During the last two decades few institutions have been as much in the forefront of public affairs as the Although specific issues having to do with higher education have changed from time to time, debates on those issues almost always have included references to an of the Both critics and defenders of the university have been wont to invoke the traditions and ideals of the university in arguing for their varying points of view. The freedom and frequency with which the or ideal of the university is injected into public discourse suggest that there is a general agreement and understanding about what the university ideally is or should be. But issues have remained unresolved and the debates have continued. Perhaps the of the university is not as well understood as it seems to be; perhaps there is no coherent at all. The objective of this essay is to describe and analyse the ideas of one person who has said and written more about the university than any other Canadian. He is Claude Thomas Bissell, president of Carleton University from 1956 to 1958 and the University of Toronto from 1958 to 1971. Many ofhis ideas about the university are thought-provoking, some are unique, and all of them taken together constitute a definition of the university within Canadian society. Before considering Bissell's ideas about the university, a brief comment about the methodology of our approach in this discussion is in order. Western society is indebted to John Henry Cardinal Newman for having first suggested that there was an idea of the university. Despite the gratitude due him, the ramifications of Newman's approach are as complicating as they are illuminating. Like many foundations of social and intellectual history, Newman's description of what, in his opinion, the ideal university should be came, over time, to be regarded as what the of the university in fact was. Newman's for a university became the of The University. More important, Western thought has come to assume that the of the university preceded the reality of the university, or, stated in other words, that the abstraction preceded the institution. Philosophically this is a Platonic attitude and historically it is very Christian. That there were and are deviations from the ideal does not deny the ideal's existence.
Read full abstract