Introduction If humans have become a rival to Nature, then the epic nomenclature of the great forces – the eras, periods, and epochs of geological time – have finally been reconciled with the social, something geographers might cheer or lament. For over a century, there have been calls to recognise human impact with its own geological epoch. The most recent of these calls – and the most significant given the unprecedented shift in Earth system functioning (Steffen et al., 2011) – proposes the name the Anthropocene (Crutzen and Stoermer, 2000). To date, the Anthropocene has been also the most successful in terms of its academic and popular reception. The proposal has led to an explosion of popular and academic debate among both scientific and social thinkers, and for both groups the proposal has refreshed long-standing exploration of the purported division between science and society (Rittel and Webber, 1973; Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1993). This paper introduces concepts and debates within a special issue of Geographical Research that deals with the Anthropocene. Our aim is to contribute to and help consolidate the rapidly expanding discourse that explores humanity as akin to a geological force, but with the added emphasis on geography and geographers. Geographers have a history of both being wary of ‘buzzwords’, only with hindsight to lament missed opportunities when those buzzwords are adopted by other disciplines and become the convention (see environmental studies). Is the ‘Anthropocene’ a fad, an important idea that should be embraced by geographers, or something altogether different? The notion of the Anthropocene is not so far settled that it cannot be influenced by the discipline of Geography, and there is reason to think that Geography has much to offer regardless of whether the concept becomes widely or popularly adopted or discarded. More important than the issue of its definition are the moral, cultural, and political challenges that the Anthropocene is amplifying. Geographers, then, have an opportunity to consider the concept during its ‘adolescence’ (cf Castree, 2014c) and to, simultaneously, consider whether and how the discipline might capitalise on what appears to be a rapid ascension. This ‘opportunity-challenge’ has been recognised and explored by geographers elsewhere (e.g. Dalby, 2007; Gibson-Graham, 2011; Yusoff, 2013b; Castree, 2014a; 2014b; 2014c; Johnson et al., 2014; Whitehead, 2014; Young, 2014), leading us to take up a promising and daunting issue to emerge from those Anthropocene-Geography discussions: whether and how this concept might present a ‘meeting place’ for the heterogeneous groups, framings, and sub-disciplinary specialisms that make up the discipline. The Anthropocene is a concept that is being adopted in wide and divergent ways. Our goal here is not in any way to establish consensus or impose direction, but to explore emergent themes in the context of Geography. The Anthropocene requires a sophisticated approach to space, time, knowledge, politics, social action, and, perhaps most of all, interactions between human and environmental systems, including the empirical and ontological blurring of these categories. As bs_bs_banner