Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Research Articles

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery surgery for left main disease according to lesion site: A meta-analysis

BackgroundComparative data after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease according to lesion site (ostial/shaft vs distal) are scant. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate outcomes after PCI or CABG for ULMCA disease according to lesion site. MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and adjusted observational studies that compared PCI versus CABG in patients with ULMCA disease and reported outcomes according to lesion site were systematically identified. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization) and all-cause death were the co-primary end points. Individual components of MACE were secondary end points. Sensitivity analysis including RCTs only were performed for each outcome. ResultsNine studies (3 RCTs, 6 adjusted observational), encompassing 6296 patients (2274 and 4022 treated for ostial/shaft or distal ULMCA, respectively) were included. At the 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between CABG and PCI for MACE, death, or any other secondary outcome for ostial/shaft ULMCA lesions (MACE: hazard ratio [HR], 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.27]; death: HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.84-1.46]). For distal ULMCA, PCI was associated with an increased risk of MACE (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.58), death (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.19-2.04), and revascularization (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.5-2.84). The benefit of CABG for MACE and revascularization was confirmed in the analysis limited to RCTs, whereas the benefit for mortality was not. ConclusionsAmong patients with distal ULMCA disease, CABG is associated with lower incidence of MACE and revascularization compared with PCI, whereas no differences in outcomes were observed for ostial/shaft ULMCA disease.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Following Coronary Revascularization in Men-vs-Women with Unprotected Left Main Disease

Gender differences have been recognized in several aspects of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, evidence for gender differences in long-term outcomes after left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization is limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of gender on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected LMCA disease. We evaluated 4,320 patients with LMCA disease who underwent CABG (n=1,456) or PCI (n=2,864) from the Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization registry. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Among 4,320 patients, 968 (22.4%) were females and 3,352 (77.6%) were males. Compared to males, females were older, had a higher prevalence of hypertension and insulin-requiring diabetes, more frequently presented with acute coronary syndrome, but had less extensive CAD and less frequent left main bifurcation involvement. The adjusted risk for the primary outcome was not different after PCI or CABG in females and males (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-1.63 and HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.80-1.19, respectively); there was no significant interaction between gender and the revascularization strategy (P for interaction=0.775). In multivariable analysis, gender did not appear to be an independent predictor for the primary outcome. In revascularization for LMCA disease, females and males had a comparable primary composite outcome of death, MI, or stroke with either CABG or PCI without a significant interaction of gender with the revascularization strategy.

Four-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome.

Background. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) have become a feasible and efficient alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery, especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are limited data regarding early and late outcomes after ULMCAD PCI in patients with ACS and stable angina.The aim of this study was to compare early and four-year clinical outcomes in patients with ULMCAD PCI presenting as ACS or stable angina in a high-volume PCI center.Methods. We conducted a single center retrospective observational study, which included 146 patients with ULMCAD undergoing PCI between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided in two groups: Group A included patients with stable angina (n = 70, 47.9%) and Group B patients with ACS (n = 76, 52.1%).Results. 30-day mortality was 8.22% overall, lower in Group A (1.43% vs 14.47%, p = 0.02). Mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates at 4 years were significantly lower in Group A (9.64% vs 33.25%, p = 0.001, and 24.06% vs 40.11%, p = 0.012, respectively). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 4 year did not differ between groups (15% in Group A vs 12.76% in Group B, p = 0.5).Conclusions. In our study patients with ULMCAD and ACS undergoing PCI had higher early and long-term mortality and MACE rates compared to patients with stable angina, with similar TLR rate at 4-year follow-up.

The impact of right coronary artery support on outcomes of patients with unprotected left main disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Many operators are discouraged from performing left main (LM) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in the absence of right coronary artery (RCA) support due to the increased procedure risk. We aimed at assessing the impact of absent functional RCA on prognostic implications in patients undergoing unprotected LM PCI. 613 patients underwent LM PCI in our department between 2015 and 2019. Consecutive 385 patients with unprotected LM and at least 1-year follow-up were included in the study. The study population comprosed 272 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) with dominant RCA, without any significant lesions (Group 1), and 113 ULMCAD patients and without RCA support (Group 2). In Group 2, 32.7% patients had a significant RCA stenosis, 48.7% had chronic total occlusion (CTO) of RCA, and 18.6% had recessive RCA. Patients in Group 2 were older and had higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). SYNTAX Score (median [IQR] 26.0 [20.0-33.0] vs 19.0 [13.0-25.5]; P <0.001) was higher and left ventricular ejection fraction was lower (median [IQR] 50.0 [40.0-60.0]% vs 55.0 [45.0-60.0]%; P = 0.01) in this group. All periprocedural complications did not differ among the groups. Long-term all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 1149 days did not differ significantly (23% vs 20%; P = 0.37). The long-term mortality in CTO-RCA group was also not significantly different. Patients with ULMCAD who have undergone LM PCI in the absence of RCA support, compared with those with ULMCAD and RCA support, differed neither in the prevalence of periprocedural complications nor in long-term all-cause mortality.

Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease.

BACKGROUNDPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) is increasing strategy in coronary artery patients. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the impact of sex on outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI.METHODSFrom January 2004 to December 2015, there were 3,960 patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI at our institution, including 3,121 (78.8%) men and 839 (21.2%) women. The clinical outcome included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization), all-cause death, MI, revascularization at three years follow-up.RESULTSCompared with men, women had not significantly different MACE (14.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.89, all-cause death (3.5% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.76), MI (5.0% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.38), revascularization (9.1% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.86), respectively. After adjustment, rates of MACE (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.24−1.81;P < 0.0001) and all-cause death (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09−2.48; P = 0.017) occurred more frequently in male patients, as well as revascularization (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.16−1.85;P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONIn this analysis, compared to men, women undergoing ULMCAD PCI have better outcomes of MACE, all-cause death, and revascularization.

Potential of Circulating Proangiogenic MicroRNAs for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Objective: This study aimed to explore the association of 14 proangiogenic microRNAs (miRNAs) with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurrence in unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: A total of 196 ULMCAD patients who underwent first ever CABG were recruited. The peripheral blood samples were collected prior to CABG, and then plasma samples were separated to detect expressions of 14 proangiogenic miRNAs by the reverse transcription quantitative PCR. Patients were regularly followed up to MACCE occurrence or 36 months after CABG. Results: MACCE occurrence at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years was 7.1, 11.2, and 14.3%, respectively, and accumulating MACCE occurrence time was 32.7 (95% confidence interval: 31.5–33.9) months. Both Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate Cox’s regression analyses displayed that miR-let-7f, miR-19a, miR-126, miR-130a, and miR-378 high expressions were associated with lower accumulating MACCE occurrence. Furthermore, forward stepwise multivariate Cox’s regression disclosed that miR-let-7f high expression and miR-378 high expression independently predicted decreased accumulating MACCE occurrence, whereas BMI (>25.0 kg/m²), diabetes, previous stroke, and higher disease extent were independent predictive factors for elevated accumulating MACCE occurrence. Conclusion: Measurement of circulating proangiogenic miRNAs especially miR-let-7f, miR-19a, miR-126, miR-130a, and miR-378 helps predict MACCE risk in ULMCAD patients who underwent CABG.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in acute unprotected left main coronary artery disease: Provisional strategy or two-stent technique?

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute unprotected left main coronary artery disease, however, tends to be a complex procedure as it lasts longer, requires more expertise, and frequently involves critical bifurcation and often results in more than one stent. Here we present a retrospective analysis of a specific group of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in our center. Methods: Retrospectively 55 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions and acute coronary syndrome diagnosis treated with per cutaneous coronary intervention were identified: The two-stent technique was applied in 28 cases, and provisional stenting (PS) was applied in 27 cases. Results: Current smoking (82.1% vs. 48.1%, p=0.007), prior myocardial infarction (35.7% vs. 7.4%, p=0.010) and prior coronary stent implantation history (28.6% vs. 3.7%, p=0.012) were more common in the two-stent technique group. While procedure duration was higher in the two-stent technique group compared to PS (58.21 vs. 33.15, p<0.001), door-balloon time was lower (29.7 vs. 42.1, p=0.006). However, creatinine levels 48-72 hours post-procedure (1.08 vs. 1.33, p=0.422) and in-hospital mortality rates were similar between the two groups (28.6% vs. 14.8%, p=0.229). Conclusion: In the treatment of acute unprotected left main coronary artery with percutaneous coronary intervention, two-stent technique is a viable, effective and safe strategy as it has similar contrast-induced nephropathy and mortality rates compared to provisional strategy.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graftinge Among Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Era (From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3)

Long-term safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still controversial in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD), and there is a scarcity of real-world data on the comparative long-term clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG for ULMCAD in new-generation drug-eluting stents era. The CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3 enrolled 14927 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization with PCI or isolated CABG between January 2011 and December 2013, and we identified 855 patients with ULMCAD (PCI: N = 383 [45%], and CABG: N = 472 [55%]). The primary outcome measure was all-cause death. Median follow-up duration was 5.5 (interquartile range: 3.9 to 6.6) years. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was not significantly different between the PCI and CABG groups (21.9% vs 17.6%, Log-rank p = 0.13). After adjusting confounders, the excess risk of PCI relative to CABG remained insignificant for all-cause death (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.47; p = 0.99). There were significant excess risks of PCI relative to CABG for myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.37; p = 0.002, and HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.96 to 4.46; p < 0.001), whereas there was no significant excess risk of PCI relative to CABG for stroke (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.41; p = 0.52). In conclusion, there was no excess long-term mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG, while the excess risks of PCI relative to CABG were significant for myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization in the present study population reflecting real-world clinical practice in Japan.

WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program in unprotected left main coronary artery disease patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: an effective approach in reducing anxiety, depression, loss to follow-up, and improving quality of life.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program (WERP) on anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE)-free survival, and loss to follow-up rate in unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In this randomized controlled study, 140 ULMCAD patients who underwent CABG were randomly assigned to WERP group (n=70) or control care (CC) group (n=70). During the 12-month intervention period, anxiety and depression (using hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)) and HRQoL (using 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)) were assessed longitudinally. During the total 36-month follow-up period (12-month intervention and 24-month non-intervention periods), MACCE and loss to follow-up were recorded. During the intervention period, HADS-anxiety score at month 9 (M9) (P=0.047) and month 12 (M12) (P=0.034), anxiety rate at M12 (P=0.028), and HADS-D score at M12 (P=0.048) were all reduced in WERP group compared with CC group. As for HRQoL, SF-12 physical component summary score at M9 (P=0.020) and M12 (P=0.010) and SF-12 mental component summary score at M9 (P=0.040) and M12 (P=0.028) were all increased in WERP group compared with CC group. During the total follow-up period, WERP group displayed a trend of longer MACCE-free survival than that in CC group but without statistical significance (P=0.195). Additionally, loss to follow-up rate was attenuated in WERP group compared with CC group (P=0.033). WERP serves as an effective approach in optimizing mental health care and promoting life quality in ULMCAD patients after CABG.

Percutaneous Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease With Thin-Strut Durable-Polymer or Early Generation Thicker-Strutted and Coated Bioabsorbable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in a Large-Scale Registry

BackgroundThe ideal drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) is unknown. We compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using durable polymers versus early-generation, thicker strutted and coated bioabsorbable polymers for ULMCA disease. MethodsPatients who underwent ULMCA PCI (893 patients) from April 2008 to November 2014 were identified from the Grand-DES registry. The primary end point was 3-year target lesion failure (TLF) after propensity score matching. ResultsThe final analysis included 754 patients (84.4%) and 139 patients (15.6%) in the durable and bioabsorbable polymer group, respectively. The groups differed significantly in lesion and procedural characteristics. Propensity score-matched analysis revealed a trend toward a lower 3-year TLF in the durable polymer group (log rank p=0.071). Independent predictors of 3-year TLF were chronic kidney disease, presentation with acute myocardial infarction, and a two-stenting technique for ULMCA lesions. Definite/probable stent thrombosis rates at 3-years were low in both groups (0.8% vs. 0.7%, p=0.925). ConclusionsThe safety of ULCMA PCI was excellent, and durable and bioabsorbable polymer DES provided similar clinical outcomes at 3-year follow-up. Landmark analysis revealed that the durable polymer group had a lower TLF rate from 9 months. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Long-term outcomes of single stenting compared with double stenting strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background:The optimal interventions for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease have long been debated, and long-term clinical studies comparing single stenting to double stenting strategies for ULMCA are currently lacking.Methods:We plan to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing single stenting with double stents strategy for ULMCA disease. We will search PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Library using a comprehensive strategy. The related conference proceedings and reference lists of the included studies will also be checked to identify additional studies. Two reviewers will screen retrieved records, extract information and assess the risk of bias independently. STATA software will be used to conduct data synthesis. There is no requirement of ethical approval and informed consent.Results:This study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.Conclusion:We hope it will provide a relatively comprehensive reference for clinical practice and future relevant clinical trials.Ethics and dissemination:Ethics approval and patient consent are not required, as this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.INPLASY registration number:INPLASY2020110030

Sex-differences in outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main disease: from the DELTA registries

Abstract Background Women have worse outcomes than men after PCI, with some studies suggesting a lower mortality of CABG vs PCI in females. Purpose To assess the outcomes of CABG and PCI according to sex in a large registry population of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. Methods The DELTA and DELTA 2 registries are two multicentric, prospective registries evaluating the outcomes of subjects undergoing coronary revascularization for ULMCA disease. Results Total population was 6253 patients, 27% women. Table 1 shows baseline clinical characteristics. Median follow up was of 880 days. Women undergoing CABG had lower incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accidentc (CVA) (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35–0.79) and a lower risk of death (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24–0.67). No significant differences were observed in men (Figure 1A). SIgnificant interaction was observed between sex and revascularization strategy for both outcomes (p&amp;lt;0.01-Figure 1B). CABG was associated with lower risk of target-vessel and target-lesion revascularization consistently inwomen and men (pint=0.49 and pint=0.89, respectively–Figure 1B). Conclusions In women undergoing coronary revascularization for ULMCA disease, CABG is associated to lower risk of death, MI or CVA. Further dedicated studies are needed to determine the optimal revascularization strategy in women with ULMCA disease. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Four-year outcomes of unprotected left main lesion treated with one-stent versus two-stent technique

Introduction – Most reports on left main bifurcation lesions have demonstrated that treatment with a singlestent strategy is superior to a two-stent strategy but have excluded patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aims – The aim of the current study was to compare the four year outcomes of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a one-stent or two-stent strategies in a population including those presenting as ACS. Methods – A total of 135 patients with ULMCAD treated by PCI were included, of which 75 (55.6%) had a one-stent strategy (Group A) and 60 (44.4%) had a two-stent strategy (Group B). Results – Fewer patients in Group A had a TIMI III flow at the end of the procedure (89.4% vs 100%, p=0.03) and complete revascularization (65.3% vs 88.3%, p=0.002). We found a higher early mortality in Group A without reaching statistical significance (13.4% vs 3.3%, p=0.1). Mortality rate at 4-year follow up was higher with Group A after multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 0.36, CI 0.15-0.85, p=0.02). We found no significant differences between the groups in terms of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (adjusted HR 0.85, CI 0.34-1.48, p=0.7) or target lesion revascularization (TLR) (adjusted HR 1.37, CI 0.42-4.47, p=0.6) at 4-year follow up. Conclusions – Among unselected patients with ULMCAD PCI, with or without ACS, the early mortality rate is similar between one and two-stent strategy. Although, 4 year TLR and MACE rates were similar between the two groups, the 4-year all-cause mortality rate was lower in the two-stent strategy group.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Percutaneous Angioplasty versus Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background and Aim: Treatment of patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected LMCA treated randomly by PCI or CABG. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov database searches identified five randomized trials (RCTs) including 4499 patients with unprotected LMCA comparing PCI (n = 2249) vs. CABG (n = 2250), with a minimum clinical follow-up of five years. Random effect risk ratios were used for efficacy and safety outcomes. The study was registered in PROSPERO. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction or stroke. Results: Compared to CABG, patients assigned to PCI had a similar rate of MACE (risk ratio (RR): 1.13; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.36; p = 0.19), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.97 to 2.25; p = 0.07) and stroke (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23; p = 0.42). Additionally, all-cause mortality (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.28; p = 0.48) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.43; p = 0.31) were not different. However, the risk of any repeat revascularization (RR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.15; p < 0.00001) was higher in patients assigned to PCI. Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the long-term survival and MACE of patients who underwent PCI for unprotected LMCA stenosis were comparable to those receiving CABG, despite a higher rate of repeat revascularization.

Three-year clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease patients complicated with chronic kidney disease treated by coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous coronary intervention.

This study aimed to compare the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) in unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) patients complicated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Three hundred sixty-eight ULMCAD patients complicated with CKD who underwent first ever CABG (n = 207) or PCI with DES (n = 161) were recruited in this prospective cohort study. Patients were followed up to MACCE occurrence or 36months after operations, and accumulating MACCE occurrence was calculated. Accumulating MACCE occurrence was decreased in CABG group compared with PCI group (P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that CKD stage positively correlated with accumulating MACCE occurrence in total patients (P = 0.006) and in PCI-treated patients (P = 0.018), but not in CABG-treated patients (P = 0.217). Further univariate Cox's regression model displayed that CABG (versus (vs.) PCI) (P = 0.008) was associated with lower accumulating MACCE occurrence, while age (≥ 65years) (P = 0.048), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.013), diabetes (P = 0.012), previous heart failure (P = 0.011), previous stroke (P = 0.030), LVEF < 50% (P = 0.048), higher CKD stage (P = 0.002), and more diseased vessels (P = 0.022) were associated with increased accumulating MACCE occurrence. Forward stepwise multivariate Cox's regression model disclosed that CABG (vs. PCI) (P = 0.002) independently predicted decreased accumulating MACCE occurrence, whereas hyperlipidemia (P = 0.033), diabetes (P = 0.002), higher CKD stage (P = 0.001), and more diseased vessels (P = 0.009) independently predicted elevated accumulating MACCE occurrence. CABG could be considered as the preferred treatment strategy compared with PCI with DES in ULMCAD patients complicated with CKD.

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

The optimal coronary revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with adrug-eluting stent (DES) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ULMCA disease with or without LVSD. Atotal of 984 patients with ULMCA disease who received aDES (n = 511) or underwent CABG (n = 473) were included in this study. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical parameters and outcomes of ULMCA disease patients with different left ventricular ejection fraction levels. There were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke between the CABG and DES groups with or without LVSD. The rate of target vessel revascularization was significantly higher with DES compared with CABG in patients without LVSD; however, the difference was not significant between the mild LVSD and severe LVSD groups. For patients with ULMCA disease and LVSD, there was no significant difference between DES and CABG in terms of efficacy and safety. Treatment with DES was an acceptable alternative to CABG.

Impact of Elective, Uncomplicated Target Lesion Revascularization on Cardiac Mortality After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

This study sought to investigate the impact of elective, uncomplicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) on long-term cardiac mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for ULMCA disease between January 2003 and December 2015 in 1 interventional center in Northern Italy were included. Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), as well as those undergoing urgent or complicated TLR were excluded. The primary endpoint of the study was cardiac mortality. Among the 418 patients fulfilling the study criteria, 79 (18.46%) underwent elective, uncomplicated TLR. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, there were 23 cardiac deaths among patients undergoing elective, uncomplicated TLR versus 50 in patients not undergoing TLR. After adjusting for possible confounders, TLR was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality (Hazard ratio [HZ] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 3.49; p = 0.03). Patients undergoing TLR had also significantly higher rates of the composite of cardiac death, MI and stroke compared with the no TLR group (adjusted HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.72). In conclusion, elective, uncomplicated TLR after PCI of ULMCA disease is associated with increased risk of long-term cardiac mortality. Reducing the risk of TLR after PCI of ULMCA disease may potentially improve the survival of these patients.

Long noncoding RNA NEAT1/microRNA-125a axis predicts increased major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event risk independently in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease underwent coronary artery bypass grafting.

BackgroundThe study aimed to investigate the long noncoding RNA nuclear‐enriched abundant transcript 1 (lnc‐NEAT1) and microRNA‐125a (miR‐125a) expressions, and further explore the role of lnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis in predicting major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) risk in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsA total of 280 patients with ULMCAD underwent CABG were consecutively enrolled in our prospective study, and their plasma samples were collected before CABG for the detection of lnc‐NEAT1 and miR‐125a expressions by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Lnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis was calculated via dividing lnc‐NEAT1 by miR‐125a. After CABG, regular follow‐up was continued until MACCE occurrence or 36 months.ResultsLnc‐NEAT1 expression, miR‐125a expression, and lnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis were 0.998 (IQR: 0.440‐1.720, range: 0.116‐5.771), 0.997 (IQR: 0.461‐1.650, range: 0.055‐3.621), and 1.018 (IQR: 0.384‐2.782, range: 0.041‐52.832), respectively. And lnc‐NEAT1 was negatively associated with miR‐125a. The 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year MACCE occurrence was 19 (6.8%), 29 (10.4%), and 38 (13.6%), respectively. Lnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis (χ 2 = 11.207, P = .001) and lnc‐NEAT1 expression (χ 2 = 5.345, P = .021) positively associated with accumulating MACCE occurrence, while miR‐125a expression (χ 2 = 5.869, P = .015) negatively correlated with accumulating MACCE occurrence. Notably, lnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis presented numerically better predictive value compared with lnc‐NEAT1 or miR‐125a alone for MACCE risk. Furthermore, lnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis high, elderly age, increased BMI, diabetes, previous stroke, LVEF, and higher disease extent (all P < .05) were independent predictive factors for increased accumulating MACCE occurrence.ConclusionLnc‐NEAT1/miR‐125a axis, as a combined index, presents potential value to be a prognostic biomarker for MACCE risk in ULMCAD management.

Long-Term Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

We compared the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease in a real-world population. CABG is the standard of care for ULMCA disease. Contemporary randomized trials have reported conflicting results with the two revascularization strategies for the treatment of ULMCA disease at intermediate-term follow-up. We evaluated 422 consecutive patients with ULMCA disease who underwent CABG (n = 273) or PCI (n = 149) from 1998-2008. The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 10 years. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was used to assess long-term MACCE. The cumulative 10-year incidence of risk for MACCE was not significantly different between the PCI and CABG groups (24.8% vs 20.5%, respectively; log rank P=.22; log rank PSM P=.45). The risk for all-cause death was not significantly different between the two groups (log rank P=.09; PSM log rank P=.51). The risk for stroke was significantly lower with PCI (log rank P=.02), but was not significant after matching (PSM log rank P=.27). The risk for TVR was significantly higher with PCI vs CABG prior to and after matching (log rank P<.001; log rank PSM P=.01). There were no significant differences in MACCE between the two groups when stratified by SYNTAX scores ≤22% (log rank P=.61) and >23% (log rank P=.06). In patients with ULMCA disease, PCI was comparable with CABG for long-term MACCE and death rates. The TVR rate was higher in the PCI group.

5-YEAR OUTCOME OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VS. CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY FOR PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH UNPROTECTED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND PROPENSITY SCORE ADJUSTED STUDIES

With the advance in stent, imaging and pharmacotherapy in the past decade, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been accepted as a treatment in selected patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD). However, the long-term outcomes of PCI vs coronary artery bypass