The mean drainage period was 4.2 days (range, 2–9 days). Grade ≥ 3 postoperative complications were confirmed in three patients. The 2-year DFS rate was 71.2%, and the 2-year OS rate was 76.2%. A pathological complete response compatible with ypStage 0 was achieved in four (30.8%) patients. Patients with ypStage 0 and I achieved significantly better OS than those with ypStage ≥ II (p = 0.044), and patients without severe complications achieved significantly better DFS and OS than those with severe complications (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsSalvage surgery after chemotherapy including ICIs is a feasible and effective treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who acquire downstaging to pathological stage 0 or I. However, severe perioperative complications might affect patient survival. A prospective study is urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of salvage surgery.

The Survival Effect of Metformin on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review

Objective. Metformin is a common antidiabetic drug that has been reported to serve as an anticancer agent in combination with other therapies. But the effect of the addition of metformin on the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemotherapy is still controversial. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the survival effect of metformin added to chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. Methods. Electronic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception up to April 2023. The study region, study design, histological subtype of the NSCLC, tumor stage, treatment strategy, sample size, follow-up duration, diabetes status, and HR of OS or PFS of the included studies were extracted. The quality was assessed through Cochrane collaboration’s tool for RCT and the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies, respectively. Results and conclusions. Eleven studies with a total of 4606 patients were finally included. Five RCTs showed a high risk of bias due to the open-label nature while six retrospective studies were of high quality. Two studies of NSCLC patients with diabetes reported significant benefits in overall survival from metformin addition, while one study of patients without diabetes reported a negative effect on the survival of metformin addition. The survival impact of metformin added to chemotherapy on unresectable NSCLC patients remains inconclusive. The survival benefit might be more prominent in patients with diabetes, awaiting further evidence.

Safety and efficacy of durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation in Black patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The PACIFIC trial established consolidative durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation as standard-of-care in patients with stage III or unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Black patients, however, comprised just 2% (n = 14) of randomized patients in this trial, warranting real-world evaluation of the PACIFIC regimen in these patients. This single-institution, multi-site study included 105 patients with unresectable stage II/III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiation followed by durvalumab between 2017 and 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 pneumonitis-free survival (PNFS) were compared between Black and non-Black patients using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. A total of 105 patients with a median follow-up of 22.8 months (interquartile range, 11.3-37.3 months) were identified for analysis, including 57 Black (54.3%) and 48 (45.7%) non-Black patients. The mean radiation prescription dose was higher among Black patients (61.5 ± 2.9 Gy vs. 60.5 ± 1.9 Gy; p = .031), but other treatment characteristics were balanced between groups. The median OS (not-reached vs. 39.7 months; p = .379) and PFS (31.6 months vs. 19.3 months; p = .332) were not statistically different between groups. Eight (14.0%) Black patients discontinued durvalumab due to toxicity compared to 13 (27.1%) non-Black patients (p = .096). The grade ≥3 pneumonitis rate was similar between Black and non-Black patients (12.3% vs. 12.5%; p = .973), and there was no significant difference in time to grade ≥3 PNFS (p = .904). Three (5.3%) Black patients and one (2.1%) non-Black patient developed grade 5 pneumonitis. The efficacy and tolerability of consolidative durvalumab after chemoradiation appears to be comparable between Black and non-Black patients.

Prognostic Impact of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Germline Variants in Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Platin-Based Chemotherapy.

Platin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance to this therapy is a major obstacle in successful treatment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of several pharmacogenetic variants in patients with unresectable NSCLC treated with platin-based chemotherapy. Our results showed that DPYD variant carriers had significantly shorter progression-free survival and overall survival compared to DPYD wild-type patients, whereas DPD deficiency was not associated with a higher incidence of high-grade toxicity. For the first time, our study provides evidence that DPYD gene variants are associated with resistance to platin-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. Although further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms of this association, our results suggest that genetic testing of DPYD variants may be useful for identifying patients at a higher risk of platin-based chemotherapy resistance and might be helpful in guiding future personalized treatment strategies in NSCLC patients.

Durvalumab outcomes for patients with PD-L1 positive and negative stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer treated at veterans health administration facilities.

e18793 Background: Clinical trials and real-world studies have documented the benefit of durvalumab consolidation therapy in patients with stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (UR-NSCLC) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: Patients with stage III UR-NSCLC on durvalumab following CRT, at any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility from 1/1/17 to 6/30/20, were included. Patients were followed from their durvalumab initiation date through the earliest of their last VHA visit, loss to follow up, death, or end of study. Electronic health record and chart review data were retrospectively collected to determine baseline characteristics, number of durvalumab doses, length of follow-up, and overall survival (OS). Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare baseline characteristics for patients with PD-L1 negative (&lt;1%) and positive (1% or greater) tumors. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for OS. Cox proportional hazards regression, with controls for divergent baseline characteristics, were used to compare OS between the two groups. Results: Of 935 available patients, 340 had PD-L1 results: 221 had PD-L1 positive (65%) and 119 had PD-L1 negative (35%) tumors. The two groups of patients were largely similar with respect to baseline characteristics, including age, sex at birth, White race, smoking status, marital status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ECOG status, histology, stage, EGFR, and RAS mutations (Table). Patients with PD-L1 positive and negative tumors had a similar median (interquartile range [IQR]) number of durvalumab doses (15 [6-24] vs 12 [5-23], p=0.38) and length of follow-up (31.5 [12.1-43.5] vs 28.7 [12.2-40.6] months, p=0.43). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were similar for patients with PD-L1 positive and negative tumors: estimated 12-month OS rates (95% CI) of 84% (78%-88%) vs 89% (81%-93%) and 24-month OS rates of 72% (65%-78%) vs 76% (67%-84%); median OS was not reached in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors and was 47.0 months for the PD-L1 negative group. Cox Proportional Hazards regression analysis also demonstrated similar OS for both groups (p=0.64). Conclusions: In this real-world study of a subpopulation of VHA patients with stage III UR-NSCLC and known PD-L1 levels, survival benefits with durvalumab were consistent with those reported in the PACIFIC trial, despite having worse baseline prognostic factors. Patients with PD-L1 positive and negative tumors experienced similar overall survival, including 12- and 24-month OS rates.[Table: see text]

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) versus durvalumab (durva) following concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in unresectable EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8567 Background: Adjuvant osimertinib (osi) improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients (pts) with resected, early-stage, EGFR-mutant (EGFRmut) NSCLC, yet the benefit of osi after CRT in pts with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC is unknown. Post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial showed a lack of survival benefit with consolidation durva versus placebo in pts with EGFRmut NSCLC. Comparisons between consolidation durva and EGFR TKIs in unresectable EGFRmut NSCLC following CRT are lacking. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of pts with stage III unresectable EGFRmut NSCLC (exon19 deletion, exon21 L858R), who received EGFR TKI or durva after ≥ 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy plus definitive radiation therapy between 2015-2022. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, smoking history, PD-L1 status, and outcomes on DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety were collected. Multivariable (MVA) cox regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. Treatment-related adverse events (trAE) were defined using CTCAE 5.0. Results: Seventeen pts from 12 institutions received an EGFR TKI (osi, n=15; erlotinib, n=2), and 13 pts received consolidation durva. Median follow-up was 23 months. Median age of all pts was 61 years (IQR:52-72) and 76.7% were female. Most pts in both groups had never-smoked and had adenocarcinoma. All pts received ≥ 60 Gy of radiation with concurrent chemotherapy. PD-L1 expression was ≥ 50% in 1/10 (10%) pts treated with durva vs 6/13 (46.2%) treated with TKI, p=0.09. Median duration on treatment for EGFR TKI and durva was 12.2 months and 4.8 months, respectively. Pts treated with EGFR TKI had significantly longer 24-month DFS versus pts treated with durva after adjusting for stage (3A vs 3B vs 3C) (Table). Any grade tRAE occurred in 58.8% (10/17) of pts treated with EGFR TKI vs 38.5% (5/13) with durva. Grade &gt; 3 tRAE occurred in 15.4% (1 pneumonitis and 1 AST/ALT elevation) of pts treated with durva but in none of pts treated with EGFR TKI. Three pts within each arm came off treatment due to toxicity (EGFR TKI: 1 pneumonitis and 2 dermatitis; durva: 1 of each pneumonitis, Type 1 diabetes, AST/ALT elevation). Conclusions: EGFR TKI therapy after definitive CRT was associated with significantly longer DFS compared to durva in this retrospective study of pts with stage III unresectable EGFRmut NSCLC, without unanticipated safety signals. Follow-up is ongoing and OS outcomes will be evaluated subsequently. Further investigation is warranted to define the optimal therapy for locally advanced EGFRmut NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Real world assessment of clinical benefit with consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

e18853 Background: The phase III PACIFIC trial compared the efficacy of consolidation durvalumab to placebo in newly diagnosed, unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not progressed after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). With a median follow-up of 34.2 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 16.9 months (13.0-23.9) compared to 5.6 months (4.6-7.7) for placebo (HR = 0.55, 95% CI,0.45-0.68). We report a real-world study that utilizes surrogate endpoints to assess duration of clinical benefit with consolidation durvalumab. Methods: OncoHealth, a digital health company, conducted a retrospective observational real-world study to assess time to treatment failure in patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC who received consolidation durvalumab after completion of CRT between June 2018-June 2021. Data sources included electronic medical records (EMR) submitted with prior authorization (PA) requests to OncoHealth and medical claims data. With a data cut-off of 12/22/2022, real-world Time to Progression (rwTTP), and real-world Time to Next Treatment (rwTTNT) were evaluated to assess time to treatment failure. All end points were measured from durvalumab administration dates, rwTTP spanned until earliest date of clinician-assessed progression, and rwTTNT spanned until initiation of subsequent treatment. Results: Total of 281 patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC who received durvalumab after completion of definitive CRT were identified. Median age was 71 years (range: 53 to 88), 57% male, 53% former smokers, 47% Stage IIIA, 52% non-squamous histology and 98% received concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy prior to durvalumab. Median time between completing CRT and initiating durvalumab was 41 days. With a cutoff date of 12/22/2022, and a median follow up of 28.4 months, 34% (n = 95) experienced disease progression. Sites of progression included lung, lymph nodes, adrenal, liver, bone and brain. The median rwTTP was 10.6 months (range: 2.0-38.1 months) and median rwTTNT was 12.4 months (range: 2.5-39.6 months). Conclusions: In this real-world study, the patient and disease characteristics available in EMR were comparable to those reported in the PACIFIC trial. The rwTTP and rwTTNT reported here suggest treatment failure occurred within one year of exposure to durvalumab and subsequent line of treatment was initiated shortly thereafter. Variables such as co-morbidities, performance status, treatment compliance, change of payers and barriers to treatment in real world will be further explored.

Concurrent durvalumab plus chemoradiation therapy followed by durvalumab in Chinese patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: CRUISER study.

e20576 Background: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy has demonstrated significant survival benefit for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in PACIFIC trial. However, there are still 20%-30% patients who have disease progression (PD) or intolerable toxicity. This prospective study aimed to evaluate safety and clinical activity of concurrent durvalumab plus CRT followed by durvalumab in unresectable stage III NSCLC (NCT04982549). Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial and planned to enroll 35 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC of any PD-L1 expression level and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. All of patients will receive concurrent durvalumab 1500mg every 4 weeks plus SoC CRT followed by durvalumab monotherapy 1500mg every 4 weeks until PD or unacceptable toxicity. One cycle of induction durvalumab plus chemotherapy is allowed before radiotherapy upon investigator discretion. The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse event (AE). Here we report the preliminary clinical activity and safety of a preplanned interim analysis of this study. Results: By September 2022, 28 patients finished concurrent durvalumab plus CRT treatment and were included for analysis. 21 (75%) of 28 patients had radiographic tumor evaluation and entered the consolidation treatment stage, 7 (25%) patients discontinued treatment without radiographic tumor evaluation because of intolerable AE (5 patients) or withdrawing from the study (2 patients). 20 (71.4%) of 28 patients received one cycle induction therapy of durvalumab plus chemotherapy. The median age of these 28 patients was 64 years old, 26 (92.9%) of 28 patients with ECOG performance status of 1, and 14 (50%) of 28 patients were squamous carcinoma. Disease stage was IIIA (42.9%, 12/28), IIIB (39.3%, 11/28) and IIIC (17.9%, 5/28), with most of them (89.3%, 25/28) had N2/N3 lymphatic metastasis. 19 (90.5%) of 21 patients achieved objective response. Median interval from enrollment to the first radiological evaluation was 112 days. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAEs) occurred in 13(46.4%) of 28 patients, including six (21.4%) possibly related to durvalumab. Conclusions: The interim results from CRUISER study showed promising clinical activity and manageable toxicity of durvalumab plus concurrent CRT followed by durvalumab for unresectable stage III NSCLC. The survival outcome and biomarker exploration will be analyzed upon data maturity. Phase 3 PACIFIC-2 study investigating clinical outcome of concurrent durvalumab plus CRT in unresectable NSCLC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04982549 .

Circulating tumor DNA to guide furmonertinib monotherapy or combination therapy in advanced EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A randomized, open-label, multicenter study (FOCUS-C).

TPS9150 Background: Detection of EGFR ctDNA after several weeks EGFR-TKIs treatment was an effective method to identify prognosis of advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. Patients with uncleared EGFR ctDNA had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) ( Mack PC et al; CCR 2022). However, whether they can benefit from EGFR-TKI combination therapy has not been reported. Furmonertinib (AST2818), a potent, orally bioavailable, highly brain penetrant, third generation EGFR-TKI with unique chemical structure designed to improve potency and specificity, showed superior efficacy compared with gefitinib as first-line therapy in EGFR mutant NSCLC along with an acceptable safety profile without new signals ( Shi, YK et al.; Lancet Respir Med 2022). We hypothesized that monitoring clearance of EGFR ctDNA in blood could rationally guide subsequent monotherapy or combination therapy with furmonertinib and will improve outcomes in patients with uncleared EGFR ctDNA. Methods: The FOCUS-C study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized study. Patients who are aged 18 years or older and have histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic, stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions (19Del) or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation (L858R) on tissue biopsy and plasma will be treated with furmonertinib. Eligible patients with uncleared EGFR 19Del or L858R ctDNA after 3 weeks furmonertinib treatment will be stratified according to EGFR mutation (19Del or L858R), central nervous system metastases (with or without) and detectable accompanying gene aberrances in plasma (with or without) and randomly assigned (2: 2: 1) to receive furmonertinib or furmonertinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed and carboplatin for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed) or furmonertinib plus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (pemetrexed, carboplatin and bevacizumab for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab) in 21-day cycles until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicities, withdrawal of consent, or other discontinuation reasons judged by the investigators. The primary endpoint is PFS between furmoneritnib plus chemotherapy versus furmonertinib alone. Secondary endpoints include PFS, objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival and safety. Several exploratory endpoints will also be evaluated based on ctDNA detection by next-generation sequencing (Genecast, Wuxi, China). The study is enrolling. 34 patients had been enrolled till 2nd Feb 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05334277 .

Independent association of metabolic tumor response on FDG-PET with pulmonary toxicity following risk-adaptive chemoradiation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: Inherent radiosensitivity or immune response?

BackgroundIn the context of a phase II trial of risk-adaptive chemoradiation, we evaluated whether tumor metabolic response could serve as a correlate of treatment sensitivity and toxicity. MethodsForty-five patients with AJCCv7 stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC enrolled on the FLARE-RT phase II trial (NCT02773238). [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT images were acquired prior to treatment and after 24 Gy during week 3. Patients with unfavorable on-treatment tumor response received concomitant boosts to 74 Gy total over 30 fractions rather than standard 60 Gy. Metabolic tumor volume and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) were calculated semi-automatically. Risk factors of pulmonary toxicity included concurrent chemotherapy regimen, adjuvant anti-PDL1 immunotherapy, and lung dosimetry. Incidence of CTCAE v4 grade 2+ pneumonitis was analyzed using the Fine-Gray method with competing risks of metastasis or death. Peripheral germline DNA microarray sequencing measured predefined candidate genes from distinct pathways: 96 DNA repair, 53 immunology, 38 oncology, 27 lung biology. ResultsTwenty-four patients received proton therapy, 23 received ICI, 26 received carboplatin-paclitaxel, and 17 pneumonitis events were observed. Pneumonitis risk was significantly higher for patients with COPD (HR 3.78 [1.48, 9.60], p = 0.005), those treated with immunotherapy (HR 2.82 [1.03, 7.71], p = 0.043) but not with carboplatin-paclitaxel (HR 1.98 [0.71, 5.54], p = 0.19). Pneumonitis rates were similar among selected patients receiving 74 Gy radiation vs 60 Gy (p = 0.33), proton therapy vs photon (p = 0.60), or with higher lung dosimetric V20 (p = 0.30). Patients in the upper quartile decrease in SUVmean (>39.7%) were at greater risk for pneumonitis (HR 4.00 [1.54, 10.44], p = 0.005) and remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR 3.34 [1.23, 9.10], p = 0.018). Germline DNA gene alterations in immunology pathways were most frequently associated with pneumonitis. ConclusionTumor metabolic response as measured by mean SUV is associated with increased pneumonitis risk in a clinical trial cohort of NSCLC patients independent of treatment factors. This may be partially attributed to patient-specific differences in immunogenicity.

Befotertinib (D-0316) versus icotinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study

Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, selective oral third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of befotertinib with icotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study at 39 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC, and had confirmed exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system to receive either oral befotertinib (75-100 mg once daily) or oral icotinib (125 mg three times per day) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by type of EGFR mutation, CNS metastasis status, and gender, and participants, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomly assigned patients. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in safety analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04206072, and the overall survival follow-up is still in progress. Between Dec 24, 2019, and Dec 18, 2020, 568 patients were screened, of whom 362 were randomly assigned to the befotertinib (n=182) or icotinib (n=180) group; all 362 patients were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 10·2-23·5) in the befotertinib group and 19·4 months (10·3-23·5) in the icotinib group. Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 17·9-not estimable) in the befotertinib group and 13·8 months (12·4-15·2) in the icotinib group (hazard ratio 0·49 [95% CI 0·36-0·68], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55 (30%) of 182 patients in the befotertinib group and in 14 (8%) of 180 patients in the icotinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 37 (20%) patients in the befotertinib group and in five (3%) patients in the icotinib group. Two (1%) patients in the befotertinib group and one (1%) patient in the icotinib group died due to treatment-related adverse events. Befotertinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared with icotinib in first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Although serious adverse events were more common in the befotertinib than the icotinib arm, the safety profile of befotertinib was manageable overall. Betta Pharmaceuticals (China). For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.