Unnecessary Neuroimaging Research Articles

P.007 Role of neuroimaging in headache management; are we following the guidelines?

Background: Healthcare systems incur a significant financial burden through unnecessary neuroimaging, which globally, is in the order of the billions of dollars. Current recommendations suggest avoiding neuroimaging in patients with stable headaches, particularly those meeting the criteria for migraine. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 100 headache patients in an outpatient neurology clinic. We evaluated the use of CT and MRI imaging and the impact of neuroimaging on clinical management. Results: 55% of patients had a history of migraine. Overall, 74 of 100 patients had either CT or MRI imaging. Imaging was largely normal or identified non-specific, clinically irrelevant findings. There was 1 case of a cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumor and another of suspected MS. Neuroimaging did not alter headache management. Conclusions: The data is consistent with current guidelines suggesting that neuroimaging is not necessary in patients with stable headaches, particularly migraine. Neuroimaging overuse might reflect lack of awareness of guideline recommendations, insecurity over diagnoses, medicolegal concerns, as well as patients and primary practitioners’ expectations. Resources to help improve public and physician awareness regarding neuroimaging use in patients with stable headache may help reduce unwarranted imaging studies and could have significant financial savings for healthcare systems.

Clinical Characteristics and Appropriateness of Investigations in Children With Headaches at the Emergency Department

BackgroundIdentifying the cause of headaches in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) can be challenging due to the lack of comprehensive research. This study aims to identify the frequency, characteristics, and unnecessary diagnostic procedures of patients with headaches in the PED setting. MethodsA six-month cross-sectional study was conducted at the PED of Alexandria University Children's Hospital, including all children with headaches. Children were classified as having primary headache (PH), secondary benign headache (SBH), and secondary serious headache (SSH) according to predetermined criteria. Logistic regression was employed to analyze the risk factors associated with SSH. ResultsA total of 164 visits to the PED were recorded, out of a total of 22,662 visits, accounting for approximately 0.72% of all visits and 1.17% of the total number of children admitted. PH was the most common cause, accounting for 61.0% of cases, followed by SSH with 24.4%, whereas SBH was the least common with 13.4%. Abnormal neurological examination (odds ratio, 53.752 [1.628 to 1774.442], P = 0.026∗) was found to have a strong and statistically significant association with SSH in the multivariate analysis. Regarding the appropriateness of the investigations conducted, it was found that over half (66.5%) of the cases had unnecessary neuroimaging, with 52% of these cases being children with PH. ConclusionsHeadaches in children are commonly reported during visits to the PED. PH was the most prevalent, followed by SSH, whereas SBH was the least common. Many of the children received inaccurate first diagnoses and performed unnecessary laboratory tests, neuroimaging, and other tests, mostly electroencephalography.

Injudicious use of cranio-spinal imaging in Guillain-Barré syndrome in a low resource country.

Background: Many patients being investigated for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) undergo unnecessary neuroimaging. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with GBS undergoing neuroimaging investigation, and to investigate any association with different GBS variants using the Brighton criteria. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the leading tertiary care hospital in Pakistan; 148 patients being investigated for, and subsequently diagnosed with GBS between January 2017 and March 2020 were enrolled. Participants were asked if they had undergone neuroimaging of the craniospinal axis before or during hospital admission, and the purpose of any computed tomography (CT) scan was investigated. We enquired whether fundoscopy had been performed before lumbar puncture (LP) and determined the level of certainty based on the Brighton criteria. Results: The majority of participants were men (n = 107, 73%), with a mean age of 42.85 ± 18.40 years. The mean waiting time to their first interaction with a neurologist was 5.20 ± 4.01 days, and the demyelinating variant of GBS was more common than the axonal variant (1.6:1). Most patients were diagnosed with level I certainty using the Brighton criteria (n = 113, 76%). Brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed ahead of admission in 48 (32%) and 59 (39%) patients, respectively. Brain CT scan was performed in 121 (82%) patients before LP, while 27 (18%) only underwent fundoscopic examination before LP. Conclusion: Clinical examination is fundamental in the diagnosis of GBS. Neuroimaging may be inappropriate and unnecessary, and may detract attention from crucial peripheral neuropathy measures while misusing limited resources.

Trends in the Management of Headache Disorders in US Emergency Departments: Analysis of 2007-2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data.

We examined trends in management of headache disorders in United States (US) emergency department (ED) visits. We conducted a cross-sectional study using 2007–2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. We included adult patient visits (≥18 years) with a primary ED discharge diagnosis of headache. We classified headache medications by pharmacological group: opioids, butalbital, ergot alkaloids/triptans, acetaminophen/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antiemetics, diphenhydramine, corticosteroids, and intravenous fluids. To obtain reliable estimates, we aggregated data into three time periods: 2007–2010, 2011–2014, and 2015–2018. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined medication, neuroimaging, and outpatient referral trends, separately. Among headache-related ED visits, opioid use decreased from 54.1% in 2007–2010 to 28.3% in 2015–2018 (Ptrend < 0.001). There were statistically significant increasing trends in acetaminophen/NSAIDs, diphenhydramine, and corticosteroids use (all Ptrend < 0.001). Changes in butalbital (6.4%), ergot alkaloid/triptan (4.7%), antiemetic (59.2% in 2015–2018), and neuroimaging (37.3%) use over time were insignificant. Headache-related ED visits with outpatient referral for follow-up increased slightly from 73.3% in 2007–2010 to 79.7% in 2015–2018 (Ptrend = 0.02). Reflecting evidence-based guideline recommendations for headache management, opioid use substantially decreased from 2007 to 2018 among US headache-related ED visits. Future studies are warranted to identify strategies to promote evidence-based treatment for headaches (e.g., sumatriptan, dexamethasone) and appropriate outpatient referral and reduce unnecessary neuroimaging orders in EDs.

Differentiating central from peripheral causes of acute vertigo in an emergency setting with the HINTS, STANDING, and ABCD2 tests: A diagnostic cohort study.

Diagnosing stroke in dizzy patients remains a challenge in emergency medicine. The accuracy of the neuroophthalmologic examination HINTS performed by emergency physicians (EPs) is unknown. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of the HINTS examination performed by trained EPs for diagnosing central cause of acute vertigo and unsteadiness and to compare it with another bedside clinical tool, STANDING, and with the history-based score ABCD2. This was a prospective diagnostic cohort study among patients with isolated vertigo and unsteadiness seen in a single emergency department (ED). Trained EPs performed HINTS and STANDING tests blinded to attending physicians. ABCD2≥4 was used as the threshold and was calculated retrospectively. The criterion standard was diffusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Peripheral diagnoses were established by a normal MRI, and etiologies were further refined by an otologic examination. We included 300 patients of whom 62 had a central lesion on neuroimaging including 49 strokes (79%). Of the 238 peripheral diagnoses, 159 were vestibulopathies, mainly benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (40%). HINTS and STANDING tests reached high sensitivities at 97% and 94% and NPVs at 99% and 98%, respectively. The ABCD2 score failed to predict half of central vertigo cases and had a sensitivity of 55% and a NPV of 87%. The STANDING test was more specific and had a better positive predictive value (PPV; 75% and 49%, respectively; positive likelihood ratio [LR+]= 3.71, negative likelihood ratio [LR-]= 0.09) than the HINTS test (67% and 44%, respectively; LR+= 2.96, LR-= 0.04). The ABCD2 score was specific (82%, LR+= 3.04, LR-= 0.56) but had a very low PPV (44%). In the hands of EPs, HINTS and STANDING tests outperformed ABCD2 in identifying central causes of vertigo. For diagnosing peripheral disorders, the STANDING algorithm is more specific than the HINTS test. HINTS and STANDING could be useful tools saving both time and costs related to unnecessary neuroimaging use.

Emergent neuroimaging for seizures in epilepsy: A population study

We determined how often patients with epilepsy presented to the emergency department (ED) for seizure and the frequency and predictors for undergoing emergent neuroimaging during those visits. We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative claims' data from 2007 to 2015. Adults with epilepsy were identified based on a diagnosis of epilepsy and an outpatient prescription for an antiepileptic medication. The Bonferroni corrected significance level was 0.0018. We identified 381,362 patients with a mean follow-up period of 1.99 years, of whom 35,015 (9.2%) patients presented to the ED for seizure at least once. Patients with at least one ED visit were younger, more likely to be male, had fewer comorbidities, and had longer follow-up as compared with those with no ED visit (all p < 0.001). Among the 35,015 patients presenting to the ED, 13.6% had neuroimaging, mostly commonly head computed tomography (CT; 95.5%). Patients undergoing neuroimaging were younger (46 versus 48 years) and with higher rates of psychosis (17.4% versus 13.8%) and depression (16.1% versus 12.2%; p < 0.001). This helps to quantify the burden of ED and emergent neuroimaging utilization for patients with epilepsy and can help inform efforts to curtail unnecessary neuroimaging.

Unusual Brain MRI Findings in Patients Imaged for Headache: a Case Series.

We describe a series of cases with unusual brain MRI findings in patients who present with headache disorders. Incidental findings in patients imaged for headache include the following: aneurysm, arachnoid cyst, cerebral vascular malformations, Arnold-Chiari malformations, empty sella turcica, gray matter heterotopias, mastoiditis, mega cisterna magna, meningioma, normal variants of cerebral circulation, paranasal sinus disease, pineal cyst, pituitary tumor, Rathke's cleft cyst, skull hyperostosis, and vestibular schwannoma. The most common abnormal MRI findings encountered in migraine are nonspecific white matter lesions. The current 2019 guidelines from the American College of Radiology and American Headache Society recommend against ordering neuroimaging in patients with a high probability of a primary headache disorder not typically associated with diagnostic imaging findings and who have normal neurologic exam in addition to no red flags in history. Often, unnecessary neuroimaging yields incidental findings, and this typically results in patient anxiety and further unnecessary testing. Detailed below are a series of cases in which unusual findings were found in patients presenting to our clinic for further evaluation of headache disorders. Imaging may have been done prior to presentation to us or by us due to concern for secondary causes.

National Audit of Meningitis Management (NAMM): a National Infection Trainee Collaborative for Audit and Research (NITCAR) audit of adherence to the 2016 UK joint specialist societies’ guideline on the diagnosis and management of acute meningitis in adults

Background Bacterial meningitis has significant mortality but frontline doctors will see it infrequently. Therefore, UK guidance on meningitis in adults, with auditable standards, was revised in 2016. We undertook a national audit to assess adherence to the guidelines. Methods Patients with community acquired meningitis were identified through coding or laboratory data. Audit standards, including immediate management, diagnostics and treatment, were evaluated by notes review. Results Notes from 1472 patients with meningitis were reviewed – 309/1472 (21%) had bacterial aetiology, 615/1472 (42%) viral, 548/1472 (37%) unidentified aetiology. Only 50% of patients had blood cultures taken within one hour of admission and just 2% had a lumbar puncture (LP) within the first hour. 27% received antibiotics within one hour. Most patients received ceftriaxone or cefotaxime but only 37% of over-60s received empirical anti-listeria antibiotics. 26% of patients who had antibiotics were given adjunctive steroids. Half had CSF microscopy within two hours of LP. Less than a third had pneumococcal and/or meningococcal PCR on cerebrospinal fluid. Only 44% had an HIV test. 62% had unnecessary neuroimaging before LP. Overall mortality was 3% - 16% in pneumococcal disease and 8% in meningococcal meningitis. There was a trend toward improved survival in patients with pneumococcal meningitis who received dexamethasone [85/96 (88%)] compared to those who did not [57/73 (78%)] (p=0.066). Conclusions Adherence to the meningitis guidelines is inadequate, potentially compromising patient safety. Improvements in guideline dissemination, novel educational resources and clinician and patient engagement are required if we are to increase guideline adherence and improve outcome.

Community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis in adults: a clinical update.

Acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) in adults is associated with a mortality that may exceed 30%. Immunization programs have reduced the global burden; in the UK, declining incidence but persistently high mortality and morbidity mean that clinicians must remain vigilant. A systematic electronic literature search of PubMed was performed to identify all ABM literature published within the past 5years. Clinical features cannot reliably distinguish between ABM and other important infectious and non-infectious aetiologies. Prompt investigation and empirical treatment are imperative. Lumbar puncture (LP) and cerebrospinal fluid microscopy, biochemistry and culture remain the mainstay of diagnosis, but molecular techniques are increasingly useful. The 2016 UK joint specialist societies' guideline provides expert recommendations for the management of ABM, yet published data suggest clinical care delivered in the UK is frequently not adherent. Anxiety regarding risk of cerebral herniation following LP, unnecessary neuroimaging, underutilization of molecular diagnostics and suboptimal uptake of adjunctive corticosteroids compromise management. There is increasing recognition that current antibiotic regimens and adjunctive therapies alone are insufficient to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with ABM. Research should be focused on optimization of vaccines (e.g. pneumococcal conjugate vaccines with extended serotype coverage), targeting groups at risk for disease and reservoirs for transmission; improving adherence to management guidelines; development of new faster, more accurate diagnostic platforms (e.g. novel point-of-care molecular diagnostics); and development of new adjunctive therapies (aimed at the host-inflammatory response and bacterial virulence factors).

Provider-directed education to reduce unnecessary neuroimaging in uncomplicated headache disorders.

More than 1.9 million annual outpatient visits to neurologists in the United States are associated with headache diagnoses. For uncomplicated headache disorders, the evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines recommend against neuroimaging unless specific neurological signs and symptoms are present; however, neuroimaging rates have only modestly decreased since the guidelines were developed. We evaluated unnecessary neuroimaging rates in patients with uncomplicated headache at the Emory Department of General Neurology. The rate of unnecessary neuroimaging suggested a provider knowledge gap in the use of neuroimaging in patients with uncomplicated headaches. A provider-directed educational session was delivered, and outcomes were evaluated 8 weeks after implementation. The postintervention rates of unnecessary neuroimaging were compared with preintervention rates. A 15-minute educational session on the EBP guidelines for neuroimaging use in uncomplicated headache was presented to all general neurology providers (n = 9). The providers were given an electronic version of the presentation and a pocket-sized EBP algorithm for neuroimaging in this population. Data collected from the project site's neuroimaging dashboard showed a significantly lower proportion of unnecessary neuroimaging orders in the 8-week posteducational interval (4.2%) compared with the 8-week preeducation interval (7.2%) (t = 2.78, p = .014), a 41.6% reduction. We found that a provider-directed educational session reviewing the EBP guidelines for neuroimaging in patients with uncomplicated headache disorders was successful in lowering rates of neuroimaging. Implementing similar projects in other departments could further reduce unnecessary neuroimaging use across the organization.

WED 014 Oct minimises unnecessary investigation for suspected papilloedema

BackgroundOptical coherence tomography (OCT) is a rapid and painless way to provide a record of the optic disc structure. Though not specific, it can identify swollen optic discs. We determined the impact of OCT prior to referral on the pathway for managing suspected papilloedema.MethodsAudit of adults referred from the Western Eye Hospital to St Mary’s Hospital with suspected papilloedema was performed between 1/1/17 and 16/5/17. A follow-up re-audit was performed from 1/6/17 to 31/8/17 following implementation of OCT prior to referral.ResultsThe initial audit identified 50 patients over 136 days and the re-audit 26 patients over 92 days. In the initial audit 6/50 had OCT and 17/50 (34%) were admitted. 6/50 patients were subsequently found not to have papilloedema on fundoscopy, none of whom had OCT. 4/6 underwent unnecessary neuroimaging and lumbar puncture. 3 were admitted, equating to 18% of all admissions, for an average of 2.3 days. In the re-audit all had OCT, 6/26 (23%) were admitted and none were subsequently found not to have papilloedema.ConclusionUse of OCT prior to referral for suspected papilloedema helps to reduce unnecessary investigations.

Unnecessary Neuroimaging for Patients With Primary Headaches.

Background - Headache may be due to either a primary or secondary disorder, and neuroimaging assessments can play an important role when differentiating between these types of headache. Although many studies have reported no significant differences between primary headache patients and the general population in terms of abnormal neuroimaging findings, others have shown that neuroimaging may be employed to rule out secondary causes of headache that could impact morbidity and mortality. This issue remains under debate. Thus, the present study compared the neuroimaging findings of headache patients and healthy controls. Methods - This study recruited 1070 healthy controls and 1070 primary headache patients from the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. The primary headache patients were diagnosed by computerized clinical decision support systems, and re-diagnosed by a specialist. All participants were assessed with either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The neuroimaging findings were classified as significant abnormalities, non-significant abnormalities, or normal. Results - All the significant abnormalities were found using MRI scans. Significant abnormalities were identified in 4 primary headache patients (0.58%) and 5 healthy controls (0.73%); the rate of significant abnormalities was not significant different between both groups (P > .05). Conclusions - The present study found that neuroimaging was unnecessary for the primary headache patients.

Emergency Department Use of Neuroimaging in Children and Adolescents Presenting with Headache

To evaluate emergency department use and outcomes of neuroimaging for headache in a free-standing children's hospital system. We prospectively enrolled children aged 6-18 years who presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of headache from September 2015 to September 2016. Standardized data collection was performed in real time, including telephone follow-up as needed, and imaging outcome was determined through a chart review. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated the associations between clinically important patient characteristics and neuroimaging. Of 294 enrolled patients, 53 (18%) underwent neuroimaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) and 2 (0.7%) had clinically important intracranial findings. Presenting with abnormal neurologic examination findings (OR, 11.55; 95% CI, 3.24-41.22), no history of similar headaches (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.08-4.18), and white race (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.51-6.12) were significantly associated with an increased odds of undergoing imaging in multivariable regression models. Our observed emergency department imaging rate was 26.5 times higher than our positive result rate, suggesting there is room to decrease unnecessary neuroimaging. Associations for abnormal examination and new headache type are consistent with the American Academy of Neurology clinical imaging recommendations. The increased odds of imaging white patients suggests bias that should be addressed. The low rate of positive findings supports the need for an evidence-based clinical decision tool for neuroimaging in the acute care setting.

Red flag findings in children with headaches: Prevalence and association with emergency department neuroimaging.

Clinicians appear to obtain emergent neuroimaging for children with headaches based on the presence of red flag findings. However, little data exists regarding the prevalence of these findings in emergency department populations, and whether the identification of red flag findings is associated with potentially unnecessary emergency department neuroimaging. We aimed to determine the prevalence of red flag findings and their association with neuroimaging in otherwise healthy children presenting with headaches to the emergency department. Our secondary aim was to determine the prevalence of emergent intracranial abnormalities in this population. A prospective cohort study of otherwise healthy children 2-17 years of age presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department with non-traumatic headaches was undertaken. Emergency department physicians completed a standardized form to document headache descriptors and characteristics, associated symptoms, and physical and neurological exam findings. Children who did not receive emergency department neuroimaging received 4-month telephone follow-up. Outcomes included emergency department neuroimaging and the presence of emergent intracranial abnormalities. We enrolled 224 patients; 197 (87.9%) had at least one red flag finding on history. Several red flag findings were reported by more than a third of children, including: Headache waking from sleep (34.8%); headache present with or soon after waking (39.7%); or headaches increasing in frequency, duration and severity (40%, 33.1%, and 46.3%). Thirty-three percent of children received emergency department neuroimaging. The prevalence of emergent intracranial abnormalities was 1% (95% CI 0.1, 3.6). Abnormal neurological exam, extreme pain intensity of presenting headache, vomiting, and positional symptoms were independently associated with emergency department neuroimaging. Red flag findings are common in children presenting with headaches to the emergency department. The presence of red flag findings is associated with emergency department neuroimaging, although the risk of emergent intracranial abnormalities is low. Many children with headaches may be receiving unnecessary neuroimaging due to the high prevalence of non-specific red flag findings.

Neuroimaging utilization and findings in headache outpatients: Significance of red and yellow flags.

Background Neuroimaging for headache commonly exceeds published guideline recommendations and may be overutilized. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of all outpatient community patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester who underwent a neuroimaging study for a headache indication in 2015. We assessed the neuroimaging utilization pattern, clinical application of red flags, and concordance with neuroimaging guidelines. Results We identified 190 outpatients who underwent 304 neuroimaging studies for headache. The median age was 46.5 years (range 18-91 years), 65% were female, and most reported no prior history of headache (n = 97, 51%). A minority of patients had prior brain imaging studies (n = 44, 23%) and neurological consultations for headache (n = 29, 15%). Few studies were ordered after consultation with a neurologist (n = 14, 7%). Seventy-seven percent of patients were documented to have a "red flag" justifying the imaging study. Abnormal neuroimaging findings were found in 3.1% of patients with warning flags (5/161); carotid dissection (n = 3) and reversible cerebral vasoconstrictive syndrome (n = 2). An estimated 35% of patients were imaged against guidelines. Conclusions The prevalence of serious causes of headache in a community practice was low despite the presence of a documented red flag symptom. Inadequate understanding or application of red flags may be contributing to recommendations to image patients against current guidelines. Interventions to reduce unnecessary neuroimaging of patients with headache need to be designed and implemented.

Utility of Head CT Scan for Acute Inpatient Delirium

Delirium is a common occurrence in hospitalized patients, especially in the geriatric age group. Data was retrospectively reviewed for patients who developed delirium during hospitalization. Acute intracranial changes on imaging were noted only in four patients (11%) and all had preimaging clinical symptoms and signs, which warranted imaging. Imaging should be considered only in the presence of head injury, fall, history of anticoagulation, focal neurological signs, fever, and raised intracranial pressure. Development of more clear guidelines will result in decreased ordering of unnecessary neuroimaging, substantial cost savings, and less radiation exposure for patients.

Connecting Patients, Providers, and Payers Improves Quality, Safety and Efficiency

Connecting Patients, Providers, and Payers Improves Quality, Safety and Efficiency

Does Health Information Exchange Reduce Unnecessary Neuroimaging and Improve Quality of Headache Care in the Emergency Department?

Health information exchange (HIE) is advocated as an approach to reduce unnecessary testing and improve quality of emergency department (ED) care, but little evidence supports its use. Headache is a specific condition for which HIE has theoretical benefits. To determine whether health information exchange (HIE) reduces potentially unnecessary neuroimaging, increases adherence with evidence-based guidelines, and decreases costs in the emergency department (ED) evaluation of headache. Longitudinal data analysis All repeat patient-visits (N = 2,102) by all 1,252 adults presenting with headache to a Memphis metropolitan area ED two or more times between August 1, 2007 and July 31, 2009. Use of a regional HIE connecting the 15 major adult hospitals and two regional clinic systems by authorized ED personnel to access the patient's record during the time period in which the patient was being seen in the ED. Diagnostic neuroimaging (CT, CT angiography, MRI or MRI angiography), evidence-based guideline adherence, and total patient-visit estimated cost. HIE data were accessed for 21.8 % of ED patient-visits for headache. 69.8 % received neuroimaging. HIE was associated with decreased odds of diagnostic neuroimaging (odds ratio [OR] 0.38, confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.50) and increased adherence with evidence-based guidelines (OR 1.33, CI 1.02-1.73). Administrative/nursing staff HIE use (OR 0.24, CI 0.17-0.34) was also associated with decreased neuroimaging after adjustment for confounding factors. Overall HIE use was not associated with significant changes in costs. HIE is associated with decreased diagnostic imaging and increased evidence-based guideline adherence in the emergency evaluation of headache, but was not associated with improvements in overall costs. Controlled trials are needed to test whether specific HIE enhancements to increase HIE use can further reduce potentially unnecessary diagnostic imaging and improve adherence with guidelines while decreasing costs of care.

012 Encephalitis

: Encephalitis is a rare but important neurological emergency. Encephalitis means diffuse inflammation of brain matter, but there is no universal clinical definition. A recently proposed clinical definition is encephalopathy...

Utilization, Diagnosis, Treatment and Cost of Migraine Treatment in the Emergency Department

To determine the percentages of patients receiving migraine-specific therapy and to estimate the rate of unnecessary neuroimaging studies in the emergency department (ED). A retrospective study was conducted analyzing medical records and hospital charge data of ED visits for migraine during 2005 in 2 university-affiliated hospitals. Following a preliminary review of 23 randomly selected ED charts selected to determine the reliability of the coding process, 172 other charts were selected to include 1 visit per patient with a primary discharge diagnosis code of 346.0, 346.1, or 346.9. The diagnosis of migraine was confirmed using predefined criteria. Demographic information, treatment strategies, laboratory and neuroimaging tests, response to therapy, discharge planning, and charge data were evaluated. Of 156 patients with completed visits, neuroimaging studies were performed in 36 patients (23%), and only 4 patients had no documented justification for obtaining imaging studies. Seventy-eight patients (50%) had a potential contraindication to receiving migraine-specific therapy. Nine patients (11.5% of eligible patients) received migraine-specific therapy. Most patients were treated with a combination of parenteral antiemetics, narcotics, or ketorolac. This analysis supports previous studies indicating the underutilization of migraine-specific treatment in the ED, and suggests that the ED is generally used as a "last resort" when the patient's home medication fails. Because of various contraindications, migraine-specific medications may not be a treatment option in up to 50% of patients seen in the ED. Although almost all of the neuroimaging studies were justified, the radiology charges were a major contributing factor to the overall financial burden of emergency migraine care.