Unplanned Excision Research Articles

Real-world Referral Pattern of Unplanned Excision in Patients With Soft-tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study Conducted by the Bone and Soft-tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

Despite the well-publicized clinical outcomes after unplanned excision (UE) and re-excision (re-excision) in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), there is little information about the real-life referral patterns for UE, such as patient profile, details of procedures, and subsequent management after UE. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with UE who were referred to sarcoma-specific centers. Between May 2022 and June 2023, we registered 97 patients who underwent UE and were referred to sarcoma-specific centers in Japan. We excluded those with well-differentiated liposarcomas and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberances. We investigated the details of UE and additional treatment after UE. There were 49 men and 48 women, with a mean age of 62 years. A broad range of surgeons performed UE; 36 plastic surgeons, 22 orthopedic surgeons, 17 general surgeons, 17 dermatologists, and 5 others. The mean tumor size was 4.1 cm. Local anesthesia was administered to 58 patients. Forty-five patients underwent UE without prior magnetic resonance imaging. Inappropriate transverse skin incisions were performed in 42 patients. Of the 97 patients, 82 underwent re-excision after UE. The mean time between UE and date of initial presentation at the referral hospital was 46 days. The mean interval between UE and re-excision was 96 days. Of the 82 patients, 59 underwent soft-tissue reconstruction after re-excision. A broad range of surgeons performed UE. Continuous education about STS should be considered for all surgeons. UE should be avoided because residual tumors are common, and reconstructive surgery may be necessary.

The Importance of Patient Systemic Health Status in High-Grade Chondrosarcoma Prognosis: A National Multicenter Study

Background: Due to the relatively advanced age and high mortality rate of patients with high-grade chondrosarcoma (CS), it is important to holistically assess patient- and tumor characteristics in multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making with regard to treatment options. While current prognostic models include multiple tumor and treatment characteristics, the only patient characteristics that are commonly included are age and gender. Based on clinical experience, we believe that factors related to patient preoperative systemic health status such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score may be equally important prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Methods: A retrospective nationwide cohort study was identified from four specialized bone sarcoma centers in The Netherlands. Patients with a primary CS grade II, III, and dedifferentiated CS were eligible. Prognostic factors including age at presentation, gender, ASA score, CVD, tobacco use, BMI, histological tumor grade, tumor size, pathological fracture, presentation after unplanned excision, type of surgery and surgical margin were evaluated. The outcome measure was OS at the time of surgery. The Kaplan–Meier methodology was employed to estimate OS; a log-rank test was used to assess the difference in survival. To study the impact of prognostic factors on OS, a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was estimated. Results: In total, 249 patients were eligible for this study, and 89 were deceased at the end of follow-up. In multivariate analysis, histological grade (HR 2.247, 95% CI 1.334–3.783), ASA score III (HR 2.615, 95% CI 1.145–5.976, vs. ASA I), and age per year (HR: 1.025, 95% CI 1.004–1.045) were negatively associated with OS. No association was found between tobacco use, BMI, gender or cardiovascular disease and OS in this cohort. Pathological fracture and tumor size were only associated with OS in univariate analysis. Conclusions: This multicenter study is the first on sarcomas to include ASA in a prognostic model. Results show that ASA score as a proxy for patients’ systemic health status should be included when providing a prognosis for patients with a high-grade primary CS, besides the conventional risk factors such as tumor grade and age. Specifically, severe systemic disease (ASA score III) is a strong negative predictor. Conversely, we found no difference in OS between ASA scores I and II. These findings aid multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making with regard to these complex sarcoma patients that often require life-changing surgeries. Level of Evidence: Prognostic level III. See the instructions for authors for the complete description of levels of evidence.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the extremities: a Korean multi-center study of 107 cases

BackgroundDedifferentiated liposarcoma of the extremities (DDL-E) is rare in comparison to that of the retroperitoneum. Its clinical features and surgical principle for resection margins at the dedifferentiated and the well-differentiated components are yet to be elucidated.MethodsThis retrospective multi-center study examined patients diagnosed with DDL-E from August 2004 to May 2023 at 5 sarcoma centers. Clinical features, oncologic outcomes, and prognostic factors were analyzed.ResultsA total of 107 patients were reviewed. The 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were 84.7%, 78.6%, and 87.8%, respectively. Other primary malignancies and extrapulmonary metastasis were observed in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. The independent risk factor for local recurrence was R1/2 margin at the dedifferentiated component of the tumor. Metastasis was associated with tumor size in univariate analysis. The independent risk factor for DSS was tumor grade. Previous unplanned excision, de novo presentation, tumor depth, absence of the well-differentiated component, infiltrative border, R1/2 margin at the well-differentiated component were not associated with oncologic outcomes.ConclusionsThis is the largest study examining DDL-E to-date. Localized DDL-E has low potential for metastasis and carries an excellent prognosis. Other primary malignancy and extrapulmonary metastasis are more frequent in DDL-E, thus close monitoring of other sites during follow-up is recommended. While wide resection margin is the standard surgical approach for DDL-E, further investigation into moderated wide resection margin at the well-differentiated component is warranted.

Oncology

The October 2024 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Composite reconstruction: is it the answer for pelvic resections?; Can the cartilaginous thickness determine the risk of malignancy in pelvic cartilaginous tumours, and how accurate is the preoperative biopsy of these tumours?; Incidence and survival outcomes of patients with high-grade appendicular bone sarcoma and isolated regional lymph node metastasis; Improved metastatic-free survival after systematic re-excision following complete macroscopic unplanned excision of limb or trunk soft-tissue sarcoma; UK guidelines for the management of soft-tissue sarcomas; Current management of desmoid tumours: a review.

Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcoma The Impact of Residual Disease in Re Excision Specimen

Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcoma The Impact of Residual Disease in Re Excision Specimen

Clinical Variables Influencing Outcomes in Patients with Atypical Intradermal Smooth Muscle Neoplasms (Formerly Cutaneous Leiomyosarcomas): Single-Institution Study of 95 Surgical Patients.

Atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasm, also commonly termed cutaneous leiomyosarcoma, is a soft tissue tumor with a low risk of aggressive behavior. These lesions arise in the dermis with possible superficial subcutaneous extension, demonstrate cytologic atypia, and often show mitotic activity. A retrospective review of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment methods was conducted in a consecutive series of patients presenting to MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from 2002 to 2021 (n=95). All pathology was reviewed by MDACC pathologists and determined to be atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasm. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range 22-86), and 74% were male. Ninety-five percent (n=90) of patients identified as White, non-Hispanic. Most tumors were slow-growing, solitary, and painless nodules. Tumors were in the lower extremities (44.2%), followed by the upper extremity (28.4%), trunk (22.1%), and head and neck (5.2%). All patients (n=44, 46.3%) who had a punch/incisional biopsy for diagnostic purposes had a subsequent tumor excision. Unplanned excision or excisional biopsy was performed on the remaining 46 (48%) patients. Of this subset, 41 of the 46 aforementioned patients (89%) had positive margins and underwent re-excision. Final pathology in 25/38 (66%) re-excision specimens was negative for residual tumor despite an initial positive margin. Two patients in the cohort had local recurrence 2 and 3 years after initial surgery. Both patients had positive margins, underwent excision of the recurrent tumor, and remain free of disease. After median follow-up of 6.9 years (range 1 day-18 years), 5-year recurrence-free survival was 96% and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 78%. In this study of consecutive patients presenting with atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasm, we found good OS and local control after definitive surgical excision with negative margins, including excisional biopsy with close margins. Atypical intradermal smooth muscle neoplasm is unlikely to metastasize and has an excellent prognosis. Guidelines to determine optimal surveillance strategies for these patients should be revisited.

Whether unplanned excision on synovial sarcoma will influence the prognosis? An retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in 54 synovial sarcoma cases at a single center.

In this study, we examined the reason and prognosis of unplanned excision on synovial sarcoma. We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between March 2013 and February 2021, including 26 cases of unplanned excision surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they underwent unplanned excision. Then, factors such as gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, unplanned excision, time of onset, duration of disease, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, amputation, local recurrence factors, and death were statistically evaluated. The results of a multivariate analysis revealed that the AJCC staging is an independent factor for patient prognosis. When patients were divided into two groups, those who had undergone unplanned excision and those who had not, statistical analysis revealed that there was no difference of survival between two groups, but tumor size and AJCC staging had statistical difference. To further explore the influences of unplanned excision, we performed propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching using the nearest neighbor matching method to balance the covariates between the two groups. There was no difference of survival between two groups after propensity score matching. Unplanned excision is commonly performed in synovial sarcoma and do not impact the prognosis after extensive resection.

Optimizing Morbidity in Unplanned Soft Tissue Sarcoma Excisions: Should We Skip the Reconstructive Ladder?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare and diverse primary malignant tumors that comprise approximately 1% of all malignancies. Misdiagnoses and unplanned excisions of STSs are common due to the tumor's rarity, leading to secondary tumor bed excisions (TBEs). Reconstructive outcomes for TBEs remain poorly understood, prompting this study to address the knowledge gap and inform preoperative discussions. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent STS excisions at a quaternary cancer center. Patients were categorized into mass excision (ME) and TBE groups. Reconstructive approaches were divided into simple (primary closure, complex repair, skin grafts, local flaps) and advanced (pedicled or free flaps). The groups were compared for postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death. When simple reconstructive techniques were used, TBEs exhibited higher rates of overall and major complications, whereas MEs had higher rates of overall and minor complications. Intergroup analysis revealed that with simple reconstruction, rates of overall and major complications were higher in TBEs than in MEs, and rates of minor complications were higher in MEs than in TBEs. Regression analyses revealed that simple reconstruction of TBEs had 90% and 180% higher odds of major complications and reoperation compared to simple reconstruction of MEs (P < 0.05). TBEs, despite their smaller size, exhibited a heightened susceptibility to overall and major complications, challenging the notion that simpler techniques suffice in these cases. Our findings encourage the consideration of advanced reconstructive techniques for TBEs that may seem amenable to simple reconstructive techniques.

Early Complications of Planned Resection Versus Unplanned Excision of Sarcomas in the Distal Upper Extremity

Unplanned excisions are defined as excisions of malignant tumors performed without preoperative cross-sectional imaging or diagnostic biopsy, frequently resulting in residual disease and re-excision secondary to positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative morbidity of planned versus unplanned upper-extremity sarcoma excisions. A single tertiary referral hospital pathology database was queried from January 2015 through 2022 for primary upper-extremity sarcomas (forearm, wrist, hand, and finger). Demographics, tumor features, survival characteristics, and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two upper-extremity sarcoma patients were identified, two-thirds of whom had unplanned excisions. Those with unplanned excisions were more likely to be female (relative risk [RR]: 1.9; P= .002), undergo initial excision at a nonsarcoma center (RR: 14.0; P < .001), have masses distal to the forearm (RR: 1.6; P= .02), and have smaller masses (4.8 vs 7.4 cm, P= .03). 71.4% of tumors were high grade, and 60.7% less than 5 cm in size.Unplanned excisions had positive margins in 96.4% of cases and were more likely to undergo re-excision (odds ratio [OR]: 20.0; P= .001), more total resections (2.7 vs 1.4, P= .009), sacrifice of neurovascular structures (OR: 6.1; P= .04), adjuvant radiation therapy (OR: 4.5; P= .05), adjuvant systemic therapy (OR: 10.9; P= .03), or experience a complication (OR: 17.6; P= .002) at an average of 38.0 months of follow-up.Nearly half of all unplanned excision patients developed a local recurrence or metastatic disease. Six patients required an amputation versus one in the planned cohort (P= .17), and 26.5% of patients died at an average of 32.5 months from presentation. Distal upper-extremity sarcoma excisions are frequently unplanned, with high rates of morbidity compared with planned excisions. Surgeons should have a low threshold for cross-sectional imaging and core needle biopsy of atypical lesions, irrespective of size, with referral to a sarcoma center. Prognostic IV.

Is Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Associated with Worse Oncological Outcomes?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare neoplasms which can be mistaken for benign masses and be excised in a non-oncologic fashion (unplanned excision). Whether unplanned excision (UE) is associated with worse outcomes is highly debated due to conflicting evidence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Main outcomes analyzed were five-year overall survival (OS), five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), amputation rate and plastic reconstruction surgery rate. Risk ratios were used to compare outcomes between patients treated with planned and unplanned excision. We included 16,946 patients with STS, 6017 (35.5%) with UE. UE was associated with worse five-year LRFS (RR 1.35, p = 0.019). Residual tumor on the tumor bed was associated with lower five-year LRFS (RR = 2.59, p < 0.001). Local recurrence was associated with worse five-year OS (RR = 1.82, p < 0.001). UE was not associated with a worse five-year OS (RR = 0.90, p = 0.16), higher amputation rate (RR = 0.77, p = 0.134), or a worse plastic reconstruction surgery rate (RR = 1.25, p = 0.244). Unplanned excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the presence of disease in tumor bed after one were associated with worse five-year LRFS. Tumor bed excision should remain the standard approach, with special consideration to the presence of residual disease.

Unplanned Sarcoma Excisions: Understanding How They Happen.

Soft-tissue sarcomas present as a mass with nonspecific symptoms, and unplanned excisions commonly occur. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of unplanned excisions performed by orthopaedic surgeons and to conduct a root cause analysis (RCA) of the steps that led to unplanned excisions in all the cases. A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Two cohorts were identified, one including patients who underwent an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma (n = 107) and a second cohort with patients whose entire care was performed at our sarcoma center (n = 102). A RCA was conducted with the whole sample to identify the preventable causes that led to sarcoma unplanned excisions. Orthopedic surgeons were the second group of physicians to perform the most unplanned excisions, only behind general surgeons. Inadequate imaging was encountered in 76.6% of the patients (n = 82, 95% confidence interval, 67.8 to 83.6). Forty-five patients (42.1%) had no imaging studies before the unplanned procedure. In the RCA, the most notable obstacles found were (1) incorrect assumption of a benign diagnosis, (2) failure to obtain the appropriate imaging study, (3) incorrectly reported imaging studies, (4) failure to order a biopsy, and (5) incorrect reporting of the biopsy. Despite educational efforts, unplanned excisions and the devastating consequences that sometimes follow continue to occur. Orthopaedic surgeons persist in playing a role in the unplanned procedure burden.

The efficacy of re-excision after unplanned excision for synovial sarcoma

BackgroundThis investigation studied the clinical features and outcomes of synovial sarcoma (SS) patients from a single institution. MethodsA retrospective clinicopathologic study was conducted on 129 postoperative SS patients during 2003–2018. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression (Cox) models were performed to determine the parameters associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) via univariate and multivariate analysis. The impact of unplanned excision (UE) and residual tumor in re-excision specimens was evaluated. ResultsThe 3-year RFS, MFS and 5-year CSS were 72 %, 70 %, and 76 %, respectively. Independent factors associated with significantly inferior survival included older age, UE without re-excision, UE with residual tumors, high grade, and deep tumor for RFS, trunk-related tumor, UE without re-excision, UE with residual tumors, and deep tumor for MFS, UE with residual tumors, high grade, and deep tumor for CSS. Re-excision after UE was significantly associated with better RFS (P < 0.001). Residual tumors were remarkably correlated with inferior RFS (P = 0.0012), MFS (P = 0.0016), and CSS (P = 0.048), especially in patients at stage II (MFS: P < 0.001, CSS: P = 0.0014). ConclusionUE and residual tumors have a marked impact on the long-term survival of SS patients. Primary wide excision and re-excision is especially essential for patients at stage II.

Translated article] Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas of the musculoskeletal system

IntroductionThe diagnosis process of soft tissue sarcomas of the musculoskeletal system (SPBAL) continues to be complex, with cases of unplanned excisions (“whoops” surgeries). This study evaluates the frequency of these type of procedures, trying to identify patient characteristics, tumours, surgical treatment and final results. Material and methods131 patients treated surgically between October 2018 and December 2021 of a SPBAL were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with SPBAL located in the viscera, mediastinum, heart, retroperitoneum, peritoneum and genital tract were excluded. Differences between patients with planned and unplanned excisions were assessed with Chi2 tests and a Cox multivariate regression model. ResultsUnplanned excisions of SPBAL have taken place in 18% of the patients in our area, mainly in tumours of less than 5cm and located superficial to the fascia. 29.2% of these patients did not have a previous imaging test. It has not been shown that a “whoops” surgery can lead to a decrease in survival or a higher rate of recurrences. ConclusionsWe recommend carrying out an imaging test always prior to the removal of any type of soft tissue tumour, as well as adherence to the referral guidelines to reference centres.

Detecting residual soft tissue sarcoma after unplanned excision; model-free analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at short-term follow-up.

To evaluate diagnostic utility of additional DCE-MRI for detecting residual soft tissue sarcomas (STS) after unplanned excision (UPE). We retrospectively evaluated 32 patients with UPE of STS, followed by conventional MRI with DCE-MRI and wide excision (WE), between November 2019 and January 2022. Residual tumors on conventional MRI were categorized into three groups: Lesion-type-0, no abnormal enhancement, Lesion-type-1, an indeterminate lesion, and Lesion-type-2, a definite enhancing nodule. On DCE-MRI, ROIs were manually placed on enhancing areas of suspected residual tumor. The mean and 95th percentile values of AUC of time-intensity curve were calculated at 60, 90, and 120 s of Enhancement-cycle-1 and -2. Optimal DCE parameters were identified by ROC analysis. Diagnostic performance of conventional MRI and DCE-MRI was compared using McNemar's test. On WE, residual tumor was present in 23 (71.9%) of 32 patients. On MRI, Lesion-type-1 was found in 16/32 (50%) patients and Lesion-type-2 in 16/32 (50%). The optimal DCE parameter was the 95th percentile value of AUC at 120s of Enhancement-cycle-2. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were as follows: 65.2% (95% CI, 45.8-85.7%), 88.9% (CI, 68.4-100%), and 0.77 (CI, 0.62-0.92) for conventional MRI, and 100%, 55.6% (CI, 23.1-88.0%), and 0.78 (CI, 0.61-0.95) for combined conventional and DCE-MRI. Additional DCE-MRI aided in detecting residual STS after UPE, particularly in cases without definite soft tissue nodular enhancement. Close follow up may be suggested for patients showing abnormality in DCE-MRI, with more suspicion of residual tumor.

Unplanned excision of extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas

Unplanned excision of extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas

Optimal timing of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients: Immediate intervention versus waiting for local recurrence.

To investigate the difference in efficacy of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients with and without residual tumor following unplanned excision, and to compare the prognostic outcomes of immediate re-excision versus waiting for local recurrence. This study included synovial sarcoma patients who underwent re-excision at our center between 2009 and 2019, categorized into groups based on unplanned excision and local recurrence. Analyzed endpoints included overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). Prognostic factors associated with these three different survival outcomes were analyzed through the use of Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression approaches. In total, this study incorporated 109 synovial sarcoma patients, including 32 (29.4%) with no residual tumor tissue identified after re-excision, 31 (28.4%) with residual tumor tissue after re-excision, and 46 (42.2%) with local recurrence after initial excision. Patients were assessed over a median 52-month follow-up period. The respective 5-year OS, 5-year LRFS, and 5-year DRFS rates were 82.4%, 76.7%, and 74.2% for the nonresidual group, 80.6%, 80.4%, and 77.3% for the residual tumor tissue group, and 63.5%, 50.7%, and 46.3% for the local recurrence group. There was no significant difference in OS of nonresidual group and residual group patients after re-excision (p = 0.471). Concurrent or sequential treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of metastasis and mortality when compared with noncombined chemoradiotherapy, and was more effective in the local recurrence group (p < 0.05). Prompt and adequate re-excision is crucial for patients with synovial sarcoma who undergo initial inadequate tumor excision, and their prognosis is significantly better compared with patients who delay re-excision until local recurrence.

Results of resection of forearm soft tissue sarcoma

PurposeSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the forearm are rare. We aim to assess their oncological and functional outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 34 patients who underwent surgical excision for forearm STS at our institution between 1993 and 2020. We analyzed postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating scale (MSTS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates. The significance of the following variables was determined: age, sex, histology, tumor size, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, surgical margin, unplanned excision, metastases upon initial presentation, receipt of chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT).ResultsThe postoperative median MSTS score was 28. Bone resection or major nerve palsy was the only factor that influenced MSTS scores. The median MSTS scores in patients with or without bone resection or major nerve palsy were 24 and 29, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year LRFS rates was 87%. Univariate analysis revealed that the histological diagnosis of myxofibrosarcoma was the only factor that influenced LRFS (P = 0.047). The 5-year MFS rates was 71%. In univariate analysis, no factors were associated with MFS. The 5-year OS rates was 79%. Age was the only factor that influenced OS (P = 0.01).ConclusionIn the treatment of forearm STS, reconstruction of the skin and tendon can compensate for function, while bone resection and major nerve disturbance cannot. Careful follow-up is important, especially in patients with myxofibrosarcoma, due to its likelihood of local recurrence.

Resección no planificada en sarcomas de partes blandas del aparato locomotor

IntroductionThe diagnosis process of soft tissue sarcomas of the musculoskeletal system (SPBAL) continues to be complex, with cases of unplanned excisions (“whoops” surgeries). This study evaluates the frequency of these type of procedures, trying to indentify patient characteristics, tumors, surgical treatment and final results. Material and methods131 patients treated surgically between October 2018 and December 2021 of a SPBAL were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with SPBAL located in the viscera, mediastinum, heart, retroperitoneum, peritoneum and genital tract were excluded. Differences between patients with planned and unplanned excisions were assessed with chi2 tests and a Cox multivariate regression model. ResultsUnplanned excisions of SPBAL have taken place in 18% of the patients in our área, mainly in tumors of less than 5 cm and located superficial to the fascia. 29,2% of these patients did not have a previous imaging test. It has not been shown that a “whoops” surgery can lead to a decrease in survival or a higher rate of recurrences. ConclusionsWe recommend carrying out an imaging test always prior to the removal of any type of soft tissue tumor, as well as adherence to the referral guidelines to reference centers.

ASO Author Reflections: Second Chances: Re-excision Offers Acceptable but Costly Outcomes for STS Patients with Unplanned Excisions in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country.

ASO Author Reflections: Second Chances: Re-excision Offers Acceptable but Costly Outcomes for STS Patients with Unplanned Excisions in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country.

Oncology

The February 2023 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Is the number of national database research studies in musculoskeletal sarcoma increasing, and are these studies reliable?; Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma is associated with high morbidity; Adjuvant radiation in atypical lipomatous tumours; The oncological outcomes of isolated limb perfusion and neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma patients - a nationwide multicentre study; Can low-grade chondrosarcoma be treated with intralesional curettage and cryotherapy?; Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Doxorubicin-polymeric meshes prevent local recurrence after sarcoma resection while avoiding cardiotoxicity; How important are skip lesions in Ewing’s sarcoma?; Improving outcomes for amputees: the health-related quality of life and cost utility analysis of osseointegration prosthetics in transfemoral amputees.