Reviewed by: Pursuing Middle English Manuscripts and their Texts. Essays in Honour of Ralph Hanna ed. by Simon Horobin, and Aditi Nafde Jenna Mead Horobin, Simon, and Aditi Nafde, eds, Pursuing Middle English Manuscripts and their Texts. Essays in Honour of Ralph Hanna (Texts and Transitions, 10), Turnhout, Brepols, 2017; cloth; pp. xviii, 262; 9 b/w illustrations; R.R.P. €75.00; ISBN 9782503566702. Festschriften divide opinion: for some, the appearance of such a volume signals the end of a career, but here the word 'pursuing' conveys the zing of momentum and excitement. 'As Ralph continues to publish, unhindered by retirement', editors Simon Horobin and Aditi Nafde enthuse, referring to twenty-five books, all with prestigious publishers, arising from individual and collaborative authorship, as well as 140 articles and counting, 'this list [of publications] will soon be out of date' (p. 241). This Festschrift begins with Vincent Gillespie's panegyric for his friend and colleague of more than thirty years that culminates in the word 'noble': I have not read such genuine praise, unreserved respect or acute judgement anywhere else. Gillespie traces 'Ralph's' distinguished and influential career from his first degree, [End Page 204] taken at Amherst College when it was still a men's college (1963), through his MA at Yale, then the PhD, also Yale, directed by Marie Borroff (1966); his sustained and wide-reaching contribution at the University of California, Riverside; his appointment, succeeding Malcolm Parkes, as university lecturer in palaeography and fellow of Keble College, Oxford, followed by promotion and tenure as Professor of Palaeography until his (official only) retirement in 2011. Above all, Gillespie honours Hanna's great humanist allegiance to 'lived experience and practice' that are, in Hanna's own words, 'complex and fractured, and include resistances, as well as joys' (p. xiv). This volume exemplifies the aggregated practices Gillespie calls 'total codicology' (p. xiv) and counts the great and the good among its contributors: Derek Pearsall, Linne Mooney, Thorlac Turville-Petre, A. I. Doyle, Anne Hudson, Alastair Minnis, Richard Beadle, Traugott Lawler among those providing essays; others, including Mary-Jo Arn, the inestimable editor of Charles d'Orléans, Toshiyuki Takamiya, the great collector, and celebrated younger scholars like Andrew Cole and Daniel Wakelin sparkling on the tabula gratulatoria. The essays instantiate 'the tight networks of affinity and kinship within book-making, book reading and book-transmitting' (p. xiv). Ian Doyle is hard-headed about the contents of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Ashmole 750, 'a volume in a simple calf binding […] with four raised bands […] now [comprising] over 205 numbered leaves', twice catalogued by William H. Black and Larry M. Eldredge and identified by C. H. Talbot as a commonplace book 'once the possession of John Kyllyng, monk of Vale Royal, Cheshire' (p. 113–14). 'That is not however the whole story, or even the last of it' (p. 114): first, this manuscript is not a 'commonplace book' (p. 114) and, secondly, in the midst of it all, Doyle asks: 'What was brother John Kyllyng doing, being paid a regular stipend for his services, by an extensive list of inhabitants of […] neighbouring villages, clergy and laity?' (p. 121). Hanna would approve the question. Andrew Galloway uses Hanna's codicological achievements in 'reframing London['s] literary and intellectual history' and the textual ambit of 'the Augustinian canons and their hangers-on' (p. 178) to model a discerning investigation of Peter of Cornwall's Liber disputationum, Pantheologus and, especially, Peter's most sustained work, Liber revelationum—a huge compendium of visions, surviving in a single witness, now London, Lambeth Palace, MS 51. Galloway identifies Peter as an ambitious book-maker, a clever and innovative editor, for all that he is thrillingly appreciative of rhetorical brilliance (such as expressed in Bishop Gilbert Foliot's sermons). Crucially, Peter is alert ad utilitatem multorum, to the needs of 'a more "public" or civic milieu than an academic or remotely monastic one' (p. 196), a wider, bigger, more diversified community. In other words, Galloway identifies another version of Hanna's 'affinity' (p. xiv). Anne Middleton contributes a masterly account of both the scholarship and codicology of the 'distinctive array of paratextual marks and signals' including the 'transmitters...
Read full abstract