Unresectable Melanoma Research Articles

Real-life effectiveness on overall survival of continued immune checkpoint inhibition following progression in advanced melanoma: estimation from the Melbase cohort.

The link between palliative care and oncology must continue to develop, taking into account advances in treatment.Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for metastatic melanoma is associated with different types of response, making it difficult to assess the benefits to the patient. Some clinical trials suggest a survival advantage of ICI even in the absence of an objective radiographic response. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of continuing ICI after progression of the disease on the overall survival (OS) in a cohort of final-line metastatic melanoma patients. Clinical data from 120 patients with metastatic melanoma were collected via Melbase, a French multicentric biobank, prospectively enrolling unresectable melanoma. Two groups were defined: patients continuing final-line ICI at progression (treated) and patients stopping ICI at progression (controls). The primary end-point is the OS from progression. Propensity score weighting was used to correct for indication bias. From the 120 patients, 72 (60%) continued ICI. Median OS from progression was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-6.27] in the treated group and median OS was 1.3 months (95% CI 0.95-1.74) in the control group (P < 0.0001). The calculated hazard ratio was 0.20 (0.13-0.33). Continued ICI was discovered to have an association with a higher rate of hospitalization at the end of life; more treatments received in the last 15 days of life and less utilization of specialist palliative care. This study discovered that patients with metastatic melanoma show a significant decrease in the instantaneous probability of mortality when they continue with finale-line ICI after progression.

A comparison of isolated limb infusion/perfusion, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and intralesional therapy as first-line treatment for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases.

Isolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC. Retrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM. A total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (n=356), ICI (n=125), and TVEC (n=70) with median follow-up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (p =.002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (p =.007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (p =.01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; p =.029) and a longer local progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; p =.003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; p =.012), PFS (HR, 1.79; p <.001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR, 1.75; p =.014), overall survival (HR, 1.82; p =.009), and melanoma-specific survival (HR, 2.29; p =.004). Stage IIIB disease had longer DMFS (HR, 0.24; p <.001) compared to IIIC/D. TVEC as first-line therapy for unresectable melanoma ITM was associated with superior CR rates and local PFS. Notably, TVEC was used in patients with a lower Breslow thickness, disease stage, and tumor burden. Therefore, when compared to ILI/ILP and ICI, TVEC should be considered as first-line therapy for unresectable stage IIIB melanoma ITM with minimal tumor burden and lower Breslow thickness.

Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes in advanced or metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy: Findings from the CheckMate-067 study

ObjectivePatient-reported outcomes (PROs) that predict survival in cancer patients have yet to be realized as practical tools for clinicians to make better treatment decisions. To identify such PROs in adults with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy, this study used 7.5-year follow-up data from CheckMate-067, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab. MethodsPRO data assessed using the European Organization of Research for the Treatment of Cancer Core-30 and EQ-5D-3L at baseline and during subsequent visits after treatment initiation were pooled across treatment arms. Associations between baseline PRO or change from baseline (CFB) scores with survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], and melanoma-specific survival [MSS]) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models for PFS or OS and cause-specific hazard models for MSS. ResultsBaseline and CFB scores for most PRO domains, especially for physical functioning, global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), fatigue, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), were prognostic of all survival outcomes. Achieving meaningful improvement/maintenance of baseline PRO scores at 12 weeks following treatment initiation predicted better survival outcomes than with meaningful worsening from baseline. ConclusionsPROs at baseline and during treatment, particularly for physical functioning, GHS/QoL, fatigue, and EQ-VAS, were prognostic of survival outcomes. This knowledge may accelerate development of prognostic tools to manage treatment in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma who undergo immunotherapy.

Genetic Factors Associated with Clinical Response in Melanoma Patients Treated with Talimogene Laherparapvec: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis.

Talimogene laherparapvec (T-VEC) is a modified herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and the first oncolytic virus to be approved for the treatment of unresectable melanoma. We assessed whether there are tumor-intrinsic genetic factors that are associated with tumor control. A single-institution, retrospective analysis of melanoma patients treated with T-VEC was performed. Demographics, histopathologic reports, treatment history, clinical outcomes, and tumor genomic analysis of approximately 100 genes were collected. Ninety-three patients who had received T-VEC were identified, of whom 84 (91%) were diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma. Sixty-nine (69) patients received more than one dose of T-VEC and had sufficient data available for clinical analysis. Of these patients 30.0% (n=21) had evidence of a complete response, defined as complete regression of all lesions without the need for additional treatment or procedures. Stage III disease (p<0.001), absence of macroscopic nodal disease (p<0.001), and absence of visceral/central nervous system metastases (p=0.004) were all associated with evidence of any clinical response or local control by univariate analysis. At the time of analysis, 54 patients had tumor genetic data available. Sixty genes were mutated in at least one patient, and all but one patient had at least one gene mutation identified. Presence of TERT promotor mutation was associated with evidence of any clinical response (p=0.043) or local control (p=0.039) by multivariate analysis. This work describes the experience using T-VEC in melanoma at a single institution and highlights the presence of TERT promotor mutations as a possible driver of clinical response.

Mutation-Specific CRISPR Targeting with SaCas9 and AsCas12a Restores Therapeutic Sensitivity in Treatment-Resistant Melanoma.

Background: Melanoma remains one of the most challenging cancers to treat effectively with drug resistant remaining a constant concern, primarily with activating BRAF mutations. Mutations in the BRAF gene appear in approximately 50% of patients, 90% of which are V600E. Two frontline BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), vemurafenib and dabrafenib, are frequently used to treat unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E melanoma. Initial response rates are high, but soon thereafter, 70-80% of patients develop resistance to treatment within a year. A major mechanism of resistance is the generation of a secondary Q61K mutation in the NRAS gene. Methods: We have developed an approach in which a CRISPR-Cas complex can be designed to distinguish between mutant genes enabling resistance to standard care in tumor cells and normal genomes of healthy cells. For the first time, we demonstrated the utility of two CRISPR-directed mutation-specific editing approaches to restore BRAFi sensitivity in BRAFV600E/NRASQ61K resistant A375 cells. Results: We utilize an AsCas12a protospacer adjacent motif site created by the NRAS Q61K mutation and the Q61K mutation in the critical seed region of an SaCas9 sgRNA for Q61K-selective targeting. We show here that both approaches allow for effective NRAS targeting of only mutated-Q61K and after CRISPR-directed Q61K-targeting, previously resistant A375 cells are re-sensitized to BRAFi treatment. Conclusion: Our data support the feasibility of the development of CRISPR-Cas therapeutic approaches to the treatment of melanoma. Successful therapeutic CRISPR-directed gene editing would enable both specific and efficient editing of a mutation-specific targeting approach eliminate concern for on- and off-target damage to the genomes of healthy cells.

6529 The Risk of Hypophysitis Following Treatment With Relatlimab+Nivolumab Appears Higher Than Expected

Abstract Disclosure: N. Chamorro-Pareja: None. A.T. Faje: None. K.K. Miller: Stock Owner; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb. Hypophysitis is a recognized complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy; the risk of developing hypophysitis in patients receiving nivolumab (an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-1]) is estimated to be &amp;lt; 1%. Relatlimab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) recently approved in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The risk of hypophysitis as a complication of relatlimab therapy is not well-defined. Objective: To examine the prevalence, identify risk factors, and characterize the clinical presentation of hypophysitis in patients receiving relatlimab+nivolumab. Methods: 159 patients received relatlimab+nivolumab at the Mass General Brigham health care system between 6/2015 and 11/2023. Twenty-seven patients were excluded because they were either diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency (AI) before receiving relatlimab+nivolumab or AI was secondary to other factors, primarily exogenous glucocorticoid administration, leaving a total of 122 patients. The medical records of these patients, including provider encounters, laboratory results, medication records, and radiologic images were reviewed. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Results: Central AI was diagnosed in 10 patients (7.5% of the cohort) after relatlimab+nivolumab administration. The mean age was 64.5±13.8 vs. 67.1±14.4 in patients with AI vs. patients without AI (p= 0.58). Sixty percent of patients in the AI group were male compared to 53% of patients without AI (p= 0.68). The development of AI was not related to the cumulative dose of relatlimab+nivolumab (mean number of cycles 6.4±3.2 vs. 4.9±5.0, p=0.35). The most common presenting symptoms of AI were fatigue, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. No patients were diagnosed with additional anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies, though not all patients were evaluated for these diagnoses; none had diabetes insipidus. Nine patients had MRIs performed after the diagnosis of central AI; 7 of these patients had pre-treatment MRIs for comparison. Diffuse pituitary enlargement was seen on MRI after initiation of relatlimab+nivolumab in 3 patients up to 8 weeks prior to the diagnosis of hypopituitarism. All patients had persistent hypopituitarism at the most recent evaluation. Conclusions: This study is the first cohort analysis of hypophysitis in patients treated with relatlimab+nivolumab. A significant portion of patients were diagnosed with central AI, presumptively due to hypophysitis given the lack of an identifiable alternative etiology. Although the clinical phenotype of these patients paralleled published studies analyzing anti-PD-1 monotherapy, combination treatment with relatlimab+nivolumab appeared to confer a significantly higher risk of developing hypophysitis. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Longitudinal analysis of the gut microbiota during anti-PD-1 therapy reveals stable microbial features of response in melanoma patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve outcomes in advanced melanoma, but many patients are refractory or experience relapse. The gut microbiota modulates antitumor responses. However, inconsistent baseline predictors point to heterogeneity in responses and inadequacy of cross-sectional data. We followed patients with unresectable melanoma from baseline and during anti-PD-1 therapy, collecting fecal and blood samples that were surveyed for changes in the gut microbiota and immune markers. Varying patient responses were linked to different gut microbiota dynamics during ICI treatment. We select complete responders by their stable microbiota functions and validate them using multiple external cohorts and experimentally. We identify major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC class I)-restricted peptides derived from flagellin-related genes of Lachnospiraceae (FLach) as structural homologs of tumor-associated antigens, detect FLach-reactive CD8+ Tcells in complete responders before ICI therapy, and demonstrate that FLach peptides improve antitumor immunity. These findings highlight the prognostic value of microbial functions and therapeutic potential of tumor-mimicking microbial peptides.

Sequencing of Checkpoint or BRAF/MEK Inhibitors on Brain Metastases in Melanoma

BackgroundThe impact of the order of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors on the development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic unresectable BRAFV600-mutant melanoma is unknown. The SECOMBIT trial examined the impact of the order of receipt of these treatments in such patients.MethodsIn this three-arm trial, we reviewed patients without brain metastases who received the BRAF/MEK inhibitors encorafenib and binimetinib until they had progressive disease followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab (arm A); or treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by encorafenib and binimetinib (arm B); or treatment with encorafenib and binimetinib for 8 weeks followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by retreatment with encorafenib arm binimetinib (arm C).ResultsBrain metastases were discovered during the trial in 23/69 patients in arm A, 11/69 in arm B, and 9/68 in arm C. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the 60-month brain metastases–free survival rates were 56% for arm A, 80% for arm B (hazard ratio [HR] vs. A: 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.58), and 85% for arm C (HR vs. A: 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.76).ConclusionsIn patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma, the treatment sequence of immune checkpoint inhibition followed by BRAF/MEK inhibitors was associated with longer periods of new brain metastases–free survival than the reverse sequence. A regimen in which immune checkpoint inhibition was sandwiched between BRAF/MEK inhibition also appeared to be protective against brain metastases. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02631447.)

Durable local control with hypofractionated radiation therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma

Background and purposeAs patients with advanced melanoma live longer in the context of systemic therapy advancements, better strategies for durable control of bulky tumors are needed. In this study, we evaluated if dose-escalated hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) can provide durable local control and improve tumor-associated symptoms in patients with unresectable or bulky metastatic melanoma for whom stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (RT) approaches are not feasible due to tumor size or location. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with unresectable or bulky metastatic melanoma who were treated to a total of 53 tumor targets with 12–17 fractions HFRT at our institution between 2015–2022. Clinical scenarios included: unresectable, locoregional only disease (26 %); oligometastatic disease (<3 total sites, 17 %); oligoprogressive disease (<3 sites progressing, 17 %); and aggressive palliation (>5 known sites of disease or with at least 3 sites progressing, 40 %). ResultsOf the 53 HFRT targets, 91 % (n = 48) had radiographic evidence of response as defined by either stabilization (6 %, n = 3), decreased size (74 %, n = 39), or decreased FDG avidity (11 %, n = 6). Of the 43 symptomatic patients, 98 % (n = 42) had symptomatic improvement. One −year local control was 79 %, with 2-year progression-free and overall survival of 33 % and 39 % respectively. The most common acute toxicities were radiation dermatitis (16 %, n = 8) or a pain flare (14 %, n = 7). Late toxicities were uncommon and typically grade 1. ConclusionHFRT provides favorable local control and symptomatic relief with limited toxicity in tumors not amenable to surgical resection or stereotactic ablative RT.

A phase III study to access the safety and efficacy of prolgolimab 250 mg fixed dose administered every 3 weeks versus prolgolimab 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic melanoma (FLAT).

Prolgolimab is the first Russian PD-1 inhibitor approved for the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma and advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It was approved in two weight-based regimens of 1 mg/kg Q2W and 3 mg/kg Q3W, but because of re-evaluation of weight-based dosing paradigm, studying of a fixed-dose regimen was considered perspective. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety study to obtain data that would allow the approval of the new flat dosing regimen of prolgolimab in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma (BCD-100-8/FLAT, NCT05783882). The primary objective was to prove the non-inferiority of prolgolimab 250 mg Q3W versus prolgolimab 1 mg/kg Q2W for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma in terms of ORR according to RECIST 1.1. Patients from the MIRACULUM study (BCD-100-2/MIRACULUM, NCT03269565) comprised a historical control group. One hundred fourteen patients received prolgolimab 250 mg Q3W, and 61 patients received prolgolimab (Prolgo) 1 mg/kg Q2W (historical control). Objective response was achieved by 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.8, 42.8] of patients in the Prolgo 250 mg group compared with 32.8% (95% CI: 21.3, 46.0) of patients in the Prolgo 1 mg/kg group. Risk difference was 0.00, 95% CI (-0.12; NA), p = 0.0082. Both regimens were well tolerated, and safety profiles were comparable. The pharmacokinetic analysis (PK) showed that the regimen with the fixed dose of 250 mg Q3W was characterized by higher PK parameters. The immunogenicity study did not detect binding antibodies to prolgolimab in any of the subjects. The obtained results showed that the selected fixed dosing regimen of prolgolimab 250 mg Q3W is characterized by efficacy and safety parameters comparable to that observed for the 1 mg/kg Q2W regimen.

1092P Nivolumab plus relatlimab vs nivolumab in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 3-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047

1092P Nivolumab plus relatlimab vs nivolumab in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 3-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047

Cryoablation and post-progression immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic melanoma: a phase II trial

Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation is an established minimally invasive oncologic treatment. We hypothesized that cryoablation may modify the immune microenvironment through direct modulation of the tumor, thereby generating an anti-tumor response in tumors refractory to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). In this non-randomized phase II single-center study (NCT03290677), subjects with unresectable melanoma progressing on ICI underwent cryoablation of an enlarging metastasis, and ICI was continued for a minimum of two additional cycles. The primary endpoints were safety, feasibility and tumor response in non-ablated lesions. From May 2018 through July 2020, 17 patients were treated on study. The study met its primary endpoints with the combination strategy found to be safe and feasible with an objective response rate of 23.5% and disease control rate of 41% (4 partial response, 3 stable disease). Our data support further study of this synergistic therapeutic approach.

Advances in understanding the role of immune checkpoint LAG-3 in tumor immunity: a comprehensive review.

Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), also known as CD223, is an emerging immune checkpoint that follows PD-1 and CTLA-4. Several LAG-3 targeting inhibitors in clinical trials and the combination of relatlimab (anti-LAG-3) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) have been approved for treating - unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Despite the encouraging clinical potential of LAG-3, the physiological function and mechanism of action in tumors are still not well understood. In this review, we systematically summarized the structure of LAG-3, ligands of LAG-3, cell-specific functions and signaling of LAG-3, and the current status of LAG-3 inhibitors under development.

Chitosan/dextran-based organohydrogel delivers EZH2 inhibitor to epigenetically reprogram chemo/immuno-resistance in unresectable metastatic melanoma

Melanoma either intrinsically possesses resistance or rapidly acquires resistance to anti-tumor therapy, which often leads to local recurrence or distant metastasis after resection. In this study, we found histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) demethylated by an inhibitor of histone methyltransferase EZH2 could epigenetically reverse the resistance to chemo-drug paclitaxel (PTX), or enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-TIGIT via downregulating TIGIT ligand CD155. Next, to address the complexity in the combination of multiple bioactive molecules with distinct therapeutic properties, we developed a polysaccharides-based organohydrogel (OHG) configured with a heterogenous network. Therein, hydroxypropyl chitosan (HPC)-stabilized emulsions for hydrophobic drug entrapment were crosslinked with oxidized dextran (Odex) to form a hydrophilic gel matrix to facilitate antibody accommodation, which demonstrated a tunable sustained release profile by optimizing emulsion/gel volume ratios. As results, local injection of OHG loaded with EZH2 inhibitor UNC1999, PTX and anti-TIGIT did not only synergistically enhance the cytotoxicity of PTX, but also reprogrammed the immune resistance via bi-directionally blocking TIGIT/CD155 axis, leading to the recruitment of cytotoxic effector cells into tumor and conferring a systemic immune memory to prevent lung metastasis. Hence, this polysaccharides-based OHG represents a potential in-situ epigenetic-, chemo- and immunotherapy platform to treat unresectable metastatic melanoma.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with interferon-alpha 1b and anlotinib hydrochloride as the second-line therapy in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma: A retrospective study.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are now used more commonly in combination than monotherapy as the first-line choice in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma. Nevertheless, for cases that progressed after the initial combination therapy, the subsequent regimen option can be very difficult. Herein, we reported the efficacy and safety of a triple combination regimen in Chinese unresectable advanced melanoma patients who had poor responses to the first-line immune therapy. We reviewed the clinical profiles of patients diagnosed with stage IIIC-IV melanoma between June 1, 2020, and September 30, 2023. The patients who failed the prior immune therapies and received anti-PD-1 mono antibody plus interferon(IFN)-alpha 1b and anlotinib hydrochloride as the second-line therapy were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. Additionally, we examined the exhaustion of T-cells using mIHC staining in available tumor samples. Fifty-five patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 13.6 months. The objective response rate evaluated by the investigators was 9.1%(1CR, 4PR). The disease control rate was 47.3%. The median overall survival was 17.6 months, and the median progression-free survival was 2.8 months. The adverse events rate of any grade was 100%. Grade 3 or 4 irAEs were observed in 29.1% of cases. Multiplex immunohistochemical staining revealed an increased trend of TIM3 expression on tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients without objective response. PD-1 monoclonal antibody plus interferon-alpha 1b plus anlotinib showed acceptable tolerability and anticancer benefits in Chinese metastatic melanoma patients as a second-line therapy.

Early On-Treatment Assessment of T Cells, Cytokines, and Tumor DNA with Adaptively Dosed Nivolumab + Ipilimumab: Final Results from the Phase 2 ADAPT-IT Study.

The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT;NCT03122522) investigated adaptive ipilimumab discontinuation in melanoma based on early radiographic assessment. Initial findings indicated similar effectiveness compared with conventional nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo-ipi). Exploratory biomarker analyses and final clinical results are now reported. Patients with unresectable melanoma received two doses of nivo-ipi. Radiographic assessment at Week 6 informed continuation of ipilimumab before nivolumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at Week 12. Plasma was assayed for circulating tumor DNA and 10 cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed with an 11-color panel. Among the treated patients, expansion of proliferating T-cell populations was observed in responders and nonresponders. Baseline IL6 levels were low in patients achieving an objective radiographic response (median 1.30 vs. 2.86 pg/mL; P = 0.025). High baseline IL6 levels were associated with short progression-free survival [PFS; HR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.52; P = 0.041]. At Week 6, patients with response had lower average tumor variant allele fractions than nonresponders (median 0.000 vs. 0.019; P = 0.014). Greater increases in average variant allele fractions from baseline to Week 6 correlated with short PFS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = 0.023). Week 12 overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%-59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors. Median PFS was 21 months (95% CI, 10-not reached); 76% of responses (95% CI, 64%-91%) persisted at 36 months. Adaptively dosed nivo-ipi responses are durable and resemble historical data for conventional nivo-ipi. Baseline IL6 and circulating tumor DNA changes during treatment warrant further study as biomarkers of nivo-ipi response.

Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy of giant unresectable melanoma of the scalp.

Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy of giant unresectable melanoma of the scalp.

The Long-Term Results of Electrochemotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with Locoregionally Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma.

Background/Objectives: Despite observing progress in recent years in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma, the optimal management of locoregional recurrence has not been determined. Various methods are used to treat this group of patients. One of these methods is electrochemotherapy. The present study presents the distant results in treating patients with the locoregional recurrence of melanoma, using the technique of electrochemotherapy. Methods: This study includes a retrospective analysis of 88 patients' data with locoregional melanoma recurrence, treated with electrochemotherapy (ECT) between 2010 and 2023, in two reference centers. Results: Approximately 80% of patients responded to the ECT treatment, achieving partial or complete remission. In a multivariate analysis, statistically significant longer overall survival was found in the group of patients who achieved complete remission after ECT and were treated with immunotherapy. Discussion: The results may suggest the existence of synergy between ECT and immunotherapy. However, confirmation of this fact requires further prospective studies that will also establish the role of ECT in the combination treatment of patients with locoregional recurrence of melanoma.

Tebentafusp (Kimmtrak) for uveal melanoma.

The FDA has approved tebentafusp-tebn (Kimmtrak – Immunocore), a first-in-class bispecific gp100 peptide-HLA-directed CD3 T-cell engager, for treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma in adults.

Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 in acral melanoma: A nationwide study.

Previous studies demonstrated limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable acral melanoma (AM); it remains unclear how this translates to the adjuvant setting. This study investigates clinical outcomes of acral compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection. All stages III-IV AM and CM patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2018 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of RFS was performed to adjust for potential confounders. We included 1958 (86 AM and 1872 CM) patients. At baseline, AM patients more frequently had KIT mutations, higher disease stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and fewer BRAF and NRAS mutations. Median RFS was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5-29.3) in AM and 37.4 months (95% CI: 34.6 to not reached) in CM (p = .002). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HRadj 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.17; p = .019). Two-year DMFS tended to be worse for AM than for CM: 64.5% versus 79.7% (p = .050). Two-year OS was significantly lower in AM (71.5% vs. 84.3%; p = .027). The results of this study suggest a poorer outcome of adjuvant-treated AM compared to CM. Studies assessing the added value of adjuvant treatment in AM are needed. Future research should investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve outcomes of high-risk AM.